|
|
The goals and measures contained in
Employee Benefits Security Administration's Annual
Performance Plan for Fiscal Year 2002 support those contained in the Employee Benefits Security Administration
Fiscal Year 1999 - 2004
Strategic Plan, specifically, the department's second strategic goal: A
Secure Workforce. Employee Benefits Security Administration's primary mission is to protect the pension, health
and other employee benefits of the over 150 million participants and
beneficiaries in private sector employee benefit plans in excess of 6 million
plans and $4.8 trillion in assets. Through its program, Employee Benefits Security Administration safeguards
and promotes the economic security of workers and families. To accomplish
this, Employee Benefits Security Administration has established the following agency goals:
|
|
On
This Page |
|
|
|
-
Facilitate compliance by plan sponsors, plan
officials, service providers and other members of the regulated community.
Employee Benefits Security Administration facilitates compliance through the timely issuance of advisory opinions,
exemptions, regulations, compliance guides and other issuances designed to
assist the regulated community in understanding and complying with their
responsibilities under the law, while removing unnecessary impediments and
protecting the rights and benefits of participants and beneficiaries.
These efforts are supplemented by Employee Benefits Security Administration participation in conferences, symposia,
and programs designed to expand an understanding of Employment Income Security Act of 1974’s compliance
requirements.
-
Deter and correct violations of the relevant
statutes. Employee Benefits Security Administration deters and corrects violations of the relevant statutes by
identifying civil violations and achieving appropriate correction in a
cost-effective manner (i.e. voluntary compliance, administrative proceedings or
federal court action); detecting, investigating and referring criminal
violations to prosecutorial authorities; ensuring that annual reports are filed
timely and accurately; and ensuring that audits of employee benefit plans comply
with professional standards.
-
Assist workers in understanding their rights and
protecting their benefits. Employee Benefits Security Administration assists workers in understanding their
rights and protecting their benefits by disclosing plan documents; developing
publications, news releases, and other educational materials which inform
participants of their rights and responsibilities under Federal law; assists in
the development of amicus curiae briefs to further participant rights and
benefits; and maintains a nationwide participant assistance program which
provides written and telephone responses to participant problems and inquiries.
-
Encourage the growth of employment-based benefits.
As one of the principal agencies with responsibility in the area of pension,
health and other employee benefits, Employee Benefits Security Administration plays a leadership role in the
development of retirement, health and employee benefits policy. Employee Benefits Security Administration
discharges its responsibilities in this area in a variety of forms including,
but not limited to, maintaining an active research program; continuing its
educational outreach efforts to help plan sponsors and participants understand
their rights and obligations as well as the importance of and options for
retirement savings and health care benefits; assisting the Administration, other
Federal agencies (e.g. the Departments of Treasury and Health and Human
Services, the Internal Revenue Service, and the Pension Benefit Guaranty
Corporation, among others) and the Congress in the development and/or review of
legislative initiatives affecting employee benefits.
|
|
|
The Employee Benefits Security Administration
is
responsible for the administration and enforcement of Title I of the Employee
Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, as amended, in both civil and
criminal areas. Employee Benefits Security Administration is also responsible for enforcing sections 8477 and
8478 of the Federal Employees' Retirement System Act of 1986. The
primary mission of Employee Benefits Security Administration is to protect the pension, health and other employee
benefits of the over 150 million participants and beneficiaries in private
sector employee benefit plans.
|
The Employee Benefits Security Administration's appropriation is comprised of three budget
activities:
|
The Enforcement and Compliance activity conducts civil and
criminal investigations, performs reviews to ensure compliance with the
fiduciary provisions of Employment Income Security Act of 1974 and Federal Employees' Retirement System Act of 1986, and assures compliance with applicable
reporting requirements, as well as accounting, auditing, and actuarial
standards. This activity seeks the restoration of plan losses, removal of
plan fiduciaries and/or prosecution of fiduciaries and others that result from
violations of Employment Income Security Act of 1974 and applicable criminal Statutes, assesses civil penalties
under Employment Income Security Act of 1974, and conducts quality reviews of plan accountants' work papers.
It also conducts liaison activities with the Financial Accounting Standards
Board and the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants, including
referrals of deficient accountants' work.
|
The Policy, Regulation and Public Services activity
conducts policy, research and legislative analysis on pension, health, and other
employee benefit issues; promulgates regulations and interpretations regarding
reporting and disclosure, fiduciary, and coverage provisions; issues individual
and class exemptions from Employment Income Security Act of 1974's and Federal Employees' Retirement System Act of 1986's prohibited transactions
provisions; discloses legally-required reports; provides technical assistance to
plan officials, employee benefits practitioners, and the general public;
provides direct assistance to plan participants and beneficiaries in enforcing
their rights under Employment Income Security Act of 1974 and in obtaining benefits under employee benefit plans;
and provides assistance in response to requests from members of Congress
(including constituent requests), as well as technical assistance to about a
dozen legislative committees with jurisdiction affecting Employment Income Security Act of 1974 and
Federal Employees' Retirement System Act of 1986.
|
The Program Oversight activity provides leadership, policy
direction, strategic planning, and management of the pension and welfare
benefits program. Oversight and operational guidance is provided in the
areas of financial management, budget formulation and execution, debt
management, human resource management, labor and employee relations, employee
development and other administrative activities. In addition, this
activity conducts a comprehensive technical training program, for both new and
seasoned employees, in support of the agency's enforcement, policy, legislative,
and regulatory functions.
|
|
|
Departmental Goal #1 - A Secure Workforce (Promote the
economic security of workers and families).
|
Agency Strategic Goal - Facilitate compliance by plan
sponsors, plan officials, service providers and other members of the regulated
community.
|
Agency Performance
Measure #1
|
1A
Performance
Goal:
|
As a result of Help Desk assistance, increase the
percentage of filings corrected Form 5500 by 3%.
Fiscal Year 2001: Same Goal
Fiscal Year 2000: N/A
|
Indicator:
|
Corrected Form 5500
filings
|
Data Source:
|
Office of the Chief
Accountant Information Systems
|
Baseline:
|
TBD in
Fiscal Year 2002 (first
year of data availability as a result of new ERISA Filing Acceptance System).
|
Comment:
|
The goal of this standard
is to improve the accuracy and completeness of required plan filings.
With the adoption of the new ERISA Filing Acceptance System, plan filings will now be made
with and processed by the U.S. Department of Labor. In conjunction with
this change, Employee Benefits Security Administration established a Help
Desk function, to provide technical
assistance to plan filers in resolving deficiencies in their Form 5500
filings. Filers contacting the Help Desk will be provided detailed
guidance on their deficiencies and how to correct those deficiencies.
|
1B
Performance
Goal:
|
As a result of the non-filer initiatives, achieve
2,500 new plan filings.
