<font size="-1" , face="Arial" ,"Helvetica">National
Bipartisan Commission on the Future of Medicare
GO TO: Medicare HOME | Press Releases and
Public Statements
For Immediate Release: July 8, 1998
Contact: Rusty Jabour
Website: http://medicare.commission.gov
MEDIA ADVISORY
For Immediate Release: July 8, 1998
National Medicare Commission Details Field Hearing Schedule
Testimony to Focus on Ideas, Recommended Solutions for Medicare
WASHINGTON (July 8) - The National Bipartisan Commission on the Future of Medicare
today released a detailed agenda for its national field hearing in Minneapolis next
Monday, July 13. The Commissioners will tour four local health care sites that morning,
and will hear several hours of public testimony at an afternoon hearing at the Minneapolis
Convention Center, Commission Chairmen Sen. John Breaux (D-La.) and Rep. Bill Thomas
(R-Calif.) said today.
The Chairmen said the Commission scheduled the national field hearing as part of its
continuing effort to hear from American citizens about the future of Medicare.
The afternoon field hearing is open to the public, but tickets are required for
admission. The tickets are free and will be available beginning at 10 a.m., Monday, July
13, outside the field hearing room at the Convention Center. General admission tickets are
first-come, first-serve, based on space availability.
According to the schedule, the Commissioners will visit four health care sites on
Monday morning. During those site visits, the Commissioners will see programs and discuss
issues involving
- coordinated care for Medicare beneficiaries who also receive Medicaid services (dual
eligibles)
- new technology and its effects on costs and quality
- health care access in rural areas (i.e. telemedicine)
- data collection to evaluate medical outcomes and cost effectiveness of treatments
At noon, the Commission will meet at the Minneapolis Convention Center for a public
field hearing which will feature three panels of speakers, addressing
- the experience of private employers in purchasing health care for their employees
- managed care plans and the experience of a mature market
- education and choices for current and future Medicare beneficiaries
The afternoon session also will include two hours of audience members sharing their
ideas and recommendations about improving Medicare. The Commission announced the "Call For Solutions" program on June 26 when it named Minneapolis as its field hearing site.
The 17-member Commission was created by the Congress in the Balanced Budget Act of 1997
and is charged with recommending solutions for the Medicare program by March 1, 1999, to
the Congress and the Administration. Medicare is in good financial shape for about 10
years, but then the program begins to face increased demand as 77 million "Baby
Boomers" begin to retire and enter the program.
National Field Hearing Details
July 13, 1998 / Minneapolis, Minnesota
MORNING TOUR SCHEDULE
8:30 - 10:30 A.M.
The National Bipartisan Commission on the Future of Medicare is
working to strengthen and improve Medicare for future generations. In its work, the
Commission is exploring a number of issues related to Medicare, including costs, benefits,
eligibility, management and administration, and financing. On the morning of Monday, July
13, the Commissioners will tour four health care sites to learn more about programs which
could offer innovations, quality and efficiency for Medicare and its beneficiaries.
The Commissioners will divide into groups to visit the four
sites listed below:
1. Topic: Coordinating financing for dual eligibles
Site: Wilder Senior Services
Clinic
Action: Commissioners will
visit a Minnesota Senior Health Options (MSHO)
clinical site and talk with beneficiaries, contractors and program
administrators.
The Commission, especially the Reform Task Force, has begun discussing the different
sources of funding for health care services for Medicare beneficiaries. Minnesota Senior
Health Options (MSHO) is a demonstration project run by the Minnesota Department for Human
Services which serves dual eligibles (people who receive both Medicare and Medicaid) and
combines funding from both Medicare and Medicaid. The state contracts with health care
organizations that receive a capitated payment to provide Medicare and Medicaid services.
The rationale is that more integrated care and reimbursement will result in better
coordination and outcomes for beneficiaries. Sample topics for discussion include 1) the
expected outcomes from integrating payments and care, 2) the process of obtaining waivers
for demonstration projects, 3) the rationale of combining funding sources, and 4) the
reasons for Minnesota's innovative health care environment.
2. Topic: Coordinating care for
dual eligibles and rural areas
Site: Fairview University Medical Center / Mayo Clinic / rural clinic
Action: Commissioners will tour an integrated care clinical site, observe a
telemedicine demonstration with the Mayo clinic and a rural facility,
and
talk with providers, beneficiaries and administrators.
This visit provides a good perspective on coordinating
care and financing for dual eligibles and rural communities from a provider's and
beneficiary's perspective. The Fairview health system is affiliated with the University of
Minnesota's academic medicine program, the National Chronic Care Consortium, and Medica's
SeniorDual program. Fairview participates with Medica in MSHO and thus accepts capitated
risk for dual eligibles for a full range of care, including primary, acute, and long-term
care. The Mayo Health System is a network of 13 organizations providing community-based
care in 54 communities in Minnesota, Iowa, and Wisconsin. The Mayo System integrates local
care, often in rural communities, with specialty care at the Mayo Clinic. Sample topics
for discussion include 1) the benefits of integrating care and payment for disabled and
other beneficiaries, 2) the potential use of telemedicine to integrate care and increase
access in rural areas, and 3) the impact of large medical group practices in rural
counties.
