Managing Our Nation’s Fisheries: Past, Present and Future Thursday, November 13, 2003 Omni-Shoreman Hotel and Conference Center, Washington D.C. 2500 CALVERT STREET, NW Keynote Speaker Remarks - Vice Admiral Conrad Lautenbacher Thank you Bill for the kind introduction and thank you for all the hard work you’ve done these past few years to improve fisheries management. And thank you Deputy Secretary Bodman for agreeing to be a keynote speaker. We are saddened to know that you will be moving on to the Department of Treasury as you have been a valued friend to NOAA. We will miss you very much, but our loss is the Treasury Department’s gain. Thank you Senator Stevens for your opening remarks. You’ve really charged the room and set the tone for lively discussion and exchange of ideas for the rest of the conference! It’s always good to hear from you. Good morning. It is a great pleasure and privilege to be with you today and I thank NOAA Fisheries and the regional management councils for inviting me to be a part of today’s keynote address. This conference is the first of its kind to my knowledge. Never before have so many representatives of the regional fisheries management councils, NOAA, recreational and commercial fishing interests, NGOs, academia, congressional members and staff, the public and media been brought together to enter into a serious dialogue about what we are doing to protect and manage our nation’s living marine resources. A
New Way of NOAA Doing Business Additionally, NOAA is working to foster new partnerships and to bridge the gap between constituents and traditional “beltway politics”. Members of the NOAA Leadership team recognize the need for more communication with stakeholders and constituents, and as a result have conducted more outreach with fisheries constituents than ever in the past. I have held a number of constituent roundtables and meetings with diverse fisheries constituent groups. The head of NOAA Fisheries, Bill Hogarth, has also been extremely busy, conducting 17 constituent meetings throughout the country since May of this year. This was an unprecedented undertaking on Bill’s part and I don’t think fisheries constituents have ever had such access to the NOAA Assistant Administrator for Fisheries. Better
communication with constituents, honest dialog and transparency in
the fisheries management process are essential pieces to the very
complex puzzle of fisheries management. Also essential is understanding
the complexity of marine ecosystems and how we impact our coastal
and marine resources through various activities. Attempting to understand
those things has historical roots back to the creation of the original
national fisheries management organization. Seeking solutions to reverse
the decline of New England’s fisheries in 1871, Congress created
the U.S. Commission of Fish and Fisheries. The first appointed Commissioner,
Spencer Baird, initiated marine ecological studies as one of his first
priorities. According to Baird, our understanding of fish “...
would not be complete without a thorough knowledge of their associates
in the sea, especially of such as prey upon them or constitute their
food....” He understood that the presence or absence of fish
was related not only to fishing pressures, but also to the dynamics
of physical and chemical oceanography. The U.S. Commission of Fish
and Fisheries later became the National Marine Fisheries Service,
and fisheries management has been continually evolving into the process
we have today. The fisheries management process established by the Magnuson-Stevens Act is a dynamic and successful management regime that has evolved to meet new challenges. The public-private partnership of the regional fisheries management process is both democratic and transparent, although not without contention and dissension at times. Evaluating the effectiveness of the nation’s fisheries management process must be viewed as an evolutionary process that continues today. After more than 25 years, the collaborative stewardship between NOAA Fisheries, the regional councils, and our constituents has produced a world-class body of science and management strategies that are leading the way toward ecosystem management, international stewardship, and most importantly, the successful rebuilding and sustainable harvesting of our Nation’s fisheries. 1996
Reauthorization - SFA
The SFA also called for greater consideration of fishing communities and safety at sea, the formation of constituent advisory panels, and analysis of fishing capacity. Additionally, Congress, through the SFA, charged the National Marine Fisheries Service with assessing the extent to which ecosystem principles are used in fisheries management and research, and to recommend how such principles can be implemented further to improve our Nation’s management of living marine resources. An Ecosystem Principles Advisory Panel forged a consensus on how to expand the use of ecosystem principles in fishery management. They didn’t come up with a magic formula, but did offer a practical combination of principles and actions that they believe will propel management onto ecologically sustainable pathways. However, we expect that ecosystem-based fishery management will contribute to the stability of employment and economic activity in the fishing industry and to the protection of marine biodiversity on which fisheries depend. The SFA provided NOAA Fisheries with a number of necessary tools to meet the challenges of the new millennium as world-class leaders in fishery stewardship. The agency has placed a stronger emphasis on reducing bycatch, protecting marine habitats, halting overfishing, and rebuilding fish stocks to sustainable levels. We already have seen many fish stocks rebound as a direct result of the changes to the Magnuson-Stevens Act. However, the true magnitude of our achievements has yet to be realized, as these sweeping changes to the Act have been in place for a relatively short period of time. It will likely take many years before the results can be fully realized. In the meantime, NOAA Fisheries has made a number of important strides for which I would like to commend them. Achievement:
