Table H-1 | Measurements of Distress from Observations of 1992 Drawdown |
Table H-2 | Potential Failure Areas Resulting From a Permanent Drawdown |
Table H-3 | Factors of Safety for Slope Stability |
Figure H-1 | Railroad and Roadway Repair Small Slope Failures |
Figure H-2 | Large Slope Failures |
H.1 Introduction
This portion of the study addresses of the potential effects of drawdown on railroad and roadway embankments from the Snake River’s confluence with the Columbia River to the Idaho state line. Those effects are settlement and slope stability directly impacted by the drawdown of the reservoir. Problems and anticipated modifications required to resist the erosive forces of the river on the embankments are described in Annex F.
There is no doubt that many of the railroad and highway embankments will be damaged as a result of rapid reservoir drawdown. As drawdown occurs, areas of the embankments along the river are anticipated to fail due to steep slopes, saturated soils, and pore pressure increase. This annex describes the critical elements that contribute to embankment failures from rapid drawdown. It summarizes the observations from the 1992 test drawdown and, from those observations, projects damages resulting from a full reservoir drawdown. It discusses the necessity and impacts of the selected drawdown rate.
H.2 Review of 1992 Drawdown
A test of the reservoir drawdown concept was performed in March 1992, using Lower Granite and Little Goose Dams. The purpose of the test was to gather information regarding the effects of substantially lowering existing reservoirs. The drawdown test was scheduled to be completed within the month of March in order to minimize potential negative impacts to Snake River migrating fish. On March 1 the Lower Granite reservoir was drafted from its starting point of normal minimum operating pool (elevation 223.4 meters [733 feet]) at a rate of 0.6 meters per day for 14 days. Elevation 214.9 meters (705 feet) was achieved on March 15. During subsequent phases. Little Goose reservoir was lowered a total of 3.8 meters and Lower Granite Reservoir was further lowered to elevation 212.4 meters (697 feet) for a total drawdown of 11.0 meters.
During the drawdown the Corps monitored road and railroad embankments along the two reservoirs for potential problems. The following damage on the Lower Granite reservoir was reported:
It was noted that most of the sliding activity associated with the drawdown occurred within slopes consisting of natural deposits of silts, sands, and gravels. For the purposes of this study, stability of natural slopes was not addressed, and efforts focused on man-made embankments. Drawdown of each reservoir of up to 30 meters cannot be assumed to occur without embankment failures.
H.3 Embankment Geometry and Material Considerations
The key to understanding how embankments will behave under drawdown conditions is to understand the embankment materials. Embankments constructed from materials that are so "free-draining" that the soil saturation level falls quickly will have increased stability under drawdown conditions. Stability is decreased if the soil saturation level lags behind the reservoir drawdown level. Therefore the rate of drawdown associated with a minimal lag is related to the "free draining" ability of embankment materials. Greater permeability and porosity of soils results in a greater ability of the material to be "free draining." Although a material may be free draining, the rate of reservoir drawdown may be too fast, resulting in a greater saturation level lag and reduced embankment stability.
The man-made embankments along the lower Snake River are, in general, constructed from locally borrowed materials, and were not subject to the same quality control efforts (grain size and compaction control) which were used in construction of major embankment dams. Also, internal drainage features such as pipes or clean stone drains were not incorporated into the designs. According to railroad and roadway relocation reports and drawings, many embankments were constructed from "random fill" or "granular fill" materials. Compaction was probably used in placing these materials, but it is not clear how much compactive effort was used and what methods were employed. The nature of "random fill" available for borrow in the vicinity of the lower Snake River varies, although the material is predominately sand and gravel with varying amounts of fines (silts and clays passing the No. 200 sieve) and cobbles. The CPRR relocation report (Lower Granite DM 9.2) states that embankment foundations along the relocated alignments consists of bedrock or materials described as relatively clean talus rock, silty talus rock, alluvial material, and wind-deposited sand and silts. Similar materials were used for construction of the relocated road and railroad embankments.
