iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Rep. Maxine Waters

GET UPDATES FROM Rep. Maxine Waters
 

California Deserves a Better Deal

Posted: 11/17/11 11:32 AM ET

A recent editorial in the Los Angeles Times, "California Should Make that Mortgage Deal," admonishes California Attorney General Kamala Harris for her insistence on ensuring that the big banks that caused the foreclosure crisis in our state pay their fair share to our homeowners. The editors urge Attorney General Harris to take the deal that's currently on the table, even though she knows -- and California's homeowners know -- that the deal isn't good enough.
 
In order to fully appreciate what is being asked of Ms. Harris, it's important to put the size of California's foreclosure crisis in perspective. About one million foreclosures have hit our state since 2008. Moreover, 30 percent of current California homeowners owe more on their homes than they're worth, a rate that's higher than the national negative equity rate of 25 percent. With about 2 million underwater mortgages in our state, and assuming that each homeowner is $93,000 underwater -- an average calculated by CoreLogic -- then to address all the negative equity in California, the settlement would have to provide $214 billion to our state alone. How big is the settlement currently on the table? $30 billion. And that's for the entire country. This isn't a settlement; it's a bailout for the banks.
 
It's another bailout because in exchange for getting off cheap with California's homeowners, the banks would be released from liability on the origination and servicing of trillions of dollars of mortgages.  The release would come before any of the attorneys general, including our own, have been able to properly investigate allegations of foreclosure fraud. What anecdotal evidence we do have that says the wrongdoing potentially runs deep, with Delaware Attorney General Beau Biden, who has also abandoned the multi-state settlement, saying that a cursory examination of foreclosures in his state indicates that in one out of every four times a bank went to foreclose on a homeowner, they were foreclosing on behalf of an entity that did not own the underlying mortgage.  By settling now, and for so little, the attorneys general could be leaving potentially hundreds of billions of dollars on the table. No wonder the banks want a deal so badly.
 
Moreover, the attorneys general need to learn from past mistakes and fight for not only a fair settlement, but strong enforcement mechanisms.  By most accounts, the terms of past settlements have been flouted by the banks.  For example, in the case of the $8.4 billion Countrywide settlement with California and eleven other states in 2008, the lender, now owned by Bank of America, has failed to provide the loan modifications and reforms to their systems that were promised.  The current settlement, which will reportedly use a "credit system" where banks agree to reduce a predetermined amount of principal owed on mortgages, may likely face the same enforcement pitfalls as previous efforts.
 
So before we can cut any deal, we first need to be assured that the wrongdoing that necessitated these settlements in the first place has stopped.  To date, we have no reason to believe that it has.  And then what we need is a robust and thorough investigation into what happened and who has been impacted -- from mortgage servicing fraud, to title and securitization issues, to the banks' use of MERS to avoid paying deed recordation fees to local governments. 
 
Without the leverage that comes from knowing the full scope of wrongdoing, we will never be able to negotiate a settlement large enough to compensate for all the fraud in our mortgage securitization and servicing systems, and help prevent the 6 million foreclosures over the next 6 years that some housing analysts predict.
 
Attorney General Harris knows that the banks want a sweetheart deal like this. The banks hope that we'll see all the zeros and think that they've actually given us something.  But many of us, including California's attorney general, are not buying it.  Instead of pressuring Attorney General Harris to go with the flow, the rest of the attorneys general should follow her lead.

 

Follow Rep. Maxine Waters on Twitter: www.twitter.com/Maxinewaters

A recent editorial in the Los Angeles Times, "California Should Make that Mortgage Deal," admonishes California Attorney General Kamala Harris for her insistence on ensuring that the big banks that ca...
A recent editorial in the Los Angeles Times, "California Should Make that Mortgage Deal," admonishes California Attorney General Kamala Harris for her insistence on ensuring that the big banks that ca...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 215
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4  Next ›  Last »  (4 total)
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Sam Damon
Do or do not, there is no try.
07:39 PM on 11/29/2011
Californians deserve better representation in Congress. The banks and all the evil Wall Street 1%’ers didn’t break the law Ms. Waters. Congress passed the laws and provided the influence that made all this happen. Stop spinning your constituents already and tell them the truth.
02:30 PM on 11/21/2011
California deserved better representation than Ms. Waters or Mr.Frank, but then again they got what they asked for and the Nation was worse off for it and Californian will only get worse as long as they are in office.
03:39 AM on 11/21/2011
California deserves to continue to sink Titanic style and fast, just rid us other states of this bankrupt, sancutary for illegals, crime riddled, greedy clueless state and sever our union with california so we can have 49 states instead of 50!
03:42 AM on 11/19/2011
I'm a little interested in the connection between politics and banks Does anyone know about any banks receiving preferences in Federal bailout money?As I understand it, a minority owned bankwas the sole bank at this meeting and received 12 Million dollars. The chairman of the bank was married to some woman named "Taters" or "Platters" or something like this. Perhaps Cong Waters.....wait a minute.
03:29 AM on 11/19/2011
Congresswoman,
I know I speak for many Republicans is saying how happy I am the requirement for a 3 digit IQ for all House members failed.And,may I compliment you in your courage during the debate?
COrwin. Being Cruel. But,only to be Kind
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
03:49 PM on 11/18/2011
California you have made your bed, now you must lay in it… or just slide off into the ocean that would work too.
03:21 PM on 11/18/2011
In response to seanwol. If Wall Street told Fannie, Freddie and the politicians that lowering the lending guidelines would result in massive defaults, why did they continue to package and sale products that they knew were doomed to fail?
02:29 PM on 11/18/2011
I want to remind all of you..Ms Waters was leading the charge with Barney Frankto ease restrictions and to take over Fannie and Freddie, as government entities when they failed on their own. She also is an enthusiastic backer of the unlimited rescue fund package that disperses billions to keep these bad mortgages from hitting the streets. Ms. Waters is also guilty of agreeing with the Obama Administrations decision to forfeit an actual budget to hide the extent of the debt Fannie and Freddie carry on their books, which would add an additional 5 trillion dollars to the debt ceiling lev.el of 15 billion. The administration uses this accounting device to deflect critics charges of a spend spend spend administration. Ms. Waters also backs the push by Barney Franks to 'dissolve' Fannie and Freddie and ther debt. Hello..thank goodness for Kamala.
photo
wetbonder
Educating liberals one day at a time
11:11 AM on 11/18/2011
Countrywide's Mozilo honored as 2004 Housing Person of the Year.