Status of the Stocks Rebuilding a depleted stock to a point where it can be fished sustainably is the desired outcome best or the environment and the economy. NOAA Fisheries and the regional fisheries management councils strongly believe we should do what we can to preserve fishing as an important part of local economies and the overall national economy. Fishing communities are an important part of the fabric of the American way of life. In the few short years since implementing the SFA, we already have begun to witness the benefits of stewardship and sustainable harvests. For example, in 2002, commercial fishermen brought 908.1 million pounds of fish and shellfish to the port of Dutch Harbor-Unalaska, Alaska — an increase of 73.6 million pounds over 2001 landings — surpassing the 32-year volume record of 848.2 million pounds held by the port in Los Angeles, California. As the world’s 5th largest fishing nation, our total commercial landings in 2002 totaled 9.4 billion pounds, worth $3.1 billion (exvessel). Additionally, the recreational fishing industry in the United States makes an enormous contribution to the U.S. economy. Over 17 million Americans participated in recreational fishing in 2002, making over 65 million fishing trips and supporting almost 350,000 jobs with an economic impact of more than $30 billion. Healthy fish stocks are critical to maintaining this economic base. Achievement:
Habitat Restoration Achievement:
Better Data Collection and Research Achievement:
NEPA Compliance Achievement:
Bycatch reduction In March 2003, NOAA Fisheries unveiled its strategy to further reduce bycatch and achieve the national goal of minimizing bycatch and the mortality of bycatch to the extent practicable through regional approaches and implementation plans. The strategy also includes an initiative to develop new international approaches to reducing bycatch on a global scale. Achievement:
Capacity Reduction Achievement:
Cooperative research programs with the fishing industry Challenges
for the Future Challenge:
The Need for Better International Fisheries Management Challenge:
Earth Observation System I mentioned before that we are changing the way we are doing business and we are trying to be more responsive to our constituent-base. NOAA has also embarked upon an exciting new initiative aimed at understanding the Earth and its complex systems. I strongly believe we have reached a time for an “Earth Science Renaissance” - a new era where human ingenuity must be applied to develop a deeper understanding of the complex systems of Planet Earth. To that end, NOAA is committed to the development of a comprehensive, integrated and sustained Earth observing system that will link thousands of individual technological assets, including space-borne, airborne and in situ observation systems around the world. The information obtained from an Earth observing system, particularly the ocean observing portion of it, will be of great value to fisheries managers. By better understanding the physical, chemical, and biological components of our oceans, and how those factors interact, I expect that we will greatly improve our understanding of ocean and coastal ecosystems, as well as the impact of humans on those systems. Given the difficult social and economic issues facing the world, the time has come to move beyond considering the separate disciplines of science as "stand alone" components of the big picture of life on Earth toward a broader ecosystem-level approach. We need to ask how the parts fit together and function as a whole. By aligning the organization, mission and research agenda of NOAA in a way that looks at the whole Earth system, we are poised to fully understand and implement ecosystem-based management of our marine and coastal resources such that we can manage our coastal and marine resources in a responsible, sustainable manner for generations to come. Sustainable management of our fisheries resources is also the goal NOAA Fisheries as well as the Magnuson-Stevens Act. Challenge:
Magnuson-Stevens Reauthorization
The fisheries management process has undergone dramatic change since the 1970s, when eliminating foreign fishing and developing domestic fisheries were the primary objectives. Today, the regional management framework has become a leading forum for advancing science-based management of living marine resources. Together, the regional fishery management councils and NOAA Fisheries continue managing our ocean resources for the maximum benefit to the nation, ensuring long-term recreational fishing opportunities for the American public, supporting coastal communities and fishing families, and maintaining a sustainable seafood supply. I wholeheartedly agree with a statement Bill Hogarth made recently, “Our fisheries management system is one of the most successful in the world, and with refinement, we can look forward to an even better system.” Hopefully the reauthorization of the Magnuson-Stevens Act will provide that needed refinement. With that I will close my remarks and invite you to enjoy the rest of your time here. I’ve looked at the agenda and it is ambitious, but should provide a great venue for meaningful dialogue and hopefully the generation of new ideas on how to solve these complicated problems.
|