Testimony
of Robert J. Garrity, Jr., Deputy Assistant Director, Records
Management Division, FBI
Before the House of Representatives, Committee on Science
February 25,
2004
"The FBI's Role in Vetting Foreign Visa Applicants Under
The Visa Mantis Program"
Mr. Chairman
and members of the Committee, thank you for inviting Assistant
Director Hooton here today to testify in this hearing, in
which the Committee is reviewing the conflict between science
and security in visa policy. Unfortunately, Mr. Hooton could
not be here today, so I have been designated to provide testimony
in his stead. My name is Robert Garrity, and I have served
as an FBI Special Agent since 1976. I currently serve as the
Deputy Assistant Director of one of the FBI's newest divisions,
the Records Management Division (RMD). My goal today is to
discuss the FBI's role in vetting foreign visa applicants
under the Visa Mantis program. First, I would like to say
that the FBI appreciates the Committee's interest in this
subject and hopes that the General Accounting Office (GAO)
found us both cooperative and forthcoming in developing their
report on Improvements Needed to Reduce Time Taken to Adjudicate
Visas for Science Students and Scholars.
FBI
Name Check Process
The FBI
receives information on the applicants from the Department
of State via computer disc, cable, or manual (facsimile) submissions.
The requests are entered into the FBI's National Name Check
Program (NNCP). The information is searched against the FBI
Universal Indices (UNI). The searches seek all instances of
the individual's name and approximate date of birth, whether
a main file name or reference. By way of explanation, a main
file name is that of an individual who is the subject of an
FBI investigation, whereas a reference is someone whose name
appears in an FBI investigation. References may be associates,
witnesses, co-conspirators, or victims whose names have been
indexed for later retrieval. The names are searched in a multitude
of combinations, switching the order of first, last, middle
names, as well as combinations with just the first and last,
first and middle, et cetera. It also searches different phonetic
spelling variations of the names, especially important considering
that many names in our indices have been transliterated from
a language other than English.
If there is a match with a name in a FBI record, it is designated
as a "Hit," meaning that the system has stopped
on a possible match with the name being checked, but now a
human being must review the file or index entry to further
refine the names "Hit" upon. If the search develops
a name and birth date match, it is designated an "Ident."
An "Ident" is usually easier to resolve.
Approximately
85% of name checks are electronically returned to the Department
of State as having "No Record" within 72 hours.
A "No Record" indicates that the FBI's Central Records
System contains no identifiable information regarding this
individual. By agreement with the Department of State, partially
due to our concern about the time factors in approving visa
requests, a "No Record" equates to a "No Objection"
to the issuance of a visa. The investigative divisions in
the FBI, (i.e., the Counterterrorism Division, the Counterintelligence
Division, the Criminal Investigative Division, and the Cyber
Division) do not review visa requests where there is no record
of the individual. Duplicate submissions (i.e., identically
spelled names with identical dates of birth submitted within
the last 120 days) are not checked and the duplicate findings
are returned to State.
With
the remaining 15% that were not immediately eliminated as
a "No Record," because a name and birth date are
not sufficient to positively correlate the file with an individual,
additional review is required. A secondary manual name search
usually identifies an additional 10% of the requests as also
not being identical to an individual in our files, for a 95%
overall "No Record" response rate. This is usually
accomplished within a week of the request. The remaining 5%
are identified as possibly being the subject of an FBI record.
The FBI record must now be retrieved and reviewed. If the
records were electronically uploaded into the FBI Automated
Case Support (ACS) electronic record-keeping system, it can
be viewed quickly. If not, the relevant information must be
retrieved from the existing paper record. Review of this information
will determine whether the information is identified with
the subject of the request. If not, the request is closed
as a "No Record."
The information
in the file is reviewed for possible derogatory information.
Less than 1% of the requests are identified with an individual
with information that is derogatory or poses concern to the
FBI about having access to sensitive or special U. S. technologies.
These requests are forwarded to the appropriate FBI investigative
division for further analysis. If the investigative division
determines there is no objection to the visa request, the
request is returned to the name check dissemination desk for
forwarding to the Department of State. Results of the name
check process are returned to the Department of State twice
weekly by computer disc or telephonically in expedited requests.
If there
is an objection to the visa request, the investigative division
will prepare a written Security Advisory Opinion and forward
it separately to the Department of State. In instances where
the investigative division determines it appropriate, that
individual will be placed on a watch list. In reviewing these
visa requests, the FBI has, in the past, identified individuals
attempting to enter the United States who are of serious concern
to the FBI.
I want
to emphasize to you that the FBI is sensitive to the impact
that delays in visa processing of students and scholars may
have on business, education, foreign relations, and worldwide
perceptions of the United States. With these considerations
in mind, the FBI is working diligently with the Department
of State toward the common goal of improving the expediency
and efficiency of the visa clearance process. At the same
time, the consequences of the FBI’s mission on homeland
security requires that our name check process be primarily
focused on accurate and thorough results. This means that
there are instances when the FBI’s review of a visa
request must require as much time as needed to obtain an unequivocally
correct result.
Processing
Times
The FBI’s
goal is to have all visa requests completed within 120 days.