Fiscal Year 2001: Same Goal
Fiscal Year 2000: N/A
|
Performance
Result:
|
Fiscal Year 2001: 2,608
Fiscal Year 2000: N/A
|
Indicator:
|
Number of new filers via
non-filer initiatives
|
Data Source:
|
Office of the Chief
Accountant Information Systems
|
Baseline:
|
Average number of filers
Fiscal Year 96-Fiscal Year 99 (3,015).
|
Comment:
|
Employee Benefits Security Administration's Delinquent Filer
Voluntary Compliance Program was developed to allow plan
administrators to voluntarily (and with reduced financial penalties)
correct late filing and non-filing issues. Entity Control will
target those plan administrators who do not file or have stopped filing
and have not complied voluntarily. Through aggressive education and
outreach efforts, as well as routine contact with plan filers, Employee Benefits Security Administration will
encourage plan administrators and others in the employee benefit plans
community to utilize the Delinquent Filer Voluntary Compliance Program program.
|
1C
Performance
Goal:
|
Decrease by 3%, the number of late filers of the Form
5500
Fiscal Year 2001: Same Goal
Fiscal Year 2000: N/A
|
Indicator:
|
Number of Form 5500s
filed late
|
Data Source:
|
Office of the Chief
Accountant Information Systems
|
Baseline:
|
To be
established in Fiscal Year 2002. (The base line was previously Fiscal Year 1995 data, the
last available from the IRS. With the recently implemented ERISA Filing Acceptance System,
Employee Benefits Security Administration will now be able to establish a more timely and reliable
baseline).
|
Comment:
|
The purpose of this goal
is to increase the timeliness of Form 5500 filings. This is critical
to the department's enforcement efforts which depend on timely information
being submitted by plan filers. Equally important, the department is
responsible for ensuring that plan participants and beneficiaries have
timely access to plan information contained in the Form 5500.
|
1D Performance
Goal:
|
Complete 10% of the new systems audits for the
re-engineered Thrift Savings Plan.
Fiscal Year 2001: Same Goal
Fiscal Year 2000: N/A
|
Performance
Result:
|
Fiscal Year 2001: Delayed pending
Thrift Savings Plan implementation of
new system anticipated in late Fiscal Year 2002
Fiscal Year 200: N/A
|
Indicator:
|
Audit Records
|
Data Source:
|
Office of Chief
Accountant Thrift Savings Plan Audit Records
|
Baseline:
|
Fiscal Year 2002: Initiate audits
of new systems once implemented which, at this time, the Thrift Savings
Board has delayed until late Fiscal Year 2002.
|
Comment:
|
Employee Benefits Security Administration is primarily
responsible for oversight of the nearly $100 billion Thrift Savings Plan, involving 2.4 million Federal participants (excluding military
which is slated to begin participation during Fiscal Year 2002) and is statutorily
required to carry out audits of the system. The Thrift Savings Plan will implement a
totally re-engineered record keeping system that is significantly more
complex than the system that existed previously. The enhancements
include:
-
Implementing completely new
Thrift Savings Plan record keeping
software.
-
Replacing the Thrift Savings Plan bookkeeping system by converting from monthly to daily
account valuations with new individual account unit valuations.
-
Establishing two new Thrift Savings Plan investment funds (an international fund and a
small cap fund), as required by Congress. These enhancements will require
activities similar to a first time audit in addition to Employee Benefits Security Administration's ongoing
audit function which involves routine testing of ongoing transactions for
compliance with fiduciary standards.
|
|
Strategies to Achieve Goals - Continue monitoring the new Form 5500 processing system
which was implemented in Fiscal Year 2000 that promotes the electronic filing of the
annual reports to further streamline the system and reduce the cost and burden
of filing, as well as the cost of operating the system. The reports are
filed annually by employee benefit plans to provide information about plan
operations to plan participants and the regulatory agencies. The new
system will streamline the process for converting Form 5500 data into electronic
format and yield more accurate and timely data for enforcement targeting, public
disclosure, research and policy development.
|
Increase compliance of benefit plan filings and related
audits by:
-
Educating filers through a filer Help Desk, clearer Form 5500
instructions, enhanced Web pages, and printed forms
-
Refining computerized
edit tests and corrective correspondence
-
Expanding outreach with the
American Institute of Certified Public Accountants
and State Certified Public Accountant societies to educate and provide technical guidance to plan
auditors
-
Imposing penalties for deficient
audits
-
Referring
significantly deficient professional audit work to the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants and State licensing
authorities for disciplinary action. Since small Certified Public Accountant firms often have
little Employment Income Security Act of 1974 expertise, technical assistance will be particularly focused on
them. A toll free number assists users in becoming familiar with the Form 5500
and decreases the number of filing errors.
|
Provide individual technical assistance to target audiences
(employers, unions, fiduciaries, accountants, actuaries, attorneys, third-party
administrators, workers and their dependents) by participating in conferences,
symposia and programs designed to expand an understanding of Employment Income Security Act of 1974's compliance
requirements. Web and satellite broadcasts will be utilized to reduce
participant costs.
|
Provide appropriate, responsive and cost-effective
regulatory framework and interpretive guidelines for private-sector employee
benefit plans which minimize regulatory and administrative burdens with respect
to the statutory and regulatory requirements.
|
Process exemption requests under Title I of
Employment Income Security Act of 1974 in a
timely manner, establishing effective conditions and safeguards to protect
plans, participants and beneficiaries and facilitating meritorious transactions
that would otherwise be prohibited.
|
|
Departmental Goal #2 - A Secure Workforce (Promote the economic security of workers
and families).
|
Agency Strategic Goal - Deter and correct violations of the
relevant statutes.
|
Agency Performance
Measure #2
|
2A
Performance
Goal:
|
Increase by 5% per year
to 1,993 the number of
closed civil investigations of employee pension plans where assets are
restored, prohibited transactions are corrected, participant benefits are
recovered, or plan assets are protected from mismanagement and risk of
future loss is reduced.
Fiscal Year 2001: 1,725 Cases
Fiscal Year 2000: N/A (The previous combined goal was met)
Fiscal Year 1999: N/A. The
enforcement goal was separated, in Fiscal Year 2001, into two goals to better
reflect Employee Benefits Security Administration's health and pension responsibilities. (The previous combined
goal was met). |
Performance
Result:
|
Fiscal Year 2001: 1,942 cases
Fiscal Year 2000: N/A
Fiscal Year 1999: N/A |
Indicator:
|
Number of
closed civil investigations of employees pension plans where assets are
restored, prohibited transactions are corrected, participant benefits are
recovered, plan assets are protected, and other violations are corrected. |
Data Source:
|
Employee Benefits Security Administration’s Enforcement
Management System |
Baseline:
|
The average number of
closed civil investigations of employee pension plans where assets are
restored, prohibited transactions are corrected, participant benefits are
recovered, plan assets are protected, and other violations are corrected
for Fiscal Year 2000 and 2001 (1,899). |
Comment:
|
The protection of plan
assets and the correction of Employment Income Security Act of 1974 violations is the primary investigative
purpose. When plan assets have been potentially endangered by an
imprudent act on the part of a plan fiduciary or have otherwise been
misused, U.S. Department of Labor seeks to have plan made whole through the restoration of
assets. |
2B
Performance
Goal:
|
Increase by 5% per year
to 620 the number of closed
civil investigations of employee health and welfare plans where assets are
restored, prohibited transactions are corrected, participant benefits are
recovered, or plan assets are protected from mismanagement and risk of
future loss is reduced.
