Recent Press Releases

McConnell on Judge Mukasey

October 17, 2007





Washington, D.C. – U.S. Senate Republican Leader Mitch McConnell delivered the following remarks on the Senate floor Wednesday regarding the confirmation process for Judge Michael Mukasey to serve as Attorney General of the United States:



“Today the Judiciary Committee will begin hearings on the nomination of Judge Michael B. Mukasey to be the nation’s 81st Attorney General.



“Judge Mukasey has outstanding qualifications and a sterling reputation. Throughout four decades, he selflessly devoted his life to public service, culminating in his selection as Chief Judge of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York.



“As a jurist, Judge Mukasey handled complex legal problems judiciously, thoughtfully, and fairly. The complex problems that face the Justice Department merit similar serious treatment, and I am confident that were he to be confirmed, Judge Mukasey will bring his trademark qualities to bear in analyzing them.



“Analyzing these problems requires a careful and deliberative process. It is a process that starts today, and it will continue after the Judiciary Committee’s hearings are over. It is a process that does not lend itself to snap judgments or snap answers.



“Judge Mukasey will not abandon his trademark qualities of judiciousness and thoughtfulness today, nor should we want him to.



“And it would be injudicious and un-thoughtful for Judge Mukasey to make snap judgments about particular outcomes on highly complex--and highly-sensitive--policies in the war on terror before he even gets into office. Judge Mukasey is not read into some of these programs, and is not, at the present time, fully familiar with others.



“And even if he were fully familiar with them, it would be imprudent for him to discuss their classified features in open session, while our enemies are watching.



“The Senate Judiciary Committee should be mindful of the complex problems that Judge Mukasey is being called on to solve, as well as the constraints under which he is operating. And it should treat him fairly.



“If he is treated fairly, I am confident that the Committee will report him to the floor for a prompt up or down vote.”



###





'Your holiness, America admires you and we thank you. You are always welcome here'

The Rotunda, U.S. Capitol, October 17, 2007



“Your Holiness, Mr. President, distinguished congressional colleagues and friends.



“One of the people we have to thank for this event isn’t with us. Senator Craig Thomas of Wyoming was a strong but serene man who admired the Dalai Lama and worked with him closely for a long time as chairman of the Foreign Relations panel that deals with Asia. Along with Senator Feinstein, he introduced the bill that got us here. We remember him and we thank Susan, his wife, for being with us.



“I also want to recognize someone who could have stayed home this afternoon but didn’t …U.S. Presidents have met privately with the Dalai Lama for years. But it wasn’t until today that any of them had lent the prestige of the office to a public event in his honor. Mr. President: good to see you. You join a growing list of world leaders who are stepping forward to say in public what the world has long known: the Tibetan people have a right to their heritage, their freedom, and the man we honor today is not only courageous but also right to demand both.



“Congress has expressed this view in sixteen resolutions since 2001. We’ve delivered funds to preserve the Tibetan culture and to help refugees who’ve escaped through the mountains to India and Nepal. We’ve educated some of these refugees at U.S. schools through the Tibet Fulbright program. And we’ve broadcast a message of hope across Tibet through Voice of America and Radio Free Asia.



“Again and again, we’ve reached out in solidarity to the Dalai Lama and the Tibetan people, and the Chinese government needs to know that we will continue to do so. The U.S. Congress stands with Tibet.



“Truth is persistent, and in the case of the Dalai Lama, so is the messenger. He’s carried the plight of his people to the world for nearly fifty years, never growing tired or frustrated. It’s this constancy and hope in the face of violence and intimidation that inspires Tibetan teenagers and grandfathers to risk arrest, or worse, by keeping pictures of him in their homes or by scrawling his name on a schoolhouse wall. In recent weeks he has inspired the suffering people of Burma to similar acts of heroism. And he has inspired Congress to give him the greatest honor in our power to bestow.



“Your holiness, America admires you and we thank you. You are always welcome here.”



###

McConnell on FISA

October 17, 2007



‘Any bill that leaves this chamber must restore to intelligence officials the same tools they’ve had in fighting terrorism for decades’



Washington, D.C. – U.S. Senate Republican Leader Mitch McConnell delivered the following remarks on the Senate floor Wednesday regarding the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act and the need to provide intelligence officials with the tools they need to protect the nation:



“As the House prepares to take up the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act, I’d like to remind my colleagues what we decided about this program just a little over two months ago.



“In August a bipartisan Senate majority voted to embrace the two principles behind the original FISA law in 1978: that foreign terrorists overseas are a legitimate target for warrantless surveillance, and that Americans at home are not.



“We did this because we’d been informed by the Director of National Intelligence that advances in technology and an outdated provision in law had made it impossible for the intelligence community to act on the first of these principles, causing us to miss significant, actionable intelligence.



“The Senate responded to this information accordingly. We addressed the change in technology and updated the law, restoring to the intelligence community a tool it had effectively used even before the 9/11 attacks to track terrorist activity abroad.



“Congress made sure in 1978 that the intelligence community was free to collect intelligence on foreign targets overseas and act on it quickly. In a post 9/11 world, we were insisting that they continue to have this vital capability. Now we’ll have the chance to insist on it again, by voting against the bill that’s being considered in the House or by approving an alternative that corrects its flaws.



“The bill that’s being taken up in the House has two major weaknesses. First, it requires intelligence officials to obtain a warrant before listening in on foreign terror suspects abroad. In other words, if we want to listen in on a terrorist in Tehran who may be talking about blowing up Los Angeles, we’d have to stop and get a court approval first. I guarantee you there isn’t a single person in this country outside this building who thinks that makes any sense.



“It’s just common sense that our ability to act quickly on the intelligence we get is a crucial part of our ability to prevent terror attacks at home.



“This dangerous provision would create a new hurdle for intelligence officials to jump before they can collect and act on a live potential threat. Allowing it to stand would have been foolish before 9/11. It would be inexcusable now, which is exactly why we acted to remove it in August and why the President has rightly said he’ll veto any law that retains it.



“Second, this bill would expose U.S. phone companies to giant lawsuits for cooperating with the intelligence community in pursuit of terrorists, for doing their part to defend this country from terrorists groups like Al Qaeda. We need to be making it easier for our intelligence officials to detect terrorist plots against us, not harder. And we need to be rewarding people for helping us in this fight, not penalizing them or scaring them with the threat of a lawsuit if they do.



“So let’s make something clear right now: Any bill that leaves this chamber must restore to intelligence officials the same tools they’ve had in fighting terrorism for decades. And it should reassure U.S. businesses that they have no reason to regret cooperating with intelligence officials in the past and that they shouldn’t be the least bit afraid to do so in the future.



“The Bill of Rights doesn’t extend to terrorists overseas who want to hurt us here at home. Our laws have always reflected that. In a post 9/11 world we are being asked to affirm it. We didn’t hesitate in August. We shouldn’t hesitate now.



“The House bill that’s being considered needs some major work. In addition to the two points I’ve raised, House Democrats have also struck a provision that allows the U.S. to conduct warrantless surveillance on foreign suspects who have information relating to the conduct of foreign affairs.



“In a time of heightened threats, we can’t throw away the tools we’ve always used to keep this country safe. And so I urge my colleagues to give intelligence officials the tools they need to protect us, to give them a bill that the President will sign it into law.



“We can’t let our enemies exploit a weakness that we —

and now they — can clearly see. We know the threat is real. And the bill we pass should reflect that.”



###