Randy's Blog

RSS Feed
Posted by Randy | November 30, 2012
Last the weekend, China’s Defense Ministry released video and pictures of a Chinese J-15 fighter jet taking off and landing from its aircraft carrier, the Liaoning.


The news marks a significant milestone for China 14 years after it acquired the unfinished carrier from the Ukraine, 18 months after its first sea trials and two months after its commissioning into the People’s Liberation Army Navy. Though significant work lies ahead to make the Liaoning combat operational,  the commencement of carrier-based, fixed-wing flight operations puts China in elite company, with only five other nations with these current capabilities – The U.S., Russia, France, India and Brazil.  

This comes during a time of increasing concern among China’s neighbors in the Pacific, many of which remain embroiled in territorial disputes with China over the long-term regional intentions of the People’s Liberation Army and the Chinese Communist Party.  This week, Congressman Forbes moderated an important discussion at the Foreign Policy Initiative entitled, “All Eyes on Asia: Perspectives From Our Allies” between representatives of several nations in the region on their security concerns and the re-rise of China.

Additionally, click here to read about Congressman Forbes’ work as Chairman and founder of the Congressional China Caucus, whose primary mission is to investigate and educate its members on the emergence of China’s global reach and the consequences of its growing international, economic, and political influence on U.S. interests.

Question of the week: Given China’s growing military capabilities, do you consider China….

( ) a partner of the United States
( ) friendly, but not a partner of the United States
( ) a competitor to the United States
( ) an adversary to the United States
( ) I don't know
( ) Other (Leave your comments below)

Take the poll here.

Find out the results of last week’s instapoll here.

Find out the results of my instapoll about the “Fiscal Cliff” here.
Posted by Randy | March 07, 2012
Just days after the Department of Defense failed to release its annual report to Congress on China’s military power, China announced that its military spending will top $100 billion for the first time. This a double-digit increase on last year's military spending, and comes “as China’s neighbors are increasingly unnerved by the country’s growing assertiveness in pressing territorial claims,” according to the Washington Post.

The news of this increase alone fuels concerns about China’s long-term intentions. Taken within the context of DoD military power report delay, it raises significant questions about our nation’s long-term strategy, or lack thereof, for responding in an era of Chinese military modernization.  The DoD report is critical for the United States to be able to evaluate its own defense strategy in light of a dramatic military buildup by China in the Western Pacific.  Each day without the report is another without a necessary tool to understand the Department of Defense’s perspective on China in light of this continued military buildup.

Read about the letter I sent to Secretary of Defense Leon Panetta, asking him to comply with the law and release the report on China’s military power: http://forbes.house.gov/News/DocumentSingle.aspx?DocumentID=282971
Posted by Randy | February 23, 2012

According to a new forecast by the research group IHS Global Insight, China is set to double its defense spending between 2011 and 2015. This increase from $119.8 billion to $238.2 billion will exceed the combined spending of the next twelve largest defense budgets in the Asia-Pacific region, solidifying China's status as a regional superpower.

This increase in military capability has been enabled by China's rapidly expanding economy. From 2000 to 2009, China's defense budget grew by an average of 12 percent annually. The projected surge of China's gross domestic product over the next three years will accelerate this growth, allowing for an annual increase in defense spending of 18.75 percent.

This rise is unlikely to subside anytime soon, notes IHS Asia-Pacific chief economist Rajiv Biswas. He says “Beijing has been able to devote an increasingly large portion of its overall budget towards defense and has been steadily building up its military capabilities for more than two decades. This will continue unless there is an economic catastrophe.”

I recently discussed the issue of China’s growing defense budget and ways that the United States can meet China’s military challenges in an article I wrote for Aviation Week. You can read that article here.

Posted by Randy | January 19, 2012
Yesterday, the Administration announced that it had rejected plans for construction of the Keystone XL Pipeline from the tar sands of Alberta, Canada to U.S. Gulf Coast Refineries.  Although several environmental studies related to construction had been completed, the Administration continued to delay issuing a final decision on construction of the pipeline.  As a result, Congress issued a requirement at the end of last year that the Administration issue a decision within 60 days of the President signing the payroll tax cut extension into law.  The rejection has been applauded by organizations that had resisted construction of the pipeline due to environmental concerns, but has also been opposed by the U.S. Chamber of Commerce and other business organizations that point to the estimated 120,000 jobs and steps toward energy independence the pipeline would create.  TransCanada, the corporation seeking the permit to construct the pipeline, must now find another recipient for its 830,000 barrels of oil a day it plans to export.  In November, Canadian Prime Minister Stephen Harper indicated that China may be interested in procuring the North American energy.

Question of the Week: Do you support the Administration's decision opposing construction of the Keystone XL Pipeline?

(  )  Yes, I support the Administration's decision regarding construction of the Keystone XL Pipeline.
(  )  No, I oppose the Administration's decision regarding construction of the Keystone XL Pipeline.
(  )  Other (share your thoughts below)
(  )  I am unsure.

Take the poll here.

Find the results of last week's instaPoll here.