Fiscal Year 2001: 340 Cases
Fiscal Year 2000: N/A (The previous combined goal was
met)
Fiscal Year 1999: N/A The
enforcement goal was separated, in Fiscal Year 2001, into two goals to better
reflect Employee Benefits Security Administration’s health and pension responsibilities. (The previous
combined goal was met). |
Performance
Result:
|
Fiscal Year 2001: 782 Cases
Fiscal Year 2000: N/A
Fiscal Year 1999: N/A |
Indicator:
|
Number of civil
investigations of employee health and welfare plans where prohibited
transaction are corrected, prohibited transactions are corrected,
participant benefits are recovered, plan assets are protected, and other
violations are corrected. |
Data Source:
|
Enforcement Management
System |
Baseline:
|
The average number of
closed civil investigations of employee health and welfare plans where
prohibited transactions are corrected, assets are restored, participant
benefits are recovered, plan assets are protected, and other violations
are corrected for fiscal years 2000 and 2001 (590). |
Comment:
|
The protection of plan
assets and the correction of Employment Income Security Act of 1974 violations is the primary investigative
purpose. When plan assets have been potentially endangered by an
imprudent act on the part of a plan fiduciary or have otherwise been
misused, U.S. Department of Labor seeks to have the transaction corrected to minimize potential
loss. |
2C
Performance
Goal:
|
Increase by 3 (to 10) the number of closed fiduciary
investigations where plan assets are protected by filing a proof of claim
or adversary complaint in a bankruptcy action.
Fiscal Year 2001: Establish Base
Fiscal Year 2000: N/A |
Performance
Result:
|
Fiscal Year 2001: 7 Cases |
Indicator:
|
Number of closed civil
investigations where plan assets are protected by filing a proof of claim
or adversary complaint in a bankruptcy action. |
Data Source:
|
Enforcement Management
System
|
Baseline:
|
Fiscal Year 2001: 7 closed
civil investigations where plan assets are protected by filing a proof of
claim or adversary complaint in a bankruptcy action.
|
Comment:
|
These investigations are
ones in which Employee Benefits Security Administration is able to protect plan assets by filing a proof of
claim or adversary complaint in a bankruptcy action (REACT Initiative).
|
2D
Performance
Goal:
|
Increase by 1% per year the ratio of closed civil
cases with corrected violations to total civil cases closed to 51.83%.
Fiscal Year 2001: 34.99%
Fiscal Year 2000: 21.01% |
Performance Result:
|
Fiscal Year 2001: 57.2%
Fiscal Year 2000: 44.45%
Fiscal Year 1999: 36.49% |
Indicator:
|
Ratio of closed civil
investigations with corrected violations to total civil investigations
closed.
|
Data Source:
|
Enforcement Management
System |
Baseline:
|
The
Fiscal Year 2000-2001 average
ratio of closed civil investigations with corrected violations to total
civil investigations closed (50.83%). |
Comment:
|
Those
cases with corrected violations are cases in which Employee Benefits Security Administration obtained a
correction of any Employment Income Security Act of 1974 violation. |
2E
Performance
Goal:
|
Increase by .25% per year the ratio of criminal cases
referred for prosecution to United States Attorneys or to State
prosecutors to total criminal cases to 43.41%.
Fiscal Year 2001: 43.16%
Fiscal Year 2000: 42.91%
|
Performance
Result:
|
Fiscal Year 2001: 53.98%
Fiscal Year 2000: 64.27%
Fiscal Year 1999: 42.68%
|
Indicator:
|
Ratio of criminal
investigations referred for prosecution to total criminal investigations. |
Data Source:
|
Enforcement Management
System |
Baseline:
|
The
Fiscal Year 1997-2001 average
ratio of criminal investigations referred for prosecution to total
criminal investigations (50.76%). |
Comment:
|
Although
the protection and restoration of plan assets through civil investigation
and litigation is our primary investigative purpose, we also have a
responsibility to enforce the applicable criminal statutes. There
are times during the course of an investigation when we identify conduct
which is potentially criminal in nature. Further, we are often
called upon by other law enforcement agencies to support their
investigations, particularly those that involve complex employee pension
or other benefit related transactions. This goal measures continual
improvement in our criminal investigative program. |
|
Strategies to Achieve Goals - Enforcement activities are perhaps the most prominent
activities and consequently, are where the vast majority of resources are
devoted. However, underlying the enforcement program is a whole array of
activities that support our Deter and Correct performance measure. They
include technology enhancements, compliance assistance and education, and
traditional enforcement activities.
|
Compliance Assistance - Increasing compliance of benefit plan filings and related
audits by:
-
Educating filers via a filer Help
Desk
-
Refining computerized
edit tests and corrective correspondence
-
Expanding outreach with the
American Institute of Certified Public Accountants
and State Certified Public Accountant societies to educate and provide technical guidance to plan
auditors
-
Imposing penalties for deficient
audits
-
Referring
significantly deficient professional audit work to the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants and State licensing
authorities for disciplinary action. Since small Certified Public Accountant firms often have
little Employment Income Security Act of 1974 expertise, technical assistance will be particularly focused on
them. As the redesigned Form 5500 employee benefit plan annual filing is
implemented, users will need additional help in becoming familiar with the new
form to avoid an increased error rate.
|
Promoting the formal voluntary compliance program through
which fiduciaries who have found problems with their plans can seek assistance
and/or approval in taking corrective action. This will particularly
benefit small employers who otherwise might not take the corrective actions
necessary to come into compliance.
|
Continuing to develop and refine compliance guides for our
customer service staff in Employee Benefits Security Administration field offices to assist them in handling
inquiries and ensure that American workers and their families receive the
important protections afforded under Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996 and other recently enacted health
care laws.
|
Providing individual technical assistance to target
audiences (employers, unions, fiduciaries, accountants, actuaries, attorneys,
third-party administrators, workers and their dependents).
|
Supporting the
department’s cross-cutting initiatives
pertaining to Coordinated Compliance Assistance for Small Businesses and
One-Stop Centers for Education and Outreach.
|
Educating the pension and welfare benefits community as to
the problem areas that we have uncovered in our investigations and the standards
for compliance with Employment Income Security Act of 1974.
|
Enforcement - Employee Benefits Security Administration will pro-actively enforce existing and future
regulations as a means for deterring and correcting violations of Employment Income Security Act of 1974.
Strategies include:
-
Continuing to target and investigate pension plan
violations where participants are susceptible to actual loss of benefits, or
populations of plan participants who are potentially exposed to the greatest
risk of falling victim to unlawful conduct.
-
Identifying civil violations and achieving appropriate
correction in the least obtrusive and most cost-effective manner.
-
Strategic targeting and investigating of cases where
meaningful monetary or injunctive relief can be obtained. When alternative
methods are available to prevent, redress, or punish violations, in general,
preference will be given to options which will result in the most timely
remedial action and the most efficient use of agency resources.
-
Referring evidence of criminal activity, whether or not
pursued by Employee Benefits Security Administration, to the appropriate United States Attorney's office or to the
appropriate state's attorney's office.
