Recent Press Releases



Washington, D.C. – U.S. Senate Republican Leader Mitch McConnell introduced an amendment today to the Defense Authorization bill that addresses the elimination of the U.S. stockpile of chemical weapons, a significant portion of which is stored at the Blue Grass Army Depot in Madison County, Kentucky. Senator McConnell made the following remarks on the Senate floor Wednesday regarding his amendment:



“There’s an old saying that goes, ‘If you want something done right, you have to do it yourself.’ For years I have led the fight in Congress to push the Department of Defense to safely and efficiently dispose of the deadly chemical weapons stored at the Blue Grass Army Depot in Madison County, Kentucky, and in other facilities across the country.



“For years, forces burrowed deep within the middle layers of the DOD bureaucracy have dragged their feet on this issue, and refused to comply with Congress’s directions.



“And as a result, for years, the people of Madison County have had to live with 523 tons of chemical weapons in their midst, including VX nerve agent, one of the deadliest nerve agents ever created.



“Just 10 milligrams of VX is enough to kill a human being. And they have over a hundred tons of the stuff, stored just down the road from a schoolhouse.



“Well, my colleagues and I have had enough. And we have concluded that if you want something done right, you have to do it yourself.



“Therefore, I rise today to speak about an amendment I filed on Tuesday, Amendment Number 2061, that will set a deadline into law for DOD to complete work on the disposal of the chemical weapons at the Blue Grass Army Depot and other facilities.



“The deadline in this amendment will hold DOD to complete work on disposal within 10 years—no later than 2017.



“Thanks to years of delay and mismanagement, last year the Defense Department formally notified Congress that it could not make the deadline set in the Chemical Weapons Convention, or CWC, of 2012.



“The United States has committed itself to that document, and therefore will be in violation of its treaty obligations.



“But now DOD’s latest projections would put off the completion of the disposal process at Blue Grass Army Depot to 2023, 11 years past the original deadline. That’s simply unacceptable.



“I have documents from DOD that confirm that, with sufficient funds, the entire U.S. chemical weapons stockpile could be eliminated by 2017, the deadline set by this amendment—or possibly sooner. If that goal can be met, then it certainly should be met.



“Compounding the longstanding mismanagement within DOD on this issue is that DOD has consistently failed to request sufficient funds for disposal efforts. For years, Congress has had to do the heavy lifting by increasing funds and making clear our commitment that these weapons be disposed of safely and with dispatch.



“A formal deadline in law, along with a regular reporting requirement, should finally push DOD to request sufficient funds in the future. That seems to be the only way to get DOD to ask for the funds it needs to get the job done.



“Authorizers and appropriators of both parties, and in both houses, have repeatedly expressed great frustration at DOD’s sluggish response to Congress’s will. For years, DOD has flouted Congress and continued business as usual. That’s got to stop.



“Passing this amendment will send a strong signal to DOD that this Congress has had enough of their pig-headed stubbornness on this issue—and we are not going to take it anymore.



“To prove we mean business, this amendment will also provide an additional $49.3 million for chemical demilitarization activities at Blue Grass Army Depot and a comparable facility at Pueblo Depot in Colorado. Those funds are fully offset in the bill.



“The money will be targeted to the two depots that have the furthest to go to dispose of their stockpiles, so this extra funding will help speed up the elimination of chemical weapons.



“Delaying the disposal of the chemical weapons in Kentucky and Colorado until the 2020s would cost the taxpayers an additional $3.3 billion. Appropriating $49.3 million and setting a firm deadline in law now will save us that $3.3 billion later.



“The Department of Defense has over 16,000 tons of lethal chemical agents stored in military depots across America. VX nerve gas stolen by a terrorist from the Blue Grass Army Depot in Kentucky could have grave consequences for Americans living as far away as Los Angeles, Houston, Miami or even here in Washington, D.C.



“The risk from these weapons is particularly acute for those who live near these storage facilities. Every risk assessment ever done has concluded that the longer these deadly weapons lay fallow, the more unstable and dangerous they become.



“The threat of terrorism posed by our failure to dispose of these weapons is not limited to the storage of such materials in the United States. With America soon to be in breach of its treaty obligations under the CWC, it will be all the more difficult for us to prod Russia to dispose of its outstanding chemical weapons.



