Recent Press Releases

‘All of us recognize that we should reduce the amount of energy we use. We also recognize that the energy we use should be as clean as possible, as reliable as possible, and as inexpensive as possible. Our balanced approach of finding more American energy and using less would bring about all these things without hurting the economy or disrupting our lives or hindering security’

WASHINGTON, D.C. - U.S. Senate Republican Leader Mitch McConnell made the following remarks on the Senate floor Thursday regarding a balanced, sensible solution to combat the energy crisis and address the concerns of those involved in the energy debate:

“Americans have noticed a steady uptick in the price of gasoline over the past few weeks, and it’s only going to get worse during the summer driving season. The economic downturn may have caused gas prices to fall from last summer’s record highs. But as the economy recovers, $4 a gallon gasoline could well return. And Americans will want answers.

“Fortunately, many of us have been busy putting together a balanced, sensible solution that gets at the root of our energy crisis and addresses the concerns of everyone involved in this debate, including some who’ve traditionally been at odds. We believe it’s possible to build a bridge to the clean energy future that all of us want without introducing crippling taxes on consumers or industry. So this morning, with Memorial Day fast approaching, I’d like to briefly outline this balanced approach.

“The first step is to admit that we’ve got a serious problem. Something must be done to reduce America’s dependence on foreign oil. America uses more than a fifth of the world’s supply of oil, much of it from countries that don’t like us. And if we start by using less, we’ll need a lot less from other countries. So conservation and increased efficiency are necessary. It’s something that everyone can agree on. We need to use less.

“But conservation is only half the equation. Even as we use less energy, we need to produce more of our own. America sits on an ocean of untapped oil and natural gas, and vast stores of coal and oil shale. Our geography also makes us rich in renewable energy sources like wind, solar, and geothermal. Taken together, these resources are the perfect complement as we move toward the day when cars and factories run on cleaner, more efficient fuels. But we have to be realistic about how far off that day is. We have to admit there’s a gap between the clean, renewable fuel we want, and the reliable energy we need.

“So, as we invest in technologies that will bring us cleaner, more efficient energy, the only way we can expect to truly reduce our dependence on foreign sources of oil is to produce more American energy, and use less. This may sound like a simple proposal. The best solutions usually are. Unfortunately, the idea of finding more energy at home and using less is needlessly controversial because some are unwilling to admit that a gap exists between the energy we need now and the energy we want, and still others don’t like a number of our proposals for finding more domestic energy.

“Here’s what we’ve proposed:

"We propose building 100 new clean nuclear energy plants as soon as possible

"We propose offshore exploration for natural gas and oil

"We propose making plug-in electric cars and trucks half of all new vehicles sold in 20 years

"And we propose doubling research and development on energy to make all of this possible

“These and other proposals, including the development of clean coal and coal-to-liquids technologies, constitute a balanced, comprehensive approach that would do all the things we need to reduce our dependence on foreign oil, help reduce our consumption, and build the bridge to a cleaner, more efficient energy future.

“This approach would strengthen our economy by preserving jobs in existing industries even as we create new jobs by investing in new technologies. It would enhance our security by reducing our dependence on foreign suppliers. And it would help the environment by embracing the cleaner, more efficient energy sources of the future.

“All of us recognize that we should reduce the amount of energy we use. We also recognize that the energy we use should be as clean as possible, as reliable as possible, and as inexpensive as possible. Our balanced approach of finding more American energy and using less would bring about all these things without hurting the economy or disrupting our lives or hindering security.

“As the summer driving season continues, Americans will be reminded once again that our nation’s energy crisis has not gone away. But the approach that I’ve outlined addresses that crisis head-on. Republicans will continue to speak out about the produce-more-use-less model. We hope our friends on the other side recognize it as the only sensible approach to a crisis that must be addressed.”

###
‘So I hope the President uses his remarks this morning to present a concrete plan that demonstrates how closing Guantanamo will keep Americans as safe as Guantanamo has… If he isn’t able to provide specifics about his plan for terrorist detainees at Guantanamo, he could still provide this assurance by simply revising his policy

WASHINGTON, D.C. - U.S. Senate Republican Leader Mitch McConnell made the following remarks on the Senate floor Thursday regarding the President’s speech on Guantanamo later this morning and the threats and legal questions posed by bringing Guantanamo detainees to the United States:

“A little later this morning, the President will discuss his decision to close Guantanamo by an arbitrary deadline that is now only eight months away.

“It’s clear to both Republicans and Democrats in Congress that the administration does not currently have a plan for closing Guantanamo, and that closing it without a plan is unacceptable.

“So I hope the President uses his remarks this morning to present a concrete plan that demonstrates how closing Guantanamo will keep Americans as safe as Guantanamo has.

“We know the FBI has serious concerns about any plans to release or transfer other detainees into the United States.

“Just yesterday, FBI Director Mueller said detainees who are sent to U.S. soil, even if they are only sent to secure detention facilities, might still be able to conduct terrorist activities, much like gang leaders who’ve been able to run their gangs from prison.

“Director Mueller also stated that detainees released or transferred into the United States could endanger the American people by radicalizing others or providing financial support for terrorism.

“Director Mueller’s testimony appears to undermine the claim that sending detainees to the United States is a safe alternative to Guantanamo.

