Recent Press Releases

‘Over the last few months, we’ve seen government getting involved in virtually every aspect of our economy. Washington is suddenly running the banks and the auto companies. Now it’s thinking about running Americans’ health care’

WASHINGTON, D.C. - U.S. Senate Republican Leader Mitch McConnell made the following remarks on the Senate floor Tuesday regarding the importance of getting it right on health care reform:

“Yesterday I noted that all of us want to reform health care, but that we need to do so without sacrificing the things Americans like about our current system: the freedom, the choice, the quality of care, the options, and the efficiency.

“I also noted that the kind of government takeover of health care that some of our Democrat friends are contemplating could lead to a decline in every one of these things. This morning I’d like to explain in a little greater detail how it could happen.

“The first point I’d like to make is that the very concept of a government ‘option’ is itself misleading. What starts out as an option could quickly become the only option.

“This is clear to anyone who realizes that unlike market-based health plans, any government-run plan would have unlimited access to taxpayer money and could use that money to subsidize the cost of services. And artificially lower prices would make the government-run plan more attractive to individuals and businesses.

“Some say this can be avoided by creating ‘safeguards’ to ensure a level playing field for market-based insurers and a government plan. But no safeguard could create a truly level playing field, and any safeguard could easily be eliminated once a government plan is enacted. A government plan would also be able to operate at a loss, a loss that the taxpayers would have to cover one way or another.

“Government could also keep health care costs artificially low by paying providers less than private insurers do — just as it already does with Medicare and Medicaid.

“At first blush, that may sound appealing. But, as we know, there’s no such thing as a free lunch. Let me explain. Right now, doctors and hospitals make up the difference between what a procedure costs and what the government is willing to pay for it by passing those costs onto private insurers. But doctors and hospitals would likely get even less under a new government health plan. So they’d shift even more costs onto private insurers, who would then raise rates for individuals and businesses even higher than they were before. Once these higher rates take effect, employers would be all but certain to start encouraging workers to enroll in the government-run plan.

“As a result of all this, it’s easy to see how private market health plans would become more and more expensive — and thus less and less affordable and accessible. At some point private health plans would likely be crowded out altogether, and government care would be the only option left.

“That’s when the delays and denied care would kick in. Under a government system, Americans would have no choice but to accept all the bureaucratic hassles, and the endless time spent on hold waiting for a government service representative to take their calls. They’d also have to deal with all the restrictions of care that follow. What’s being advertised as an option will eventually lead to delays in testing, delays in diagnosis, and delays in treatment.

“So the question Americans need to ask themselves is whether this is the reform they really want. Do we really want a government takeover of health care? Because that’s what a so-called government option could lead to in short order. Americans need to realize that when someone says ‘government option,’ what could really occur is a government takeover that could soon lead to government bureaucrats denying and delaying care and telling Americans what kind of care they can have.

“The irony in all of this is that as a result of a government takeover of health care, the private plans that tens of millions of Americans currently enjoy will eventually only be available to a few very wealthy Americans — to those who are able to pay more for the health care they currently have and like.

“According to a recent study, 119 million Americans would lose the private coverage they currently have as a consequence of a government plan. The best options would only remain available to a select few.

“Over the last few months, we’ve seen government getting involved in virtually every aspect of our economy. Washington is suddenly running the banks and the auto companies. Now it’s thinking about running Americans’ health care. The results, I’m afraid, would not lead to the kind of reforms that Americans really want in their health care. Instead, it would lead to a system that most Americans would deeply regret.”

###
‘The Senate will thoroughly review Judge Sotomayor’s judicial record to ensure a full and informed debate over her qualifications to become one of the chief guardians of our nation’s Constitution and its laws. We believe the American people expect nothing less’

WASHINGTON, D.C. - U.S. Senate Republican Leader Mitch McConnell made the following remarks on the Senate floor Monday regarding the President’s nominee for the Supreme Court Judge Sonia Sotomayor:

“On the matter of the Supreme Court, I would note that I spoke with the President’s nominee, Judge Sotomayor, over the recess, and I assured her that she would be treated fairly and respectfully during the confirmation process. I’ll deliver the same message when the two of us have a chance to sit down and talk later on this week.

“Republicans take very seriously our obligation to review anyone who is nominated to a lifetime position on our nation’s highest court. The Senate will therefore thoroughly review Judge Sotomayor’s judicial record to ensure a full and informed debate over her qualifications to become one of the chief guardians of our nation’s Constitution and its laws. We believe the American people expect nothing less.

“Judge Sotomayor is no stranger to the process. This will be the third time she’s come before the Senate for confirmation to the Federal bench. In considering her for a seat on the Supreme Court, the standards for review become understandably more rigorous, as the Vice-President observed when he chaired the Judiciary Committee. Yet the basic qualities we look for in our justices are the same qualities we look for in any federal judge: superb legal ability, personal integrity, sound temperament, and, most importantly, a commitment to read the law even-handedly.

“In this last respect, some of Judge Sotomayor’s past statements and decisions have raised some understandable questions and concerns. One of these is a statement she made a few years back that the Court of Appeals is, quote, ‘Where policy is made.’ I think that’s a tough statement to square with Article III of the U.S. Constitution, which clearly contemplates a far more limited role for federal judges, and I suspect that a number of us over here in the Legislative Branch will want to ask Judge Sotomayor questions about that statement.

“The reason is simple. I think most Americans would agree that the courtroom is not an appropriate place to exercise one’s political beliefs or personal preferences. As far as most of us are concerned, politics ends at the courthouse door. The courtroom is where you go to get a fair and even-handed reading of the law, regardless of who you are or where you came from or who you voted for. Legislators make the laws, not judges. Most people understand that and place a high value on it. And the last time Judge Sotomayor came before the Senate for confirmation, I voted against her nomination precisely out of a concern that she’d bring pre-existing personal and political beliefs into the courtroom.

