[Federal Register: September 30, 2004 (Volume 69, Number 189)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 58304-58310]
From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]
[DOCID:fr30se04-15]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
40 CFR Part 180
[OPP-2004-0313; FRL-7678-8]
Mesotrione; Pesticide Tolerances for Emergency Exemptions
AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This regulation establishes a time-limited tolerance for
residues of mesotrione, 2-[4-(methylsulfonyl)-2-nitrobenzoyl]-1,3-
cyclohexanedione, in or on cranberry. This action is in response to
EPA's granting of an emergency exemption under section 18 of the
Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act (FIFRA) authorizing
use of the pesticide on cranberry. This regulation establishes a
maximum permissible level for residues of mesotrione in this food
commodity. The tolerance will expire and is revoked on December 31,
2007.
DATES: This regulation is effective September 30, 2004. Objections and
requests for hearings must be received on or before November 29, 2004.
ADDRESSES: To submit a written objection or hearing request follow the
detailed instructions as provided in Unit VII. of the SUPPLEMENTARY
INFORMATION. EPA has established a docket for this action under Docket
identification (ID) number OPP-2004-0313. All documents in the docket
are listed in the EDOCKET index at http://www.epa.gov/edocket. Although
listed in the index, some information is not publicly available, i.e.,
CBI or other information whose disclosure is restricted by statute.
Certain other material, such as copyrighted material, is not placed on
the Internet and will be publicly available only in hard copy form.
Publicly available docket materials are available either electronically
in EDOCKET or in hard copy at the Public Information and Records
Integrity Branch (PIRIB), Rm. 119, Crystal Mall 2, 1801 South
Bell St., Arlington, VA. This docket facility is open from 8:30 a.m. to
4 p.m., Monday through Friday, excluding legal
[[Page 58305]]
holidays. The docket telephone number is (703) 305-5805.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Libby Pemberton, Registration Division
(7505C), Office of Pesticide Programs, Environmental Protection Agency,
1200 Pennsylvania Ave., NW., Washington, DC 20460-0001; telephone
number: (703) 308-9364; e-mail address: Sec-18-Mailbox@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. General Information
A. Does this Action Apply to Me?
You may be potentially affected by this action if you are an
agricultural producer, food manufacturer, or pesticide manufacturer.
Potentially affected entities may include, but are not limited to:
Crop production (NAICS code 111)
Animal production (NAICS code 112)
Food manufacturing (NAICS code 311)
Pesticide manufacturing (NAICS code 32532).
This listing is not intended to be exhaustive, but rather provides
a guide for readers regarding entities likely to be affected by this
action. Other types of entities not listed in this unit could also be
affected. The North American Industrial Classification System (NAICS)
codes have been provided to assist you and others in determining
whether this action might apply to certain entities. If you have any
questions regarding the applicability of this action to a particular
entity, consult the person listed under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT.
B. How Can I Access Electronic Copies of this Document and Other
Related Information?
In addition to using EDOCKET (http://www.epa.gov/edocket/), you may
access this Federal Register document electronically through the EPA
Internet under the ``Federal Register'' listings at http://www.epa.gov/fedrgstr/.
A frequently updated electronic version of 40 CFR part 180
is available at E-CFR Beta Site Two at http://www.gpoaccess.gov/ecfr/.
II. Background and Statutory Findings
EPA, on its own initiative, in accordance with sections 408(e) and
408(l)(6) of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (FFDCA), 21
U.S.C. 346a, is establishing a tolerance for residues of the herbicide
mesotrione, 2-[4-(methylsulfonyl)-2-nitrobenzoyl]-1,3-cyclohexanedione,
in or on cranberry at 0.01 parts per million (ppm). This tolerance will
expire and is revoked on December 31, 2007. EPA will publish a document
in the Federal Register to remove the revoked tolerance from the Code
of Federal Regulations.
Section 408(l)(6) of the FFDCA requires EPA to establish a time-
limited tolerance or exemption from the requirement for a tolerance for
pesticide chemical residues in food that will result from the use of a
pesticide under an emergency exemption granted by EPA under section 18
of FIFRA. Such tolerances can be established without providing notice
or period for public comment. EPA does not intend for its actions on
section 18 related tolerances to set binding precedents for the
application of section 408 of the FFDCA and the new safety standard to
other tolerances and exemptions. Section 408(e) of the FFDCA allows EPA
to establish a tolerance or an exemption from the requirement of a
tolerance on its own initiative, i.e., without having received any
petition from an outside party.
