Recent Press Releases

McConnell, Cornyn Express Concern Over Administration Pressure On Sports Groups to Promote Obamacare

Senators urge sports commissioners to resist and report any Obama administration efforts to pressure sports leagues on Obamacare promotion

June 28, 2013

WASHINGTON, D.C. – U.S. Senate Republican Leader Mitch McConnell and Republican Whip John Cornyn, R-TX, sent letters to the heads of the six major professional sports organizations expressing concern that they would agree to help the Obama administration promote new health insurance plans under Obamacare.

The letters were prompted by recent news reports that Health and Human Services Secretary Kathleen Sebelius was in talks with the NFL and other sports organizations in an effort to get them to help encourage people to enroll in new Obamacare health plans that are set to begin Jan. 1.

“Given the divisiveness and persistent unpopularity of the health care [law], it is difficult to understand why an organization like yours would risk damaging its inclusive and apolitical brand by lending its name to its promotion,” the senators wrote in letters that were sent to the commissioners of the National Football League, Major League Baseball, National Basketball Association, National Hockey League, Professional Golf Association and the chairman and chief executive officer of NASCAR.

The senators wrote that Obamacare remains “deeply divisive and unpopular” more than three years after the law was enacted and that this was one of the reasons why Congress has resisted providing the administration with funds it has requested to promote Obamacare. It is also one of the reasons, according to the letter, that the administration is approaching major professional sports organizations to help pitch Obamacare enrollment.
                          
The law was enacted on a strictly partisan basis and Republicans unanimously opposed it based on evidence that it would raise health care costs, increase taxes, raid Medicare to pay for a new Obamacare entitlement program and prompt the federal government to intervene in Americans’ personal health care decisions.

McConnell and Cornyn wrote that they have long been concerned by the Obama Administration’s record of using the threat of policy retaliation to solicit support for its policies or to silence its critics. They urged the heads of the major professional sports organizations to resist such pressure and to contact the senators immediately so they can investigate should the administration suggest that there will be any policy consequences for not participating in the Obamacare outreach efforts.

The senators said it was difficult to remember another time when major sports leagues took public sides in such a highly polarized public debate. “Yet given this administration’s public request of your assistance in promoting this unpopular law, we felt it important to provide you with a fuller accounting of the facts before you made such a decision,” they wrote.

Note: Below are copies of the letters.

Senate Democrats Block Bipartisan Student Loan Reform

‘It is my hope that the President will call members of his party and encourage them to allow bipartisan student loan reform to move forward when the Senate returns in July.’

June 27, 2013

WASHINGTON, D.C.U.S. Senate Republican Leader Mitch McConnell released the following statement regarding the Democrat-led Senate blocking a bipartisan solution to ensure that student loan rates don’t double on July 1st:

“Despite the introduction of a bipartisan solution, the Democrat Senate leadership continues to block student loan reform by attacking the President’s plan. As a result of their obstruction, the Democrat-led Senate will leave town and allow interest rates on some new student loans to increase on Monday. The Republican House has already passed legislation and Senate Republicans, along with the President, are ready to pass bipartisan student loan reform that will ensure that student loan rates don’t double on July 1st.

“Sadly, Senate Democrats continue to block reform and insist on kicking the can down the road with a tax hike attached, while attacking the President’s reform plan. It is my hope that the President will call members of his party and encourage them to allow bipartisan student loan reform to move forward when the Senate returns in July.”

Background: The President’s plan has deficit reduction, has no cap or  tax hikes. Sen. Reid announced opposition to the bipartisan plan because it has deficit reduction, has no cap or  tax hikes.

 

McConnell: Senate Immigration Bill Fails to Secure Border

‘This bill may pass the Senate today, but not with my vote.’

June 27, 2013

WASHINGTON, D.C.U.S. Senate Republican Leader Mitch McConnell made the following remarks on the Senate floor regarding the need to address border security for comprehensive immigration reform:

“At the outset of this debate I expressed my hope that we could do something about our nation’s broken immigration system.

