Recent Press Releases

McConnell says CRS memo doesn’t excuse Democrat delay of troop funding



LOUISVILLE – U.S. Senate Republican Leader Mitch McConnell made the following statement Saturday regarding a Congressional Research Service (CRS) memo being used as an excuse for slowing funds to troops deployed in combat:



“I am a bit surprised that the Democrat leadership needed CRS to verify that if the Army and Marine Corps stopped training, repairing equipment and moving personnel, that the funds Congress appropriated for those activities would be available for other purposes. The simple fact is every day we don't fund our troops is a day their ability to fight this war is weakened."



“The only reason this report was issued is to try to paper over why congressional Democrats are taking a two-week break before finishing a funding bill—and insisting on adding a surrender date that they know will draw a veto—when our troops are in the field and need the funding. Excuses won’t fund the troops, and procrastination won’t be excused.”



* * *



The CRS memo cited by Democrats explains why delaying funds for the troops is not in their best interest:



“The Army has suggested that these actions would disrupt its programs including facilities repair, depot maintenance, and training. In order to ensure that funding is available for the later months of the year, the Army may very well decide that it must slow down its non-war-related operations before money would run out by, for example, limiting facility maintenance and repairs, delaying equipment overhauls, restricting travel and meetings, and, perhaps slowing down training.”



And Gen. Peter Pace, chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, testified before Congress Thursday and made clear that the delays envisioned by congressional Democrats would hinder the military mission:



“[I]f we get to about the 15th of April, specifically for the United States Army, then the Army has told us that they will have to begin curtailing some training here at home for Guard, Reserve and for units, which means that the baseline for those units will be reduced as far as their capability and when they are called…Second, quality of life initiatives for the service will have to be reduced again past 15 April, because money that is allocated to that will have to be shifted to the funding of the war. Third, there will be some repair of equipment that is back here that will have to be reduced until we can get the funding.”



###
Washington, D.C. – The United States Congress on Thursday honored the Tuskegee Airmen with a Congressional Gold Medal. The award is the most prestigious Congress can offer to an individual who performs an outstanding act of service for the security, prosperity, and national interest of the United States.



Senate Republican Leader Mitch McConnell’s remarks honoring the Tuskegee Airmen

The Rotunda, U.S. Capitol, March 29, 2007



“Thank you. I’m honored to be a part of this ceremony, and to be in the company of these brave men. Sixty years after your deeds of heroism, this recognition is long overdue.



“But the true reward is not in a medal. It is in the nation you defended, and shaped, through your heroic efforts in the skies of Europe.



“Men trained at the Tuskegee Army Air Field in the 1940s did what none of their counterparts in the Army did. You fought to protect a country that, in large part, didn’t want you in combat. By doing so, you transformed that disdain into admiration and respect.



“Thirteen cadets began the first class of training at Tuskegee in 1941. Only five finished. But by the war’s end, hundreds of Tuskegee Airmen had flown more than 15,000 combat sorties. You ripped open the steel armor of the Axis Powers. And you pried open the hardened legacy of racism in the minds of Americans everywhere.



“Although World War II is long over, your lessons for our country about courage, duty and resolve in the face of hardship must not stop.



“We’re blessed to have over 300 Tuskegee Airmen here with us today, part of a very special brotherhood.



“And I hope all of you know that your legacy of heroism is being passed down to the latest generation of Americans, including the current generation who fight to protect us and who follow in your footsteps.



“Congratulations on this well-deserved, if overdue honor. Thank you for serving our country, then and now. And thank you for leaving it better than you found it.



“Thank you.”



###



Washington, D.C. – U.S. Senate Republican Leader Mitch McConnell made the following statement Thursday regarding the Iraq supplemental funding bill and why the President should veto it soon:

“Two months ago General David Petraeus came to Capitol Hill to explain the situation in Baghdad and to outline his plan for improving it. And then we ratified that plan. A Democratic-controlled Senate sent General Petraeus to Iraq, and they did so without dissent.

“There were no illusions about what the mission would involve: we’d demand greater cooperation from the Iraqi government, and they’d get greater security in return. If we had more room to help secure the capital city, they’d have room to build a civil society.

“Now that mission’s underway. Security’s improving and political reforms have followed. The Petraeus Plan, not two months old, and running at half its ultimate strength, is, at this point, showing progress.

“There will be no political reforms in Iraq without basic security. That’s what General Petraeus told us. That’s the story he told us we could hope to see unfold, and if it did, we’d have reason to hope for success.

“The American people are willing to stick with this fight as long as they think we have a chance to win it. And right now we’ve got a chance to win it. The question is, do we fan this spark of hope or do we smother it?

“The Democratic leadership has a different view. They don’t seem to think situations can change. They’ve made no allowance whatsoever for improvements in Iraq. They call for a change in course, but the only change in course they seem to approve of is retreat.

“The bill they’re sending to the President today says one of two things: it says they’re either determined to lose the War in Iraq or they’re convinced it’s already lost.

“Nothing good can come from this bill.

“It’s guaranteed to delay the delivery of supplies and equipment to the troops. It’s loaded with pork that has no relation to our efforts in Iraq or Afghanistan. And it includes a deadline for evacuation that amounts to sending a ‘Save the Date’ card to Al Qaeda.

“The date isn’t tied to circumstances on the ground. It’s completely arbitrary. They pulled it out of thin air. And the terrorists have already marked it on their calendars.

“This bill is the document of our defeat. The President knows this. That’s why he’s said for weeks that he isn’t going to sign it. And because it has no chance of becoming law, because the Democrats knew it never had a chance of becoming law, it’s nothing more than a political statement.

“Which means one thing: the Democrats have traded in the possibility of a military victory in Iraq for the promise of a political win at home. They’ve said so. They talk about this bill as ‘not one battle,’ but ‘a long-term campaign.’ If only they had the same appetite for victory in Iraq as they do for political victories on the floor of the Senate.

“The political point they want to make is that we should pull our troops out of Iraq. They’re sending equipment and supplies to our troops to carry out their mission, but telling them they’ll have to come home a year from now, regardless of how far along that mission is.

“But if the war’s already lost, why wait a year? It’s not right to ask American soldiers to stick it out another year if you think the battle’s over. If Democrats want to end this war, they should vote against funding it. Period.

“But they’re not going to do that. They’ll wait another year. They’ll supply and equip our soldiers to fight a war they think we’ve lost. They’ll just use the spending bill that funds that extra year of fighting as a vehicle for pork. There’s more than $20 billion of spending in this war spending bill that has absolutely nothing to do with the War in Iraq or Afghanistan, and it shouldn’t be there.

“The senior senator from Nevada has said repeatedly today that this legislation is serious.

“How serious is $2.5 million for tours of the Capitol?

“Is $3 million for sugar cane serious?

“$22.8 million for geothermal research?

“Or $13 milling for ewe replacement and retention.

“Is this serious?

“This bill was intended to fund and equip American soldiers and Marines who left their families to risk their lives overseas. But it’s become a joke. It’s ballooned into a gravy train for members. It absurdly broadcasts a date certain for withdrawal of U.S. troops from Iraq to our enemies. And it’s designed to draw a veto, risking that the very supplies it’s meant to deliver won’t get there in time.

“The American people are watching this charade. They have reason to be confused.

“They have reason to be angry.

“I urge my colleagues to vote against this bill to demonstrate that it is right for the President to veto it, and to show that we’ll proudly sustain that veto.

“Then we can get on with our real mission: to fund our troops.

“Let’s get this to the President as quickly as possible, so he can do with it what it deserves.

“No bill has deserved the veto pen more than this one.”

###