Section 408(b)(2)(A)(i) of the FFDCA allows EPA to establish a
tolerance (the legal limit for a pesticide chemical residue in or on a
food) only if EPA determines that the tolerance is ``safe.'' Section
408(b)(2)(A)(ii) of the FFDCA defines ``safe'' to mean that ``there is
a reasonable certainty that no harm will result from aggregate exposure
to the pesticide chemical residue, including all anticipated dietary
exposures and all other exposures for which there is reliable
information.'' This includes exposure through drinking water and in
residential settings, but does not include occupational exposure.
Section 408(b)(2)(C) of the FFDCA requires EPA to give special
consideration to exposure of infants and children to the pesticide
chemical residue in establishing a tolerance and to ``ensure that there
is a reasonable certainty that no harm will result to infants and
children from aggregate exposure to the pesticide chemical residue. . .
.''
Section 18 of the FIFRA authorizes EPA to exempt any Federal or
State agency from any provision of FIFRA, if EPA determines that
``emergency conditions exist which require such exemption.'' This
provision was not amended by the Food Quality Protection Act of 1996
(FQPA). EPA has established regulations governing such emergency
exemptions in 40 CFR part 166.
III. Emergency Exemption for Mesotrione on Cranberry and FFDCA
Tolerances
The States claim that emergency situations have occurred due to new
pests that have been introduced into cranberry producing areas. Oregon
and Washington have both declared crisis exemptions under FIFRA section
18 for the use of mesotrione on cranberry for control of several
broadleaf weeds. EPA concurs that emergency conditions exist for these
States.
As part of its assessment of this emergency exemption, EPA assessed
the potential risks presented by residues of mesotrione in or on
cranberry. In doing so, EPA considered the safety standard in section
408(b)(2) of the FFDCA, and EPA decided that the necessary tolerance
under section 408(l)(6) of the FFDCA would be consistent with the
safety standard and with FIFRA section 18. Consistent with the need to
move quickly on the emergency exemption in order to address an urgent
non-routine situation and to ensure that the resulting food is safe and
lawful, EPA is issuing this tolerance without notice and opportunity
for public comment as provided in section 408(l)(6) of the FFDCA.
Although this tolerance will expire and is revoked on December 31,
2007, under section 408(l)(5) of the FFDCA, residues of the pesticide
not in excess of the amounts specified in the tolerance remaining in or
on cranberry after that date will not be unlawful, provided the
pesticide is applied in a manner that was lawful under FIFRA, and the
residues do not exceed a level that was authorized by this tolerance at
the time of that application. EPA will take action to revoke this
tolerance earlier if any experience with, scientific data on, or other
relevant information on this pesticide indicate that the residues are
not safe.
Because this tolerance is being approved under emergency
conditions, EPA has not made any decisions about whether mesotrione
meets EPA's registration requirements for use on cranberry or whether a
permanent tolerance for this use would be appropriate. Under these
circumstances, EPA does not believe that this tolerance serves as a
basis for registration of mesotrione by a State for special local needs
under FIFRA section 24(c). Nor does this tolerance serve as the basis
for any State other than Oregon and Washington to use this pesticide on
this crop under section 18 of FIFRA without following all provisions of
EPA's regulations implementing FIFRA section 18 as identified in 40 CFR
part 166. For additional information regarding the emergency exemption
for mesotrione, contact the Agency's Registration Division at the
address provided underFOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT.
[[Page 58306]]
IV. Aggregate Risk Assessment and Determination of Safety
EPA performs a number of analyses to determine the risks from
aggregate exposure to pesticide residues. For further discussion of the
regulatory requirements of section 408 of the FFDCA and a complete
description of the risk assessment process, see the final rule on
Bifenthrin Pesticide Tolerances (62 FR 62961, November 26, 1997) (FRL-
5754-7).
Consistent with section 408(b)(2)(D) of the FFDCA, EPA has reviewed
the available scientific data and other relevant information in support
of this action. EPA has sufficient data to assess the hazards of
mesotrione and to make a determination on aggregate exposure,
consistent with section 408(b)(2) of the FFDCA, for a time-limited
tolerance for residues of mesotrione in or on cranberry at 0.01 ppm.
