The Mission
The fight against
terrorism is now the first and overriding priority of the Department
of Justice. We will devote all resources necessary to disrupt, weaken,
and eliminate the infrastructure of terrorist organizations, to
prevent or thwart terrorist attacks, and to bring to justice the
perpetrators of terrorist acts.
Our single objective
is to prevent terrorist attacks by taking suspected terrorists off
the street. We will use every available statute. We will seek every
prosecutorial advantage. We will use all our weapons within the
law and under the Constitution to protect life and enhance security
for America. We will not hesitate in this pursuit, nor will we be
thwarted.
- United States Department of Justice Strategic Plan
2001-2006, A Message from the Attorney General
The Directive
On September 17, 2001, Attorney General John Ashcroft directed
all United States Attorneys' Offices to take several immediate steps
in the fight against terrorism. The directive that he issued required,
first, that the United States Attorneys make anti-terrorism "our
first and overriding priority." Second, it instructed the United
States Attorney's Offices and all Department of Justice components
to implement an anti-terrorism plan that would employ all available
law enforcement tools and criminal charges to incapacitate those
individuals who participate in, or lend support to, terrorist activities.
Third, it ordered the United States Attorneys to appoint an Anti-Terrorism
Coordinator and to establish within each district an Anti-Terrorism
Task Force ("ATTF"). The ATTF was to serve as a conduit
for sharing information among federal and state authorities, a coordinating
body for carrying out the anti-terrorism plan, and an organizational
structure for responding to any future terrorist incidents. The
Connecticut ATTF held its first meeting on September 18, 2001.
On September 24, 2003 the name of the ATTF was changed to the Anti-Terrorism
Advisory Council (ATAC). The responsibilities of the ATAC will continue
as they have since the ATTF was first conceived:
- Coordinate Anti-Terrorism
Initiatives:
a) Ensure that federal, state, and local enforcement efforts
are focused and coordinated as they pursue targets who may be
connected to terrorism.
b) Mobilize and coordinate federal, state, and local officials
for national prevention-based initiatives that involve significant
prospects of imminent prosecution.
c) Provide a central forum for agencies to congregate and identify
potential terrorism links among their investigations.
- Initiate Training Programs.
- Facilitate timely sharing
of information.
- Support the JTTF in all
operational aspects of terrorism investigations.
The Definition of Terrorism
Terrorism, in the broadest sense, is politically, religiously,
or socially motivated violence perpetrated against non-combative
targets by groups or individuals. This definition includes violence
directed at governmental entities as well as at private citizens,
and violence directed at people and property, all for the purpose
of forcibly changing public policy.
The District of Connecticut
Plan of Action
United States Attorney Kevin J. O'Connor heads the District of
Connecticut's Anti-Terrorism Advisory Council. John A. Danaher III,
who served as United States Attorney at the time of the September
11th attacks, currently serves as the Anti-Terrorism Advisory Council
Coordinator.
On September 18, 2001, the new Anti-Terrorism Advisory Council
established a basic membership that included state, federal and
local law enforcement. Since November 2002 numerous new member agencies
have joined the ATAC team bringing the current agency/department
strength to 67 agencies. The ATAC includes representation from the
following: 18 Federal agencies, 7 State of Connecticut agencies,
5 different units of the CT Department of Public Safety, 6 military
units, 24 local police departments and 7 other agencies. It meets
regularly to share information, coordinate investigative and prosecutorial
strategies and train law enforcement and other personnel.
The ATAC in the District of Connecticut has five goals:
Prevent, disrupt and
defeat terrorist operations before they occur.
Develop and implement
the full range of resources available to investigate terrorist incidents,
bringing the perpetrators to justice.
Vigorously prosecute
those who have committed, or intend to commit, terrorist acts in
the United States.
Protect critical infrastructure.
Deter threat and hoax
events that drain law enforcement and other first-responder resources.