The amount of fines controls the ability of an embankment material to be "free draining," and the amounts of fines in silty talus rock and wind-deposited sands and silts could be significant enough to preclude free draining conditions. Alluvial materials obtained from local terrace gravel deposits and clean talus rock materials likely consist of a predominantly granular mixture of sand, gravel, and cobbles, with a lower percentage of fines than the silty materials. Although aeolian silt often exists on the ground surface of the terrace gravel deposits, it is not likely that significant amounts of fines are present in the alluvial random fill mixtures. The ability of the embankments to be free draining, and therefore more stable during drawdown, depends on the borrow source used to construct the embankments.
Man-made embankments were generally constructed with slopes of 2h:1v, with riprap or rockfill slope protection within the normal reservoir surface operating range. Some embankments, particularly on the Ice Harbor reservoir, have buttress fills against the toe of embankments with slopes of 2.5h:1v to 3h:1v. The embankments along the reservoirs have various top and toe elevations, and the drawdown range will vary from approximately 30 meters just upstream of each dam to nearly no drawdown, or possibly a slight increase in water level, just downstream of each dam. There are many embankment and drawdown rate configurations, and when the variations in embankment geometry, material types and compaction criteria are considered, there are an infinite number of material parameter and geometric combinations.
H.4 Rate of Reservoir Drawdown
The man-made embankments along the four lower Snake River reservoirs were constructed by various entities (including the federal government, state transportation department, and railroad companies) over an extended period of time. Embankment characteristics which vary include the method of embankment construction, embankment geometry, materials used in the embankments, surrounding land topography, embankment foundation materials, and vertical distance of drawdown from the normal reservoir surface elevation. All of these characteristics result in embankments which will behave differently under a drawdown scenario. Behavior may vary from no visible movement or damage to few tension cracks and minor movement or sloughing, to the extreme case of slope failure with extensive movement.
The rate of reservoir drawdown is an important parameter in establishing the schedule for overall embankment dam removal and reservoir drawdown. There are several biological and weather factors which influence the beginning, end, and duration of drawdown. The primary constraint in determining the rate of drawdown is the time period during which the reservoir must be lowered and the embankment removed. Reservoir evacuation cannot begin in any year prior to 1 August. This is because the spring runoff flows extend into June and July and downstream fish migration continues until this time. By January of any year the probability of high flows in the river increases dramatically. These beginning and end point constraints require that the drawdown to be done during this 5-month period. This time is further reduced to allow sufficient time to excavate the embankment and remove cofferdams.
The drawdown rate will be controlled at each dam by the spillway and powerhouse gates. Consequently, a nominal drawdown rate of 0.6 meter (2 feet) per day has been assumed for feasibility level construction planning. While some latitude may be possible as designs and schedules are further developed, the drawdown rate of 0.6 meter per day may only be slightly reduced.