EPA's assessment of the dietary exposures and risks associated with
establishing the tolerance follows.
A. Toxicological Endpoints
The dose at which no adverse effects are observed (the NOAEL) from
the toxicology study identified as appropriate for use in risk
assessment is used to estimate the toxicological endpoint. However, the
lowest dose at which adverse effects of concern are identified (the
LOAEL) is sometimes used for risk assessment if no NOAEL was achieved
in the toxicology study selected. An uncertainty factor (UF) is applied
to reflect uncertainties inherent in the extrapolation from laboratory
animal data to humans and in the variations in sensitivity among
members of the human population as well as other unknowns. An UF of 100
is routinely used, 10X to account for interspecies differences and 10X
for intraspecies differences.
For dietary risk assessment (other than cancer) the Agency uses the
UF to calculate an acute or chronic reference dose (acute RfD or
chronic RfD) where the RfD is equal to the NOAEL divided by the
appropriate UF (RfD = NOAEL/UF). Where an additional safety factor (SF)
is retained due to concerns unique to the FQPA, this additional factor
is applied to the RfD by dividing the RfD by such additional factor.
The acute or chronic Population Adjusted Dose (aPAD or cPAD) is a
modification of the RfD to accommodate this type of FQPA SF.
For non-dietary risk assessments (other than cancer) the UF is used
to determine the level of concern (LOC). For example, when 100 is the
appropriate UF (10X to account for interspecies differences and 10X for
intraspecies differences) the LOC is 100. To estimate risk, a ratio of
the NOAEL to exposures (margin of exposure (MOE) = NOAEL/exposure) is
calculated and compared to the LOC.
The linear default risk methodology (Q*) is the primary method
currently used by the Agency to quantify carcinogenic risk. The Q*
approach assumes that any amount of exposure will lead to some degree
of cancer risk. A Q* is calculated and used to estimate risk which
represents a probability of occurrence of additional cancer cases
(e.g., risk is expressed as 1 x 10-\6\ or one in a million).
Under certain specific circumstances, MOE calculations will be used for
the carcinogenic risk assessment. In this non-linear approach, a
``point of departure'' is identified below which carcinogenic effects
are not expected. The point of departure is typically a NOAEL based on
an endpoint related to cancer effects though it may be a different
value derived from the dose response curve. To estimate risk, a ratio
of the point of departure to exposure (MOEcancer = point of
departure/exposures) is calculated. A summary of the toxicological
endpoints for mesotrione used for human risk assessment is shown in the
following Table 1:
Table 1.--Summary of Toxicological Dose and Endpoints for Mesotrione for Use in Human Risk Assessment
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Dose Used in Risk FQPA SF and LOC for Study and Toxicological
Exposure Scenario Assessment, UF Risk Assessment Effects
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Acute dietary Not applicable Not applicable No appropriate study
all populations...................... available.
----------------------------------------------------------------
Chronic dietary LOAEL = 2.1 milligrams/ FQPA SF = 10X Reproduction study -
all populations...................... kilograms/day (mg/kg/ cPAD = chronic RfD / mouse
day) FQPA SF = 0.0007 mg/kg/ Offspring LOAEL = 2.1
UF = 3................. day. mg/kg/day based upon
Chronic RfD = 0.007 mg/ tyrosinemia in F1 and
kg/day. F2a offspring and
ocular discharge in F1
pups.
----------------------------------------------------------------
Short-term dermal (1-7 days) Oral study LOC for MOE = 300 Developmental toxicity
(Occupational/Residential)........... LOAEL = 100 mg/kg/day (Occupational) study - rat
(dermal-absorption LOC for MOE = 3,000 Developmental LOAEL =
rate = 25%). (Residential). 100 mg/kg/day based
upon delays in
skeletal ossification
and changes in manus/
pes ossification
assessments.
----------------------------------------------------------------
Short-term inhalation (1-7 days) Oral study LOAEL = 100 LOC for MOE = 300 Developmental toxicity
(Occupational/Residential)........... mg/kg/day (Occupational) study - rat
(inhalation-absorption LOC for MOE = 3,000 Developmental LOAEL =
rate = 100%). (Residential).. 100 mg/kg/day based
upon delays in
skeletal ossification
and changes in manus/
pes ossification
assessments.