3. Topic: The impact
of new technology on Medicare
Site: Medtronic
Action: Commissioners will tour Medtronic's
facilities, see product
demonstrations from local companies, and talk with local
manufacturers, beneficiaries and providers who have used
sample
products.
Health care technology has been identified as one of the
most difficult components of health care costs to predict and control. Indeed, the
Commission heard Federal Reserve Board Chairman Alan Greenspan comment that medical
technology tends to reduce per unit costs, but still increase overall spending. Minnesota
is the birthplace of the major Class 3 Device companies like 3M, Medtronic, St. Jude, and
many smaller ones. Medtronic, for example, develops and manufactures medical devices to
treat cardiovascular and neurological disorders (well-known devices are their cardiac
pacemakers). Sample topics for discussion include 1) the relationship between technology
and health inflation, 2) the impact of Minnesota's managed care environment on the
adoption of new technology, and 3) the public and private sectors' approval and
reimbursement processes for new technology.
4. Topic: Measuring quality
Site: United Health Care
Research Center / Institute for HealthCare Quality
Action: Commissioners
will tour United's facilities, view a presentation of the
Institute's
research, and talk with both companies' clinical experts.
As incentives to control costs increase and options among health plans multiply, it
becomes even more important to gather and compare information on health care outcomes and
quality. United Health Care gathers and analyzes patient data to evaluate medical
outcomes and cost effectiveness of treatments. For example, United demonstrated that more
effective use of beta blockers prevented more serious heart attacks. The Institute for
Healthcare Quality has developed an index to rank the quality of health care in each state
and to assess local clinical systems. Sample topics for discussion include 1) methods for
collecting data, 2) the use of clinical data for educational purposes and to improve care
for beneficiaries, 3) socioeconomic and other variables which impact health outcomes, 4)
the need for more outcomes data as incentives to control costs increase, 5) the
limitations of available data, and 6) the role of HCFA in collecting data.
AFTERNOON FIELD HEARING SCHEDULE
12:00 NOON - 1:30 P.M. - Panel
Discussions
Panel 1: Purchasing Coalitions --
Experience of Private Employers
During this panel, the Commissioners will hear about the
Buyers Health Care Action Group (BHCAG), a coalition of 27 large, Twin-Cities-based
self-insured employers, including 3M, General Mills and Honeywell. BHCAG contracts
directly with 25 "care systems" which are groups of hospitals, clinics and
medical practices. Sample topics for discussion include 1) how BHCAG and its providers
have addressed the questions involved in the Medicare Plus Choice implementation (e.g.
open enrollment, beneficiary education, employer contributions, etc.), 2) the potential
for private purchasers to contract directly with providers, and 3) the effects of the
coalition on quality and costs.
Speakers: Steve Wetzell, BHCAG Director; Thomas
Ebert, Employers Association President/CEO; Mike Anderson, 3M Manager; and Mark Fisher,
St. Croix Valley Health Care CEO
Panel 2: Managed Care Plans --
Experience of a Mature Market
Minnesota has had more experience with managed care than
most states, especially in the Minneapolis/St. Paul metro area. About 40 percent of
Minnesota's population is enrolled in managed care plans. In this panel, the Commissioners
will hear from three major managed care / Medicare risk insurers in the Minnesota market:
Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Minnesota, Health Partners and Allina. Sample topics for
discussion include 1) the regional variation in utilization and the role of the private
sector in lowering Minnesota's utilization rates, and 2) managed care's experience in
providing care for disabled, chronically ill and other persons.
Speakers: Deborah Glass, Blue Cross and Blue Shield Vice President for
Government Programs; George Halvorson, HealthPartners President and CEO; and David Strand,
Allina Health System Vice President and President of Medica
1:30 - 2:00 p.m. Break
2:00 - 2:30 p.m. Panel Discussion
Panel 3: Current and Future
Beneficiaries - Education and Choices
Pertinent information and quality beneficiary education have become increasingly
important as both the private and public sectors offer consumers more health care choices.
Individuals must often choose both plans and providers. This session will consider the
role of both current and future Medicare beneficiaries in making choices about their
health care options. Sample topics for discussion include 1) current and future
beneficiaries' role in making choices as their options increase, 2) the role of
information brokers, and 3) suggestions to make consumer information more useful.
Speakers: Bea Sieber, Health Insurance Counselor, Minnesota Senior Federation; Martin
Kellogg, Citizens for Choice in Health Care; Kent Eklund, Co-Chair, Citizens
League, Co-Chair, Project 2030 and CEO Cincinnatus; and Tim Penny, Senior Fellow of the
University of Minnesota Humphrey Institute, and former Minnesota Congressman
2:30 - 4:30 p.m.
"Call For Solutions" Ideas and
Recommendations
On June 26, when the Commission announced its intent to
hold a field hearing in Minneapolis, the Commission issued its "Call For
Solutions," inviting citizens in the Minnesota region to submit their ideas and
recommendations for improving Medicare for future generations. During this session,
audience members will be invited to briefly present their ideas and recommendations to the
Commission.
4:30 p.m. Adjourn
|