H.5 Methods
The location and extent of embankment failures is extremely difficult to predict based on the uncertainty and variability of materials and methods used in constructing the embankments. However, embankment damage data from the 1992 drawdown of Lower Granite was useful in making such predictions. Table H1 summarizes the specific areas where damage was observed after the 1992 test drawdown. A rational methodology was desired to determine potential damages and subsequent repairs. To estimate the potential for road and railroad embankment failures from observed embankment distress, the study team made the following assumptions:
Table H1 Measurements of Distress From Observations of 1992 Drawdown | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Station | Station Location |
Feature | Description | Natural Slope (%) |
Distance From River (ft) |
Height Above River (ft) |
Embank Slope (%) |
Materials |
2431+14 | Rd. 9000 | Pavement Crack | 149 ft long, 1 in wide | 30 | 50 | 30 | 60 | 0 ft to 14 ft: silt with scattered rock fragments |
2452+26 | Rd. 9000 | Pavement Crack | 58 ft long, ½ in wide | 17 | 50 | 20 | 40 | 0 ft to 15 ft: rock fragments in sandy silt matrix |
2457+54 | Rd. 9000 | Pavement Crack | 19 ft long, ¼ in wide | 18 | 50 | 20 | 40 | 0 ft to 15 ft: fine sandy silt with rock fragments |
2552+58 | Rd. 9000 | Pavement Crack | 422 ft long, 10 in wide | 4 | 50 | 20 | 40 | 0 ft to 15 ft: fine sandy silt with rock fragments |
2605+38 | Rd. 9000 | Pavement Crack | 248 ft long, 1 ft wide | 60 | 30 | 20 | 60 | 0 ft to 15 ft: interbedded silt and sand |
2605+38 | Rd. 9000 | Pavement Crack | 63 ft long, ¼ in wide | 60 | 30 | 20 | 60 | 0 ft to 15 ft: interbedded silt and sand |
2626+50 | Rd. 9000 | Pavement Crack | 341 ft long, 9 in wide | 6 | 50 | 20 | 40 | 0 ft to 14 ft: silt with scattered rock fragments |
2637+06 | Rd. 9000 | Pavement Crack | 154 ft long, 3 in wide | 13 | 20 | 10 | 50 | 0 ft to 15 ft: silt with scattered rock fragments |
2684+58 | Rd. 9000 | Pavement Crack | 80 ft long, ¼ in wide | 8 | 50 | 20 | 40 | 0 ft to 14 ft: sandy silt |
2710+98 | Rd. 9000 | Pavement Crack | 24 ft long, 6 in wide | 27 | 50 | 20 | 40 | 0 ft to 15 ft: silt with scattered rock fragments |
2742+66 | Rd. 9000 | Pavement Crack | 221 ft long, ¾ in wide | 50 | 30 | 20 | 65 | 0 ft to 14 ft: silt with scattered rock fragments |
2753+22 | Rd. 9000 | Pavement Crack | 45 ft long, 2 in wide | 17 | 30 | 20 | 65 | 0 ft to 14 ft: rock fragments in silty and ash matrix |
2753+22 | CPRR | Pavement Crack | 197 ft long, 15 in wide | 17 | 30 | 20 | 65 | 0 ft to 14 ft: rock fragments in silty and ash matrix |
2758+50 | CPRR | Pavement Crack | 33 ft long, 6 in wide | 30 | 30 | 20 | 65 | 0 ft to 14 ft: rock fragments in silty and ash matrix |
2758+50 | CPRR | Pavement Crack | 51 ft long, 7 in wide | 30 | 30 | 20 | 65 | 0 ft to 14 ft: rock fragments in silty and ash matrix |
2763+78 | Rd. 9000/CPRR | Pavement Crack | 191 ft long, 6 in wide | 25 | 40 | 20 | 50 | 0 ft to 40 ft: interbedded silt and sand |
2763+78 | Rd. 9000 | Pavement Crack | 48 ft long, 2 in wide | 25 | 40 | 20 | 50 | 0 ft to 40 ft: interbedded silt and sand |
2779+62 | Rd. 9000 | Pavement Crack | 81 ft long, 6 in wide | 18 | 50 | 20 | 40 | 0 ft to 3 ft: sand and gravel, 3 ft+: bedrock |
2784+90 | Rd. 9000 | Pavement Crack | 118 ft long, 13 in wide | 12 | 40 | 20 | 50 | 0 ft to 14 ft: rock fragments in silty matrix |
2784+90 | Rd. 9000 | Pavement Crack | 102 ft long, 4 in wide | 12 | 40 | 20 | 50 | 0 ft to 14 ft: rock fragments in silty matrix |
2784+90 | Rd. 9000 | Pavement Crack | 228 ft long, 13 in wide | 12 | 40 | 20 | 50 | 0 ft to 14 ft: rock fragments in silty matrix |
2790+18 | Rd. 9000 | Pavement Crack | 289 ft long, 7 in wide | 40 | 50 | 20 | 40 | 0 ft to 14 ft: rock fragments in silty matrix |