-
Correcting abusive practices by service providers and
financial institutions who offer a variety of administrative, financial,
consulting, and other types of services to employee benefit plans enabling Employee Benefits Security Administration
to leverage its enforcement resources.
-
Continuing to be alert for new and emerging threats to
employee benefit plans and plan participants.
|
Enforcing the new health care provisions contained in the
new part 7 of Employment Income Security Act of 1974, particularly Health Insurance Portability and
Accountability Act, Newborns' and Mothers' Health Protection Act of
1996, Mental Health Parity Act of 1996, the Women's Health and Cancer Rights Act
of 1998. The ongoing responsibilities of Employee Benefits Security Administration in this area include
developing comprehensive regulations, interpretive bulletins, opinions, rulings,
and model forms and providing training, technical assistance and other guidance
at the State and Federal level to facilitate compliance with and enforcement of
the health care portability, non-discrimination and other provisions of Title I
of Employment Income Security Act of 1974 relating to group health plans. In satisfying these
responsibilities Employee Benefits Security Administration coordinates closely with the Department of Health and
Human Services through an ongoing interagency working group and the Department
of the Treasury.
|
Refining our investigative aid to assist investigators in
reviews of health plans to determine whether there is compliance with the new
health care laws. Employee Benefits Security Administration investigators are currently implementing a
nationwide enforcement pilot project to test the investigative aid and how it
can best be used in future investigations of health plans to ensure that workers
and their families are not unjustly denied any protections provided under Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996
and other related health care provisions.
|
Technology - Employee Benefits Security Administration has and continues to take advantage of
state-of-the-art technologies as a means for achieving more efficient and
effective program delivery. They include:
-
Continuing to refine the new processing system outside the
IRS for Form 5500 Annual Report. The reports are filed annually by
employee benefit plans to provide information about plan operations to plan
participants and the regulatory agencies. The new system will streamline
the process for converting Form 5500 data into electronic format and yield more
accurate and timely data for enforcement targeting and public disclosure.
-
Promoting the electronic filing of the annual reports to:
-
Reduce the cost and burden of
filing
-
Reduce the cost of operating the
system
-
Provide more timely reports as a means for facilitating
enforcement and disclosure activities
-
Developing a system to disclose Form 5500 annual reports
via an Internet site to make data more readily available to participants and to
the agencies which use it to protect employee benefits. The use of the
Internet for disclosure will provide U.S. Department of Labor with the technology it needs to enhance
its customer service.
|
|
Departmental Goal #3 - A Secure Workforce (Promote the economic security of workers
and families).
|
Agency Strategic Goal - Assist workers in understanding their
rights and protecting their benefits.
|
Agency Performance
Measure #3
|
3A
Performance
Goal:
|
Respond to all requests for plan documents, annual
reports and other information maintained for public disclosure within an
average of 10 working days.
Fiscal Year 2001: 10 Days
Fiscal Year 2000: 10 Days
Fiscal Year 1999: 10 Days
|
Performance
Measure:
|
Fiscal Year 2001: 8 Days
Fiscal Year 2000: 5.3 Days
Fiscal Year 1999: 6.3 Days
|
Indicator:
|
Average response
time |
Data Source:
|
Office of Participant
Assistance & Communication Tracking System |
Baseline:
|
Fiscal Year 1998: 6.70 days |
Comment:
|
Providing plan documents
to participants and the general public in a timely manner enables them to
identify potential problems with their benefit plans, take appropriate
action and protect their interests. Further, if there are problems
brought to our attention we may be able to take action to protect their
interest. |
3B
Performance
Goal:
|
Provide timely assistance to participants and
beneficiaries. Respond to 90% of written requests within 30 days.
Respond to 99% of telephone requests by c.o.b. the next business day.
Fiscal Year 2001: Written - 99%; Telephone - 99.9%
Fiscal Year 2000: Written - 99%;
Telephone - 99.9%
|
Performance
Measure:
|
Fiscal Year 2001: Written - 99.00%; Telephone - 99.90%
Fiscal Year 2000: Written - 98.70%; Telephone - 99.90%
Fiscal Year 1999: Written -
99.21%; Telephone - 99.98%
|
Indicator:
|
Percent of responses
within prescribed time frames |
Data Source:
|
Office of Participant
Assistance & Communication Tracking System |
Baseline:
|
Fiscal Year
1998:
Written - 99%
Telephone - 99.9% |
Comment:
|
Many plan participants
and beneficiaries contact us when they have a potential dispute with their
plan or employer or when they are concerned regarding the security of
their benefits. Prompt response is not only important to assist the
requester during a potentially emotionally charged time, but is also
important if the requester's interest is to be protected by timely Agency
action. |
3C
Performance
Goal:
|
Increase by 2% (to $67 million) benefit recoveries
for individuals achieved through the assistance of Benefit Advisers.
Fiscal Year 2001: $66 Million
Fiscal Year 2000: $53 Million (New
Measure in Fiscal Year 2000)
|
Performance
Result:
|
Fiscal Year 2001: $64.7 Million
Fiscal Year 2000: $67 Million
|
Indicator:
|
The dollar value of
benefit recoveries achieved through the assistance of technical assistance
staff. |
Data Source:
|
Technical Assistance
and Inquiries System |
Baseline:
|
Average of the benefit
recoveries achieved in Fiscal Years 2000 and 2001 ($66 million). |
Comment:
|
Represents the amount of
dollars returned to participants via the intervention of Benefit Advisors
in benefit disputes. |
3D
Performance
Goal:
|
Increase by 2%, the percentage of people who rate
Employee Benefits Security Administration materials as helpful and
understandable. |
Indicator:
|
Stakeholder Opinion |
Data Source:
|
Customer Service Survey |
Baseline:
|
To be established in
Fiscal Year
2002 |
|
Strategies to Achieve Goals - Assisting workers and conducting outreach and education
activities are perhaps the most ubiquitous of activities yet are an integral
part of achieving Employee Benefits Security Administration's mission in a cost effective manner. The tangible
outcomes, however, are the most difficult to measure. Nevertheless, Employee Benefits Security Administration
strongly advocates that meaningful education, outreach, and assistance results
in positive dividends such as earlier detection of potential violations,
protection and/or restoration of assets or benefits to participants, and
increased coverage rates. Some of the strategies utilized include:
-
Continuing to implement a new health education campaign to:
-
Raise public awareness about where to seek assistance about their
rights
-
Educate workers and their employers about health
plans
-
Provide
individual technical assistance to workers who have questions about their health
benefits or need assistance in obtaining those benefits
-
Provide
information to employers and plan sponsors about their responsibilities under
the law.
