Back to Speeches || NOAA Home |
Statement
by |
Honorable Deputy Chief of Mission Thandabantu Nhlapo, distinguished panelists and invited guests, thank you for attending this panel on the World Summit on Sustainable Development. Special thanks to the Women’s Aquatic Network for organizing this important discussion and to the South African Embassy for hosting it. Last month, I had the great honor and pleasure of being part of the U.S. delegation at the World Summit on Sustainable Development (or WSSD) in Johannesburg, South Africa. The WSSD served as a 10 year follow-up to the 1992 United Nations Conference on Environment and Development, also known as the Earth Summit. Like its predecessor, the WSSD sought to generate continued action on sustainable development and the environment. The expected outcomes were a negotiated text and an array of partnerships poised for continued collaboration. I will elaborate on these mechanisms in a moment. First, I would like to give you a picture of what is was like to be at the Summit:
How does all of this effect the fact that: “60 percent or more of world fisheries are judged to be fully exploited or overfished?” And that some 80 percent of the pollution load in the oceans originates from land-based activities? As Nitin Desai, United Nations Secretary-General of the World Summit and Under-Secretary-General for Economic and Social Affairs succinctly stated, “Johannesburg gives us a solid basis for implementation and action to go forward. Although the Johannesburg Plan of Implementation, (i.e., the negotiated outcome), is only some 50 pages long, it is more targeted and more focused than (the Earth Summit’s) Agenda 21. We have agreed on global priorities for action and we have agreed to take action." The negotiated text from Johannesburg includes:
Assistant Secretary Turner will elaborate on the text. However, to accomplish this work, not only governments — but NGOs, intergovernmental organizations and businesses — launched more than 300 voluntary initiatives. The U.S. government announced a White Water to Blue Water initiative. The initiative recognizes the critical land/sea link — that oceans and coasts are recipients of whatever happens upland and upstream. The initiative, therefore, seeks to build capacity for integrated, natural resource and ecosystem-based management of watersheds and marine ecosystems on a regional basis. The Departments of Commerce, Agriculture, State, and Interior, USAID, and EPA are working together — as well as with state and foreign governments, the private sector and NGOs — to launch a pilot in the Caribbean next year. We want to help the Caribbean basin countries promote better cross-border coordination for watershed and coastal management. This initiative
will also draw from or expand on existing efforts such as the U.S. Coral
Reef Task Force. Two weeks ago, the Task Force identified land-based
pollution as one of its key focus areas over the next three years. It
established a regional subcommittee to help support watershed-based
efforts in the United States and wider Caribbean region to address land-based
pollution and coastal zone activities affecting valuable coral reef
ecosystems. There are a host of other initiatives the U.S. government will pursue with its partners:
I could continue for the full hour and a half panel describing partnerships related to water and sanitation, large marine ecosystems, integrated global observation systems and other activities affecting the coastal and marine environment, but I will save time for the other panelists to speak! For those
who would compare Rio in 1992 with Johannesburg in 2002, remember that
in Rio we generated plans and promises — while in Johannesburg,
we engaged in the hard 1
BBC, 15 July 2002, ‘Poor Prospects for Earth Summit’ by
Alex Kirby
|