2800+74 | Rd. 9000 | Pavement Crack | 313 ft long, 11 in wide | 17 | 50 | 20 | 40 | 0 ft to 14 ft: rock fragments in silty matrix |
2806+02 | Rd. 9000 | Pavement Crack | 116 ft long, 9 in wide | 40 | 30 | 20 | 65 | 0 ft to 14 ft: rock fragments in silty matrix |
2806+02 | Rd. 9000 | Pavement Crack | 254 ft long, 10 in wide | 40 | 30 | 20 | 65 | 0 ft to 14 ft: rock fragments in silty matrix |
2811+30 | Rd. 9000 | Pavement Crack | 241 ft long, 1 in wide | 10 | 50 | 20 | 40 | 0 ft to 14 ft: rock fragments in silty matrix |
2816+58 | Rd. 9000 | Pavement Crack | 56 in long, 1/8in wide | 20 | 60 | 30 | 50 | 0 ft to 14 ft: rock fragments in silty matrix |
2849+94 | Rd. 9000 | Pavement Crack | 50 ft long, ¼ in wide | 30 | 50 | 20 | 40 | 0 ft to 14 ft: rock fragments in silty matrix |
2890+50 | Rd. 9000 | Pavement Crack | 204 ft long, ¼ in wide | 26 | 30 | 10 | 30 | 0 ft to 14 ft: rock fragments |
2901+06 | Rd. 9000 | Pavement Crack | 253 ft long, 5 in wide | 19 | 40 | 15 | 40 | 0 ft to 14 ft: rock fragments in silty matrix |
2948+58 | CPRR | Pavement Crack | 15 ft long, ¼ in wide | 15 | 40 | 15 | 40 | 3 ft to 6 ft: gravel 6 ft to 12 ft: silt |
2953+86 | CPRR | Pavement Crack | 123 ft long, 6 in wide | 4 | 150 | 20 | 13 | volcanic ash, silt, and sand |
2959+14 | Rd. 9000 | Pavement Crack | 30 ft long, 4 in wide | 7 | 50 | 20/TD> | 40 | 0 ft to 4 ft: talus and colluvium 4 ft+: bedrock |
2959+14 | Rd. 9000 | Pavement Crack | 162 ft long, 14 in wide | 7 | 50 | 20 | 40 | 0 ft to 4 ft: talus and colluvium 4 ft+: bedrock |
2959+14 | Rd. 9000 | Pavement Crack | 758 ft long, 14 in wide | 5 | 50 | 20 | 40 | 0 ft to 35 ft: interbedded silt and sand |
2964+42 | Rd. 9000 | Pavement Crack | 267 ft long, 2 in wide | 18 | 60 | 20 | 30 | 0 ft to 35 ft: interbedded silt and sand |
The team developed materials estimates for making repairs to the road and railroad embankments using the following assumptions:
Combinations of theoretical and practical methods were used to evaluate potential railroad and roadway damage during drawdown. Practical methods were based on observations made during the 1992 Lower Granite Reservoir drawdown. The drawdown test section consisted of Whitman Co. Road No. 9000 and the Camas Prairie Railroad along the Lower Granite Reservoir (Steptoe Canyon to Wawawai Canyon). It appeared that many failures occurred along the contact between the structure fill and the natural foundation material. At other locations, it was evident that the failure extended into the foundation material. Therefore, both modes of failure had to be taken into account. The measurements taken at the time of the observations are summarized in Table H1.
Also, from the observations along the test section, it was evident that nearly all failures occurred at locations that were within 15 meters horizontal distance and 6-meter vertical distance of the reservoir perimeter, and on slopes less than 50 percent (greater than 50 percent would indicate shallow bedrock and greater stability). Therefore, the study team concluded that sections along the river in similar positions with similar physical characteristics would display a similar response. The team also assumed that sections at a horizontal distance of 15 meters to 30 meters and vertical distance greater than 6 meters from the reservoir would display only about 10 percent of the failures of the more closely adjacent sections. The areas of settlement within the test section along the Lower Granite Reservoir are marked on 1 inch = 1,000 feet maps, contract drawing maps, and copies of aerial photographs in the
The study team estimated that a total of 68 potential failure areas could result. These anticipated failure
areas are shown in Table H2.
