Avian Botulism | ||
The most dramatic example of geographic expansion of a noninfectious indigenous disease is avian botulism, caused by the bacterium Clostridium botulinum. In 1914 a Bureau of Biological Survey researcher began investigating catastrophic die-offs that had begun in 1910 and in which millions of waterbirds along the Great Salt Lake, Utah, had died. Later studies revealed that avian botulism was responsible for those die-offs. Historically, avian botulism was referred to as "western duck disease" because of its rather limited geographical distribution of occurrence (Kalmbach and Gunderson 1934; Fig. 2). |
Avian botulism now occurs all over the United States (Fig. 2) and in many other countries as well. Because of the visibility of massive die-offs, avian botulism is probably the best-documented nonhunting waterfowl mortality (Stout and Cornwell 1976). The continued reporting of avian botulism die-offs since the early 1900's makes researchers suspect that much of the disease's geographic expansion is of recent origin. Also, most (15 of 21) initial outbreaks of avian botulism in countries other than in North America have occurred since 1970. |
Fig. 2. Known distribution of "western duck sickness" (avian botulism) in North America, 1934 (Kalmback and Gunderson 1934), and from 1975 to 1993. |
|
Avian Cholera |
Avian cholera, caused by the bacterium Pasteurella multocida, has been recognized as an important infectious disease of domestic poultry in the United States since at least 1867 (Rhoades and Rimler 1991). Therefore, it is noteworthy that a 1930 evaluation of the status of waterfowl commented on the lack of documentation of avian cholera in wild waterfowl (Phillips and Lincoln 1930). In 1944, however, the disease was documented in wild waterfowl in the United States (Quortrup et al. 1946). Limited geographical expansion of avian cholera in wild waterfowl occurred during the 1940's and 1950's, and sporadic occurrences were documented at a few new locations during the 1960's (Fig. 3). By the end of the 1960's, though, avian cholera was reported as established in the Central and Pacific flyways. Outbreaks in the Mississippi Flyway were unusual, and only two outbreaks had occurred in the Atlantic Flyway. With the exception of a single instance during the breeding season, outbreaks occurred in winter (Stout and Cornwell 1976). During the 1970's, avian cholera became established as a major cause of waterfowl mortality in all four flyways within the United States and as a recurring cause of waterfowl mortality in Canada (Fig. 3). Geographic expansion of die-off locations continues, and outbreaks now occur during all seasons of the year (Friend 1987). |
Fig. 3. Geographic distribution of avian cholera in wild waterfowl within the United States, before 1960 (first outbreak in 1944), during the 1960's, and after 1970, when disease spread (National Wildlife Health Center files). |
|
Duck Plague |
Fig. 4. Number of duck plague outbreaks in waterfowl in the United States, by flyway (suspect cases have pathology consistent with duck plague but lack isolation of the virus to confirm the diagnosis), and total number of outbreaks by decade. | |
Duck plague is another emerging disease of North American waterfowl. This herpesvirus infection first appeared on the North American continent in 1967 when it caused large-scale losses in the domestic duck industry and losses of a small number of wild waterfowl (Leibovitz and Hwang 1968). The first major die-off involving wild waterfowl occurred during January 1973 at the Lake Andes National Wildlife Refuge in South Dakota (Friend and Pearson 1973). Duck plague has expanded throughout North America since the initial outbreak, along with an increasing number of outbreaks in each decade (Fig. 4). Nearly all occurrences of duck plague have involved nonmigratory waterfowl (captive, tame, and resident waterfowl that do not undergo traditional migratory movements). A February 1994 outbreak in the Finger Lakes region of New York State involving mallards (Anas platyrhynchos) and American black ducks (A. rubripes) is the first major outbreak involving migratory waterfowl since the January 1973 Lake Andes outbreak. |
Other Diseases |
Magnitude of Losses |
Changes over time in the frequency of wild bird die-offs and losses from disease cannot be precisely determined because no appropriate data base exists. Also, changes in surveillance and reporting confounds interpretation of existing data. Nevertheless, with the exception of rare catastrophic events, available information suggests that substantially greater numbers of wild birds are dying from diseases now than in earlier periods of the 20th century. The yearly average of 55,066 reported waterfowl deaths from disease during 1930-64 (Friend 1992) has been exceeded or nearly exceeded by single events since 1964. Several disease outbreaks, for example, have killed between 25,000 and 100,000 waterfowl; die-offs of 5,000 to 10,000 waterfowl are common. | Table 2. Emerging diseases of wildlife. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Fig. 5. Number of wild bird die-off events listed in the National Wildlife Health Center data base, 1981-93. | |
The number of avian die-offs in the NWHC data base with reported mortality of 1,000 or more is sufficient to support the contention of increased numbers of birds dying from disease compared with the period before 1965. The annual number of avian die-offs is an additional indicator of the relatively high frequency of avian disease during the late part of the 20th century (Fig. 5). |
