Justin Amash
is on Facebook.
To connect with Justin Amash, sign up for Facebook today.
Sign UpLog In
  1. From the article, on what GOP leadership wants from me:

    "It's not that 'these are unpleasant people and bad colleagues and we don't want them around'; it's that they aren't just content to vote against bad stuff and then be quiet about it."

    Bingo. Unlike many in Congress, I don't attack my colleagues personally. I just explain every vote on Facebook. These simple explanations upset many in the political class who want to avoid public scrutiny.
  2. Recent Posts by Others on Justin AmashSee All
    • I would like to ask that you do what you can to get Jon Hammar, an american in jail in Mexico, home before Christmas. The story ran on Hannity last night, and it seems ridiculous that he is even in jail. We need to help his family bring him home.
      about an hour ago
    • Jon Compton
      You are truly for the people. I say this because you your work shows through. Thank you for your leadership and post.
      about an hour ago
    • I truly appreciate you Integrity and Candor, I would suggest to you that this opportunity you have now, shouldn't be taken lightly or wasted.
      1 · 2 hours ago
    • Kepp raising hell sir and I support what you are doing and keep it up and we need more like you in congress.
      1 · 2 hours ago
  3. I voted "yes" on the motion to suspend the rules and pass S Con Res 50, which expresses the sense of Congress that the Secretary of State should continue working to promote a global Internet free from government control. It encourages resistance to the imposition of an International Telecommunication Union-mandated international settlement regime on the Internet. The non-binding resolution passed 397-0.
  4. I voted "no" on the motion to adjourn. The motion was meant to fail so members of Congress could show that they aren't planning to leave town until there's a deal to address the so-called fiscal cliff. This is a symbolic vote. It failed 3-393.
  5. I voted "present" on approving the Journal of the previous session. I always vote "present" when this is not handled by voice vote, because we are never given adequate time to review the Journal. Generally, the point of the vote is to extend the current session by five minutes (so that leadership can whip us on an upcoming vote). This was the only roll call vote of the day. Because a Journal vote is legislatively inconsequential, many Representatives oppose their own party on these votes to improve their independence rating. It was approved 290-106-2.
  6. I voted "no" on the motion to suspend the rules and pass H R 6582, American Energy Manufacturing Technical Corrections Act, as amended. The bill makes several revisions to the Energy Policy and Conservation Act of 2007, which established energy efficiency standards for certain appliances and commercial equipment. I appreciate the bill's revisions that make energy efficiency standards more predicta...
    ble for those already regulated, but I'm concerned by the new energy efficiency mandates contained in the bill. It also requires a study on the potential "economic benefits" of providing the industrial sector with $5 billion in federal energy efficiency grants, which will only encourage Congress to spend more on these central-planning efforts. The bill passed 398-2-1.
    See More
  7. I have received a response from Speaker Boehner concerning the secret scorecard used to target certain fiscally responsible members of the Budget and Financial Services committees.

    The Speaker did not dispute the existence of a scorecard and he did not deny that it was used to justify the Representatives’ removals.

    I recently was told that I received a "0" on the Republican leadership’s scorecard. Given my work with Democrats and Republicans on serious proposals to balance ...
    the budget, it is certain that the scorecard awarded points for supporting bigger deficits and more debt.

    Americans deserve to know the priorities of the current House leadership team. As fellow House Republicans, we deserve to know how we’re being judged when we vote.

    I’m proud of my fight for a balanced budget. Our leaders should be proud of the positions they take.

    Mr. Speaker, show us the scorecard.

    + + +

    Letter from Speaker Boehner: http://amash.house.gov/sites/amash.house.gov/files/121112BoehnerLetter.pdf
    See More
  8. Dear President Obama and Congressional Leaders,

    As you begin negotiations to improve our nation’s fiscal health, we write to express bipartisan support for including defense savings in any final budget agreement. We have serious concerns about the careless and arbitrary way that sequestration reduces defense spending, but we support its general intent to improve our fiscal condition. We believe that substantial defense savings can be achieved over the long-term, without com...
    promising national security, through strategic reductions in the Pentagon’s budget.

