RPC Must Read November 3, 2011

 

100 Stimulus-Related Criminal Investigations

 

It has been more than two years since President Obama’s stimulus bill was passed, and it is abundantly clear that it has failed to meet its most basic objective: keeping unemployment below 8 percent. The following article highlights the widespread fraud and abuse that has also plagued this costly bill. The misuse of taxpayer dollars in pursuit of misguided economic policies is wrong, but using taxpayer money to fund criminal activity is particularly egregious.

 

DOE IG: 100 stimulus-related probes

By: Darius Dixon

Politico

November 2, 2011

 

The Energy Department's inspector general has launched more than 100 criminal investigations related to 2009 economic stimulus spending.

 

In written testimony prepared for delivery to the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee today, Inspector General Gregory Friedman said the investigations have involved "various schemes, including the submission of false information, claims for unallowable or unauthorized expenses, and other improper uses of Recovery Act funds."

 

So far, the investigations have led to five criminal prosecutions and brought in "over $2.3 million in monetary recoveries," Friedman said.

 

"This includes a series of cases involving fictitious claims for travel per diem resulting in the recovery of $1 million alone in Recovery Act funds," he added.

 

The activity is partially due to the fact that few "shovel ready" projects existed in 2009, Feldman said. "The concept of 'shovel ready' projects became a Recovery Act symbol of expeditiously stimulating the economy and creating jobs. In reality, few actual 'shovel ready' projects existed," he said.

 

The stimulus funding DOE received — more than $35 billion — was greater than previous annual budgets for the entire agency, most notably its $27 billion in funding for fiscal 2011.

 

"Our reviews have identified a fairly consistent pattern of delays in the pace at which Recovery Act funds had been spent by grant and other financial assistance recipients," Friedman said.

 

He also offered a critical talking point for opponents of the DOE loan guarantee program, which is the subject of a White House-ordered independent review in light of the failure of solar manufacturer Solyndra after it received a $535 million loan guarantee in 2009.

 

"The Loan Guarantee Program had not [been] properly documented and as such could not always readily demonstrate how it resolved or mitigated relevant risks prior to granting loan guarantees," Friedman said.

 

Even programs that appeared the most straightforward, such as home weatherization, were mired in challenges at the federal, state and local levels.

 

"Weatherization work was often of poor quality. In a recent audit performed at the state level, nine of the 17 weatherized homes we visited failed inspections because of substandard workmanship, Friedman said.

 

Last month, the DOE IG’s office reported that a third of the stimulus money the DOE doled out in energy efficiency and conservation block grants had gone unspent, as of March.