Read Congressman Forbes' statement in regard to the Administration's decision here.
Posted by Randy | January 19, 2012
Don't miss this article I wrote for Aviation Week magazine on the need for U.S. long-term military and diplomatic effort in the Western Pacific.

Click the image to expand the article or click here.

Posted by Randy | January 17, 2012
The Wall Street Journal has just launched a real time “Econtracker” that provides a good snapshot of China’s economic growth. The indicators include China’s Gross Domestic Product, Fixed Asset Investment, Export, Foreign Exchange Reserves and more. 

Check it out here or by clicking the chart below.

Posted by Randy | January 11, 2012

A new piece from The Diplomat titled “China’s 2012 Challenges” lays out twelve key challenges that the People’s Republic of China and the Chinese Communist Party will face during the next year.  These challenges range from the need for economic reforms, to social instability and expected friction in the South China Sea.  It is vital that American policymakers know and understand these challenges while prioritizing U.S. foreign policy initiatives.  Here are three of the twelve challenges identified in the piece:

  • The run-up to Beijing’s once-in-a-decade political transition in October 2012 is likely to generate intensified clampdowns internally and assertive rhetoric abroad as China faces rising domestic challenges, and finds itself constrained internationally. Fearful neighbors may further strengthen ties with the United States. Pariah/failed state “allies” North Korea, Pakistan, and Iran will likely experience problems that affect China’s own interests.
  • China’s government will likely tighten domestic media reporting guidelines, as it remains highly concerned about social unrest and seeks to suppress news that might create controversy ahead of October 2012. Investors will have to take particular care that important data points are not swept under the table.
  • There is a heightened risk that inflation will exceed expected levels. If growth falters as real estate prices continue to fall and the economies of major trading partners remain weak, Beijing may be forced to loosen lending restrictions. Such monetary supply expansion would very likely push inflation well beyond the 2.8% figure that Li Daokui of People’s Bank of China forecasts for 2012.

The piece can be read in its entirety here: http://the-diplomat.com/china-power/2012/01/08/chinas-2012-challenges/

Posted by Randy | January 05, 2012
The Chinese government revealed in a white paper a new five-year plan for space exploration that expands the nation’s goals for challenging U.S. space superiority by creating new spacecrafts, satellites and a space lab by 2016.

China’s white paper specifically says that “China will strengthen its basic capacities of the space industry, accelerate research on leading-edge technology and continue to implement important space scientific and technological projects, including human spaceflight, lunar exploration, high-resolution Earth observation system, satellite navigation and positioning system, new-generation launch vehicles and other priority projects in key fields.”

The New York Times reports that “Under the new space plan, it would vastly expand its version of a Global Positioning System, which would have military as well as civilian uses. The plan shows how the government intends to draw on military and civilian resources to meet the goals, which the government is betting will also produce benefits for the Chinese economy.”

I am concerned that China is looking for ways to exert its strength through space exploration, while the United States is scaling back on our own program. This is especially true as China has failed to reassure the U.S. and other nations of its peaceful intentions in space, beginning in 2007 when it destroyed an orbiting weather satellite signaling to the world that it had the capability to intentionally destroy our communications networks and certainly had the capability to unintentionally damage our assets in space with the considerable debris left behind.

What kind of implications do you think China’s five-year plan will have for the United States? Weigh in below.
Posted by Randy Forbes | December 20, 2011
What does the death of North Korean Leader Kim Jong Il mean for North Korea, China and the surrounding region? In addition to potentially bringing a dangerous period of transition for northeast Asia as his youngest son takes the reins, an article in the Wall Street Journal points out that China “has long worried that a collapse of the regime in Pyongyang could bring South Korean and U.S. troops perilously close to its border.”

Here are three news articles from the Wall Street Journal that discuss the impact of the North Korean leader’s death, particularly as it relates to China and the surrounding region.

North Korean Leader Kim Jong Il is Dead
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052970204791104577107922829964182.html

Pyongyang's Uncertainty Hangs Over Region
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052970204879004577107932871454536.html 

China Reactions to Kim Jong Il's Death
http://blogs.wsj.com/chinarealtime/2011/12/19/the-emoticons-have-it-chinese-reactions-to-kim-jong-ils-death/?mod=WSJBlog&mod=chinablog
Posted by Randy | December 13, 2011
The Wall Street Journal reports  today that U.S. intelligence agencies have identified many of the Chinese groups that are responsible for cyberspying in the U.S., including groups  connected to China's People's Liberation Army and other non-military groups. 

The article notes that "the National Security Agency has determined the identities of individuals working in these groups, which is a critical development that provides the U.S. the option of confronting the Chinese government more directly about the activity or responding with a counterattack, according to former officials briefed on the effort.”

Read the full article here.

A separate piece in the New York Times this weekend detailed how Chinese spies have infiltrated and undermined the U.S. government over the last 15-20 years, asserting that our intelligence agencies must "rethink their priorities and shift their focus, resources and energy eastward to counter China’s spies.  If not, more secrets like the W-88 nuclear warhead will continue to find their way to Beijing.”

Weigh in with your thoughts on these articles. How do you think Washington's priorities must shift to address China's cyberspying efforts?