----------------------------------------------------------------
Cancer (oral, dermal, inhalation) ``Not likely'' Not applicable Acceptable oral rat and
mouse carcinogenicity
studies; no evidence
of carcinogenic or
mutagenic potential.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
[[Page 58307]]
B. Exposure Assessment
1. Dietary exposure from food and feed uses. Tolerances have been
established (40 CFR 180.571) for the residues of mesotrione, in or on a
variety of raw agricultural commodities. Risk assessments were
conducted by EPA to assess dietary exposures from mesotrione in food as
follows:
i. Acute exposure. Acute dietary risk assessments are performed for
a food-use pesticide if a toxicological study has indicated the
possibility of an effect of concern occurring as a result of a one day
or single exposure. No appropriate study available show any acute
dietary effects of concern.
ii. Chronic exposure. In conducting this chronic dietary risk
assessment the Dietary Exposure Evaluation Model (DEEM\TM\) analysis
evaluated the individual food consumption as reported by respondents in
the USDA 1989-1992 nationwide Continuing Surveys of Food Intake by
Individuals (CSFII) and accumulated exposure to the chemical for each
commodity. The following assumptions were made for the chronic exposure
assessments: Residue levels are at the recommended tolerances for
cranberry, field and sweet corn, and 100% of the crop is treated with
mesotrione. The % cPAD for the general U.S. population is 2.3% and for
the most sensitive population subgroups, Children (1-6 years old), is
5.4%
iii. Cancer. Acceptable oral rat and mouse carcinogenicity studies
showed no evidence of carcinogenic or mutagenic potential.
2. Dietary exposure from drinking water. The Agency lacks
sufficient monitoring exposure data to complete a comprehensive dietary
exposure analysis and risk assessment for mesotrione in drinking water.
Because the Agency does not have comprehensive monitoring data,
drinking water concentration estimates are made by reliance on
simulation or modeling taking into account data on the physical
characteristics of mesotrione.
The Agency uses the Generic Estimated Environmental Concentration
(GENEEC) or the Pesticide Root Zone/Exposure Analysis Modeling System
(PRZM/EXAMS) to estimate pesticide concentrations in surface water and
screening concentration in ground water (SCI-GROW), which predicts
pesticide concentrations in ground water. In general, EPA will use
GENEEC (a Tier 1 model) before using PRZM/EXAMS (a Tier 2 model) for a
screening-level assessment for surface water. The GENEEC model is a
subset of the PRZM/EXAMS model that uses a specific high-end runoff
scenario for pesticides. GENEEC incorporates a farm pond scenario,
while PRZM/EXAMS incorporate an index reservoir environment in place of
the previous pond scenario. The PRZM/EXAMS model includes a percent
crop area factor as an adjustment to account for the maximum percent
crop coverage within a watershed or drainage basin.
None of these models include consideration of the impact processing
(mixing, dilution, or treatment) of raw water for distribution as
drinking water would likely have on the removal of pesticides from the
source water. The primary use of these models by the Agency at this
stage is to provide a coarse screen for sorting out pesticides for
which it is highly unlikely that drinking water concentrations would
ever exceed human health LOC.
Since the models used are considered to be screening tools in the
risk assessment process, the Agency does not use estimated
environmental concentrations (EECs) from these models to quantify
drinking water exposure and risk as a %RfD or %PAD. Instead drinking
water levels of comparison (DWLOCs) are calculated and used as a point
of comparison against the model estimates of a pesticide's
concentration in water. DWLOCs are theoretical upper limits on a
pesticide's concentration in drinking water in light of total aggregate
exposure to a pesticide in food, and from residential uses. Since
DWLOCs address total aggregate exposure to mesotrione they are further
discussed in the aggregate risk sections below.
Based on the GENEEC (Version 1.2) and SCI-GROW models the EECs of
mesotrione for acute exposures are estimated to be 20 parts per billion
(ppb) for surface water and 0.15 ppb for ground water. The EECs for
chronic exposures are estimated to be 4.3 ppb for surface water and
0.15 ppb for ground water.
