Smith Questions EPA Administrator on Lack of Transparency

Today, the House Science, Space, and Technology Committee held a hearing to receive testimony from Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Administrator Gina McCarthy on the agency’s overreaching regulatory agenda.

Click here or on the photo above for video of the full exchange.

Chairman Smith: “Over the last year, the Environmental Protection Agency has released some of the most expensive and expansive regulations in its history. A glaring example is the president’s Power Plan. This plan is nothing more than a ‘Power Grab’ to give the government more control over Americans’ daily lives. Even EPA data shows that this regulation would reduce sea level rise by only 1/100th of an inch, the thickness of three sheets of paper.  This rule represents massive costs without significant benefits. In other words, it’s all pain and no gain.”

Chairman Smith questioned Administrator McCarthy on how the agency can justify its Clean Power Plan proposal, which is estimated to offset only 0.01 degrees Celsius. Administrator McCarthy did not dispute that estimate, and indicated the regulation is intended to urge other nations to act on their own emissions.

When asked if she considers 0.01 degrees to be a significant contribution to halting climate change, Administrator McCarthy said, “No, the value of this rule is not measured in that way. It is measured in showing strong domestic action which can actually trigger global action to address what is necessary action.”

Members also asked Administrator McCarthy about the agency’s proposed ozone standards that are estimated to cost taxpayers millions of dollars and could be unachievable in certain areas, due to naturally occurring ozone levels. A report released today by the Center for Regulatory Solutions shows that the ozone standards would put many jobs at risk, particularly in the greater Chicago area. Members questioned the need for such a rule when EPA’s own figures show that since 1980, ozone levels have decreased by 33 percent and continue to improve.

Several Members also asked about the EPA’s lack of independence. The Science Committee recently requested information and documents related to the EPA’s development of the proposed Waters of the U.S. rule and the agency’s inappropriate lobbying of outside organizations to generate grassroots support. Members today questioned inappropriate relationships between the EPA and outside environmental groups.

The Committee obtained a number of emails between environmental groups such as the National Resources Defense Council, the Sierra Club and the League of Conservation Voters and Michael Goo, former Associate Administrator of the EPA Office of Policy. The emails include evidence that Mr. Goo shared draft documents with outside groups and urged them to write reports in support of EPA actions. Members today asked Administrator McCarthy if this is a typical way the agency conducts business.

For additional information on today’s hearing, including witness testimony and the archived webcast, visit the Science, Space, and Technology Committee website.