Recent Press Releases

Washington, D.C.U.S. Senate Republican Leader Mitch McConnell made the following remarks on the Senate floor outlining his opposition to the confirmation of Nina Pillard to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit:

“Yesterday, I talked about the Left’s ends-justify-the-means quest for power — and the lengths to which they’re willing to go to satisfy it.

“The Obama Administration and its allies have done just about everything to get what they want, one way or the other – even fundamentally altering the contours of our democracy when they couldn’t get their way playing by the rules.

“We saw the culmination of that with the Majority Leader’s power grab in the Senate last month.

“The real-world consequences of that power-grab are most sharply illustrated by the nominee before us.

“Professor Pillard may be a fine person, but she is not someone who should receive a lifetime position on the second highest court in the land. She will be confirmed, however, because of the Democrat Majority’s power grab.

“A review of her legal views makes one thing clear: the nominee before us is a liberal ideologue — in other words, just the kind of person this administration was looking for to rubber stamp its most radical legislative and regulatory proposals on the D.C. Circuit Court.

“Take the so-called Hosanna Tabor case.

“Last year, the Supreme Court reinforced a core First Amendment principle when it ruled unanimously that churches, rather than the government, could select their own leaders. Every single justice sided with the church’s argument in that case — every single one. It just makes sense. Freedom of religion is a bedrock foundation of our democracy.

“I think every member of this body would agree that the government doesn’t have any business picking a group’s religious leaders for them.

“But Professor Pillard seems to have a different view.

“Prior to the court’s unanimous decision, she said the notion that ‘the Constitution requires deference to church decisions about who qualifies as a minister’ in the case before the court seemed ‘like a real stretch.’

“And she went even further than that. The position of the church in the Hosanna Tabor case, she said, represented a ‘substantial threat to the American rule of law.’

“A ‘substantial threat to the American rule of law’! On a case the Supreme Court decided 9-0.

“I mean, even the court’s most liberal justices as I mentioned, disagreed with Professor Pillard on this one.

“One of them characterized that kind of position as ‘amazing.’

“In other words, Professor Pillard must think even the furthest-left Supreme Court justice isn’t far left enough for her.

“We rightly expect justices on our nation’s highest courts to evaluate cases before them with a judge’s even-handed mindset — not the absolutism of an ideologue. But just listen to the kinds of things Pillard has said.

“Professor Pillard has expressed sympathy with the idea that the rights of our Constitution – the same Constitution she would be charged with upholding – have ‘just about run out,’ and that this necessitates a shift toward international law.

“Pillard has said that abortion, essentially without limits, is necessary to avoid ‘conscription into maternity,’ and that even common-sense laws many American men and women support serve to ‘enforce…incubation.’

“She’s referred to the types of ultrasound images that are now available to so many proud moms and dads-to-be as ‘deceptive images’ perpetuated by the ‘anti-choice movement.’ In other words, she appears to think proud moms and dads-to-be shouldn’t believe their own eyes when they look at the images science has made increasingly available to us over the past few decades.

“It’s an understatement to say these sorts of views are worrying for someone the President wants to be one of our nation’s top judges.

“In short, Professor Pillard does not seem like a person with the mindset or temperament of a judge. She seems like a person with the attitude and disposition of a left-wing academic, someone who seems to come to conclusions based on how well they support her own theories.

“Judges are charged with fairly evaluating the law that is before them, not the law as they wish it would be.

“So I will be voting against the Pillard nomination.

“And it’s important to keep this is mind as well: Nearly every single Democrat Senator voted to enable the Majority Leader’s power grab last month.

“Those senators are responsible for its consequences. That includes the confirmation of Ms. Pillard, regardless of how they vote on her nomination.

“So I’d urge you to rethink the kind of nominees you bring to the floor moving forward – because they’re now all yours.”

Washington, D.C.U.S. Senate Republican Leader Mitch McConnell made the following remarks on the Senate floor regarding the Senate Democrats changing the Senate rules in order to achieve their goals:

“I want to start out by saying that I think it was important for all of us to get back home and hear from our constituents over the past couple weeks. I talked with a lot of Kentuckians, and I can tell you there’s a lot of anxiety and frustration out there. Folks are frustrated and upset by what’s happening with their health care under Obamacare.

“And they’re outraged at the tactics and the outright deception that led to its passage.

“It’s now clear that the President knew perfectly well that a lot of folks wouldn’t be able to keep the plans they had and liked, despite the endless assurances to the contrary they heard from the President himself. Many are also now starting to realize that the talking points they heard about their premiums and keeping their doctors weren’t worth the paper they were written on either.

“And the response they’ve gotten from the White House in the face of all this is just as bad. In the face of all the hardship and disruption this law is causing for millions of Americans — the White House is defiant. In the face of all these things, the President is trying to convince people that somehow we’re the problem. According to the President, the problem isn’t the law. The problem is the people who are unhappy with it.

“Well, look, this is exactly the kind of thing folks are frustrated with — the idea that Washington knows best. So we’re going to keep fighting this fight. If anybody needed any proof that Big Government liberalism doesn’t work, they’ve gotten a clinic over the past two months. It’s clearer now than ever that we need to replace this law with common-sense, patient-centered reforms that will actually drive down costs and increase innovation.

“The idea that making our health care system more like the DMV will somehow improve the final product has now been thoroughly discredited. And a thousand presidential speeches won’t change that.

“But here’s the larger story: Obamacare isn’t an isolated case. It may be the most obvious example of this administration’s determination to advance its agenda by any means possible. But it’s one example of many.

The latest example was the administration’s complicity in the power grab we saw last month in the Senate.

