Congressman

Cynthia Lummis

Representing Wyoming

Contact: Ryan Taylor (202) 225-2311

Lummis Takes a Stand for Wyoming Airports


Washington, May 21, 2009 -

U.S. Representative Cynthia Lummis, R-Wyo., is working together with Rep. James Oberstar, D-Minn., Chairman of the Transportation and Infrastructure Committee, to ensure Wyoming’s airports will not be negatively impacted by provisions contained in the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) authorization bill, H.R. 915, currently before the U.S. House.

The bill includes a provision that could force airports to comply with unnecessary and excessive National Fire Protection Association (NFPA) standards. This unfunded mandate would impose enormous new costs onto smaller airports, like those in Wyoming, by dramatically increasing staffing, training, infrastructure and equipment requirements. The new standards could also force reduced airline services to Wyoming’s airports in order to recover increased costs of operation.

“I agree that the FAA should complete an update on standards and commend Chairman Oberstar for his dedication to improved safety at our airports,” Lummis said. “However, I am concerned that the provision in question would unnecessarily create a significant financial burden on small, rural airports, least capable of absorbing cost increases.”

“At a time when both large and small airports are doing everything they can to keep their costs low, airports would have no choice but to pass those operating costs on to the airlines. Increased operating costs would be particularly devastating to small airports that are struggling to maintain and attract new commercial air service.”

Rep. Oberstar personally assured Lummis that he would work with her to encourage a flexible approach to the standards and take into account the unique needs of small, rural airports.

On May 20, 2009, Lummis joined with Rep. Adrian Smith, R-Neb., in introducing an amendment to H.R. 915 to provide adequate flexibility to meet the unique needs of small and mid-size airports.  The House Rules Committee denied its consideration along party lines.

Print version of this document