Connecticut has always enjoyed an effective working relationship
among various federal, state and local law enforcement and prosecutorial
agencies. The effectiveness of those relationships, and of the new
ATAC, was put to the test in November 2001 when Ms. Otillie Lundgren,
a resident of Oxford, Connecticut, contracted inhalation anthrax
and died. The investigation of this tragic incident has been fully
supported by all entities involved and is continuing.
The Unique Posture of Connecticut
Although the State of Connecticut is the third smallest state in
the union, it is the home of many major defense contractors, including
Pratt & Whitney Aircraft, Sikorsky Aircraft, and Electric Boat.
In addition, the United States Navy maintains a submarine base in
Groton, Connecticut. There are twenty-five public airports in Connecticut,
two of which offer commercial service, including the ever-expanding
Bradley International, which also serves the Greater Springfield,
Massachusetts area from Windsor Locks. There are deep-water ports
at Bridgeport, New Haven and New London, as well as two nuclear
power generating stations, one of which has been deactivated.
Anti-Terrorism Accomplishments
The District of Connecticut has adopted a multi-pronged approach
in its anti-terrorism effort. The investigation and prosecution
of terrorist offenses, including fundraising in support of terrorist
organizations, is the District's highest priority. In order to convey
the seriousness of that commitment, and to achieve a deterrent effect,
we are committed to prosecuting terrorist hoax cases aggressively
and rapidly. We also ramped up the prosecution of passport fraud
and theft of identity cases, adding to the public perception that
crimes in those areas would not be tolerated in Connecticut. We
sought to improve relations with the Islamic community in Connecticut.
Shortly after 9/11, the Special Agent in Charge of the FBI and the
United States Attorney met with Imams from mosques around Connecticut,
assuring them of our willingness to prosecute, aggressively, any
crimes committed against their followers on the basis of religious
belief or ethnic heritage. We also sponsored a one-day training
session aimed at sensitizing law enforcement personnel to the concerns
of the Arab-American community.
We have embarked on many training programs for our ATAC. The first
ATAC training session for law enforcement officers was held on January
15, 2002. Since then, the following full-day or longer training
sessions have been completed for law enforcement officers, fire
fighters, emergency planning directors, Public Health professionals,
medical first responders and numerous others from the private and
public sector who serve as our first line of defense against terrorism
related crimes:
November 18, 2002 ATAC members at CSP HQ
March 25, 2003 ATAC members at New Haven
April 14 &15, 2003 Funding for training at the Arnold Markle
Symposium at Ledyard
"New Advances in the War on Terrorism"
June 11, 2003 ATAC Meeting with Attorney General John Ashcroft
at New Haven
June 17, 2003 Joint seminar with the Rhode Island ATAC at Warwick,
RI
September 25 & 26 Forensic Epidemiology seminar at Avon,
CT
October 15, 2003 ATAC members at CSP HQ
December 3rd and 4th, 2003 Forensic Epidemiology seminar at
Westbrook, CT
January 14, 2004 ATAC members at New Haven
March, 2004 Coordination with Connecticut Department of Health
and EPA to produce four seminars at Rocky Hill, Groton, Litchfield
and Southbury regarding Drinking Water Safety and Security
March 18, 2004 ATAC Madrid train bombings update and railroad
security in Connecticut at New Haven
April 13, 2004 ATAC members at BDL
April 27, 2004 ATAC training provided at the Concord, NH NESPIN
conference
May 10, 2004 ATAC special committee meetings at New Haven
July 14, 2004 ATAC meeting at Millstone Nuclear Generating Station
August 26, 2004 ATAC Executive Committee meeting at Wallingford, CT regarding railroad security in Connecticut for the Republican National Convention and other topics
Airport Security Initiative. We recently identified
all private and small commercial airports and heliports in Connecticut.
We then located the local law enforcement entity responsible for
the jurisdiction where each such airport is located. We prepared
an advisory notice, intended to recruit those airports' owners and
operators to assist us in identifying any suspicious activities
at those airports. Finally, we asked a local law enforcement representative
for each airport and heliport to visit the facility in their area,
become acquainted with the owner or operator, and provide such individuals
with the advisory notice. As a result of this program, we have completed
a database that identifies each airport and heliport in Connecticut,
the owner and operator for each airport, and the local law enforcement
contact for that airport. The database has been provided to numerous
state and federal agencies involved in aviation security matters.