3. From non-dietary exposure. The term ``residential exposure'' is
used in this document to refer to non-occupational, non-dietary
exposure (e.g., for lawn and garden pest control, indoor pest control,
termiticides, and flea and tick control on pets). Mesotrione is not
registered for use on any sites that would result in residential
exposure.
4. Cumulative exposure to substances with a common mechanism of
toxicity. Section 408(b)(2)(D)(v) of the FFDCA requires that, when
considering whether to establish, modify, or revoke a tolerance, the
Agency consider ``available information'' concerning the cumulative
effects of a particular pesticide's residues and ``other substances
that have a common mechanism of toxicity.''
EPA does not have, at this time, available data to determine
whether mesotrione has a common mechanism of toxicity with other
substances or how to include this pesticide in a cumulative risk
assessment. Unlike other pesticides for which EPA has followed a
cumulative risk approach based on a common mechanism of toxicity,
mesotrione does not appear to produce a toxic metabolite produced by
other substances. For the purposes of this tolerance action, therefore,
EPA has not assumed that mesotrione has a common mechanism of toxicity
with other substances. For information regarding EPA's efforts to
determine which chemicals have a common mechanism of toxicity and to
evaluate the cumulative effects of such chemicals, see the final rule
for Bifenthrin Pesticide Tolerances (62 FR 62961, November 26, 1997).
C. Safety Factor for Infants and Children
1. In general. Section 408 of the FFDCA provides that EPA shall
apply an additional tenfold margin of safety for infants and children
in the case of threshold effects to account for prenatal and postnatal
toxicity and the completeness of the data base on toxicity and exposure
unless EPA determines that a different margin of safety will be safe
for infants and children. Margins of safety are incorporated into EPA
risk assessments either directly through use of a MOE analysis or
through using uncertainty (safety) factors in calculating a dose level
that poses no appreciable risk to humans.
2. Prenatal and postnatal sensitivity. There is quantitative
evidence of increased susceptibility of the young exposed to mesotrione
in the prenatal developmental toxicity studies in rats, mice, and
rabbits. Delayed ossification was seen in the fetuses at doses below
those at which maternal toxic effects were noted. Maternal toxic
effects in the rat were decreased body weight gain during treatment and
decreased food consumption and in the rabbit, abortions and GI effects.
3. Conclusion. The FQPA safety factor (10x) is retained in
assessing the risk posed because there is quantitative evidence of
increased susceptibility of the young exposed to mesotrione in the
prenatal developmental toxicity studies in mice, rats, and rabbits and
in the multi-generation reproduction study in mice, there is
qualitative evidence of increased susceptibility of the young
[[Page 58308]]
exposed to mesotrione in the multi-generation reproduction study in
rats; and a Developmental Neurotoxicity Study is required to assess the
effects of tyrosinemia on the developing nervous system exposed to
mesotrione.
D. Aggregate Risks and Determination of Safety
To estimate total aggregate exposure to a pesticide from food,
drinking water, and residential uses, the Agency calculates DWLOCs
which are used as a point of comparison against the model estimates of
a pesticide's concentration in water (EECs). DWLOC values are not
regulatory standards for drinking water. DWLOCs are theoretical upper
limits on a pesticide's concentration in drinking water in light of
total aggregate exposure to a pesticide in food and residential uses.
In calculating a DWLOC, the Agency determines how much of the
acceptable exposure (i.e., the PAD) is available for exposure through
drinking water (e.g., allowable chronic water exposure (mg/kg/day) =
cPAD - (average food + chronic non-dietary, non-occupational
exposure)). This allowable exposure through drinking water is used to
calculate a DWLOC.
A DWLOC will vary depending on the toxic endpoint, drinking water
consumption, and body weights. Default body weights and consumption
values as used by the USEPA Office of Water are used to calculate
DWLOCs: 2 liter (L)/70 kg (adult male), 2L/60 kg (adult female), and
1L/10 kg (child). Default body weights and drinking water consumption
values vary on an individual basis. This variation will be taken into
account in more refined screening-level and quantitative drinking water
exposure assessments. Different populations will have different DWLOCs.
Generally, a DWLOC is calculated for each type of risk assessment used:
Acute, short-term, intermediate-term, chronic, and cancer.