The study team also used a theoretical approach to determine the possibility of failure of natural slopes.
Using the infinite slope equations for slope stability, the team calculated the factors of safety according to the following parameters:
While holding other parameters constant, the slope and height of the phreatic surface was varied according to the limits expressed above. Slopes range from 10 percent to 50 percent and are shown in
radians. The phreatic surface ranges from 0.0 meter to 4.5 meters (anticipated ground surface) above the
bedrock surface. The resulting factors of safety are shown in Table H3. The data shown indicate that, at
slopes greater than about 30 percent, the factor of safety drops below one when the phreatic surface
remains at the ground surface. Typical rates of permeability for silts and sandy silt mixtures (3.5 by 10 -5
m³/s or less) show that the phreatic surface would remain at the ground surface for a reservoir lowering rate of 2 feet per day, creating conditions of slope instability for slopes greater than 30 percent. For slopes of 40 percent and 50 percent, the instability would be much greater.
The study team devised a typical anticipated small failure from the observed data of the 1992 drawdown
and a theoretical model based on natural slope instability. The following parameters were used:
A cross section of the anticipated typical failure is shown in Figure H1. The quantities of construction
materials for repair were calculated for the model using typical cross sections developed for the relocation of the County Road 9000 and the Camas Prairie Railroad. The quantities of the repair materials were then calculated for all projected small failures along the Snake River by multiplying the unit quantities (cubic meters per meter) by the number of feet of projected failure (also shown in Figure H1).
Figure H2 shows the cross section of a hypothetical large failure. The failure criteria, dimensions, and
associated construction material quantities are also shown in Figure H2. It is anticipated that there would
be at least two large failures on both the Little Goose and Lower Granite reservoirs, and one large failure
on both the Ice Harbor and Lower Monumental reservoirs.
H.6 Conclusions
Drawdown would cause significant damage to road and railroad embankments. Most embankment
failures are expected to occur after the reservoirs are significantly drawn down, when the excess weight of the water in the embankment materials would cause a failure. Temporary road detours may be required during and after drawdown to allow vehicle traffic to use roadways. However, railroad embankment failures may result in a shut down of rail traffic until repairs can be made. Rapid response approach to railroad repairs will be critical to minimizing the impacts of interruption of rail service.
H.7 Construction Schedule
Embankment repairs cannot be performed until after drawdown is accomplished. Also, in some areas, it
may be necessary to wait several weeks after drawdown to allow the materials to drain and stabilize before repairs can be initiated. The exact number and extent of failures cannot be predicted prior to drawdown. Therefore, multiple equipment rental contracts would be awarded prior to drawdown, allowing repairs to be performed as failures occur. It is anticipated that most damage and consequent repairs would be completed within a few months and up to 1 year after drawdown is complete.
List of Appendixes
Annex A Turbine Passage Modification Plan
Annex B Dam Embankment Excavation Plan
Annex C Temporary Fish Passage Plan
Annex D River Channelization Plan
Annex E Bridge Pier Protection Plan
Annex F Railroad and Highway
Embankment Protection Plan
Annex G Drainage Structures Protection Plan
Annex I Lyons Ferry Hatchery Modification Plan
Annex J Habitat Management Units Modification Plan
Annex K Reservoir Revegetation Plan
Annex L Cattle Watering Facilities Management Plan
Annex M Recreation Access Modification Plan
Annex N Cultural Resources Protection Plan
Annex O Irrigation Systems Modification Plan
Annex P Water Well Modification Plan
Annex Q Potlatch Corporation Water
Intake Modification Plan
Annex R Other River Structures Modification Plan
Annex S Potlatch Corporation Effluent
Diffuser Modification Plan
Annex T PG&E Gas Transmission
Main Crossings Modification Plan
Annex U Hydropower Facilities Decommissioning Plan
Annex V Concrete Structures Removal Plan
Annex W Implementation Schedule
Annex X Comprehensive Baseline Cost Estimate
Return to the Main Report
Table H-2
Potential Failure Areas Resulting From a Permanent Drawdown
Feature
Location
Legal
DescriptionPotential
Failure
Segment
(m)Class
Estimated
Failure
Length
(m)Mat. So.