“Storage of Russia’s chemical weapons is much less secure than America’s. The longer those weapons continue to sit in storage throughout Russia, the greater the opportunity for them to fall into terrorist hands.



“At its core, continued foot-dragging poses a national security and homeland security risk to the nation.



“Finally, I would note that this is a bipartisan amendment. My good friend Senator Salazar of Colorado, on the other side of the aisle, joins me as a co-sponsor.



“On this side of the aisle, we are joined by his Colorado colleague, Senator Allard, and my Kentucky confidant, Senator Bunning, as well.



“A vote for this amendment will tell DOD that Congress is fed up with its intransigence on this issue. A vote for this amendment is a vote to save the taxpayers $3.3 billion. A vote for this amendment is a vote to dispose of deadly nerve agents that are just down the street from our homes, our churches, our schools.



“Most importantly, a vote for this amendment is a vote to make the American people safer and more secure.



“When this Congress directs DOD to safely and efficiently dispose of these deadly weapons, and when we authorize and appropriate a sufficient amount of money so they can get the job done, that’s exactly what we expect them to do.



“It is a shame that we have to place a legally binding deadline on the Department to get them to do this. But if we want this job to be done right, we are going to have to step in and set a deadline ourselves. I urge my colleagues to support the amendment.”



###


Washington, D.C. – U.S. Senate Republican Leader Mitch McConnell made the following remarks (as prepared) on the Senate floor Wednesday regarding the Webb Amendment to the Defense Authorization Act.

“We’re just a couple days into the debate on Defense Authorization Act. But a familiar and troubling pattern is already beginning to emerge.

“We could have voted on the Webb Amendment yesterday. Republicans were willing to move forward with votes on side-by-side amendments, and we said so.

“Yet the Democratic Majority insisted on a cloture filing instead that had no other effect than to slow things down. We’re about to have the same vote, with the same threshold, and the same result, that we would have had yesterday. All for no apparent reason.

“Two days into this debate, and we’re already headed down the same fruitless road we went down with the emergency supplemental bill, when the Democratic Majority delayed the delivery of funds for our troops in Iraq and Afghanistan for more than three months.

“The bill we finally sent to the President’s desk was guaranteed to draw a veto, so the Democratic Majority delayed it some more. In the end, they gave the President the bill he asked for. They wasted three months of the Senate’s time fussing and fighting over the original request, and then gave him what he wanted in the first place.

“It was a total waste of time.

“Now here we go again. Two days into this debate, and we’re already wasting time on an amendment we know the President will veto. The Webb Amendment contains many good things that Republicans strongly support. But it also limits the President’s authority as Commander in Chief, and combined with other objectionable provisions in this bill, it will provoke his veto.

“The President vetoed the emergency supplemental because it carried restrictions on his constitutional authority as Commander in Chief. He’ll do it on this bill too. We know this for a fact.

“No one here disagrees with the idea that our forces should be rested, trained, and well-equipped. Republicans showed yesterday that we’re committed to give our soldiers and Marines everything they need. That’s why this underlying bill begins the expansion of the Army and the Marine Corps. And that’s why Republicans offered a side-by-side amendment yesterday that would have given our men and women in the field all these things — without language that will draw a presidential veto.

“If the Democratic Majority would have allowed us a vote on the Graham Amendment, we could have stood here today and told the troops that rest, training, and equipment are on the way. But instead, we’re going to dangle all these things in front of them, knowing they won’t be delivered. The Democratic Majority is trying to force us to make a false choice between these two options, to pit the troops against their Commander in Chief. This isn’t just foolish. It’s wrong.

“By putting limits on the President’s authority to control forces in the field, the Webb Amendment also amounts to a backdoor effort to hamstring the Petraeus Plan.

“It’s the first vote on a strategy that hasn’t been fully manned for just about a month. Every Senator in this chamber knows we’ll get a progress report on General Petraeus’s strategy in September — two months from now. We should wait for that assessment before rushing to judgment. A Democratic-led Senate sent General Petraeus to Iraq and confirmed his nomination unanimously. He has a plan. He’s executing it. We need to let him do his work.

“Let me say it again: the Webb Amendment contains a policy objective that Republicans enthusiastically share. What we do not share is the belief that the President's constitutional powers as Commander in Chief should be eroded by politicians in Washington in a time of war. As this debate proceeds, we will debate a number of amendments that seek to limit the President’s authority and which dictate operational plans for the war in Iraq. I expect that at least some of them will seek to order an immediate withdrawal of our combat forces.