When EECs for surface water and ground water are less than the
calculated DWLOCs, EPA concludes with reasonable certainty that
exposures to mesotrione in drinking water (when considered along with
other sources of exposure for which EPA has reliable data) would not
result in unacceptable levels of aggregate human health risk at this
time. Because EPA considers the aggregate risk resulting from multiple
exposure pathways associated with a pesticide's uses, levels of
comparison in drinking water may vary as those uses change. If new uses
are added in the future, EPA will reassess the potential impacts of
mesotrione on drinking water as a part of the aggregate risk assessment
process.
1. Acute risk. Acute doses and endpoints were not selected for the
general U.S. population (including infants and children) or the females
13-50 years old population subgroup for mesotrione; therefore, an acute
dietary exposure analysis was not performed.
2. Chronic risk. Using the exposure assumptions described in this
unit for chronic exposure, EPA has concluded that exposure to
mesotrione from food will utilize 2.3% of the cPAD for the U.S.
population, 2.9% of the cPAD for all infants < 1 year old and 5.4% of
the cPAD for children (3-5 years old). There are no residential uses
for mesotrione that result in chronic residential exposure to
mesotrione. In addition, despite the potential for chronic dietary
exposure to mesotrione in drinking water, after calculating DWLOCs and
comparing them to conservative model EECs of mesotrione in surface
water and ground water, EPA does not expect the aggregate exposure to
exceed 100% of the cPAD, as shown in the following Table 2:
Table 2.--Aggregate Risk Assessment for Chronic (Non-Cancer) Exposure to Mesotrione
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Surface Ground
Population Subgroup cPAD (mg/kg/ % cPAD Water EEC Water EEC Chronic
day) (food) (ppb) (ppb) DWLOC (ppb)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
U.S. population 0.0007 2.3 4.3 0.15 23.8
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
All infants 0.0007 2.9 4.3 0.15 6.8
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Children (1-6) years old) 0.0007 5.4 4.3 0.15 6.7
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Females (13-49 years old) 0.0007 1.58 4.3 0.15 20.7
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
3. Short-term risk. Short-term aggregate exposure takes into
account residential exposure plus chronic exposure to food and water
(considered to be a background exposure level).
Mesotrione is not registered for use on any sites that would result
in residential exposure. Therefore, the aggregate risk is the sum of
the risk from food and water, which were previously addressed.
4. Intermediate-term risk. Intermediate-term aggregate exposure
takes into account non-dietary, non-occupational exposure plus chronic
exposure to food and water (considered to be a background exposure
level).
Mesotrione is not registered for use on any sites that would result
in residential exposure. Therefore, the aggregate risk is the sum of
the risk from food and water, which were previously addressed.
5. Aggregate cancer risk for U.S. population. Based on the lack of
carcinogenic response in rats and mice and the lack of mutagenic
effects, and that there are no data in the literature or SAR
information to indicate carcinogenic potential, no cancer risk is
posed.
6. Determination of safety. Based on these risk assessments, EPA
concludes that there is a reasonable certainty that no harm will result
to the general population, and to infants and children from aggregate
exposure to mesotrione residues.
V. Other Considerations
A. Analytical Enforcement Methodology
Adequate enforcement methodology (high pressure liquid
chromatography) is available to enforce the tolerance expression. The
method may be requested from: Chief, Analytical Chemistry Branch,
Environmental Science Center, 701 Mapes Rd., Ft. Meade, MD 20755-5350;
telephone number: (410) 305-2905; e-mail address:
residuemethods@epa.gov.
B. International Residue Limits
There are no CODEX, Canadian, or Mexican tolerances/Maximum Residue
Levels for mesotrione residues. Thus, harmonization is not an issue at
this time.
[[Page 58309]]
C. Conditions
Data deficiencies include the following:
1. Storage stability data in the plant and livestock metabolism
studies.
2. Revised interference study.
3. Developmental neurotoxicity (DNT) study in the mouse. (A DNT
study is required in the mouse in order to better characterize the
effects of tyrosinemia on the developing nervous system and to
correlate plasma tyrosine levels to neurotoxic effects.)
4. A 28-day inhalation toxicity study.
VI. Conclusion
Therefore, the tolerance is established for residues of mesotrione,
2-[4-(methylsulfonyl)-2-nitrobenzoyl]-1,3-cyclohexanedione, in or on
cranberry at 0.01 ppm.