“And yesterday, the Senate spoke with near unanimity, by a vote of 90 to 6, against sending terrorist detainees to U.S. soil — a vote that mirrored a vote two years ago on the same question.

“The Senate also expressed its view yesterday that Congress expects its relevant committees to be briefed on the threat posed by the terrorists at Guantanamo.

“So it’s clear that Senate Democrats don’t believe circumstances have changed over the past two years in such a way that would warrant releasing or transferring terrorists into America.

“If the President believes circumstances have changed, then he has an opportunity to explain those changes this morning.

“The American people are asking the administration to guarantee that any terrorist it releases or transfers won’t return to the battlefield.

“This is particularly urgent in light of a New York Times report this morning that says one in seven detainees already released have returned to terrorism.

“The President has an opportunity to reassure the American people that future releases won’t lead to the same result.

“If he isn’t able to provide specifics about his plan for terrorist detainees at Guantanamo, he could still provide this assurance by simply revising his policy.

“The President has shown adaptability on military commissions, prisoner photos, Iraq, Afghanistan, and Pakistan.

“Here’s an opportunity to show more of that flexibility on Guantanamo.”

###

‘If the administration isn’t willing to share information on these terrorists voluntarily, except with those in Europe, then Congress will have to require it through the kind of legislation my amendment represents’

WASHINGTON, D.C. - U.S. Senate Republican Leader Mitch McConnell made the following remarks on the Senate floor Tuesday regarding the McConnell Amendment to the Supplemental Appropriations Act:

“I’d like to speak again about my amendment relating to the Detainee Task Force that the administration established as part of its Executive Order on Guantanamo. The purpose of this task force is to review the records of detainees and to determine whether or not they should be released.

“My amendment calls on the administration to share its findings with Congress in a classified report that would indicate the likelihood of detainees returning to terrorism. It would also report on any effort Al Qaeda may be making to recruit detainees once they’re released from U.S. custody.

“This last requirement is particularly important given that many of the remaining 240 detainees at Guantanamo are from Yemen, which has no rehabilitation program to speak of, and from Saudi Arabia, which has a rehab program, but which hasn’t been entirely successful at keeping detainees from rejoining the fight even after rehabilitation.

“My amendment would require the administration to report to Congress before releasing any of the detainees at Guantanamo and to certify that any of the detainees it wishes to release prior to submitting this report pose no risk to American military personnel around the world.

“This is a simple amendment that reflects the concerns that Americans have about the danger of releasing terrorists either here or in their own home countries, where they could then return to the fight. Until now, the administration has offered vague assurances that it will not do anything to make Americans less safe. This amendment says that Americans expect more than a vague assurance — and it would require it.

“Some have argued that such a reporting requirement would reveal classified information to the public. This isn’t true. It would simply require the administration to share this information with a limited, specific group in Congress with the relevant oversight responsibilities and which already has access to the most classified information available.

“Some have said a reporting requirement isn’t necessary. This is also false. First, because we know the recidivism rate of detainees who weren’t even considered a serious threat is about 12%. It’s perfectly clear that we need to know whether any of the current detainees who we may release in the future pose a similar or even a greater threat of returning to the battle. Moreover, a reporting requirement has proven to be necessary by the simple fact that the Administration has been so reluctant to share any details whatsoever about its plans for the inmates at Guantanamo.

“Senator Sessions, the ranking member of the Judiciary Committee, has made at least two formal requests for information from Attorney General Holder — first in a letter on April 2, and second, in a letter dated May 4. To this day, Senator Sessions hasn’t received a reply to either one.

“If the administration isn’t willing to share information on these terrorists voluntarily, except with those in Europe, then Congress will have to require it through the kind of legislation my amendment represents.

“Some have argued that this reporting requirement would hinder prosecutions by making evidence public. This is also false for reasons I’ve already enumerated: it would only require a summary of the administration’s findings, and the summary would only have to be shared with a small group of members in a classified setting. This has never disrupted prosecutions in the past. It will not disrupt prosecutions in the future.

“Some have further suggested that a reporting requirement would be onerous. This is also false. The administration says that it’s already begun its review of detainees. My amendment simply asks that it share with us the details of that review. Subsequent reports would be made on a quarterly basis, which is hardly onerous, particularly given the gravity of the issue.

“Americans want the assurance that the President’s arbitrary deadline to close Guantanamo by next January will pose no threat to themselves or their families. Just today, the FBI Director testified before the House Judiciary Committee about his concerns that detainees who are currently held at Guantanamo could present a serious risk not only upon transfer to their home countries, but even upon transfer to maximum security prisons in the U.S.

“He cited concerns with their ability to radicalize others and to conduct terrorist operations. As to the latter, he cited gang leaders who’ve been able to run their gangs from prison as proof that terrorists could do the same. The Director of the FBI has access to classified information. We recognize him as one of our nation’s top law enforcement officials. He’s someone who should be taken seriously.

“Americans don’t want terrorists plotting attacks against us anywhere. They certainly don’t want them doing so in our backyards, or down the road in the local prison. And Americans don’t want terrorists that we release attacking our servicemen and women overseas. That’s why the administration should be required to let us know whether any terrorists released or transferred from Guantanamo pose a risk to our military service members overseas. My amendment would help ensure this. I urge my colleagues to support it with their votes.”

###