Recent Press Releases



‘Short-term tax extensions shouldn’t be the occasion for permanent tax increases’



Washington, D.C.— U.S. Senate Republican Leader Mitch McConnell delivered the following remarks on the Senate floor Monday calling for bipartisan negotiations to extend tax relief for American families, without raising taxes on others:



“Later on today the Senate will vote on whether to proceed to the House-passed tax extender bill. Republicans support the provisions being extended in this legislation. That’s why I, along with several of my colleagues, introduced an even stronger version of the House bill, one that contains even longer extensions of the expired provisions, provides AMT relief excluded from the House bill, and does both in a form that would avoid a veto — that is, without raising taxes.



“The tax provisions in question are an enormous help to millions of Americans, and a long-term extension would provide the added comfort of predictability into the family budget and the small business balance sheet in the midst of a difficult economic period. Republicans have been firm on this point. Which is why I read with some amusement a letter that was sent to me Friday by my good friend, the Majority Leader, extolling the virtues of the House bill.



“As I said, Republicans fully agree that the expired provisions merit extension. This is not a state secret. Our point of departure, the principle we’ve insisted on, is this: short-term tax extensions shouldn’t be the occasion for permanent tax increases. If new tax policy is being created, that’s one thing. But if current taxes are simply being extended, those extensions shouldn’t be accompanied by new tax increases. To do so would be to transform the annual ritual of extending current law tax relief into a stealth exercise in increasing the size of government.



“Unfortunately, the House Democratic Leadership seems to have dug in, saying it won’t pass an extenders bill without tax hikes. And this brings us to an impasse, for no good reason. First of all, it strikes me as odd that the House Democratic Leadership would single out these particular tax extenders for a fight on offsets. They didn’t need offsets on the stimulus bill earlier this year.



“AMT relief will apparently not require offsets this year. House leaders have signaled that a new GI benefits expansion won’t require offsets. And just last week, the House passed an unemployment insurance expansion bill that didn’t include offsets.



“Now it’s entirely possible that the Democrat Leadership is open to compromise. Recall that during last year’s AMT debate, House Democrats also insisted on offsets. On December 18th, House Democrats were saying they would not consider AMT relief unless it included tax hikes elsewhere. Then, the following day, December 19th, they passed an AMT bill without tax hikes by a 352-64 vote. After all the press releases and letters had been issued, our friends on the other side sat down with Republicans and did something we should do a lot more of around here: they negotiated.



“Notwithstanding the letter I received on Friday from my good friend the Majority Leader, I am hopeful we can do the same thing on this tax extenders bill — sit down together, and come up with a solution that’s acceptable to both sides, and which actually has a chance of becoming law.”



###

TIM RUSSERT

June 13, 2008



‘I’m sure I speak for all elected officials when I say he always asked the question we hoped he wouldn’t.’



Frankfort, K.Y.— U.S. Senate Republican Leader Mitch McConnell made the following statement Friday regarding the passing of Tim Russert:



“Elaine and I are deeply saddened by the sudden passing of Tim Russert. He was regarded as perhaps the toughest, most fair-minded, and intellectually rigorous interviewer of our day. And I’m sure I speak for all elected officials when I say he always asked the question we hoped he wouldn’t. Yet for all his achievements, Tim Russert always remained tethered to his middle-class upbringing and the good and decent people who made him who he was. But he will be remembered by many more Americans who knew him as a proud son of Buffalo, New York.



“We send our condolences to his wife Maureen, their son Luke, and the entire Russert family on this sad and sudden loss.”



###



‘If people are being forced to change their lifestyles, if the price of goods is skyrocketing, that’s apparently all right, according to our friends on the other side. Their Presidential nominee even admits it. He says the high price of gas isn’t the problem. The problem, he says, is that prices went up too quickly’



Washington, D.C.— U.S. Senate Republican Leader Mitch McConnell delivered the following remarks on the Senate floor Thursday regarding the Democrat majority’s failure to address the need for increased American production and support for a ‘gradual adjustment’ upward in the price at the pump:



“Today the national average for a gallon of regular unleaded gasoline hit another all-time high of $4.06. For truckers it’s even worse, with the average cost of diesel now at $4.79 a gallon.



“Every American is suffering the effects of high gas prices. But low and middle-income families are hurting the most. Many now spend a significant portion of their income just getting to and from work. A good number of people in Eastern Kentucky are spending 15 percent of their income just on gas.



“Some people are taking second jobs just to cover the cost of getting to and from their primary jobs.



“Prices are so high Democrats are starting to talk about gas prices being a serious problem. A number of them spoke yesterday about the effect that gas prices have on the wider economy.



“The Junior Senator from Colorado told us about a farmer in Kit Carson County who’s worried he won’t be able to afford the diesel fuel he needs to harvest his wheat crop at the end of the summer.



“The Junior Senator from Montana said manufacturers in his state are at risk of shutting down, that truckers are struggling to make ends meet, and farmers are struggling to pay for fertilizer. The Junior Senator from Minnesota said the people of her state are lining up around the block at the Costco in Minneapolis just to save some money.



“Even the Senior Senator from New York got in on the act, though mostly as an excuse to go after the 2001 and 2003 tax cuts. I’m not sure how this was relevant to gas prices. Maybe he thought people would feel better if they realized they’d be even worse off if we hadn’t cut their taxes.