ANGELO MOZILO, CHAIRMAN AND CHIEF executive officer of Countrywide Financial Corporation, Calabasas, California, was honored with the National Housing Conference (NHC) 2004 Housing Person of the Year Award in recognition of his long-standing commitment to reducing the barriers to homeownership for lower income and minority individuals and families.



Source: http://www.allbusiness.com/personal-finance/real-estate-mortgage-loans/190037-1.html#ixzz1e4e61gcT


Mozilo was doing what Waters and her democrat pals wanted him do and now they turn on him.

How left wing.
02:52 PM on 11/18/2011
no....he was committing fraud.....it is called liar loans.....the democrats and republicans wanted people to be able to purchase a house. I would say that is a huge difference
photo
wetbonder
Educating liberals one day at a time
03:12 PM on 11/18/2011
He did nothing illegal. He was pushed to make as many loans to low income people as he could.

Cuomo made predatory lending legal.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
jimtodd
Unrepentant child of '60s
10:50 AM on 11/18/2011
The American penchant for blaming the victim is rampant in this thread. The largest, most sophisticated corporations in the world created an elaborate scam to flood the market with bad mortgage backed securities in order to bet against them and make fortunes off unsuspecting investors. Even though all of this is well documented and confirmed by the companies themselves, the fools that get all their information from faux news have no idea it ever happened. The banks did not encourage bad mortgages in order to create more securities, and surely they did not violate any laws in their rush to foreclose on these properties. The poor, poor banks are innocent victims of government largess that just happened to support perpetration of these crimes, and they deserve to be made whole by the tax payers.
12:56 PM on 11/18/2011
That is because the borrower is provided their loan details 7 times at the 7th grade reading level before the loan closes. If you don't understand what the term "monthly payment" and "interest rate" mean, you have no one to blame but yourself.

It wasn't the banks that determine underwriting guidelines, it is Fannie and Freddie. Why do you think we are bailing them out to the tune of 100's of billions of dollars? The reason why banks started to bet against them, is because they were too heavily leveraged with the housing market. They didn't "make fortunes" they lost billions. Why do you think we had to bail them out? They didn't make money on their bets against the market, the lost less because of these bets.

Wall Street shares their blame in not disclosing what was in the derivatives they were selling, and they also share blame for not carrying enough capital requirements to back their bets (AIG, etc.). But the damage had already been done by our government before the securities ever got to Wall Street.
ColoradoPete
End of term coming.......
10:22 AM on 11/18/2011
Speaking of "California Deserves a Better Deal", how about replacing Maxine Waters with someone who has a brain?? California's liberal bias and free spending addiction, created by politicians like Maxine Waters, is at the heart of the state's problems.
02:55 PM on 11/18/2011
Free spending addiction? How about lax tax laws that allow corporations to pay nothing? Just to be clear since both parties are in the house....it is a political issue not just democratic or republican...less you forget George W created two wars and decreased taxes...I mean who does that? Talk about spending addiction without thinking about how to pay for it!
ColoradoPete
End of term coming.......
09:20 PM on 11/18/2011
I agree with you on GWB. Though I'm a conservative, I was always disappointed with Bush's lack of fiscal discipline. And I agree that his administration could have used a variety of techniques to balance our Federal budget, whether we were at war or not.

That is one reason why I think all our politicians in Washington, and both political parties, are at fault. That's why we all need to work together to get the message across to our politicians that the path they're on is not sustainable, and changes need to be made.