In addition, the airport owner and operators have been educated
on how to assist in the fight against terrorism and were given twenty-four
hour contact information for local law enforcement, FBI, and the
Connecticut Department of Public Safety, Division of Homeland Security.
Anthrax Possession. A University of Connecticut graduate
student was charged with the unlawful possession of anthrax. In
November 2001, the student retained a portion of anthrax, which
had been used for research, after the University ordered that it
be destroyed. Because of his assistance to law enforcement, the
student was offered and agreed to enter a pre-trial diversion program.
He is prohibited from having any access to biological materials
of a hazardous nature.
Defense Contractor Project. In the first such initiative
undertaken in the United States, in January, 2003, twenty employees
of subcontractors working at the Sikorsky Aircraft Corporation in
Stratford were arrested and charged with possession and use of false
immigration documents, the use and possession of false social security
cards, and making false statements concerning past criminal history
in order to obtain security access to facilities containing restricted
and sensitive military technology. All of the defendants pleaded
guilty and have been sentenced except for one individual who was
convicted at trial on April 19, 2004. That defendant failed to list
two prior felony convictions on his application for a restricted
access badge. Both of those prior convictions had resulted in the
defendant being incarcerated for approximately three years.
"The false documents and other information allegedly provided
by these individuals allowed them to clear their background investigations,"
stated U.S. Attorney Kevin J. O'Connor. "It is vital that the
security of our defense infrastructure is not jeopardized by individuals
who may gain access through fraudulent means." O'Connor also
praised Sikorsky for its participation in and full cooperation with
the ATAC's investigation.
We have visited other defense contractors, together with Supervisory
Special Agents from DCIS, BICE, and SSA/OIG, setting up pipelines
to investigate and prosecute export violations, fraud against the
government, and to identify identity theft or other fraud among
employees. Two recent export prosecutions include United States
v. Omega Engineering, Inc. (referred to previously) and United
States v. Ahmed, et al. In Omega, the company and its
Chief Financial Officer were convicted of illegally sending equipment,
which could be used in nuclear production, to Pakistan. Guilty pleas
were also obtained in Ahmed, where the defendants falsely
claimed that certain military technology was destined for the Bangladeshi
Air Force.
We recently visited the Millstone Nuclear Power Station to assist
its security personnel in its employee screening processes. Following
a review of over 1,700 employee records, led by the Social Security
Administration Office of Inspector General, we confirmed that none
had used false social security or other documents to obtain employment,
nor had they lied about their criminal history. A similar program
is now underway at the US Navy submarine base at Groton.
Drinking Water Security.
We worked closely with the Department of Public Safety,
Division of Homeland Security, the Connecticut Department of Public
Health and the Environmental Protection Agency to plan and provide
instructors for a very successful series of seminars. The seminars
were designed to train water company employees, law enforcement
personnel, first-responders and municipal officials in security
and safety of our drinking water facilities. The seminars were presented
in March 2004 at Rocky Hill, Groton, Litchfield and Southbury.
Hoax Cases. The months following September 11, 2001,
were marked by cases of domestic terrorism including anthrax hoaxes
that targeted state and federal employees, government office buildings,
and innocent citizens of Middle Eastern descent. There was also
an incident at the University of Connecticut where a graduate student
was found to be in unauthorized possession of anthrax, after having
been told to destroy it.
On October 11, 2001, one month to the day following the September
11 attacks, and after there had been deaths in other states attributed
to inhalation anthrax, an anthrax hoax was played out in Hartford
at the headquarters of the State Department of Environmental Protection.
The hoax prompted an all-out response of emergency personnel from
the FBI, State Police and State DEP. The building's 800 employees
were evacuated and some employees were forced to undergo decontamination.