No.Cubic
Meters
RequiredHaul
(kilometers)Ice Harbor Reservoir BNRR
North Bank
S18, T9N, R32E
121.9
Low
1.4
1.0
107.8
4.6 BNRR
North Bank
S18, T9N, R32E
182.9
High
20.6
1.0
1,617.1
3.8 BNRR
North Bank
S18, T9N, R32E
91.4
Low
1.0
1.0
81.0
3.0 BNRR
North Bank
S18, T9N, R32E
152.4
High
17.2
1.0
1,349.5
2.4 BNRR
North Bank
S7, T9N, R32E
304.8
Low
3.4
1.0
269.9
2.3 BNRR
North Bank
S8, T9N, R32E
487.7
High
55.0
1.0
4,320.0
1.2 BNRR
North Bank
S4,5, T9N, R32E
1,066.8
Low
12.0
1.0
945.0
1.2 BNRR
North Bank
S4, T9N, R32E
182.9
High
20.6
1.0
1,620.2
2.3 BNRR
North Bank
S3, T9N, R32E
335.3
Low
3.4D
1.0
269.9
2.4 BNRR
North Bank
S34, T10N, R32E
152.4
Low
1.7
1.0
134.6
3.3 BNRR
North Bank
S26, T10N, R32E
152.4
High
17.2
2.0
1,349.5
1.7 BNRR
North Bank
S26, T10N, R32E
1,066.8
Low
12.0
2.0
945.0
2.4 BNRR
North Bank
S23, S26, T10N, R32E
1,317.6
Low
15.5
2.0
1,215.7
0.9 BNRR
North Bank
S24, T10N, R32E
274.3
Low
3.1
2.0
243.9
0.6 BNRR
North Bank
S13, T0N, R32E
274.3
High
30.9
3.0
2,429.1
0.3 BNRR
North Bank
S12, T10N, R32E
792.5
Low
8.9
3.0
701.1
2.1 BNRR
North Bank
S4, T10N, R33E
701.0
Low
8.9
3.0
701.1
2.1 BNRR
North Bank
S27,34, T11N, R33E
1,371.6
Low
15.5
3.0
1,215.7
14.6 BNRR
North Bank
S14,23, T11N, R33E
670.6
Low
7.6
4.0
1,890.1
3.7 Burr Cyn. Rd.
North Bank
S19, T12N, R34E
121.9
Low
1.4
4.0
107.8
4.6 Burr Cyn. Rd.
North Bank
S18, T12N, R34E
426.7
High
24.1
4.0
1,890.1
3.7 Burr Cyn. Rd.
North Bank
S8, 17, T12N, R34E
548.6
High
61.9
4.0
4,858.3
2.4 Wilson Cyn. Rd.
North Bank
S4, 9, T12N, R34E
2,438.4
High
275.1
4.0
21,596.1
1.2 Gravel Road
South Bank
S19, T9N, R32E
609.6
High
68.8
13.0
5,398.8
0.6 UPRR
South Bank
S9, T9N, R32E
1,828.8
Low
20.6
14.0
1,620.2
0.9 UPRR
South Bank
S3, 4, T9N, R32E
1,828.8
High
206.3
14.0
16,196.5
1.2 UPRR
South Bank
S2, T9N, R32E
1,676.4
High
189.1
14.0
14,847.0
3.7 UPRR
South Bank
S36, T10N, R32E
396.2
High
44.7
14.0
3,508.0
4.9 UPRR
South Bank
S8, T10N, R33E
1,524.0
Low
1.7
15.0
133.8
1.2 UPRR
South Bank
S34, T11N, R33E
701.0
Low
7.9
15.0
619.3
3.7 UPRR
South Bank
S26, T11N, R33E
762.0
Low
8.6
16.0
675.1
2.4 UPRR
South Bank
S24, T11N, R33E
609.6
High
68.8
16.0
5,398.8
