Committee Reports
113th Congress (2013-2014)
House Report 113-160 - Part 1
| THIS SEARCH | THIS DOCUMENT | GOTO |
| Next Hit | Forward | New Search |
| Prev Hit | Back | Home Page |
| Hit List | Full Display | Help |
| Contents Display | ||
| Full Display |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
Table of Contents
Beginning
THE AMENDMENT
SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.
SEC. 2. PURPOSE.
SEC. 3. CONGRESSIONAL REVIEW OF AGENCY RULEMAKING.
`CHAPTER 8--CONGRESSIONAL REVIEW OF AGENCY RULEMAKING
`Sec. 801. Congressional review
`Sec. 802. Congressional approval procedure for major rules
`Sec. 803. Congressional disapproval procedure for nonmajor rules
`Sec. 804. Definitions
`Sec. 805. Judicial review
`Sec. 806. Exemption for monetary policy
`Sec. 807. Effective date of certain rules
SEC. 4. BUDGETARY EFFECTS OF RULES SUBJECT TO SECTION 802 OF TITLE 5, UNITED STATES CODE.
SEC. 5. GOVERNMENT ACCOUNTABILITY OFFICE STUDY OF RULES.
PURPOSE AND SUMMARY
BACKGROUND AND NEED FOR THE LEGISLATION
I. INTRODUCTION
II. BACKGROUND AND NEED FOR THE LEGISLATION
HEARINGS
COMMITTEE CONSIDERATION
COMMITTEE VOTES
COMMITTEE OVERSIGHT FINDINGS
NEW BUDGET AUTHORITY AND TAX EXPENDITURES
CONGRESSIONAL BUDGET OFFICE COST ESTIMATE
H.R. 367--REGULATIONS FROM THE EXECUTIVE IN NEED OF SCRUTINY ACT OF 2013.
AS ORDERED REPORTED BY THE HOUSE COMMITTEE ON THE JUDICIARY ON APRIL 11, 2013.
SUMMARY
ESTIMATED COST TO THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT
PAY-AS-YOU-GO CONSIDERATIONS
INTERGOVERNMENTAL AND PRIVATE-SECTOR IMPACT
ESTIMATE PREPARED BY:
ESTIMATE APPROVED BY:
DUPLICATION OF FEDERAL PROGRAMS
DISCLOSURE OF DIRECTED RULE MAKINGS
PERFORMANCE GOALS AND OBJECTIVES
ADVISORY ON EARMARKS
SECTION-BY-SECTION ANALYSIS
CHANGES IN EXISTING LAW MADE BY THE BILL, AS REPORTED
TITLE 5, UNITED STATES CODE
PART I--THE AGENCIES GENERALLY
[Struck out->][ CHAPTER 8--CONGRESSIONAL REVIEW OF AGENCY RULEMAKING ][<-Struck out]
[Struck out->][ Sec. 801. Congressional review ][<-Struck out]
[Struck out->][ Sec. 802. Congressional disapproval procedure ][<-Struck out]
[Struck out->][ Sec. 803. Special rule on statutory, regulatory, and judicial deadlines ][<-Struck out]
[Struck out->][ Sec. 804. Definitions ][<-Struck out]
[Struck out->][ Sec. 805. Judicial review ][<-Struck out]
[Struck out->][ Sec. 806. Applicability; severability ][<-Struck out]
[Struck out->][ Sec. 807. Exemption for monetary policy ][<-Struck out]
[Struck out->][ Sec. 808. Effective date of certain rules ][<-Struck out]
CHAPTER 8--CONGRESSIONAL REVIEW OF AGENCY RULEMAKING
Sec. 801. Congressional review
Sec. 802. Congressional approval procedure for major rules
Sec. 803. Congressional disapproval procedure for nonmajor rules
Sec. 804. Definitions
Sec. 805. Judicial review
Sec. 806. Exemption for monetary policy
Sec. 807. Effective date of certain rules
BALANCED BUDGET AND EMERGENCY DEFICIT CONTROL ACT OF 1985
PART C--EMERGENCY POWERS TO ELIMINATE DEFICITS IN EXCESS OF MAXIMUM DEFICIT AMOUNT
SEC. 257. THE BASELINE.
COMMITTEE JURISDICTION LETTERS
LETTER FROM THE COMMITTEE ON THE BUDGET
RESPONSE FROM THE COMMITTEE ON THE JUDICIARY
LETTER FROM THE COMMITTEE ON RULES
RESPONSE FROM THE COMMITTEE ON THE JUDICIARY
DISSENTING VIEWS
INTRODUCTION
DESCRIPTION AND BACKGROUND
CONCERNS WITH H.R. 367
I. THE REINS ACT WILL SEVERELY RESTRICT FEDERAL RULEMAKING, THEREBY UNDERMINING THE ABILITY OF AGENCIES TO PROTECT PUBLIC...II. THE REINS ACT IS BASED ON FALSE PREMISES ABOUT REGULATORY COSTS
III. THE REINS ACT IS UNNECESSARY BECAUSE CONGRESS ALREADY HAS THE TOOLS TO OVERSEE FEDERAL AGENCY RULEMAKING
IV. THE REINS ACT MAY BE UNCONSTITUTIONAL
CONCLUSION
| THIS SEARCH | THIS DOCUMENT | GOTO |
| Next Hit | Forward | New Search |
| Prev Hit | Back | Home Page |
| Hit List | Full Display | Help |
| Contents Display | ||