“News reports suggest that a President who denounced this tactic when Republicans thought about it back in 2005 was actively lobbying for it ahead of the Majority Leader’s fateful decision to pull the trigger.

“So the President and the Majority Leader were for the protection of minority rights in the Senate until they were no longer in the minority. At that point, minority rights, the Rules of the Senate, and the principle of a meaningful check on the Executive became an inconvenience that stood in the way of their desire for more power.

“As I indicated last month, this was a pure power grab.

“If the majority party can’t be expected to follow the rules, there are no rules.

“So this was a grave mistake. And it was a grave betrayal of trust, since some of the main players had previously vowed they would never do it. But then they did — just as the President had vowed that if you liked your health care you could keep it. For the President and his enablers in Congress, the ends now clearly justify the means.

“And that’s a very dangerous place for us to be.

“So Republicans will continue to speak out against these offenses against our institutions and against the American people, who have a right to expect elected leaders to keep their commitments and respect the rules and our laws.

“The American people have given us divided government. The administration needs to accept it. They need to work with the government the people have given them, not the one they wish they had. They need to stop viewing the rules that govern the rest of us as mere suggestions to follow as they wish … while the American people are left to suffer the consequences.

“As I’ve indicated, we see the results of this mindset most powerfully with Obamacare — a law that this administration was determined to force through Congress by hook or by crook, regardless of what half-truths it had to repeat to get there; regardless of whichever senators it had to coax and cajole.
But the pattern didn’t end with the law’s passage. The administration has repeatedly invoked executive power to change whichever parts of the law prove inconvenient. Its friends begged for relief from the law, so they carved out special loopholes. Statutory deadlines became an irritation, so they waived them. ‘Incorrect promises’ made to sell the law became an embarrassment, so they changed entire sections on the fly.

“To many Washington Democrats, this is all fine — not because they necessarily want to circumvent the law, perhaps, but because they feel justified in doing so if that’s what it takes to enact their agenda.

“We’ve seen Democrats use this same approach with immigration policy, welfare reform, recess appointments.

“We’ve seen them use it to justify government-sanctioned harassment of entire groups of people over at the IRS.

“And two weeks ago, we saw Washington Democrats take this ends-justify-the-means approach to a whole new level entirely, by eliminating the right of the minority party to be heard in the Senate — something they themselves had warned against for years when they were in the minority …. something the Vice President called ‘a naked power grab’ when he was in the Senate.

“Washington Democrats changed our democracy irrevocably — they did something they basically promised they would never do — and to what end? To pack the courts with judges they expect will rubberstamp the President’s partisan agenda … to eliminate one of the last remaining obstacles standing between the President and the enactment of his agenda through executive fiat. In short, because they wanted power that the voters have denied them at the ballot box.

“So before we all vote this morning, I just want to make sure everybody understands what this vote is all about. Two weeks ago, the President and his Democrat allies defied two centuries of tradition, their own prior statements, and – in the case of some Democrat Leaders – their own public commitments about following the rules of the Senate.

“They did this for one reason: to advance an agenda the American people don’t want. It’s an agenda that runs straight through the D.C. Circuit — so now they’re putting their people in place, to quote one member of their leadership, ‘one way or another.’

“This vote isn’t about any one nominee. It’s not about Patricia Millett. It’s about an attitude on the Left that says the ends justify the means — whatever it takes. That’s why we’re here today. And that’s why I’ll be opposing this nomination.

“Washington Democrats unfortunately are focusing their energy on saying and doing anything to circumvent the representatives of the people. But ultimately, they are accountable to the American people.

“And the American people will have their say again soon – sooner than many of our colleagues might hope.”

McConnell Pays Tribute to Nelson Mandela

‘Nelson Mandela was more than a politician, more than just a foreign leader. He was a symbol — a symbol of freedom and hope, not only for his own people, but for all people.’

December 10, 2013

Washington, D.C.U.S. Senate Republican Leader Mitch McConnell made the following remarks on the Senate floor mourning the loss of Nelson Mandela:

“Tens of thousands gathered today in Soweto to pay their last respects to a man who symbolized so much for so many. And it’s not hard to see why. Politicians come and go. Presidents rise and fall. But Nelson Mandela was more than a politician, more than just a foreign leader. He was a symbol — a symbol of freedom and hope, not only for his own people, but for all people. But we also remember Nelson Mandela as a symbol of reconciliation, especially when he had every reason not to be. How many of us could spend so many years in confinement — away from the people we love, with little to do but mull the circumstances of our incarceration — and emerge so forgiving toward our captors.

“To me, it was telling to see that one of the many people paying respects to Nelson Mandela this week was an Afrikaner named Christo Brand. The two men struck up an improbable, but lasting, friendship during Mandela’s time on Robben Island. I say ‘improbable’ because Brand was his jailer.

“The story goes that years after his release from prison, President Mandela was attending a ceremony and greeting Members of Parliament when he spotted Brand across the room. Mandela lifted his arms and announced to everyone that this man had been his warden, but was also his friend. Then he asked Brand join him in a group photo. ‘You must stand next to me,’ he insisted, ‘We belong together.’

“I think that says it all.

“Nelson Mandela could have followed the example of other leaders in the region. He could have led South Africa down the path of Zimbabwe.

“But he didn’t. He urged his country to embrace inclusion and freedom and democracy instead. He asked his countrymen to stand with him, because he knew that, as he once said to Christo Brand, his people ‘belong together.’ So this morning, the Senate joins the world in mourning the loss of Nelson Mandela. May his commitment to freedom and reconciliation continue to inspire.”