-
Maintaining the Federal-State-local partnership to educate
employee benefit plan participants who are at risk (such as, dislocated workers
who face job loss and associated benefits losses) in understanding not only
their rights under Employment Income Security Act of 1974, Consolidated Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act,
Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996, etc. but also how their employment
status may affect their pension and health benefits. We work with the
state Dislocated Worker Units which are funded by Employment Training Administration under
Job Training Partnership Act, Title III.
|
In addition, Employee Benefits Security Administration will coordinate with
Employment Training Administration to support the
education and assistance to dislocated workers on pension and health issues.
|
Providing individualized participant assistance
(information concerning their rights, help in seeking benefits or an explanation
of why they are not entitled to benefits, an explanation of how the law applies
and, in appropriate cases, make inquiries on their behalf).
|
Providing a prompt and courteous response to all benefit
complaints filed with us and, when requested, furnish the complainant with an
understandable explanation of the outcome or our review and investigation.
|
|
|
Activity #1 - Enforcement and
Compliance
|
FY
2001
|
FY
2002
|
Funding ($000)
|
$83,453
|
$85,525
|
FTE
|
683
|
683
|
|
Resources, Operations and Processes - The budget request reflects
Employee Benefits Security Administration's program to effectively
address the department's responsibilities in protecting plan participants'
retirement, health care, and other benefits. There are over 6 million
private employee benefit plans, which cover approximately 150 million people,
including workers, their families, and retirees, and control approximately $4.8
trillion in assets. Employee Benefits Security Administration's comprehensive and coordinated enforcement
strategy is designed to:
-
Ensure that annual reports are filed timely and
accurately
-
Ensure the highest quality independent
Certified Public Accountant audits of employee
benefit plans
-
Identify civil violations and prevent loss or achieve
appropriate correction in the least obtrusive and most cost-effective manner,
i.e. voluntary compliance, administrative proceedings or Federal court action
-
Detect, investigate and refer criminal violations to prosecutorial
authorities. Employee Benefits Security Administration's enforcement strategy will continue to be implemented
through increased and decentralized investigatory activity, reporting and
compliance efforts, and improvement of employee productivity and information
sharing through training and technology.
|
In the area of
Federal Employees' Retirement System Act of 1986 audits, the statute provides that the
Secretary of Labor will establish a program to carry out fiduciary compliance
audits. The Thrift Savings Plan has experienced phenomenal growth
since its inception. Without effective U.S. Department of Labor oversight of the
Thrift Savings Plan, the
Thrift Investment Board would have little capacity for gaining information on
behalf of the Thrift Savings Plan participants and beneficiaries about how policy is applied in
practice and the impact of the fiduciary decisions. In addition, the Thrift Savings Plan
is slated to add two new funds B an international and small cap C and transition
to a daily valued rather than monthly valued system adding that much more
complexity.
|
The agency will continue to develop and implement
state-of-the-art technology systems which will strengthen enforcement
capabilities and improve customer service in order to assist plan participants
in obtaining earned benefits. Work will also continue to refine our new
processing system which will be devoted exclusively to processing Form 5500
Series annual employee benefit report filings. This new system improves
the quality and accuracy of processed data, speeds its use in safeguarding
benefits, and is less costly to operate, yielding a substantial long-term
savings to the Federal government.
|
$500,000 will be dedicated to cover the costs associated
with providing, when necessary, independent fiduciary services to handle
termination and distribution issues related to plans that have been abandoned,
otherwise known as orphan plans. The orphan plan initiative assists
at-risk populations, specifically those participants who are in danger of losing
some or all of their retirement savings. In many orphan plan situations
fiduciaries have deserted the plan and effectively abdicated their
responsibilities. As a result, participants are unable to exercise any
rights they may have under the plan; plan assets are not being actively managed;
individual participant accounts may not be credited accurately; and reports
required to be filed are not prepared. Indeed, in many instances there are
insufficient assets in the plan to pay for the services of an independent
fiduciary without significantly depleting the participants' accounts.
|
|
Activity #2 - Policy, Regulation
and Public Services
|
FY
2001
|
FY
2002
|
Funding ($000)
|
$20,205
|
$19,953
|
FTE
|
145
|
145
|
|
Resources, Operations and Processes - This activity's request for
Fiscal Year 2002 is to maintain services
in several important areas, including managing its participant assistance
program to assure responsiveness to the increasing demand for pension and health
benefits information and technical assistance by the general public; ensuring
the timely provision of regulatory and interpretive guidance to the public and
other governmental agencies; providing policy guidance and legislative efforts
in the areas of pension coverage, portability, and preservation and health care
access and security; and carrying out an effective research program directed
toward pension and health care issues, providing both long-term and basic
research studies and short-term studies with immediate policy applications.
|
The recent enactment of the health care laws significantly
expanded U.S. Department of Labor's regulatory and interpretative responsibilities under
Employment Income Security Act of 1974.
These new laws establish Federal requirements for virtually all of the nation's
health benefit programs by adding new provisions to Employment Income Security Act of 1974, the Public Health
Services Act and the Internal Revenue Code. U.S. Department of Labor was assigned general
authority and discretion to promulgate compliance guidance (rules, guidelines
and regulations) and enforce provisions of the Act relating to
employer-sponsored group health plans. Specific U.S. Department of Labor rule making actions
are required to assure that workers receive certification of prior benefit
coverage so that benefits for pre-existing conditions are covered by new
employers and insurers. These new laws and the department's compliance
guidance and interpretations there under potentially impact over 2.5 million
group health plans, providing health care coverage to an estimated 125 million
participants and beneficiaries, and benefit-related expenditures in excess of
$250 billion.
|
In Fiscal Year 2002, the level of resources devoted to carrying out Employee Benefits Security Administration's compliance guidance activities and related functions will continue to
increase. This is the result of several related factors:
-
The
significant Federal health benefits statutes which create extensive on-going
guidance, enforcement and assistance responsibilities for the Secretary of Labor
-
The greater incidence of self-insurance which leaves
Employee Benefits Security Administration with
essentially sole jurisdiction over virtually all aspects of the operation of
employment-based health plans due to Employment Income Security Act of 1974's broad preemption provisions
-
The continued evolution of the structure and operation of the
employment-based health care system toward complicated and sophisticated forms
of managed care arrangements.
|
In addition, since the new laws affect most workers and
most employers, the need for information will be significant. Information
will be provided to participants and beneficiaries to enable them to better
understand and exercise their rights under the laws. In addition, when
possible, the staff assists the participants in recovering benefits to which
they are entitled, but have been denied. Employers and practitioners are
also provided information that helps them understand and comply with the laws
and associated rules and regulations.
|
This activity also reflects the $252,000 rescission
pursuant to Public Law 107-342.
|
|
Activity #
3 - Program Oversight
|
FY
2001
|
FY
2002
|
Funding ($000)
|
$3,975
|
$5,736
|
FTE
|
22
|
22
|
|
Resources, Operations and Processes - This activity's request for
Fiscal Year 2002 was formulated
within the context of its overall responsibilities in providing leadership,
policy direction, strategic planning, and management of the pension and welfare
benefits program. In addition to policy direction and leadership,
attention will continue to be focused upon human resource management, financial
management, debt collection, the provision of administrative support to program
operations, and implementation of the Government Performance and Results Act of
1993. Professional staff development will continue to remain a high
priority and is considered critical to maintaining the professional and
technical skills of Employee Benefits Security Administration's employees in the rapidly evolving pension and health
care benefits industry. This activity also includes the one-time emergency
preparedness funding of $1.6 million.