Attachment A illustrates the current status of how long it
takes to complete Visas Mantis name checks. This status is
current as of February 23, 2004. For Visas Mantis, the FBI
received 1,522 requests in the month of January 2004 and by
February 23 had resolved 1,334, or 88% of them. In the month
of December 2003, the FBI received 1,446 Visas Mantis requests
and by February 23 had resolved all but 130 of these requests
for a 91% resolution rate. The percentages continue to rise
over time, with 95% of Visas Mantis requests resolved within
90 days. Visas Mantis are particularly difficult to resolve
due to the predominance of requests from China and the commonality
of Asian names.
A common
question we receive is, "How long does it take
to complete a visa request name check?" As shown on the
graph, 88% are completed in 30 days and 98% of the requests
are resolved in 120 days. Most name check requests that are
over 60 days old are the result of the time required to retrieve
and review field office record information. Some delay occurs
at substantive analysts’ desks, but this is to be expected.
These analysts are assigned to an investigative division
and
are primarily assigned to the analysis of intelligence reports
from around the world in order to support on-going investigations,
or to support the flow of intelligence to policy makers.
Despite
these significant and voluminous responsibilities, these
are the best professionals to review information in our records
and to then make an informed decision on whether a requester
of a visa represents a threat to our homeland, or is interested
in illegally acquiring targeted U. S. special technology.
You will understand, however, that with the press of other
business, the reviews of visa requests do not always achieve
the analysts' highest priority in their assigned work. I
would
add, in response to one of the questions posed in the invitation
to testify before this Committee, that the investigative
divisions
believe the information found in the Visas Mantis requests
they review is of use in their other responsibilities.
FBI
Visa Tracking System
The FBI's
name check application accurately tracks each visa request
within the our name check process. At any moment, we are able
to electronically retrieve the status of an individual request,
including where it is within the name check process, determine
which requests have been pending for a certain period of time,
identify the FBI files associated with an individual, ascertain
the result of a name search, identify the type of visa request,
and generate the data found in Attachment A. This tracking
capability serves not only the 200,000 visa requests submitted
each year, but also the other 6.1 million requests submitted
by over 70 other federal, state, and local agencies.
Process
Improvement
We are
working together with the Department of State to ensure that
all old visa requests are accounted for and processed. This
is being accomplished through a systematic comparison between
the FBI name checks and the Department of State's visa databases.
We closely monitored student visa submissions for this school
year and believe that we were able to meet this seasonal demand.
We are using the National Academy of Sciences' data to assist
us in monitoring our response time for both students and visiting
scholars. We have a public inquiry system where we check the
status of individual cases. This system has been helpful in
identifying and resolving individual problems. We have not
detected any systematic problems associated with our review
process.
However,
the FBI recognizes that the increase in numbers of requests
necessitates the development of even more efficient processes
in order to sustain the current pace of processing name check
requests. We are in the process of implementing a number of
interim improvements to minimize manual submissions by all
agencies and increase efficiency within the name check process.
In addition, the FBI has developed high-level functional requirements
for a new name check application that would be compatible
with these improvements. The new name check application is
now undergoing review within the FBI's Information Technology
Investment Management Process.
Additionally,
the FBI is participating in the development of the Department
of State's new visa database. As the existing FBI name check
system is a legacy system that serves numerous other agencies,
the data from the new Department of State database must be
translated before it can enter into the FBI's name check system.
This is not an insurmountable obstacle. Current planning is
focused on the optimum manner to move requests from the Department
of State to the FBI. In the interim, the Department of State
submits requests to the FBI from its new database by computer
disc. This process is highly reliable and has improved processing
times.
Decentralized
Recordkeeping System
As I
stated earlier, a significant factor in any delay in the FBI
responding to a visa name check is retrieval of information
from paper files. While many FBI files are available electronically,
the majority of Visas Mantis checks pending over 60 days require
review of physical, paper records currently stored at one
of approximately 265 locations worldwide. FBI files are currently
stored at FBI Headquarters, all 56 field offices, many of
the larger of our 400 resident agencies, several warehouses
around the country, in records centers operated either by
the National Archives and Records Administration (NARA) or
a commercial concern, four large Information Technology Center
facilities on the east and west coast, and at Legal Attaché
offices worldwide. Delays result from NNCP personnel identifying
a file’s location and then requesting the relevant information
from a field office. Time delays mount as field office staff
search file rooms and then fax or ship copies of the needed
file or a prepared summary to FBI Headquarters. This process,
repeated for many tasks, not only dilutes the FBI’s
responsiveness, but also limits information sharing, a critical
success factor in protecting the security of our homeland
and working counterintelligence and counterterrorism cases.
One possible
solution to these problems the FBI is exploring is the establishment
of a central records complex where all of our closed paper
files would be located, and our active files stored electronically.
Our frequently requested closed files could be scanned and
uploaded into our electronic record-keeping system, so that
Agents and analysts worldwide would have instant electronic
access to the information they require for their jobs.