“Millions of men and women are living among us without any documentation or certainty about what the future will bring for themselves or their families. Many of those who come here legally end up staying here illegally. We have no way of knowing who or where they are. And current law simply doesn’t take into account the urgent needs of a modern, rapidly-changing economy.

“Beyond all this, it’s long been a deep conviction of mine that from our earliest days as a people immigration has been powerful force of renewal and national strength. Most of the people who’ve come here over the centuries have come as dreamers and risk-takers, looking for chance at a better life for themselves and their children.

“I can think of no better example of this than my wife, who came here at the age of eight in the cargo hull of a ship, because her parents didn’t have the money for a plane ticket. When she entered the third grade at a public high school in New York, she didn’t speak a word of English. And yet, in just a few short decades she’d be sworn in as a member of the President’s cabinet, an honor and an opportunity she could have hardly guessed at when she first arrived here as a girl.

“This is the kind of story that has made this nation what it is. Legal immigration made it possible. So yes, I had wanted very much to be able to support a reform to our nation’s immigration laws. I knew it would be tough, and the politics aren’t particularly easy either. But the fact is, our constituents didn’t just send us here to name post offices and pass Mother’s Day resolutions. They sent us here to tackle the hard stuff too.

“Broad bipartisan majorities agree that our immigration system needs updating. In my view, we had an obligation to our constituents to at least try to do it, together, and, in the process, show the world that we can still solve big national problems around here. And reaffirm the vital role that legal immigration has played in our history.

“So it’s with a great deal of regret, for me at least, that the final bill didn’t turn out to be something I can support.

“The reason is fairly simple. As I see it, this bill just doesn’t meet the threshold test for success that I outlined at the start of this debate. It just doesn’t say to me, at least, that we’ve learned the lessons of 1986, and that we won’t find ourselves right back in the same situation we found ourselves in after that reform.

“If you can’t be reasonably certain that the border is secure as a condition of legalization, there’s just no way to be sure that millions more won’t follow the illegal immigrants who are already here. As other have rightly pointed out, you also can’t be sure that future congresses won’t just reverse whatever assurances we make today about border security in the future.

“In other words, in the absence of a firm, results-based border security trigger, there’s just no way I can look my constituents in the eye and tell them that today’s assurances won’t become tomorrow’s disappointments; and since the bill before us doesn’t include such a trigger, I can’t support it.

“It doesn’t give me any pleasure to say this, or to vote against this bill. These are big problems that need solving. And I’m deeply grateful to all the members of my caucus and their staffs who devoted so much of their time and worked so hard over a period of many months to solve them. I’m grateful to all of them.

And while I won’t be voting for this bill, I think it has to be said that there are real improvements here.

“Current immigration policy, which prioritizes family-based immigration, hasn’t changed in decades. This bill would take an important step toward the kind of skills-based immigration a growing economy requires. Through new and reformed visa programs, for instance, this bill would provide many of our most dynamic businesses with the opportunity to legally hire the workers they need to remain competitive and expand.

“Some industries, like construction, could and should have fared better. But on balance, I think the improvements to legal immigration contained in this bill are a step in the right direction.

“We’ve learned an important lesson in this debate. One thing I’m fairly certain about is that we’ll never resolve the immigration problem on a bipartisan basis either now or in the future until we can prove that the border is secure as a condition of legalization. This, to me, continues to be the biggest hurdle to reform.

“Frankly, I can’t understand why there’s so much resistance to it on the other side. It seems pretty obvious to me, and I suspect to most Americans, that the first part of immigration reform should be proof that the border is secure. It’s common sense.

“Hopefully, Democrats now realize that this is the one necessary ingredient for success and they’ll be a little more willing to accept it as a condition for legalization. Because until they do, I for one just can’t be confident that we’ve solved this problem, and I know a lot of others won’t be either.

“So this bill may pass the Senate today, but not with my vote. And in its current form, it won’t become law. But the good news is this: the path to success is fairly clear at this point. Success on immigration reform runs through the border. Looking ahead, I think it’s safe to say that’s where our focus should lie.”