Recent Press Releases

‘What was supposed to be an exercise in smart, bipartisan, common-sense, reforms that cut costs and increase access somehow became an exercise in government expansion that promises to raise costs, raise premiums, and slash Medicare for seniors’

WASHINGTON, D.C. - U.S. Senate Republican Leader Mitch McConnell made the following remarks on the Senate floor Wednesday regarding the importance of getting it right on health care reform:

“Over the past several months, lawmakers in Washington have been engaged in a serious and wide-ranging debate about the fate of our nation’s health care system. It’s a debate that grew out of a recognition that while America may have the best health care in the world, the cost of care is too high and too many lack insurance.

“This much was never in dispute.

“There isn’t a single member of Congress from either party who doesn’t want to solve these problems. That’s why the disagreements we’ve had have arisen not over the ends, but over the means of achieving these common goals. And that’s why over the past few months, two very different approaches to reform have come into view.

“For most Democrats, reform seems to come in a single form: a vast expansion of government detailed in complicated, thousand-page bills costing trillions. The only thing that’s clear about the Democrat plans are the basics: they cost about a trillion dollars, they increase premiums, they raise taxes, and they slash Medicare.

“In short, they include a lot of things that Americans didn’t ask for and don’t want, and they include very few of the things that Americans thought they were going to get.

“What was supposed to be an exercise in smart, bipartisan, common-sense, reforms that cut costs and increase access somehow became an exercise in government expansion that promises to raise costs, raise premiums, and slash Medicare for seniors. For Democrats in Congress, the original purpose of reform seems to have blurred.

“Republicans have taken a different approach.

“We agreed at the outset that reform was needed. But in our view, those reforms wouldn’t necessarily cost a lot of money, wouldn’t add to the debt, and wouldn’t expand the government.

“Instead of a massive government-driven experiment, Republicans have offered common-sense, step by step solutions to the problems of cost and access — things like medical liability reform, which would save tens of billions of dollars and increase access to care; needed insurance reforms that would increase access and lower costs; and prevention and wellness programs, like the ones that have been so successful in bending the cost curve down at major businesses like Safeway.

“Here were the two approaches to reform.

“Well, the American people looked at these two approaches and they made their choice. All summer long, we watched as ordinary Americans reacted to the administration’s plan to put government between individuals and their health care and to pay for it with higher premiums, higher taxes, and Medicare cuts in the midst of a recession.

“Americans rejected the idea of a vast new experiment to reorder their health care and nearly one fifth of the economy in a single stunning move. They know the stakes are too high. Just last Friday, the Treasury Department announced that the government ran a deficit in the fiscal year that just ended of more than three times the previous record.

“The national debt is nearly 12 trillion dollars. It’s expected to grow by another nine trillion dollars over the next ten years. Medicare and Medicaid cost the federal government nearly $700 billion a year, a cost that’s expected to double in ten years.

“These numbers are like nothing we have ever seen.

“And yet, in the midst of all this, the administration is proposing that we conduct a trillion dollar experiment in health care that would expand government spending even more.

“And now Democrats in Congress are proposing that we put another quarter of a trillion dollars on the government charge card in order to prevent a cut in the reimbursement rate to doctors who treat Medicare patients.

“All of us want to keep this cut from happening. But the American people don’t want us to borrow another cent to pay for it. And they don’t want Democrats in Congress to pretend that this quarter of a trillion dollars isn’t part of the cost of health care reform — because it is.

“It’s also a clear violation of the President’s pledge that health care reform wouldn’t add a single dime to the deficit over the next decade. In fact, if Democrats have their way, this bill would add nearly 2.5 trillion dimes to the national debt.

“Well, the American people have a message for Democrats in Congress: the time to get our fiscal house in order is not tomorrow. It’s not next year. It’s now.

“Last week, 10 Democrat senators sent a letter to the Majority Leader outlining some of the problems that can be expected to result from our record deficit and debts.