Clearly they haven't gotten the message (my interpretation of the lack of progress seen with the so called "super committee). I hope we can get the changes enacted to put us in a sustainable financial position.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
lipps
Dont favor my comments or they will be deleted
02:31 PM on 11/22/2011
Have you seen how many corporations are fleeing Falicornia because of high taxes?
10:05 AM on 11/18/2011
In response to Sam Damon. You're partially correct in your assessment about the "evil banks and the 1%'ers not being the only parties culpable for the current mortgage fiasco. Many home buyers only have themselves to blame for purchasing homes they knew they couldn't afford. The Government also shares responsibility because of lax regulations and their,"implied" backing of Fannie and Freddie. Everyone knew these two entities were a train wreck waiting to happen. Here's the main issue I have with all the lemmings spouting off inaccuracies about the government's role in the mortgage meltdown. The banks "willingly" approved dubious loans to collect the fees with low risk. The banks risk was low because they knew they could off-load the note to other investors who in turn pooled their notes with other investors and now we have the explosion of the CDO market. The banksters didn't lower their lending standards because of any "government" home buying intiative, they lowered them because they were raking in billions of dollars in profits. The Wall Street sharks figured out ways to slice and dice up loans faster than a Benihana chef. They levered them up the loans 30 to 1 and all of that leads to the 2008 market meltdown. The Banks and Wall Street were not the only culprits,however, their greed turned the entire financial system into a virtual casino all at the expense of the US Tax Payers.
11:41 AM on 11/18/2011
Only two corrections to the above article. In the 1990's, the federal government beat lenders over the head to approve "NINJA" loans (loans to people with NO or too little Income, or No Job or Assets) for homes. So goverment initiated the problem. Interestingly, they used the model of a certain Community Organizer in Chicago in the mid-ninties, who force Talman Federal into NINJA loans, and bankrupted the bank in 4-5 years. The same Community Organizer who now claims to have "inherited someone else's mess!

After that, yes the banks (with "protection" and low interest from the feds) went on a "gourging at the trough", but again were aided by a co-conspirator (Congress), who had authorized Fannie & Freddie, then proceeded to milk it for their individual gains.
02:59 PM on 11/18/2011
Please explain how the federal government "beat lenders over the head" to approve the liar loans?
12:24 PM on 11/18/2011
Excellent post.
The history of capitalism shows that the big money profiteers will do whatever
it takes to make the mega-bucks -- that's the nature of predatory capitalism.
The motto has always been ''let the buyer beware.''
But of course, it's not a level playing field --
and our incompetent / inefficient government can't seem to do much about that.
10:00 AM on 11/18/2011
Well, we definently deserve better than "give my husband bank a stimulus loan Waters" that's for sure.
09:48 AM on 11/18/2011
Where is the blame for realtors in this whole mess? Realtors that convinced people they could afford more house than they could and consipred with mortgage brokers (not big banks) to get them 'unconventional' financing? Oddly, NO ONE has looked at this aspect.

No I'm not saying banks didn't do more than their fair share in creating this mess. And where were the realtors advising their buyers to get a real estate attorney to review the documents? I NEVER bought a house without one.
photo
TXanimal
Somewhere between Occam's Razor & Murphy's Law
10:29 AM on 11/18/2011
I wondered the same thing. My mother-in-law sells real estate...she's one of the straightforward ones who talks sense to buyers trying to live outside their means. Consequently, she doesn't make a whole lot of money. I think that says a lot about the situation.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
02:27 PM on 11/18/2011
As aRealtor, I strongly disagree with you. I often times had people tell me that the banks told them they could afford a much higher priced home than I felt a buyer should pay. I too, have made a modest income over these 30 years selling homes. I have NEVER believed in a homeowner being married to their home but instead choose a quality of life that would afford them vacations with their family , a nice dinner out and the rest. As a mother, I have always preached to buy less than what a bank tells you is affordable. my rule is 2.5 times your salary and not that 3 times or above. This is a government scam and started in the 90's as has been mentioned, the banks went along with it and fannie and freddie along with hud have really hurt the American people across the board this time. We need to uncover more and more........the blame is enormous. Look at the big bonuses given and take a look at America and the people who have been harmed. It is not the investor it is the homeowner, the one who put down their savings and worked hard to give his family and himself something that no one should have had the right to downgrade or take away as long as the ones responsible remain scott free and making even more money now.
05:30 AM on 11/18/2011
"So before we can cut any deal, we first need to be assured that the wrongdoing that necessitated these settlements in the first place has stopped. ... And then what we need is a robust and thorough investigation into what happened and who has been impacted --"

Why would anyone dispute this? We are suffering the deepest financial retraction since the Great Depression, are we not? The economy ebbs and flows, but this time it's a historic disaster. When savings and loan companies massively failed under Ronald Reagan, the crash was aggressively investigated - and that involved pocket change compared to the damage that permeates the US and world economies today. Don't we at least need to know exactly what went wrong? (And we're way behind schedule.)

Why is immunity for banks even considered? If they are blameless, why negotiate for immunity? I don't have legal immunity? Do you?

If they did something wrong, not just as an error of judgement, but as a matter of violations of the law, where is the "accountability" that politicians so often blather about? The offer to look the other way is either crazy, or deeply corrupt.
photo
wetbonder
Educating liberals one day at a time
11:07 AM on 11/18/2011
Banks did NOTHING illegal.

Immoral, yes, not not illegal. And thank democrats for it.