Recent Press Releases

WASHINGTON, D.C.U.S. Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell made the following remarks on the Senate floor today regarding the Supreme Court's vacancy:

“I recently joined my good friend from Iowa, the Chairman of the Judiciary Committee, in writing an opinion piece.

“We expressed our joint view that the death of Justice Scalia represented a significant loss for our country and that, while finding the right person to take the seat he occupied will clearly be a monumental task, it's one we think the American people are more than equipped to tackle.

“Some disagree and would rather the Senate simply push through yet another lifetime appointment from a president who's on his way out the door.

“Of course it’s within the president’s authority to nominate a successor even in this very rare circumstance — remember that the Senate has not filled a vacancy arising in an election year when there was divided government since 1888, almost 130 years ago — but we also know that Article II, Section II of the Constitution grants the Senate the right to withhold its consent, as it deems necessary.

“It’s clear that concern over confirming Supreme Court nominations made near the end of a presidential term is not new. Given that we are in the midst of the presidential election process, the Chairman of the Judiciary Committee and I believe that it is today the American people who are best-positioned to help make this important decision — rather than a lame-duck president whose priorities and policies they just rejected in the most-recent national election.”

WASHINGTON, D.C.U.S. Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell made the following statement today regarding the Senate vote to proceed to confirmation of Robert Califf to be the Commissioner of the Food and Drug Administration (FDA):

“Drug overdose deaths, driven largely by prescription painkillers, continue to outpace the number of fatalities from traffic accidents in Kentucky. While I recognize the need to protect legitimate patient access to prescription painkillers, the FDA must do more to help us fight back in the midst of today’s prescription-opioid epidemic.

“The FDA plays a leading role in addressing this epidemic through its drug-approval process, in which it is required by federal law to ensure the safety and effectiveness of all drugs. However, the FDA has been rightly criticized for not recognizing the severity of this significant problem and for not taking greater action to address it.

“Over the years, I’ve heard from many Kentuckians concerned about FDA’s lax attitude in this area, with many of the belief that the agency simply has not taken its role in fighting the prescription opioid epidemic seriously.

“To try and push the FDA in the right direction, I contacted the agency in both 2012 and 2013 to warn of the problems with allowing generic, crushable opioids to be made available without the introduction of abuse-deterrent features. As a result, the FDA announced in April 2013 that it had decided to prohibit a generic version of a certain opioid that lacked abuse-deterrent features.

“I also co-sponsored a measure in the last Congress that aimed to push the FDA to encourage the development and use of abuse-deterrent formulations of prescription opioids, which make them harder to crush and abuse.

“Additionally, I joined more than 20 Senate and House members last October in a letter to OMB’s Administrator of Information and Regulatory Affairs, Howard Shelanski. We urged him to help us tackle the prescription-drug abuse epidemic by taking down barriers in the Medicaid repayment system that actually discourage manufacturers from developing the very same abuse-deterrent formulations that I’ve been pushing the FDA to encourage.

“I recently met with Dr. Robert Califf, the FDA Commissioner nominee we’ll consider this evening. We had a productive meeting in which I expressed my concerns about the agency’s past insensitivity to the opioid crisis, along with my desire to see the FDA play a more prominent role in addressing this prescription-opioid epidemic. Dr. Califf shared his proposed plan to reassess the agency’s approach to approving and regulating prescription painkillers. Dr. Califf also acknowledged that a cultural shift will be needed within the FDA if the potential for addiction and abuse of prescription opioids is to be taken more seriously. He assured me that as head of this important agency, he would be the kind of leader our country needs when it comes to confronting this growing epidemic.

“I believe Dr. Califf understands the dire nature of the opioid epidemic and, accordingly, I believe he is today the right person to lead the FDA in a new direction. That said, confirming Dr. Califf will be just the beginning of a much longer and enduring effort on everyone’s part; he and the FDA should expect continued rigorous oversight in the way the agency deals with prescription opioids moving forward.”

WASHINGTON, D.C. – U.S. Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell delivered remarks on the Senate floor today honoring United States Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia:

“I'd like to say a few words about a towering figure of the Supreme Court who will be missed by many.

“Antonin Scalia was one of a kind.

“In the evenings he loved nothing more than a night at the opera house. During the day he often starred in an opus of his own.

“For most watchers of the court, even many of Scalia’s most ardent critics, the work he produced was brilliant, entertaining, and unmissable.

“Words had meaning to him.

“He used them to dissect and refute, to amuse and beguile, to challenge and persuade.

“And even when his arguments didn’t carry the day, his dissents often gathered the most attention anyway.

“President Obama said that Justice Scalia will be ‘remembered as one of the most consequential judges and thinkers to serve on the Supreme Court.’

“I certainly agree.

“It’s amazing that someone who never served as chief justice could make such an indelible impact on our country. He is, in my view, in league with Oliver Wendell Holmes, Louis Brandeis, and John Marshall Harlan as perhaps the most significant associate justices ever.