“They pointed out that each American’s share of today’s debt is more than $38,000; that long-term deficits will lead to higher interest rates and inflation; and that all this debt threatens to weaken not only our basic standard of living but also our national security. And then they made an urgent plea. They called on their party to do something to deal with these urgent fiscal realities.

“They shouldn’t hold their breath.

“Because instead of addressing these urgent issues, a handful of top Democrats are instead pressing forward behind closed doors with a health care plan that, once fully implemented, and including the doc fix, would cost more than $2 trillion dollars.

“It’s hard to imagine, but if the history of government entitlement programs is any guide, then these estimates are almost certainly on the conservative side.

“History shows that these kinds of programs almost never come in under cost.

“Consider just a few examples.

“At the time that Medicare Part A was created, it was estimated that costs for hospital services and related administration for the year 1990 would run about $9 billion. The actual cost was more than seven times that.

“Medicare Part B, a program that covers physician services, was expected to run on $500 million a year from general tax revenues, along with a $3 monthly premium. Last year, the program was funded through nearly $150 billion in federal revenues.

“As I say, these are just a few examples.

“But they illustrate a larger point that can’t be ignored: The nature of government entitlements is such that they only get bigger with time. The estimates we’re getting have to be viewed in light of past experience. And past experience isn’t encouraging.

“Several months into this debate, it’s easy to forget that at the outset everyone seemed to agree on two things: that health care reforms were needed, and any reform would have to lower overall health care costs.

“Yet the evidence suggests that the bill Senate Democrats and White House officials are carving up in private would do the opposite. It would actually increase costs. It would increase premiums, raise taxes, and slash Medicare — and that’s not reform.

“Americans are concerned about the direction we’re headed in. Record debts, record deficits, endless borrowing, and yet every day we hear of more plans to borrow and spend, borrow and spend.

“Americans don’t want the same kind of denial, delay, and rationing of care they’ve seen in countries that have followed the path of government-driven health care for all, and they’re perplexed that in the midst of a terrible recession, near 10-percent unemployment, massive federal debt, and a deficit that rivals the deficits of the last four years combined, the White House would move ahead with a massive expansion of government health care. They’re telling us that common sense, step-by-step reforms are the better, wiser, and more fiscally responsible way to go.

“This is the message I have delivered nearly every day on the Senate floor since the first week of June because, in my view, it’s the message that the American people have been sending us.”

###

Uigher Case has ‘critical ramifications’ for U.S. Security

‘If you want certitude that foreign terrorists detained at Guantanamo Bay are not released into the United States, then don’t bring them here in the first place’

October 21, 2009

WASHINGTON, D.C. - U.S. Senate Republican Leader Mitch McConnell made the following remarks on the Senate floor Wednesday regarding the upcoming Supreme Court case on Guantanamo detainees:

“Yesterday the Supreme Court announced it would hear a case that has critical ramifications for our ability to detain foreign nationals safely outside our borders during wartime at the U.S. Naval Station at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba. The case also provides insight into the best place to detain and try foreign terrorists.

“The case involves a group of ethnic Chinese Uighers who are detained at Guantanamo Bay. The Uighers won their habeas corpus petition to be released from custody. Many of these Uighers, however, had received terrorist training in the Tora Bora Mountains of Afghanistan —including weapons training on AK-47 assault rifles—at a camp run by the head of a group that our State Department has designated a terrorist organization, and that the United Nations has listed as a group associated with “Usama bin Laden, al Qaeda, or the Taliban.”

“Not surprisingly, it has not been easy to find countries eager to accept the Uighers into their civilian population. So the Uighers sued to be released into the United States. Federal district court Judge Ricardo Urbina granted the Uighers’ request and ordered them released here. It did not matter to Judge Urbina that the Uighers did not have an immigration status, or that they had received military style weapons training, or that they had associated with a terrorist group. He was persuaded by their argument that justice required that they be released here.

“Fortunately, the D.C. Circuit reversed Judge Urbina. It ruled that even though the Uighers had won their habeas petition, they did not have a right to be released into the United States. In other words, it ruled that even if the government had to release them, it did not have to release them into Alexandria, or Annandale, or Falls Church, or anywhere else in Northern Virginia that the Uighers might like to go.

