Recent Press Releases



‘It might have taken awhile for our friends on the other side to come around to our view and the view of most Americans on these issues, but for the sake of our troops, their families, and our security, we’re glad they finally did’



Washington, D.C.— U.S. Senate Republican Leader Mitch McConnell delivered the following remarks on the Senate floor Tuesday regarding pending legislation, including two key national security accomplishments—funding for the troops and providing the intelligence community the tools it needs to track terrorists overseas:



“Looking at the remaining days this week, Americans can expect the Senate to make progress on three significant pieces of legislation.



“After a failed attempt to address the housing crisis without Republican input, Democrats finally agreed last week to allow our input. As a result, we now have a bipartisan housing bill that addresses many of their concerns but I think it could be made even better with some further amendments which I am hopeful we’ll have an opportunity to do even if cloture is invoked.



“The Senate this week must also complete two important and long overdue national security measures: the supplemental troop funding bill that the President first requested more than 500 days ago and an updated terrorist surveillance bill that the Senate first approved last August but which expired more than four months ago after House Democrat inaction.



“It’s worth noting that on both national security measures, Democrats will be approving something Republicans have supported all along. Regarding the supplemental, Republicans have argued for the past year and a half that Congress has a solemn duty to fund our troops while they’re on the field of battle. And regarding FISA, Republicans have argued for more than a year that the intelligence community should have the tools it needs to listen in on conversations between terrorists overseas — and that the companies that may have allowed them to do so shouldn’t be punished for helping.



“And I remain hopeful that the Senate will be able to follow these important issues and end the week with a bipartisan Medicare agreement as well.



“It might have taken awhile for our friends on the other side to come around to our view and the view of most Americans on these issues, but for the sake of our troops, their families, and our security, we’re glad they finally did.”



###









By Senator Mitch McConnell

Two years ago, the Washington liberals who control Congress claimed they had a “common sense plan” to lower gas prices. But since they took over, the average price of a gallon of gas has shot up from $2.34 to more than $4.08—a whopping increase of 74 percent, and with no relief in sight. If it gets any worse, we’ll all have to commute to work in hot-air balloons powered by all the hot air they generate in Washington.



Believe it or not, that plan makes about as much sense as their latest proposal. They recently offered a “climate tax” bill which would have dramatically raised energy prices across the nation. Congress asked the Environmental Protection Agency to study the bill, and they found it would increase gas prices by as much as $1.40 a gallon—on top of the high prices we’re paying already.



Reducing greenhouse gas emissions is an important goal, and in fact, Congress already has taken important steps to do so. I was pleased to support bipartisan legislation last year that raised fuel economy standards for cars and trucks, increased our use of renewable fuels, and expanded research into innovative technologies to reduce pollution.



We should not allow, however, legislation that would increase gas prices, send American jobs overseas and fail to promote scientific innovation here at home. This proposed bill failed on all counts. Undaunted, Washington liberals submitted another terrible idea—a bill to raise taxes, by imposing a new “windfall profits” tax on energy companies.



America tried this once before in the era of double-digit inflation and double-digit interest rates under President Jimmy Carter. According to the non-partisan Congressional Research Service, the “windfall profits” tax of 1980 made things worse by depressing domestic energy production, increasing our dependence on Middle Eastern sources of oil.



A few months ago when asked about reviving a “windfall profits” tax, President Carter’s old director of domestic energy policy said, “It’s a terrible idea today.” I agree—it simply makes no sense to beg the Middle East for more oil.



I support and have sought to implement a three-pronged approach—conservation, innovation for newer technologies, and expanded exploration of our domestic resources—to solve America’s energy crisis, create thousands of jobs and get prices down at the gas pump. Expanding our domestic energy production will do all this, and limit the hold Middle Eastern nations have on our economy.



This country is the third-largest producer of oil in the world after the Saudis and the Russians. And while we must work now to reduce our dependence on fossil fuels, if we truly want to achieve energy independence, America must be allowed to take advantage of the vast energy resources we have right here at home.



A recent Gallup poll found that by a sizable majority, 57 to 41 percent, most Americans support increased production of domestic energy. Presidential nominee Barack Obama admitted that he doesn’t have a problem with higher gas prices, only with how fast we got here, saying, “I think I would have preferred a gradual adjustment.” Well, if you’re like me, $4 gas is unacceptable—whether we got here gradually or quickly!



So as gas prices continue to set record highs, and the American people clamor for relief, the liberals who run Washington have some serious questions to answer. Why don’t we help ourselves by producing more energy right here at home so we don’t have to rely on the Middle East to help us?



Senator McConnell is the Senate Republican Leader and only the second Kentuckian to lead his party in the U.S. Senate.





‘I am extremely disappointed that our friends on the other side of the aisle have objected to a fully functioning Federal Election Commission. Just yesterday, their nominee called the system ‘broken.’’



Washington, D.C.— U.S. Senate Republican Leader Mitch McConnell delivered the following remarks on the Senate floor Friday after Democrats objected to confirming nominees to the Federal Election Commission:



“I am extremely disappointed that our friends on the other side of the aisle have objected to a fully functioning Federal Election Commission. Just yesterday, their nominee called the system ‘broken.’



“Today is just one more example of the unprecedented approach the majority has taken to those nominees.



“This battle has been going on for more than 2 years, starting with the recess appointment of 3 very well qualified and well respected experts in this field.



“The three recess appointments expired at the first of this year and two nominees ultimately withdrew citing the need for gainful employment– both well qualified but one, having been unfairly and falsely maligned, withdrew.



“And here we stand today, after an April 29th commitment by the Democrat Majority that a review of new nominees would be ‘simple’ and a commitment to a ‘speedy review.’



“Let me be clear, we have gone out of our way, stood willing to confirm nominees who many believe are misguided and wrong on the law but in the interest of obtaining a fully functioning FEC—recognizing that Democrats pick their nominees and Republicans pick ours—we were willing to allow them to be confirmed.



“But we have to ask: why the objection? Do Democrats not want a fully functioning FEC?



“The reason for this is unclear but one can guess. I submit for the record an article citing the DNC’s intent to file yet another frivolous lawsuit next Tuesday, one that was dismissed before, against the FEC citing their failure to act on a matter related to Senator McCain. The only way the DNC can maintain this suit is if there is a non-functioning FEC. Thus, in order for the DNC’s already failed suit to go forward, this package must be objected to. They have done just that.



“It is a disappointing day for folks on our side of the aisle that have tried repeatedly, and will continue to try to obtain a fully functioning FEC.”



###