“But to all our friends on the other side who have spoken about the crushing effects of high gas prices, I’d simply add that they’re right on target. High gas prices do affect everything. High gas prices do hurt. And I would also add this: Democrats in Congress have no plan to lower them.



“In a month when gas prices have hit record-highs, Democrats have proposed three things: a massive carbon tax, a tax on energy companies, and allowing trial lawyers to sue our trading partners. This isn’t an energy plan. It’s a caricature. It’s a caricature of a party that seems incapable of conceiving any solution to any problem that doesn’t involve taxation or litigation.



“With gas prices causing unprecedented pain at the pump for working Americans, Democrats have responded by trying to raise taxes that we know will be passed onto consumers. Ignoring the iron laws of supply and demand, they insist that high gas prices must be the result of some corporate plot instead. But the current crisis is a supply and demand problem. Not a supply and demand and litigation problem. Not a supply and demand and taxation problem. A supply and demand problem.



“It’s fairly straightforward: at the moment, there’s greater demand than supply. And last year, Republicans joined Democrats in addressing demand by passing the first increase in national fuel efficiency standards in more than thirty years. We’ve also tried to address the supply problem by increasing production of American energy. At every turn, we’ve been blocked.



“Since 1991, the Senate has voted a dozen times on allowing limited exploration in a small portion of the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge. A Democrat president has vetoed it or Democrats have blocked it every single time. When he did it, incidentally, gas at the pump was $1.06 a gallon.



“Last year, the Senate voted on proposals to expand refinery capacity, invest in coal-to-liquid technology, and open up more domestic reserves. Democrats blocked each one.



“Last year Republicans proposed allowing Virginia to go forward with deep sea exploration off its coast — something that Virginia, under a Democratic governor, wants. Democrats in Congress said no.



“Republicans have tried to allow the use of oil shale from Western states as an alternative to foreign oil. Democrats imposed an oil-shale ban in last year’s Omnibus Appropriations bill.



“Last month, Republicans tried to increase production of American energy again, along with an increase in support for clean energy technology and plug-in hybrid vehicles. Democrats said no.



“And just last week, I offered an amendment to ensure that if the Boxer Climate Tax Bill caused gas prices to go up, we’d suspend its provisions. Democrats blocked that too.



“For years, Democrats have blocked every effort to increase the production of American energy and help bring gas prices down. They’ve said no to states that want to allow for deep sea exploration off their shores. They’ve blocked the use of oil shale. They’ve blocked a dozen efforts to open a small portion of ANWR for environmentally-sensitive exploration, which — if it hasn’t been vetoed 13 years ago — would be providing a million barrels of oil a day to American consumers right now.



“That’s twice as much as the Senior Senator from New York wants us to beg from the Saudis.



“And now, they want to raise gas prices even more through higher taxes.



“It should be abundantly clear by now to anyone who’s paying attention that our friends on the other side have no serious plan for lowering gas prices. As the record suggests, their primary concern is blocking increased production. Which has inexorably led to record gas prices.



“If people are being forced to change their lifestyles, if the price of goods is skyrocketing, that’s apparently all right, according to our friends on the other side. Their Presidential nominee even admits it. He says the high price of gas isn’t the problem. The problem, he says, is that prices went up too quickly. If he had his way, he would have raised prices much more slowly.



“He would have preferred that gas prices go up more slowly than the $1.00 increase we’ve seen under the new Democrat Congress over the last year.



“He would have preferred they go up more slowly than the astonishing $1.73 increase per gallon of gasoline we’ve seen just in the 17 months since Democrats took over Congress in January 2007.



“As the Democrat nominee put it in an interview earlier this week, he would have preferred a ‘gradual adjustment’ in gas prices, presumably so Americans wouldn’t notice the shock of it.



“We used to think $4 a gallon gasoline was unthinkable. Our friends on the other side were apparently thinking about it all along. ‘I think I would have preferred a gradual adjustment.’



“Those are the words of their nominee.



“While Americans are reeling over high gas prices, increasingly demanding that we increase our production of American energy, Democrats haven’t let us turn over a single shovel for exploration here at home. And now they’ve got what they wanted.



“We all agree that the key to our energy future is clean energy technologies and alternative fuels that move us away from oil. What the other side refuses to acknowledge is that it will take some time to get there. We are moving in that direction as quickly as we can. We have worked in a bipartisan fashion in both the 2005 and 2007 energy bills to accelerate the process of moving to clean energy technologies and alternative sources of fuel.



“But the facts are clear: in the short-term, America will depend on fossil fuels to drive our economy. For the foreseeable future, our choice is the same as it’s always been: either import our energy from people like Hugo Chavez and from Saudi Arabia, or use more of our own. But our friends on the other side have removed the option of increased American energy created by increasing American jobs. They’ve made sure we have only one option. They’ve put domestic energy off limits. And now we’re paying the price.



“Republicans have been willing to work with Democrats to address both sides of this problem. Republicans enthusiastically support conservation.



“Last year we supported the first increase in automobile efficiency standards in more than three decades. We’ve supported investments in alternative energy. We know this problem requires action on both the supply and the demand side. And we’ve shown it. But we’re still waiting for our friends on the other side to show the same commitment to actually address the problem.



“For the sake of all the American people who will today make hard choices at the gas pump, we need to work together to lower prices now, and that means that as the third largest oil producer in the world, America needs to increase its own domestic supplies in an environmentally responsible way so we’re less reliant on Middle East oil and so our people finally get some relief.”



###