“The D.C. Circuit’s ruling is important to national security in general and to the debate over where we should try foreign terrorists in particular. The D.C. Circuit noted that the Supreme Court has held that foreign nationals without property or presence in the United States have fewer legal rights than foreign nationals who are present on American soil. The D.C. Circuit also noted that the Supreme Court has repeatedly ruled that a sovereign has a right to control its borders, and that means it has a right to bar from being released into its territory foreign nationals whom it has not admitted onto its soil.

“In short, because these detainees remain at Guantanamo, outside our borders, they have fewer legal rights than they would have if they were brought within our borders, including a right to be released into our civilian population.

“We don’t know how the D.C. Circuit would have ruled if the Uighers had been present on U.S. soil. But we do know a couple of things. First, the D.C. Circuit’s reason for not releasing them into the United States was that they had not been brought into the United States. Second, other foreign nationals who have committed murder and other serious crimes who were in the United States have been released here when our government could not transfer them to another country, either because they did not want to go to another country or because other countries did not want to take them.

“The administration and its defenders in the Senate say that because we have tried terrorists in civilian court before, we should do so again. And they say there is no problem with us doing so because the administration would never release detainees into the United States, by which they really mean to say that the administration would not intentionally release detainees into the United States. Both assertions miss the mark.

“First, whether we can try terrorists here is not the issue; the issue is whether we should try terrorists here. Before he became Attorney General, Michael Mukasey was a noted federal trial judge who presided over civilian trials of terrorists, like the trial of the so-called “Blind Sheik,” Omar Abdel Rahman, for the 1993 World Trade Center bombing. He has written that there are very good reasons why we shouldn’t try terrorists in civilian court, including the additional legal rights terrorists will receive if they are brought here. I ask unanimous consent that Attorney General Mukasey’s recent op-ed on this topic be placed in the record at the end of my remarks.

“Second, once the administration brings detainees into the United States, it is no longer simply a matter for the administration. It is no longer just about what it will or will not do. It’s also about what a federal judge will or will not do. As we saw with Judge Urbina and the Uighers, a judge may very well agree with the legal arguments of Guantanamo detainees and order them released into the United States.

“Those risks do not exist if the Obama administration does not bring Guantanamo detainees into the United States, and instead tries them at the modern, multi-million dollar courtroom at Guantanamo Bay, under the very military commission rules that it has now re-written to its liking—and which we will soon vote on when we consider the Defense Authorization Conference Report.

“The Supreme Court should affirm the D.C. Circuit’s decision and let the political branches maintain control over our borders, including deciding whether and how foreign nationals outside our borders may be admitted within them. If it does, it will bring clarity to the debate over whether terrorist detainees at Guantanamo Bay ought to be transferred to the United States. And that clarity is this: if you want certitude that foreign terrorists detained at Guantanamo Bay are not released into the United States, then don’t bring them here in the first place.”

###

McConnell: Enough is Enough

October 21, 2009

-Senate Republican Leader urges vote against adding a quarter trillion dollars to the deficit-

WASHINGTON, D.C. - U.S. Senate Republican Leader Mitch McConnell made the following remarks on the Senate floor Wednesday regarding the Democrats’ plan to add $250 billion to the deficit:

“Americans are increasingly alarmed by the expansion of our national debt and this spending binge that we’re putting on the national credit card.

“They’re asking us to do what they’ve been doing: they want us to take out the scissors and cut the charge card.

“They want us to live within our means so their children and grandchildren don’t wake up one morning to find the American Dream buried under an avalanche of debt.

“Our fiscal situation has simply spiraled out of control.

“And yet now the proponents of this measure want to put another quarter of a trillion dollars on the federal credit card.

“Republicans offered a fiscally responsible way to prevent a pay cut to Medicare doctors. It was rejected.

“We are in dangerous territory.

“I will vote against this deficit-expanding bill because enough is enough. I urge my colleagues to do the same.”

###