0.2 UPRR
South Bank
S12, T11N, R33E
3,048.0
High
343.8
16.0
26,995.0
2.3 UPRR
South Bank
S30, 31, T12N, R33E
3,048.0
Low
3.4
19.0
270.7
0.9 UPRR
South Bank
S17, 19, T12N, R34E
5,181.6
High
402.3
17.0
31,590.2
2.1 UPRR
South Bank
S8, 9, T12N, R34E
1,219.2
Low
13.7
17.0
1,079.6
0.5 Lower Monumental Reservoir UPRR
South Bank
S35, 36, T13N, R34E
1,828.8
High
206.3
18.0
16,201.9
0.8 UPRR
South Bank
S30, 36, T13N, R34, 35E
1,219.2
High
137.5
20.0
10,793.1
0.9 UPRR
South Bank
S26, 27, 28, 29, T13N, R35E
7,315.2
High
825.1
21, 22
64,783.8
1.8 UPRR
South Bank
S21, T13N, R36E
304.8
High
34.4
23.0
2,699.0
1.6 UPRR
North Bank
S2, 3, T13N, R37E
1,524.0
Low
17.2
5.0
1,349.5
4.0 UPRR
North Bank
S36, T13N, R374E; S31, T13N, R38E
1,524.0
Low
17.2
5.0
1,349.5
1.2 Hwy 261
South Bank
S3, 4, T12N, R37E
609.6
High
68.8
25.0
5,398.8
4.7 Deadman Ck Rd
South Bank
S32, 33, T13N, R38E
609.6
High
68.8
26.0
5,398.8
1.8 Little Goose Reservoir CPRR
North Bank
S22, 23, T13N, R38E
Low
5.2
5a
406.8
2.7 CPRR
North Bank
S22, 23, T13N, R38E
1,066.8
High
120.4
5a
9,452.7
2.7 CPRR
North Bank
S24, T13N, R38E
243.8
Low
2.7
5b
215.6
2.4 CPRR
North Bank
S19, 24, T13N, R38E
1,066.8
High
120.4
5b
9,453.5
0.9 CPRR
North Bank
S20, 21, T13N, R38E
1,524.0
High
171.9
5b
13,497.5
2.4 CPRR
North Bank
S22, T13N, R38E
457.2
High
51.8
5b
59,398.7
4.6 CPRR
North Bank
S7, 11, 14, 23, T13N, R39, 40E
2,590.8
High
756.5
5b
59,399.5
8.5 CPRR
North Bank
S7, 12, 14, 23, T13N, R39, 40E
1,219.2
Low
1.0
5b
81.0
10.4 CPRR
North Bank
S13, 14, 22, 23, 27, T14N, R40E
4,876.8
High
550.2
6.0
43,198.4
3.1 CPRR
North Bank
S13, 17, 18, T14N, R40, 41E
1,524.0
High
171.9
7.0
13,497.5
3.1 CPRR
North Bank
S15, 16, 17, T14N, R41E
3,962.4
High
446.8
9.0
35,083.7
1.8 CPRR
North Bank
S20, T14N, R42E
1,219.2
High
137.5
9.0
10,798.4
8.5 CPRR
North Bank
S20, 21, T14N, R42E
914.4
Low
10.3
9.0
808.9
8.5 CPRR
North Bank
S13, 14, 23, T14N, R42E
3,048.0
Low
343.8
9.0
26,995.0
15.3 CPRR
North Bank
S13, 18, 19, T14N, R42E, 43E
1,828.8
High
206.3
10.0
16,197.3
14.6 Hwy 127
South Bank
S9, T13N, R40E
1,219.2
High
137.5
27.0
10,797.7
1.2 Deadman Ck Rd
South Bank
S18, 19, 30, T14N, R43E
