Cash for Appliances? Or Cash for Incompetence

Thursday, July 22, 2010

Cash for Appliances? Or Cash for Incompetence?

 U.S. Rep. Steven C. LaTourette (R-OH) is renewing his call that Gov. Strickland form an independent, bipartisan oversight board to monitor federal stimulus spending after media reports that the state used stimulus money for its cash for appliances rebate program to hire a Texas company that outsourced call center jobs to Central America.

 LaTourette and several other House Republicans wrote to Gov. Strickland in March 2009 and November of 2009 urging the creation of the stimulus oversight board.  The Governor told the lawmakers an oversight board wasn't necessary and that he favored a Deputy Inspector General.

 LaTourette said he can't believe stimulus funds intended to spur hiring in Ohio were used to hire a Texas company. 

 "This just reinforces the need to have better oversight over the stimulus funds," LaTourette said.

 In a televised by the NBC affiliate in Columbus, a state official defended the hiring of Texas-based Parago, Inc., since it had experience with rebate programs, but acknowledged she didn't know the Texas company would outsource the work.  The station said the state signed a contract worth about $500,000 with Parago to run Ohio's appliance rebate plan because it had experience with rebate programs.

 "It's no wonder only 6% of Americans believe that the Stimulus Bill created any jobs. To be fair, it does look like Governor Strickland used the funds to create some jobs - in Central America," LaTourette said.  "To suggest an Ohio company couldn't be trusted to run the appliance rebate program is insulting, and paying a Texas company nearly half a million dollars to use a call center in Central America is astounding.  This is not Cash for Appliances, it's Cash for Incompetence."

 During the report, reporter Patrick Preston interviewed Nadeane Howard, Director of the Ohio Department of Development's (ODOD) Energy Resource Division.  She was asked why a Texas company was running the $10 million Ohio appliance rebate program instead of an Ohio company.

  "Ohio has one of the largest energy star rebate programs in the country," Howard says in the report. "We could not trust it to someone who had not done this kind of work before."

 She further said ODOD stands behind its decision to hire the Texas firm even though it did not hire Americans to answer phones at the call center.  Howard was asked specifically if she knew the company would outsource the call center duties to another country.

 "We did not know that initially.  The moment we found out, the director of this agency issued a request to Parago to please on-shore their call center," Howard told the reporter.

 The company did not comply with the request, however, and LaTourette said he was dumbfounded by the explanation the state provided to the television reporter.

 "They don't have an on-shore call center that they can utilize, so with the program winding down, it still resides offshore," Howard said.

 LaTourette said the Columbus Dispatch reported in March 2009 that "a divided Ohio Controlling Board" approved the contract with Parago to administer the $10.5 million appliance rebate program for Ohio.  The vote was 4-3.  Nine companies submitted proposals to run the program, including two from Ohio.  The report said Parago would be "paid $357,300 to cover administrative costs, and was selected based on strengths including experience with appliance-based rebates, according to the request submitted to the board."
 
 The Dispatch reported in May 2009 about delays in issuing appliance rebates and noted that Parago had 795 consumer complaints filed with the Better Business Bureau in the last three years, but the company has an A+ rating from BBB. The report said appliance rebate programs in Texas, Minnesota and Iowa were experiencing problems getting through to phone banks and delays in rebates.  LaTourette said he doesn't know if those states used Parago as well.

 The NBC4 report can be found at http://www2.nbc4i.com/news/2010/jul/27/3/ohio-rebate-program-created-jobs-texas-central-ame-ar-167492/.

 

Steve's Blog

A Timeline of how the Benghazi attack unfolded

11/13/2012

The Wall Street JournaL has published a timeline of the events in BenghazI.

Read More

Early voting hours set in Ohio

10/17/2012

After the U.S. Supreme Court rejected the Ohio Secretary of State's appeal of early voting hours, voting hours were set in all 88 Ohio counties.

Read More

Connect with Steve Youtube C-Span