Habitat and Human Interactions |
Causes of major bird die-offs during the past decade and their geographic distribution are shown in Table 3. Composite data indicate a relation between bird concentrations and the occurrences of avian disease. Those states with large concentrations of migratory birds on migrational staging and wintering areas tend to have the most disease outbreaks. Preliminary assessments suggest that habitat quantity and quality are important factors in this relation. | Table 3. Geographic distribution of major (>500 birds) die-offs of wild birds by cause, 1983-93. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Wetland losses, for example, are well documented and clearly a contributing factor in the spread of avian cholera. California, a focal point for the occurrence and spread of avian cholera in waterfowl, lost 91% of its historical wetland acreage by 1980 (Dahl 1990). A similar situation exists in the Rainwater Basin of Nebraska where avian cholera first appeared in waterfowl in 1975; this area has subsequently become a focal point for spread to other areas. About 90% of historical wetland acreage within the Rainwater Basin has been lost (Farrar 1980). The association between wetland losses and spread of infectious disease is due to the interactive factors that aid disease transmission. | ||
Habitat (environment) loss often results in crowding birds on the remaining habitat, thereby enhancing the potential for transmission of infectious agents. Movement patterns of infected birds can spread the disease to other locations and populations and help establish the disease as a recurring problem. | ||
High concentrations of birds for prolonged periods of time on limited habitat often degrade the quality of habitat through fecal contamination and damage to vegetation. Deposition and survival of pathogenic parasites and microbes are aided by such environmental conditions and can result in enhanced disease maintenance and spread. | ||
Habitat degradation due to human-caused factors is also important. For example, although the bacterium responsible for avian botulism is a common inhabitant of wetland substrates, the production of the botulinum toxin that causes botulism is dependent on specific environmental factors such as ambient temperature, pH, oxygen depletion, and other factors (Locke and Friend 1987). Discharges into wetlands of sewage, agricultural chemicals, and poultry wastes from factories have frequently been associated with eruptions of avian botulism, although cause and effect relationships have not been clearly established. | ||
Prevention of Avian Diseases |
||
Diseases affecting wild birds can be prevented and controlled despite the challenges of dealing with species and populations that are often highly mobile and spend much or all of their lives in remote areas. | ||
Methodical monitoring and surveillance programs are needed to provide early detection of emerging problems so that intervention can begin when problems are most manageable. Accurate diagnostic assessments of the causes of morbidity and mortality are essential for focusing control efforts. Also, greater emphasis is needed on studies of disease ecology to provide enhanced understanding of host-agent-environment relationships for specific diseases. This information serves to identify weak links where disease-control and prevention efforts will be most effective. Molecular biology and the associated field of genetic engineering will greatly assist these efforts. | ||
National Biological Service National Wildlife Health Center 6006 Schroeder Rd. Madison, WI 53711 |
References | |
---|---|
Dahl, T.E. 1990. Wetland losses in the United States 1780's to 1980's. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Washington, DC. 13 pp. Farrar, J. 1980. The Rainwater Basin . . . Nebraska's vanishing wetlands. Nebraska Game and Parks Commission, Lincoln. 15 pp. Friend, M. 1987. Avian cholera. Pages 69-82 in M. Friend and C.J. Laitman, eds. Field guide to wildlife diseases. Vol. 1. General field procedures and diseases of migratory birds. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Resour. Publ. 167. Friend, M. 1992. Environmental influences on major diseases. Transactions of the North American Wildlife and Natural Resour. Conference 57:517-525. Friend, M., and G.L. Pearson. 1973. Duck plague: the present situation. Proceedings of the Western Association of State Game and Fish Commissioners 53:315-325. Kalmbach, E.R., and M.F. Gunderson. 1934. Western duck sickness: a form of botulism. U.S. Department of Agriculture Tech. Bull. 411. 81 pp. |
Leibovitz, L., and J. Hwang. 1968. Duck plague on the American continent. Avian Diseases 12:361-378. Locke, L.N., and M. Friend. 1987. Avian botulism. Pages 83-93 in M. Friend and C.J. Laitman, eds. Field guide to wildlife diseases. Vol. 1. General field procedures and diseases of migratory birds. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Resour. Publ. 167. Phillips, J.G., and F.C. Lincoln. 1930. American waterfowl. Houghton Mifflin Company, Cambridge, MA. 312 pp. Quortrup, E.R., F.B. Queen, and L.T. Merovka. 1946. An outbreak of pasteurellosis in wild ducks. Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association 108:94-100. Rhoades, K.R., and R.B. Rimler. 1991. Pasteurellosis. Pages 145-162 in B.W. Calnek, H.J. Barnes, C.W. Beard, W.H. Reid, and H.W. Yoder, Jr., eds. Diseases of poultry. 9th ed. Iowa State University Press, Ames. Stout, I. J., and G.W. Cornwell. 1976. Nonhunting mortality of fledged North American waterfowl. Journal of Wildlife Management 40:681-693. |