“I first met him when we both served in the Ford Administration's Justice Department.

“I was fortunate, as a young man, to be invited to staff meetings that featured some of the most influential conservative judicial minds of the time, like Robert Bork and Larry Silverman, but everyone in the department agreed on two things.

“One, Antonin Scalia was the funniest lawyer on staff.

“Two, he was the brightest.

“Scalia was usually the smartest guy in whatever room he chose to walk into. He didn’t need to tell you he was the smartest, you just knew it.

“I came back to Washington a few years later as a Senator on the Judiciary Committee, serving there when Scalia was nominated to the Supreme Court.

“His views on the court were strong and they were clear.

“Some tried to caricature his judicial conservatism as something it was not: political conservatism.

“Scalia’s aim was to follow the Constitution wherever it took him, even if he disagreed politically with the outcome. We saw that when he voted to uphold the constitutional right of protestors to burn the American flag. ‘If it was up to me,’ he said later, ‘I would have thrown this bearded, sandal-wearing flag burner into jail, but it was not up to me.’

“It was up to the Constitution.

“‘If you had to pick one freedom that is the most essential to the functioning of a democracy, it has to be freedom of speech,’ Scalia once said. ‘Because democracy means persuading one another and then, ultimately, voting.’

“‘You can't run such a system if there is a muzzling of one point of view,’ he continued. ‘So it’s a fundamental freedom in a democracy, much more necessary in a democracy than in any other system of government. I guess you can run an effective monarchy without freedom of speech. I don’t think you can run an effective democracy without it.’

“Justice Scalia defended the First Amendment rights of those who would express themselves by burning our flag just as he defended the First Amendment rights of Americans who wished to express themselves by participating in the change-making process of our democracy.

“The right to speak one's mind.

“The right to associate freely.

The rights of citizens, groups, and candidates to participate in the political process…

“Numerous cases involving these kinds of essential First Amendment principles came before the court during his tenure. I filed nearly a dozen Amicus Curiae briefs in related Supreme Court cases in recent years, and I was the lead plaintiff in a case that challenged campaign-finance laws in 2002.

“These core First Amendment freedoms may not always be popular with some politicians who'd rather control the amount, nature, and timing of speech that's critical of them. But Scalia recognized that protecting the citizenry from efforts by the government to control their speech about issues of public concern was the very purpose of the First Amendment. He knew that such speech lay at its very core.

“It's a constitutional outlook shared by many, including the members of an organization like the Federalist Society.

“You could count on him attending the society's annual dinner.

“Paul, a priest and one of his five sons, sometimes gave an opening prayer.

“‘If in an old-fashioned Catholic family with five sons you don't get one priest out of it, we're in big trouble,’ Scalia once said. ‘The other four were very happy when Paul announced that he was going to take one for the team.’

“That’s the thing about Antonin Scalia.

“His opinions could bite.

“His wit could be cutting.

“But his good humor was always in abundant supply. One study from 2005 concluded decisively — or as decisively as one can — that Scalia was the funniest justice on the court.

“He was also careful not to confuse the philosophical with the personal.

“‘I attack ideas, I don't attack people,’ he said. ‘If you can't separate the two, you gotta get another day job.’

“These qualities endeared him to many who thought very differently than he did — most famously, his philosophical opposite on the court, Ruth Bader Ginsburg.

“Their friendship began after Ginsburg heard him speak at a law conference. ‘I disagreed with most of what he said,’ she recalled, ‘but I loved the way he said it.’

“Scalia put it this way. ‘She likes opera, and she's a very nice person. What's not to like?’ Well, he continued, ‘except her views on the law.’

“Ginsburg called him ‘Nino.’ Scalia referred to the pair as ‘the Odd Couple.’

“They vacationed together. They rode elephants. They parasailed.

“And just a few months ago, their relationship was captured in the perfect medium: opera, their shared love.

Scalia/Ginsburg: A (Gentle) Parody of Operatic Proportions premiered last summer. In it, a jurist named Scalia is imprisoned for ‘excessive dissenting’ and it is none other than Ginsburg, or an actress faintly resembling her, who comes crashing through the ceiling to save him.

“It’s the kind of show that’s larger than life.

“But so was Antonin Scalia.

“He leaves behind nine children and a wife who loved him dearly, Maureen.

“Maureen would sometimes tease her husband that she had her pick of suitors and could just as well have married any of them. But she didn’t, he would remind her, because they were wishy-washy and she would have been bored.

“‘Whatever my faults are,’ Scalia once said. ‘I am not wishy-washy.’

“Far from wishy-washy.

“Anything but boring.

“Justice Scalia was an articulate champion of the Constitution, he was a personality unto himself, and his passing is a significant loss for the court and for our country. We remember him today. We express our sympathies to the large and loving family he leaves behind. We know our country will not soon forget him.”