|
|
|
Employee Benefits Security Administration will obtain its performance reporting data from
automated information and case reporting systems, managers' logs of program
activities, accountability audits/reviews, and customer knowledge and
satisfaction surveys. The agency will review and refine these data sources
on an ongoing basis. Based upon the results of these reviews, Employee Benefits Security Administration will
make adjustments or, if necessary, develop and implement alternative sources for
the performance data.
|
In addition, the Office of Inspector General will conduct
audits under the Chief Financial Officer's Act. This strategy will include
conducting, at various points during the course of the fiscal year, quality
reviews of data bases that capture performance data and inspections of field
offices to ensure the integrity and completeness of reported data.
|
In Fiscal Year 2000, Employee Benefits Security Administration embarked on an initiative, in partnership
with the department, to improve its performance measures and to address
performance data validation and reliability. MRJ, a noted expert in the
field of data validity and results-based management, assisted Employee Benefits Security Administration in
transitioning from output to outcome measures. Simultaneously, MRJ worked
with Employee Benefits Security Administration management in reviewing its internal data controls as a means for
ensuring the most reliable and accurate data to the extent practicable. Employee Benefits Security Administration received a preliminary report in late
Fiscal Year 2000.
|
In Fiscal Year 2001, Employee Benefits Security Administration participated for the first time in the
Excellence in Customer Satisfaction initiative. As a result, Employee Benefits Security Administration received
a customer satisfaction index. The initial effort focused on services
provided by Employee Benefits Security Administration benefit advisers and provided information to assist
Employee Benefits Security Administration's
efforts in evaluating its program impact and strategies. In partnership
with the department and Gallup, Employee Benefits Security Administration also conducted a limited evaluation of
certain targeted educational materials via focus groups. Employee Benefits Security Administration anticipates
a report in early Fiscal Year 2002. This early effort at evaluating the materials
is an effort to ascertain whether Employee Benefits Security Administration’s materials are helpful and
understandable and provide the necessary information for individuals to make
informed decisions about their retirement savings strategies.
|
In Fiscal Year 2002, Employee Benefits Security Administration, in partnership with the department, will
embark on a program evaluation of its education and outreach, customer service,
and enforcement strategies. These three interrelated activities provide
the backbone to many of Employee Benefits Security Administration's performance measures and provide valuable
intelligence to Employee Benefits Security Administration's compliance assistance efforts. These studies will
provide valuable insight to which strategies are producing the most positive
impact. As a result, Employee Benefits Security Administration will be positioned to leverage its limited
resources in the most effective and meaningful way.
|
|
|
In carrying out the
department's Employment Income Security Act of 1974 and Federal Employees' Retirement System Act of 1986
responsibilities, U.S. Department of Labor coordinates its enforcement, policy, regulatory and public
information programs with numerous Federal, state and local entities.
|
The U.S. Department of Labor has cross-cutting, multi-agency
involvement in a number of program areas. Under Employment Income Security Act of 1974,
U.S. Department of Labor shares
responsibility with the Internal Revenue Service and the Pension Benefit
Guaranty Corporation. Additionally, the broad sweep of our enforcement
responsibilities requires coordination with financial institution regulatory
agencies such as: Comptroller of the Currency, Federal Reserve System, Federal
Deposit Insurance Corporation, National Credit Union Administration, Security
Exchange Commission, State insurance and financial regulatory entities, as well
as the FBI, Office of the Inspector General, U.S. Postal Service and state and local law enforcement
agencies.
|
Further, in order to fulfill policy, research, regulatory
and public education responsibilities, Employee Benefits Security Administration works with the Departments of Health
and Human Services and Treasury, the National Economic Council, the Bureau
of the Census, the Bureau of Labor Statistics, the Thrift Savings Board, and the
Small Business Administration.
|
Specific examples include Employee Benefits Security Administration's joint initiative with the
Small Business Administration to expand pension coverage for women, minorities and small businesses; our
ongoing coordination with Health and Human Services and Treasury on Health care policy and
regulations; pension education initiatives, and coordinated enforcement
approaches where Employee Benefits Security Administration works with Federal, state and/or local enforcement
agencies.
|
In the international arena, Employee Benefits Security Administration provides assistance to
ILAB, the World Bank, AID and foreign governments. Employee Benefits Security Administration has provided
seminars and technical assistance regarding retirement security issues to
visiting officials from many countries. This includes technical assistance
regarding establishing private pension systems, developing policy, establishing
legal structures to control the systems and creating and operating regulatory
institutions.
|
Within U.S. Department of Labor, the Employee Benefits Security Administration participates in a number of
U.S. Department of Labor
cross-cutting programs. Specifically, in Fiscal Year 2001, the new ERISA Filing Acceptance System Form 5500
reports processing system was implemented for the first full year. This
system made it easier for plan officials to file electronically by on-line
transmission, CD-ROM, floppy disk or tape. Further, Employee Benefits Security Administration established a
customer service Help Desk operation to assist Form 5500 filers in properly
completing the forms and in using the new filing system. These initiatives
are a component of the U.S. Department of Labor Improving Customer Service with Technology Cross-Cut.
|
In Fiscal Year 2000, Employee Benefits Security Administration participated in a number of cross cutting
initiatives and will continue their coordinated assistance during Fiscal Year 2002.
|
Innovative Enforcement - The Voluntary Compliance for Fiduciary Breaches program
will provide administrative procedures to assist plan officials, including small
businesses, to correct inadvertent fiduciary violations and bring plans into
compliance and restore assets to plans more quickly than through traditional
enforcement actions.
|
One-Stop and Coordinated Compliance Assistance - Employee Benefits Security Administration will provide educational materials on health and
pension issues for distribution to employers and employees and work with Employment Training Administration to
provide further assistance, as necessary. With respect to coordinated
compliance assistance, once the program is established, Employee Benefits Security Administration will participate in
a U.S. Department of Labor pilot project to bring coordinated compliance assistance on
U.S. Department of Labor Programs
to various field locations.
|
Dislocated Workers - Employee Benefits Security Administration will place special emphasis on educating and assisting
the dislocated workers and will:
-
Establish and maintain liaison with the
department's regional Employment Training Administration staff to coordinate services for workers effected by
plant closures or reductions in force
-
Provide technical assistance to State
Bureaus of Employment Service or State Workforce development Cabinets and all
unemployment insurance offices who assist dislocated workers
-
Coordinate
with the regional workers Adjustment Retraining Notification Act program
-
Work with the AFL-CIO to provide dislocated worker
services
-
Provide
assistance to Employment Training Administration's one stop shop program with regard to dislocated worker
services.
|
Finally, in Fiscal Year 2002,
Employee Benefits Security Administration will continue working with the department in structuring an overall,
one U.S. Department of Labor, IT environment as a means for
fully integrating the department. In addition, Employee Benefits Security Administration will be an active
partner in the department’s overall program evaluation cross-cut.