VII. Objections and Hearing Requests
Under section 408(g) of the FFDCA, as amended by the FQPA, any
person may file an objection to any aspect of this regulation and may
also request a hearing on those objections. The EPA procedural
regulations which govern the submission of objections and requests for
hearings appear in 40 CFR part 178. Although the procedures in those
regulations require some modification to reflect the amendments made to
the FFDCA by the FQPA, EPA will continue to use those procedures, with
appropriate adjustments, until the necessary modifications can be made.
The new section 408(g) of the FFDCA provides essentially the same
process for persons to ``object'' to a regulation for an exemption from
the requirement of a tolerance issued by EPA under new section 408(d)
of the FFDCA, as was provided in the old sections 408 and 409 of the
FFDCA. However, the period for filing objections is now 60 days, rather
than 30 days.
A. What Do I Need to Do to File an Objection or Request a Hearing?
You must file your objection or request a hearing on this
regulation in accordance with the instructions provided in this unit
and in 40 CFR part 178. To ensure proper receipt by EPA, you must
identify docket ID number OPP-2004-0313 in the subject line on the
first page of your submission. All requests must be in writing, and
must be mailed or delivered to the Hearing Clerk on or before November
29, 2004.
1. Filing the request. Your objection must specify the specific
provisions in the regulation that you object to, and the grounds for
the objections (40 CFR 178.25). If a hearing is requested, the
objections must include a statement of the factual issues(s) on which a
hearing is requested, the requestor's contentions on such issues, and a
summary of any evidence relied upon by the objector (40 CFR 178.27).
Information submitted in connection with an objection or hearing
request may be claimed confidential by marking any part or all of that
information as CBI. Information so marked will not be disclosed except
in accordance with procedures set forth in 40 CFR part 2. A copy of the
information that does not contain CBI must be submitted for inclusion
in the public record. Information not marked confidential may be
disclosed publicly by EPA without prior notice.
Mail your written request to: Office of the Hearing Clerk (1900L),
Environmental Protection Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave., NW.,
Washington, DC 20460-0001. You may also deliver your request to the
Office of the Hearing Clerk in Suite 350, 1099 14th St., NW.,
Washington, DC 20005. The Office of the Hearing Clerk is open from 8
a.m. to 4 p.m., Monday through Friday, excluding legal holidays. The
telephone number for the Office of the Hearing Clerk is (202) 564-6255.
2.Copies for the Docket. In addition to filing an objection or
hearing request with the Hearing Clerk as described in Unit VII..A.,
you should also send a copy of your request to the PIRIB for its
inclusion in the official record that is described in ADDRESSES. Mail
your copies, identified by the docket ID number OPP-2004-0313, to:
Public Information and Records Integrity Branch, Information Resources
and Services Division (7502C), Office of Pesticide Programs,
Environmental Protection Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave., NW.,
Washington, DC 20460-0001. In person or by courier, bring a copy to the
location of the PIRIB described in ADDRESSES. You may also send an
electronic copy of your request via e-mail to: opp-docket@epa.gov.
Please use an ASCII file format and avoid the use of special characters
and any form of encryption. Copies of electronic objections and hearing
requests will also be accepted on disks in WordPerfect 6.1/8.0 or ASCII
file format. Do not include any CBI in your electronic copy. You may
also submit an electronic copy of your request at many Federal
Depository Libraries.
B. When Will the Agency Grant a Request for a Hearing?
A request for a hearing will be granted if the Administrator
determines that the material submitted shows the following: There is a
genuine and substantial issue of fact; there is a reasonable
possibility that available evidence identified by the requestor would,
if established resolve one or more of such issues in favor of the
requestor, taking into account uncontested claims or facts to the
contrary; and resolution of the factual issues(s) in the manner sought
by the requestor would be adequate to justify the action requested (40
CFR 178.32).