1,219.2
Low
13.7
28.0
1,079.6
1.5 Lower Granite Reservoir CPRR
North Bank
S33, 34, T14N, R43E S2, T13N, R43E
4,267.2
High
481.3
10.0
37,788.1
9.1 Test Section
North Bank
Wawawai Creek to Steptoe Creek
16,254.4
High
1,833.4
10 and 11
143,951.2
5.7 BNRR
North Bank
Steptoe Creek to RM 138.4
16,459.2
Low
185.9
11.0
14,598.5
4.0 Whitman Co. Rd. 9000
North Bank
Steptoe Creek to RM 138.4
11,582.4
High
1,306.4
11.0
102,571.9
6.4 Hwy 12
South Bank
Alpowa Creek to Red Wolf Bridge
10,972.8
Low
123.7
29 and 30
9,716.5
5.2 Hwy 129
West Bank
RM 140.5 to 143
5,486.4
High
618.7
32.0
48,581.9
5.2 Nez Perce Co. Rd.
East Bank
Hwy 12 to RM 143
5,486.4
Low
62.2
31.0
4,882.0
3.3
Table H-3
Factors of Safety for Slope Stability
Degree
SlopeSaturated
Material
Thickness
(m)Factor of
SafetyDegree
SlopeSaturated
Material
Thickness
(m)Factor of
SafetyDegree
SlopeSaturated
Material
Thickness
(m)Factor of
SafetyDegree
SlopeSaturated
Material
Thickness
(m)Factor of
SafetyDegree
SlopeSaturated
Material
Thickness
(m)Factor of
Safety5.7
0.0
6.11
11.3
0.0
3.06
16.7
0.0
2.04
21.8
0.0
1.54
26.6
0.0
1.23 5.7
0.3
5.88
11.3
0.3
2.94
16.7
0.3
1.96
21.8
0.3
1.48
26.6
0.3
1.19 5.7
0.6
5.65
11.3
0.6
2.83
16.7
0.6
1.89
21.8
0.6
1.42
26.6
0.6
1.14 5.7
0.9
5.43
11.3
0.9
2.72
16.7
0.9
1.81
21.8
0.9
1.37
26.6
0.9
1.10 5.7
1.2
5.21
11.3
1.2
2.61
16.7
1.2
1.74
21.8
1.2
1.31
26.6
1.2
1.05 5.7
1.5
5.00
11.3
1.5
2.50
16.7
1.5
1.67
21.8
1.5
1.26
26.6
1.5
1.01 5.7
1.8
4.79
11.3
1.8
2.40
16.7
1.8
1.60
21.8
1.8
1.21
26.6
1.8
0.97 5.7
2.1
4.59
11.3
2.1
2.30
16.7
2.1
1.53
21.8
2.1
1.16
26.6
2.1
0.93 5.7
2.4
4.39
11.3
2.4
2.20
16.7
2.4
1.47
21.8
2.4
1.11
26.6
2.4
0.89 5.7
2.7
4.19
11.3
2.7
2.10
16.7
2.7
1.40
21.8
2.7
1.06
26.6
2.7
0.85 5.7
3.0
4.00
11.3
3.0
2.00
16.7
23.0
1.34
21.8
3.0
1.01
26.6
3.0
0.81 5.7
3.4
3.81
11.3
3.4
1.91
16.7
3.4
1.28
21.8
3.4
0.96
26.6
3.4
0.77 5.7
3.7
3.63
11.3
3.7
1.82
16.7
3.7
1.22
21.8
3.7
0.92
26.6
3.7
0.74 5.7
4.0
3.45
11.3
4.0
1.73
16.7
4.0
1.16
21.8
4.0
0.87
26.6
4.0
0.70 5.7
4.3
3.28
11.3
4.3
1.64
16.7
4.3
1.10
21.8
4.3
0.83
26.6
4.3
0.67 5.7
4.6
3.10
11.3
4.6
1.55
16.7
4.6
1.04
21.8
4.6
0.78
26.6
4.6
0.63