|
|
|
Numerous external factors may ultimately influence
Employee Benefits Security Administration's
ability to achieve its goals such as structure and health of the economy,
composition and level of employment, economic growth, and sectoral shifts in
economic activity. With respect to demographics, there are additional
external factors influencing Employee Benefits Security Administration's mission such as the aging population,
increasing representation of women and minorities in the workforce, and the
increasing percentage of workers in small businesses. Finally, with
respect to the industry itself, the continuing evolution in the types of
employee benefit plan sponsors (different types necessitate different approaches
and strategies to accomplish the goals) and the evolution of the health care
services industry (changes in financial arrangements between plan sponsors and
providers create new issues that need to be addressed to achieve the goals) will
continue to challenge Employee Benefits Security Administration. Similarly, medical cost inflation can cause
employers to drop or restrict health coverage and also to pass more of the cost
on to participants. Finally, the increased prevalence of self-insured
health plans (preemption of state law by Employment Income Security Act of 1974 brings all aspects of health
benefits regulations within Employee Benefits Security Administration's jurisdiction) and the volatility of financial
markets (new financial products require us to address different issues and the
numbers and types of compliance issues increase with market volatility.) will
challenge Employee Benefits Security Administration and impact its efforts.
|
|
|
Introduction - The Employee Benefits Security Administration
continues to focus on human capital management as a way to build, sustain, and effectively deploy the skilled, knowledgeable, diverse, and
high-performing workforce needed to meet current and emerging needs. This
is particularly important to ensure the availability of well-qualified employees
who are prepared to step into leadership positions over the next five years.
|
Challenges - Like many Federal agencies, a significant number of
Employee Benefits Security Administration’s supervisors and senior managers are eligible to retire within the next
five years. Eighty percent of the Regional Directors will be
eligible for retirement during this period. These are critical senior
leadership positions. The retirement of these officials would have a major
impact on the accomplishment of the agency’s mission if well-qualified
candidates were not available to replace them.
|
In addition, seventy-five
percent of Employee Benefits Security Administration’s District
Supervisors are eligible to retire within the next five years.
District Supervisors manage district offices in Employee Benefits Security Administration’s largest regions.
The loss of these individuals would also have a significant impact on the
accomplishment of Employee Benefits Security Administration’s mission if not replaced by well-qualified candidates.
|
In addition to the District Supervisors and Regional
Directors who are eligible to retire within the next five years, thirty-two percent of Group Supervisors in the field will be eligible to retire during
the same period. These first line supervisors are the backbone of Employee Benefits Security Administration’s
compliance and enforcement operations.
|
In the national office, thirty-three
percent of Employee Benefits Security Administration’s Office Directors will be eligible to retire within the next five years. These individuals provide executive leadership within
Employee Benefits Security Administration and are
responsible for developing agency policy, issuing exemption determinations, and
ensuring reporting compliance with Employment Income Security Act of 1974. Again, we must have highly
qualified replacements ready to step in as necessary.
|
In addition to the large number of supervisors and managers
who are eligible to retire within the next five years, during the past
several years, Employee Benefits Security Administration has experienced a high rate of employee turnover in its
major occupations. This problem is particularly significant in the field.
Many of these employees are leaving after the agency has invested significant
resources into their development. During Fiscal Year 2000 and Fiscal Year 2001, an average
of seven percent of Employee Benefits Security Administration’s investigators/auditors left the agency after
working at least one year. These are front line workers who the agency
depends on to carry out the day-to-day operation of its mission. However,
analysis of Fiscal Year 2001 data indicates that overall attrition has dropped
significantly.
|
Addressing Human Capital Challenges - Employee Benefits Security Administration is acutely aware of the human resource management
challenge it faces. For several years the agency has strategically focused
on these challenges and undertaken a number of initiatives to ensure that the
right people are in the right place at the right time. Below are some of the
activities Employee Benefits Security Administration has undertaken. We also plan to use human resource
management flexibilities to stem the flow of employees leaving
investigator/auditor positions after one or more years of employment.
|
External Training - Employee Benefits Security Administration has made extensive use of the U.S. Office of
Personnel Management supervisory and executive development programs.
Annually, Employee Benefits Security Administration sends non-supervisors, supervisors and other managers to
U.S. Office of Personnel Management’s
supervisory and executive development programs. The centers offer courses
in leadership, team building, diversity, performance-based and results
management, and supervision. The knowledge and skills acquired from these
courses are invaluable to the participants and make them competitive for future
leadership positions. We know from reviewing past results that employees
who have attended the training programs frequently have progressed to
supervisory and managerial positions in Employee Benefits Security Administration. These programs are highly
regarded by those who attend.
|
In fiscal year 2001, thirty-five Employee Benefits Security Administration employees attended the Management Development Centers sponsored by
U.S. Office of Personnel Management
at a cost of $117,000, excluding travel expenses. In fiscal year 2002,
forty-seven employees are scheduled to participate at a cost of $148,000.
|
Internal Training - Employee Benefits Security Administration conducts an
extensive in house technical training program. In fiscal year 2001, Employee Benefits Security Administration
contracted with Job Performance System, Inc., to design a training needs
assessment and make recommendation on how Employee Benefits Security Administration could improve its in training
program. This assessment provided Employee Benefits Security Administration with sound recommendations on
improving its training program. In particular, the assessment identified
three skills gaps for Investigators/Auditors with less than five years
of work experience:
|
The assessment identified two
skills gaps
for Benefits Advisor:
-
Knowledge of
Employment Income Security Act of 1974
-
Laws related to
Employment Income Security Act of 1974,
e.g., Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996 and Consolidated Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act
|
These finding were shared with
Employee Benefits Security Administration senior
management officials in the National and Regional Offices. The agency is
currently evaluating comments from these managers and has begun implementing
recommendations as appropriate.
|
Long Term Career Development Assignments - These assignments can be broken
down into two categories – executive potential and executive leadership.
Each program lasts approximately one year. The executive potential program
is available to supervisory employees who demonstrate executive management
potential. Employees selected for this program must complete two sixty-day
rotational assignments outside Employee Benefits Security Administration. These rotational
assignments give employees exposure to the operations of other Federal or state
agencies. In some cases, the employee may work in a private sector
organization during one of the rotational assignments. There is also
formal training, shadowing, etc.
|
The executive leadership program
is designed primarily for journeyman level employees who demonstrate supervisory
potential. Employees selected for this program conduct research on
management and work related issues, prepare group reports and shadow supervisory
and management officials in their daily work. They also complete two rotational assignments. One of these assignments must be for sixty
days and the other thirty days.
|
Over the past several years, Employee Benefits Security Administration
has supported nine employees in these assignments. Two individuals
who were GS-11/12 when they participated in this program have been promoted to
the GS-13 grade level. Another individual who was a GS-11/12 employee in
the Boston Regional Office when she participated in this program has been
promoted to a GS-14 position in Washington, DC.
|
Short Term Career Development Assignment - A few years ago, the Deputy
Assistant Secretary for Program Operations established a Special
Assistant position in his immediate office to provide journeyman level employees
with an opportunity to work on projects at the highest level in the agency.
|
Since its inception, fourteen
employees have completed a rotational assignment with the Deputy Assistant
Secretary for Program Operations. Of these, five have either been
selected for supervisory or other management positions on a permanent or acting
basis. For Fiscal Year 2002, the Deputy Assistant Secretary will select five candidates for this program.
