Olivier Douliery-Pool/Getty Images

Oh So Polarized

7:35 a.m. E.T.

The national division coming out of the 2012 election is stark enough to make even long-time observers of our national politics do spit takes with their breakfast smoothie.

Look at these numbers from Gerald Seib’s Wall Street Journal column:

Based on nearly complete results, of the 234 Republicans elected to the House, just 15 come from districts that the Democratic president carried, according to a running tally compiled by David Wasserman of the Cook Political Report. Of 201 Democrats elected, just nine come from districts Republican Mitt Romney carried….

Not only are House members coming from reliably partisan districts, many are winning in landslides. In this fall’s election, 125 House members — 42 Republicans and 83 Democrats — won their districts with 70% or more of the vote….

The situation is similar in the Senate. There will be 45 Republican senators in the new Congress. Only 10 of them come from states President Obama won. There will be 55 Democrats and independents who caucus with Democrats. Just 11 of them come from states Mr. Romney won….

Voting in that presidential race, meanwhile, was starkly partisan. President Obama won the votes of just 6% of Republicans, exit polls indicate. Mr. Romney won just 7% of Democrats.

By contrast, when Republican Ronald Reagan was elected in 1980 — with a share of the national vote similar to President Obama’s this year — he won 27% of Democrats’ votes. Swing voters aren’t exactly an endangered species, but their population appears to be thinning.

The number of states that are so clearly red or so clearly blue that they aren’t seriously contested in presidential races is climbing, while the number of swing states in the middle is falling.

In this year’s contest, there really were only nine true swing states that were seriously contested. By contrast, as National Journal has noted, in the 1960 presidential election, 20 states were so closely contested that they were decided by margins of less than 5%. By 2000, the number of similarly competitive states had dropped to 12. This year, the number was four.

And from the New York Times:

Of the 234 House Republicans who will sit in the 113th Congress, 85 percent won re-election with 55 percent of the vote; more than half of next year’s House Republican Conference won more than 60 percent. And virtually every one of them ran on holding the line against tax increases and the Obama agenda.

There are a lot of substantive and political challenges to getting a deal to avert the fiscal cliff, but you can start with the realities reflected above.

Tuesday’s Political Ledes

5:55 a.m. E.T.

New York Times: “In Talks, House Majority Weighs Loyalty to Voters”

Washington Post: “Obama Takes Push for Higher Taxes on Wealthy to Workers at Michigan Plant”

Wall Street Journal: “Boehner’s Test: Keep GOP Ranks Behind Him”

Associated Press: “Voter Disdain Spreads as ‘Fiscal Cliff’ Looms”

Politico: “Crafting a Boom Economy”

The Hill: “Both White House and GOP Debt Plans Put U.S. Credit Rating at Risk”

Monday’s Political Ledes

6:45 a.m. E.T.

New York Times — “113th Congress: This Time, It’s Out With the New”

Washington Post — “‘Fiscal Cliff’ Deal Is Starting to Take Shape”

Wall Street Journal — “Both Parties Divided Over GOP ‘Cliff’ Idea”

Associated Press — “Minn. Gay Couple in ’71 Marriage Case Still United”

Politico — “The GOP’s Immigration Jam”

The Hill — “Grand Deficit Prize Glitters within Reach for Obama and Boehner”

Various Networks

The Sunday Shows

5:30 p.m. E.T.

Meet the Press — Transcript. Video.

Face the Nation — Video.

This Week — Transcript. Video.

Fox News Sunday — Transcript. Video.

State of the Union — Transcript. Video.

Read This Now

5:15 p.m. E.T.

Belatedly, here are two Sunday New York Times columns I recommend. I was too busy to process them until now; as busy as you are, make time for them.

Ross Douthat writes about the Republican Party post-Jim DeMint and Maureen Dowd writes about the Republican Party post-Mitt Romney.

Everyone should check them out, but Republican thinkers, activists, strategists, and electeds should pay particular attention to, and ask themselves what they think of, these particular paragraphs:

Douthat:

But if DeMint-style retrenchment was necessary for Republicans, it wasn’t anywhere near sufficient. The conservatism of 2011 and 2012 had a lot to say about the long-term liabilities of the American government but far too little to say about the most immediate anxieties of American citizens, from rising health care costs to stagnating wages to the socioeconomic malaise spreading across the country’s working class. Neither the Reagan legacy nor the current conservative catechism holds the solutions to these problems; they require Republicans to apply their principles more creatively, and think about policy anew.

Dowd:

Who would ever have thought blacks would get out and support the first black president? Who would ever have thought women would shy away from the party of transvaginal probes? Who would ever have thought gays would work against a party that treated them as immoral and subhuman? Who would have ever thought young people would desert a party that ignored science and hectored on social issues? Who would ever have thought Latinos would scorn a party that expected them to finish up their chores and self-deport?

Sunday’s Political Ledes

7:15 a.m. E.T.

New York Times: “Clinton’s Countless Choices Hinge on One: 2016″

Washington Post: “Obama’s second-term agenda will be shadowed by budget woes”

Associated Press: “Boustany Trounces Landry for LA Congressional Seat”

Politico: “On Entitlements, Republicans Are Ready to Take Any Victory They Can Get”

The Hill: “White House Could Protect Middle Class from Looming Tax Hikes”

Saturday’s Political Ledes

7:45 a.m. E.T.

New York Times: “Rice in Limbo as Nomination Remains Uncertain”

Washington Post: “Supreme Court to Hear Two Gay Marriage Cases”

Wall Street Journal: “Disagreement Over Taxes Stalls Talks on Deficit”

Associated Press: “Obama: Republicans Blocking Middle-Class Tax Cuts”

Politico: “Gay Marriage Pressure Back on Obama”

The Hill: “Hispanic Democrats Say Obama Is Missing in Action on Immigration”