VIII. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
This final rule establishes a time-limited tolerance under section
408 of the FFDCA. The Office of Management and Budget (OMB) has
exempted these types of actions from review under Executive Order
12866, entitled Regulatory Planning and Review (58 FR 51735, October 4,
1993). Because this rule has been exempted from review under Executive
Order 12866 due to its lack of significance, this rule is not subject
to Executive Order 13211, Actions Concerning Regulations That
Significantly Affect Energy Supply, Distribution, or Use (66 FR 28355,
May 22, 2001). This final rule does not contain any information
collections subject to OMB approval under the Paperwork Reduction Act
(PRA), 44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq., or impose any enforceable duty or
contain any unfunded mandate as described under Title II of the
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (UMRA) (Public Law 104-4). Nor
does it require any special considerations under Executive Order 12898,
entitled Federal Actions to Address Environmental Justice in Minority
Populations and Low-Income Populations (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994);
or OMB review or any Agency action under Executive Order 13045,
entitled Protection of Children from Environmental Health Risks and
Safety Risks (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997). This action does not
involve any technical standards that would require Agency consideration
of voluntary consensus standards pursuant to section 12(d) of the
National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995 (NTTAA),
Public Law 104-113, section 12(d) (15 U.S.C. 272 note). Since
tolerances and exemptions that are established on the basis of a FIFRA
section 18 exemption under section 408 of the FFDCA, such as the
tolerance in this final rule, do not require the issuance of a proposed
rule, the requirements of the Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA) (5
U.S.C. 601 et seq.) do not apply. In addition, the Agency has
determined that this action will not have a substantial direct effect
on States, on the relationship between the national government and the
States, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities among the
various levels of government, as specified in
[[Page 58310]]
Executive Order 13132, entitled Federalism (64 FR 43255, August 10,
1999). Executive Order 13132 requires EPA to develop an accountable
process to ensure ``meaningful and timely input by State and local
officials in the development of regulatory policies that have
federalism implications.'' ``Policies that have federalism
implications'' is defined in the Executive Order to include regulations
that have ``substantial direct effects on the States, on the
relationship between the national government and the States, or on the
distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of
government.'' This final rule directly regulates growers, food
processors, food handlers, and food retailers, not States. This action
does not alter the relationships or distribution of power and
responsibilities established by Congress in the preemption provisions
of section 408(n)(4) of the FFDCA. For these same reasons, the Agency
has determined that this rule does not have any ``tribal implications''
as described in Executive Order 13175, entitled Consultation and
Coordination with Indian Tribal Governments (65 FR 67249, November 6,
2000). Executive Order 13175, requires EPA to develop an accountable
process to ensure ``meaningful and timely input by tribal officials in
the development of regulatory policies that have tribal implications.''
``Policies that have tribal implications'' is defined in the Executive
Order to include regulations that have ``substantial direct effects on
one or more Indian tribes, on the relationship between the Federal
Government and the Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities between the Federal Government and Indian tribes.''
This rule will not have substantial direct effects on tribal
governments, on the relationship between the Federal Government and
Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities
between the Federal Government and Indian tribes, as specified in
Executive Order 13175. Thus, Executive Order 13175 does not apply to
this rule.
IX. Congressional Review Act
The Congressional Review Act, 5 U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996, generally
provides that before a rule may take effect, the agency promulgating
the rule must submit a rule report, which includes a copy of the rule,
to each House of the Congress and to the Comptroller General of the
United States. EPA will submit a report containing this rule and other
required information to the U.S. Senate, the U.S. House of
Representatives, and the Comptroller General of the United States prior
to publication of this final rule in the Federal Register. This final
rule is not a ``major rule'' as defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2).
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 180
Environmental protection, Administrative practice and procedure,
Agricultural commodities, Pesticides and pests, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements.
Dated: September 24, 2004.
Donald R. Stubbs,
Acting Director, Registration Division, Office of Pesticide Programs.
0
Therefore, 40 CFR chapter I is amended as follows:
PART 180--[AMENDED]
0
1. The authority citation for part 180 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 21 U.S.C. 321(q), 346a and 371.
0
2. Section 180.571 is amended by alphabetically adding an entry for
``Cranberry'' to the table in paragraph (b) to read as follows:
Sec. 180.571 Mesotrione; tolerances for residues.
* * * * *
(b) * * *
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Expiration/
Commodity Parts per million revocation date
------------------------------------------------------------------------
* * * * *
Cranberry......................... 0.01 12/31/07
------------------------------------------------------------------------
* * * * *
[FR Doc. 04-21934 Filed 9-29-04; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-S