FBI Special Agents pursued the matter vigorously – interviewing
numerous individuals, and polygraphing a number of employees. Eventually,
a DEP employee was indicted and subsequently convicted after trial
of making false statements to FBI agents in connection with their
investigation of the matter. The defendant had information that
the anthrax threat was a hoax but did not convey this information
when first interviewed and, indeed, misdirected the FBI by suggesting
that certain coworkers might be responsible when he had no reason
to believe that they were involved. Thereafter, numerous people
were needlessly decontaminated, and critical first-responder personnel,
as well as many other elements of law enforcement, were unnecessarily
detained at the hoax location. This was one of the first post-9/11
anthrax hoax prosecutions in the country.
On October 16, 2001, another defendant was arrested and charged
with threatening to use a weapon of mass destruction. The defendant
placed a 911 call from a phone booth to the Fairfield Police Department
claiming that court buildings in Stamford and Norwalk, and the federal
courthouse in Bridgeport had been "dusted." He also threatened
that schools and railroads would be next, that he was aligned with
the 9/11 hijackers and Al-Quaeda terrorists, and that the call was
not a hoax. The defendant was arrested a short time later at the
federal courthouse in Bridgeport where he had appeared for a pending
bankruptcy matter, and eventually pleaded guilty and was sentenced
to 6 months in prison.
In November 2001, another individual sent numerous letters threatening
anthrax contamination to various offices, including the Office of
the Governor, the Judicial Review Council, the U.S. Coast Guard
Office in Hartford and the U.S. Marine Corps Office in Danbury.
The letters stated "09.11.01 ANTHRAX IS DEADLY. YOU BREATH
AND DIE. THIS IS ONLY BEGINNING. AMERICANS WILL DIE. DEATH TO AMERICA
AND ISRAEL. ALLHU EKBER." The defendant was arrested on November
13, 2001 and later pleaded guilty to mailing a threatening communication
and was sentenced to serve 10 months in prison.
In December 2001, another individual was indicted on a charge of
making a false statement to FBI agents. The defendant told FBI agents
that he had overheard two men of Arab descent discussing plans to
mail multiple letters containing anthrax. A subsequent investigation
identified the claim as untrue. In April of 2002, the defendant
pleaded guilty to making a false statement and was sentenced to
30 days in prison.
On June 28, 2004 a former Bridgeport man was convicted at trial
on both counts of threatening the use of a weapon of mass destruction
and delivery of that threat through the mail. Evidence at the trial
indicated that in August of 2002, while incarcerated at the Cheshire
Correctional Institution, the man sent an envelope containing a
white powdery substance: a piece of paper with foreign handwriting
and prayers: and another piece of paper with the words “ANTRAX a/k/a
Bin Laden” written on it to the Connecticut State’s Attorney’s Office
in Bridgeport. The inmate had previously been prosecuted by the
State’s Attorney’s Office at Bridgeport and subsequently convicted
for aggravated sexual assault and five counts of risk of injury
to a minor.
Intelligence Information Sharing. The United States
Attorney’s Office has developed several extensive Email distribution
lists and since 2002 has used those lists to effectively distribute
a wide variety of useful intelligence and training-related information
on a daily basis. In addition, our Intelligence Research Specialist
maintains a computer-based library of essential Anti-Terrorism information
available for distribution upon request to any ATAC member. List
members include all of the representative agencies of the ATAC,
other law enforcement, public health, and first-responder officials
and members of the corporate security community.
Operation Eagle Strike. Our ATAC was an active participant
in Operation Eagle Strike, a national initiative headed by the Diplomatic
Security Service of the Department of State. This operation arose
from a scheme in which an individual in Qatar was found to have
sold American visas to a number of individuals who then used those
visas to illegally enter the United States. We received information
that four purchasers of those visas were residing in Connecticut.
All four were located, prosecuted, and convicted.
U.S. Arms Export and Diversion Cases: On September
22, 2003 the Chief Financial Officer of a Connecticut-based company
was sentenced to a ten-month term of incarceration, a three-year
term of supervised release and a $50,000.00 fine. In addition, the
company was ordered to pay a combined criminal and civil fine of
$500,000.00. The sentences resulted from convictions on charges
the CFO and the company unlawfully exported laboratory equipment
that the government believed was destined for nuclear weapons testing
and research by the government of Pakistan.