Conclusion
The FBI
recognizes the importance of accurate and timely name check
processing. I want to emphasize to you, this issue has the
full attention of Director Mueller and Assistant Director
Hooton. The FBI appreciates the interest of the Committee
in this matter. To ensure the Committee's specific pre-testimonial
questions have been answered, I have attached an addendum
that discusses them directly. The FBI welcomes any further
study by the GAO on this issue. I am prepared to answer any
questions the Committee may have.
Addendum
- Responses to Questions
To ensure
the Committee's specific pre-testimonial questions have been
answered, they are recited here with the FBI answer:
Q.
How are Visa Mantis requests currently transmitted from the
State Department to the FBI and from the FBI to the State
Department?
A. The
FBI receives Visas Mantis requests from the Department of
State via computer disc, cable, or manual (facsimile) submissions.
Results of the name check process are returned to the Department
of State twice weekly by computer disc or telephonically in
expedited requests.
Q.
What is your internal process for tracking a Visas Mantis
case? How often is that information available electronically?
And how often must that file be located physically? What are
your plans to fully automate this process? Have there been
cases where a file has not been located and the applicant
is still pending a response?
A. The
FBI's name check application accurately tracks each visa request
within the our name check process. At any moment, we are able
to electronically determine the status of an individual request,
including where it is within the name check process, determine
which requests have been pending for a certain period of time,
identify the FBI files associated with an individual, ascertain
the result of a name search, identify the type of visa request,
and generate a status report. We do not keep track of how
often a paper file must be located, as opposed to having the
information in our electronic recordkeeping system. As stated
in my testimony, each name check entails every combination
of the first, middle, and last name, which means that records
may be found responsive for each combination. In addition,
often there is a combination of paper and electronic files
for each name. So, with one name check there may be numerous
files, both paper and electronic, on a combination of name
variations. As our system cannot quantify these numbers for
us, it is too large a task to manually count and I cannot
state how many name checks have required paper files. However,
on February 23 there were 203 names that were pending over
60 days. It would be safe to assume most of these name checks
required review of paper files. While we intend to fully exploit
information technology, the system will never be fully automated.
Files and information must be reviewed by human beings, which
cannot be automated.
Now,
if the question is more appropriately, when will it be fully
electronic or the paper records digitized, the answer depends
on our success in building a new central records complex and
relocating all closed files to that location where the files
of interest can be scanned-on-demand by an agent or analyst.
There have been instances where files have not been located,
but by agreement with the State Department, the FBI may close
a case administratively if there are no counterintelligence
or counterterrorism files associated with the name.
Q.
What priority do Visas Mantis investigations have among other
FBI work? How do you think these waits impact your ability,
and the ability of other law enforcement agencies, to identify
and capture a terrorist as opposed to simply preventing him
or her from entering the country at that particular post?
A. Within
the NNCP, they are a very high priority together with other
homeland security name checks. As stated, the NNCP can resolve
99% of the name checks, with only 1% of the names and related
files having to be reviewed by an investigative division.
Within the investigative divisions, review of these files
is usually assigned to intelligence analysts. These analysts
are primarily assigned to the analysis of intelligence reports
from around the world in order to support on-going investigations,
or to support the flow of intelligence to policy makers. Despite
these significant and voluminous responsibilities, these are
the best professionals to review information in our records
and to then make an informed decision on whether a requester
of a visa represents a threat to our homeland, or is interested
in illegally acquiring targeted U. S. special technology.
Despite the press of other business, the reviews of Visas
Mantis requests by the investigative divisions generally are
handled expeditiously.
As for
the impact of these waits on the ability to identify and capture
a terrorist as opposed to simply preventing him or her from
entering the country, I am not sure that can be quantified.
However, I can say that the investigative divisions believe
the information found in the Visa Mantis requests they review
is of use in their other responsibilities.
Q.
What steps are you taking to make [the] FBI's systems interoperable
with the State Department, which recently invested about $1
million to upgrade its technology for transmitting Visas Mantis
requests? Until systems are interoperable, how will information
be transmitted and what impact will it have on processing
time?
A. The
FBI is participating in the development of the Department
of State's new visa database. Current planning is focused
on the optimum manner to move requests from the Department
of State to the FBI. In the interim, the Department of State
submits requests to the FBI from its new database by computer
disc. This process is highly reliable and has improved processing
times.
Q.
How satisfied are you about the appropriateness of the cases
referred for additional review under Mantis? Are consular
officers providing agents with enough information and the
right type of information in their requests?
A. The
name check process culls out 99% of the Visas Mantis submissions
prior to review by the investigative divisions. The information
they review is useful and is focused appropriately on sensitive
technology.
Q.
What steps have you taken to improve the visa application
vetting process? In light of the fact that there have been
lengthy waits and there are still Mantis cases that have been
pending more than 60 days, what measures do you have underway
that will identify and resolve these cases?
A. We
are in the process of implementing a number of interim improvements
to minimize manual submissions by all agencies and increase
efficiency within the name check process. The FBI has developed
high-level functional requirements for a new name check application
that will be compatible with the new FBI information systems
in development. These new information systems, over time,
will eliminate dependence on the retrieval of paper files.
The development of this new name check application is now
undergoing review within the FBI's Information Technology
Investment Management Process.
|