Employee Benefits Security Administration has also established a similar
rotational program involving regional offices. The Employee Benefits Security Administration San Francisco
Regional Office is the first to participate in this program.
|
Senior Executive Service Candidate Development Program
- The
U.S. Department of Labor has an Senior Executive Service
candidate development program of which Employee Benefits Security Administration is an active participant. This
program lasts approximately eighteen months and includes rotational
assignments inside and outside the U.S. Department of Labor. A Employee Benefits Security Administration employee
who was selected for the program has completed all requirements and is now
eligible for a noncompetitive appointment to a position in the senior executive
service.
|
Student Loan Repayment Program - Employee Benefits Security Administration is currently planning to
implement a student loan repayment program as one vehicle to attract and retain
valuable employees. Because the retention problem is more significant in
certain field offices, the plan is to establish a pilot program. If this program
proves successful, it may be implemented Employee Benefits Security Administration-wide.
|
Delegation of Human Resource Management Flexibilities
- In order to provide National and Regional Office
Directors additional tools to recruit well-qualified candidates for Employee Benefits Security Administration major
occupations, the Deputy Assistant Secretary for Program Operations has
re-delegated authority to National and Regional Office Directors to approve
certain human resource flexibilities as incentives to attract qualified
candidates. These incentives include the authority to approve advance in
pay, superior qualification appointments and payment of travel expenses for
interviews.
|
Recruitment - To better recruit well-qualified candidates,
Employee Benefits Security Administration
established recruitment teams in the National and Regional Office. Each
National Office and Regional Office component designated an individual who would
facilitate recruitment for major occupations. Recruitment team members
attend a variety of job fairs; visit college campuses and other events where
applicants with the necessary skills to do the work of the organization are
available. Recruitment teams members can access a group e-mail address to
alert other team members about their recruitment activities and share
information about the best sources of candidates.
|
In addition to recruitment teams, Employee Benefits Security Administration is beginning
to advertise its vacancies on the Internet. We have begun to utilize
BenefitsLink.com to advertise senior management and specialized positions.
Based on our preliminary review of the visits to our advertisements, we believe
this medium offers a very good recruitment source for future job advertisements.
|
Linking the Strategic Management of Human Capital - The Employee Benefits Security Administration strategic and performance goals support the
U.S.
Department of Labor’s strategic Goal 2 – A Secure Workforce. In
particular, Employee Benefits Security Administration supports the outcome goals of:
|
Employee Benefits Security Administration has developed four
strategic goals in support of
the department’s outcome goals above:
-
Facilitate compliance by plan
sponsors, plan officials, service providers and other members of the regulated
community
-
Deter and correct violations of the relevant
statutes
-
Assist
workers in understanding their rights and protecting their benefits
-
Encourage the growth of employment-based
benefits
|
When taken together, the human capital activities being
undertaken by Employee Benefits Security Administration in the areas of training, employee development, recruitment,
retention and succession planning play a critical role in accomplishing Employee Benefits Security Administration’s
strategic and performance goals. For example, the training needs
assessment survey pointed out additional areas of focus to better prepare
employees to perform their job. New Investigators/Auditors and those with
less than five years of work experience will receive additional training in
interviewing techniques, auditing and laws related to Employment Income Security Act of 1974. This
training, we believe, will facilitate the accomplishment of Employee Benefits Security Administration strategic goals
1 and 2. Benefits Advisors will receive additional training on Employment Income Security Act of 1974 and
related laws. This training will help Benefit Advisors in assisting
workers, and in their outreach and education activities. Assisting workers
and conducting outreach and education activities supports the accomplishment of Employee Benefits Security Administration strategic goals 3 and 4. By closing the identified skills gaps,
Employee Benefits Security Administration
employee will become more efficient and productive, thereby, providing better
service workers and employers.
|
As explained above, the executive development training will
better prepare new supervisors and managers in the management of
performance-bases organizations. They will receive GRPA related training
earlier so that when the time comes to replace senior managers who retire within
the next five years, these individuals will possess invaluable skills in
results based performance management.
|
Conclusion - Employee Benefits Security Administration has identified the human resource
management challenges it will face within the next five years and is
developing the supervisory and management skills of the employees who
will assume supervisory and management responsibilities in the future.
In addition to developing a pool of well-qualified candidates
internally, Employee Benefits Security Administration will also
recruit well-qualified external candidates. Also, the
utilization of the human resource flexibilities and recruitment teams
will improve Employee Benefits Security Administration’s
recruitment and retention of well-qualified candidates. The
proactive steps Employee Benefits Security Administration is taking
now to attract and/or develop internal and external candidates will
ensure that the right people are in the right place at the right time
and that the systems are in place to meet these challenges. The
activities above have been linked with Pension and Welfare Benefits
Administration’s strategic and performance plans to ensure that
Employee Benefits Security Administration has high performing
employees which leads to a high performing organization.
|
Finally, Employee Benefits Security Administration is utilizing
existing resources to accomplish its human capital activities and
producing tangible results and can link additional resources, if
available, to producing more positive results.
|
|
|
AFL-CIO
|
American
Federation of Labor-Congress of Industrial Organizations
|
AHP
|
Association
Health Plan
|
AICPA
|
American
Institute of Certified Public Accountants
|
APP
|
Annual
Performance Plan
|
COBRA
|
Consolidated
Omnibus Reconciliation Act
|
CPA
|
Certified
Public Accountant
|
DFVC
|
Delinquent
Filer Voluntary Compliance
|
EFAST
|
ERISA
Filing Acceptance System
|
EIS
|
ERISA
Information System
|
EMS
|
Enforcement
Management System
|
ERISA
|
Employee
Retirement Income Security Act
|
ETA
|
Employment
and Training Administration
|
FASB
|
Financial
Accounting Standards Board
|
FBI
|
Federal
Bureau of Investigation
|
FERSA
|
Federal
Employees’ Retirement System Act
|
GPEA
|
Government
Paperwork Elimination Act
|
GPRA
|
Government
Performance and Results Act
|
HBEC
|
Health
Benefits Education Campaign
|
HHS
|
Department
of Health and Human Services
|
HIPPA
|
Health
Insurance Portability and Accountability Act
|
ILAB
|
Bureau
of International Labor Affairs
|
IRC
|
Internal
Revenue Code
|
MHPA
|
Mental
Health Parity Act
|
NMHP
|
Newborn’s
and Mothers Health Protection Act
|
OIG
|
Office
of the Inspector General
|
PBGC
|
Pension
Benefit Guaranty Corporation
|
PHSA
|
Public
Health Services Act
|
RBEC
|
Retirement
Benefits Education Campaign
|
REACT
|
Rapid
ERISA Action Compliance Team
|
SAVER
|
Savings
Are Vital to Everyone’s Retirement
|
SBA
|
Small
Business Administration
|
TSP
|
Thrift
Savings Plan
|
VFCP
|
Voluntary
Fiduciary Compliance Program
|
WARN
|
Workers
Adjustment Retraining Notification
|
WHCRA
|
Women’s
Health and Cancer Rights Act
|
|