“These amendments would provide a direct way to end our involvement in Iraq, and the Senate will consider them in due course. But the Webb amendment is different. It would curtail the deployment of reinforcements to Iraq, denying our military commanders the ability to sustain current force levels in Iraq, especially in Anbar province, where most agree there has been evidence of success.

“The Defense Department establishes dwell times through policies that have been developed over time by our commanders and leaders. Those leaders, in turn respond to the requests of commanders in the field. The waiver contained in the Webb Amendment sets an unreasonably high bar.

“Republicans, meanwhile, will insist on amendments that protect the nation’s ability to defeat terrorists and wage war against al-Qaeda.

“I urge a no vote against the Webb amendment, as it seeks to limit the president’s authority as Commander in Chief, and will deny our field commanders operational forces. I urge my colleagues to do the same.”

###



Washington, D.C. – U.S. Senate Republican Leader Mitch McConnell spoke on the Senate floor Monday regarding the fiscal year 2008 National Defense Authorization Act:



“Let me make some observations about the defense authorization bill. What Republicans would like to see is an open and comprehensive debate. We know this debate is going to include a discussion of our policy in Iraq, and we welcome that, too. There are a variety of different proposals on both sides of the aisle about how we ought to go forward on that most important issue.



“Nobody has any doubt that is the number one issue in this country and we are certainly prepared to offer our suggestions, as well as to react to the Democrat suggestions about where we should go from here.



“But a couple of words of caution are in order as we proceed. Everyone should know from the outset that Republicans will expect and insist on the freedom to improve this bill with our own amendments. We will be offering them and expect to have them voted on as well as Democratic amendments.



“Democrats have continually tried to block our efforts at improving legislation earlier in this session as evidence by the record pace of cloture petitions we have been discussing here on the floor that have been filed since January.



“I know that there's been an effort to attempt to paint this record-setting pace of cloture petitions as a reaction against alleged Republican intransigence but, frankly, that is simply not the case. It's an effort to try to truncate the legislative process in such a way that works to the disadvantage of the minority.



“The Senate's always been a place of cooperation. One thing we know around here is that both sides have been, most of us, have been on the majority and minority recently. We know the different proposals that tend to please one and inhibit the other. The Senate is a ponderous place on purpose. It's exactly what Washington and the founders predicted.



“Republicans have insisted on our right to improve everything from ethics reform to the minimum wage bill this year. We have improved, we believe, everything we have touched and will continue to insist on our rights to do that. Specifically on this bill -- the D.O.D. authorization bill which we will turn to at 3:00 p.m. -- we will insist on amendments that respond aggressively and practically to the ongoing terrorist threat both here and abroad.



“It’s important to remember who we’re fighting. General Petraeus has said that 80 percent to 90 percent of the suicide bombers in Iraq are from outside the country, outside of Iraq. We’re fighting al-Qaeda, other terror groups, and the states that support them.



“We can’t allow these terrorists to gain a new sanctuary, even closer to the U.S. than Afghanistan, or to gain access to other ungoverned areas in the Middle East that will give them a new stage to carry out their attacks.



“It has always been in the U.S. interest, and it remains in the U.S. interest, to maintain stability in the Persian Gulf. It’s important not to forget that either.



“We need to guard against an emboldened Iran, which is facilitating and capitalizing on the weakness of Iraq for its own advantage on the world stage.



“And we must reassure our allies in Iraq, the Middle East, and the world that America remains committed to fighting terrorism wherever it’s found.



“Finally, as we proceed, we must remember that we’re at war, and that our enemies will use any means at their disposal to harm us.



“They intend to strike us at home and abroad, they will exploit any opening we give them, and they will use every tool at their disposal.



“Everyone in this chamber has America’s best interests at heart. But it will fall on Republicans in this debate to be particularly awake to the complexity of the terrorist threat.



“It’s no accident, Mr. President, we haven’t been attacked at home in nearly six years. We’ve kept terrorists at arm’s length by bringing the fight to them.



“Republican amendments will build on the lessons we’ve learned over the past six years; they’ll reflect our commitment to security and continued vigilance, and we’ll insist that they be heard.



“Republicans will succeed in improving this bill in ways that improve our war-fighting ability and our counter-terrorism tools.”



###