On April 15, 2004 a resident of Brooklyn, NY was indicted for the
illegal export of military parts and components to an Israeli company
without the required authorization from the U.S. Government. The
two-count indictment charged that the illegal activity
began in May 2003 and included shipping parts and components
for use in F-4 Phantom jet fighter aircraft, the Hawk missile guidance
system and military radar.
On May 10, 2004 a Bridgeport, CT based corporation pleaded guilty
to two counts of an Information that charged the company with exporting
defense articles and munitions items from the United States without
the necessary licenses and approvals. On the same date the son of
the owner of that company pleaded guilty to attempting to impede
federal agents who were conducting a search warrant at the company
by attempting to disable his computer during the search. The company
has agreed to pay a $500,000.00 criminal fine and to institute an
acceptable export compliance program. The prohibited items included
parts for use on military helicopters.
On May 10, 2004 a four-count indictment was unsealed that charged
a resident of Korea with violations of the Arms Export Control Act.
The man was arrested on April 1, 2004 at Dulles Airport in Virginia.
A co-conspirator remains at large. The charged violations include
the purchase of a new helicopter engine alleged to have been shipped
to the Malaysian military, which was instead routed to China. Also
charged was the attempt to purchase an additional three helicopter
engines.
Our Continuing Effort
The District of Connecticut ATAC meets quarterly to share intelligence
and investigative information, to discuss relevant projects and
to conduct specific training. A special fund was created by the
Department of Justice to help fund interagency communication, training
and intelligence coordination. We are using that fund to achieve
those objectives. We have recently expanded our ATAC membership
to reach a more geographically diverse area, including all of the
major population centers of the state.
We work very closely with the FBI Joint Terrorism Task Force ("JTTF"),
which has been in existence at the New Haven FBI office for five
years. We also work closely with the State of Connecticut Department
of Public Safety, Division of Homeland Security. We direct your
attention to their websites, found in our links section, for further
details regarding the excellent services being provided to our state
by the FBI's JTTF and the Connecticut State Police.
Our upcoming projects include a September 2004 seminar on the detection
and response to radiological-based weapons of mass destruction,
an ongoing project to monitor the safe transportation and disposal
of radioactive waste and the implementation of more anti-terrorism
training for recruit law enforcement officers.
The Patriot Act
To learn about the Patriot Act and other United States Department
of Justice Anti-Terrorism initiatives read the Preserving Life and
Liberty website www.lifeandliberty.gov.
The December 17, 2003 Homeland
Security Presidential Directive
Click here to view this directive, which describes Critical Infrastructure
Identification, Prioritization and Protection http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/releases/2003/12/20031217-5.html.
How You Can Help
Preventing terrorist acts requires that we be both diligent and
proactive in identifying, incapacitating, and punishing those groups
and individuals who would employ violence to impose their will on
public policy issues. Members of the public are invaluable resources
in our efforts to safeguard our citizens and their property. Rest
assured that the law enforcement community is doing its best to
keep us safe. You can help by offering your full support and cooperation
should your assistance be needed in an interview, request for documentation,
or request for information. You can also help by:
Learning
the normal routines of your neighborhoods, community and workplace.
Understanding these routines will help you spot anything out of
place.
Observing your
surroundings. Whether traveling, at work or at home be on the lookout
for suspicious packages, luggage or mail abandoned in a crowded
place like an office building, an airport, a school, or a shopping
center.
Listening
carefully. If you hear or know of someone who has bragged or talked
about plans to harm citizens in violent attacks or who claims membership
in a terrorist organization, take it seriously and report it to
law enforcement immediately.
If you see any activity that you deem suspicious, and possibly
linked to terrorism, please report it promptly to your local law
enforcement agency or to the following agencies:
The FBI Joint Terrorism Task Force (203) 503-5000
Connecticut Department of Public Safety, Division of Homeland Security
(866) 457-8477
|