“Many of the same concerns I had about Judge Sotomayor eleven years ago persist. But a fresh review of her record has now begun; and, as I said, Republicans will insist that the confirmation process for Judge Sotomayor is conducted in a fair and professional manner. This is the way Republicans have treated judicial nominees in the past, and this is the way we will continue to treat them: with respect.

“But respectful doesn’t mean rushed. Judge Sotomayor has a long record, and it will take a long time to get through it. She’s served 17 years on both the trial and the appellate court. She’s been involved in more than 3,600 cases since becoming a judge. In order to conduct a thorough examination of all these cases, it’s vital that the Senate have sufficient time to do so.

“During the last three Supreme Court confirmations, the average amount of time the Senate had to prepare for a hearing was more than 60 days. For Justice Alito, the Senate had 70 days to prepare for an informed hearing. And like Judge Sotomayor, Justice Alito had thousands of cases for Senators to review. Our Democrat colleagues who were in the minority during the Alito nomination appreciated the fairness they were afforded; both the Senior Senator from Vermont and the Senior Senator from New York noted at the time that in handling the Alito nomination it was important to do it right, not quick.

“This time around, our friend Senator Schumer notes that Judge Sotomayor has a very ‘extensive’ record, and we certainly have a ‘right’ to ‘scrutinize’ it. So in considering this nomination I’m confident our Democratic colleagues will treat us fairly and allow us to do it ‘right.’

“Throughout this process, Republicans will be guided by a few simple principles. But perhaps the most important ones are these: Americans expect and should receive equal treatment under the law, and Americans want judges who understand their role is to interpret the law, not write it. As Chief Justice Roberts put it during his confirmation hearing, the American people expect a judge to be like an umpire — someone who applies the rules, but doesn’t make them. No one ever went to a ballgame, as he put it, to watch the umpire.

“Lawmakers make law, and they have to answer for those laws every two or six years to the voters. Federal judges, on the other hand, never have to face the voters, and thus aren’t supposed to make policy. Lifetime appointments are a serious matter, and voting on a Supreme Court justice is one of the most important decisions a senator will ever make. Republicans approach this nomination with a clear set of guiding principles, and we will make every effort to determine whether Judge Sotomayor shares them.”

###
‘The American people want health care decisions left up to families and doctors, not bureaucrats in Washington. They don’t want a government takeover that denies or delays the care they need, and they don’t want politicians telling them how much or what kind they can have’

WASHINGTON, D.C. - U.S. Senate Republican Leader Mitch McConnell made the following remarks on the Senate floor Monday regarding the importance of getting it right on healthcare reform:

“We’re all interested in reforming health care. And while this debate has yet to fully play out, we already know one thing for sure: any action we take on this issue will affect every single American.

“There’s no doubt Americans are frustrated with the increasing cost of health care and that many are worried about losing the health care they have. Many Americans can’t afford health care or have to choose between basic necessities and medical care they need. This is what’s wrong with the current system, and we need to fix it.

“Yet it’s also true that many Americans are satisfied with the care they have. They like being able to see their doctor and being able to get the care they need, when they need it. These are the things that are right about patient-focused American-style healthcare, and that we wouldn’t want to sacrifice.

“So while both parties recognize that serious reform of our health care system is needed, we must also recognize the importance of getting it right. Americans want reform. The question is what kind of reform. Reform is necessary, but not all so-called reforms are necessarily good.

“Based on some of the things we’ve been hearing out of Democrats in Washington in recent weeks, Americans have good reason to be concerned about what the future holds for health care.

“The biggest concern is the talk of a government takeover of healthcare. Americans suspect that what’s being sold as a government ‘option’ would soon become the only option.

“Those who like the care they have don’t particularly like the idea of the people who brought us the Department of Motor Vehicles handling life or death health care decisions like whether or not they’re eligible for surgery or whether they qualify for a certain medicine according to some impersonal government board in Washington. They don’t want to rely on bureaucrats in Washington to get their phone calls returned or their office visits covered. But the prospect of a government takeover of health care is becoming more and more real.

“Democrats in the Senate want government to play a dominant role in health care delivery. Both the Chairmen of the Senate Finance and HELP Committees have said they want to produce legislation that relies on a government-run plan. And nearly half of Senate Democrats have endorsed a resolution stating that any health care reform must include a government-run plan.

“Democrats in the House of Representatives are circulating an outline of how they would like to change American health care. Their plan would create a government-run insurance model that could limit patient choices. Americans who want to keep their health insurance plan should be allowed to do so. Yet one respected study showed that 118 million Americans could lose their current private insurance and end up in a government plan if this proposal was enacted. The House Democrats’ plan could also lead to the creation of a government board that would determine what benefits and drugs are available to patients and what prices would be charged.

“The administration also wants the government to take a leading role in health care. During the campaign, the President said that if he were designing a system from scratch, he would probably ‘go ahead’ with a single-payer system. The Secretary of Health and Human Services shares the President’s belief that any reform must guarantee the inclusion of a government plan.

“The American people want health care decisions left up to families and doctors, not bureaucrats in Washington. They don’t want a government takeover that denies or delays the care they need, and they don’t want politicians telling them how much or what kind they can have.

“That’s why many of us who recognize the need for reform will insist on making health care more affordable and accessible, while protecting the doctor-patient relationship and ensuring every American can get the care they need, when they need it. This is the kind of health care reform that Americans want, and this is the reform we’ll support.”

###