    Respected policy organizations across the political spectrum have recently issued proposals that would responsibly achieve defense savings over the next decade. The Cato Institute, Taxpayers for Common Sense, the National Taxpayer’s Union, the Project on Defense Alternatives and others have released plans to save up to $550 billion without harming U.S. national security.

    In fact, achieving defense savings as part of the larger effort to reduce the national debt will go a long way toward bolstering U.S. national security. As former chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Admiral Mike Mullen pointed out, “The single biggest threat to our national security is our debt, so I also believe we have every responsibility to help eliminate that threat. We must, and will, do our part.”

    The Pentagon’s budget has increased dramatically over the last decade, due in large part to the wars in Afghanistan and Iraq. As we transition from wartime to peacetime, and as we confront our nation’s fiscal challenges, future defense budgets should reflect the conclusion of these wars and acknowledge that our modern military is able to approach conflicts utilizing fewer – but more advanced – resources. Congress must consider these changes, not past spending or percentages of GDP, and move toward defense budgeting that focuses on meeting specific military requirements.

    We know the United States can maintain the best fighting force in the world while also pursuing sensible defense savings. How we spend our resources is just as important as how much we spend. The true foundation of our military power is not dollars or equipment, but the men and women of our armed forces, who have no equal.

    As you work toward a budget agreement to address our fiscal challenges, we urge you to include substantial defense savings.

    Sincerely,

    Mick Mulvaney
    Member of Congress

    Keith Ellison
    Member of Congress

    Tom McClintock
    Member of Congress

    Barbara Lee
    Member of Congress

    Morgan Griffith
    Member of Congress

    Michael Honda
    Member of Congress

    Justin Amash
    Member of Congress

    Jared Polis
    Member of Congress

    Raúl Labrador
    Member of Congress

    James Moran
    Member of Congress

    Timothy Johnson
    Member of Congress

    Barney Frank
    Member of Congress

    Chris Gibson
    Member of Congress

    Jerrold Nadler
    Member of Congress

    Reid Ribble
    Member of Congress

    Kurt Schrader
    Member of Congress

    Thomas Massie
    Member of Congress

    Edward Markey
    Member of Congress

    Dan Benishek
    Member of Congress

    Gwen Moore
    Member of Congress

    Scott Garrett
    Member of Congress

    Lynn Woolsey
    Member of Congress
    See More
  9. I voted "yes" on H R 6429, STEM Jobs Act of 2012. This is the same bill that failed under suspension earlier this year, although a few changes have been made.

    The revised version of the bill reauthorizes the temporary "V" visa program to allow the families of lawful permanent residents to wait in the United States (without work authorization) for a green card to become available after they have s...
    pent a year on the waiting list. The bill also attempts to offset its initial costs over the next five years by extending increased guarantee fees and premiums by one year, which is estimated to reduce the deficit by an additional $2.2 billion, although not until 2022.

    My vote explanation for the original version is here: http://facebook.com/repjustinamash/posts/451203314919080.

    H R 6429 isn’t perfect or comprehensive, but our immigration system is in dire need of reform, and this bill is a step in the right direction. It passed 245-139.
    See More
  10. I voted "no" on the motion to recommit (return to committee) with instructions H R 6429, STEM Jobs Act of 2012. The motion instructs the Committee on the Judiciary to amend the bill to preserve the Diversity Visa Program and insert immigrant wage requirements. The underlying bill replaces the diversity visa lottery with a new visa for high-skilled immigrants. I don’t like favoring certain skill sets over others, but it’s better than the goal of engineering some notion of national or ethnic balance among our immigrants, and replacing this lottery system is a first step toward more comprehensive immigration reform. Moreover, this is a procedural motion, not a true amendment. It failed 157-231.
  11. I voted "yes" on H Res 821, the rule defining the process for considering H R 6429, STEM Jobs Act of 2012. The closed rule provides for 90 minutes of debate equally divided between the Chairman and the Ranking Member of the Committee on the Judiciary. The modified substitute amendment is considered adopted, and one motion to recommit with or without instructions may be offered. It is also made in order for the Speaker to entertain motions to suspend the rules on Thursday, December 6 (House Rules permit suspensions only on Monday, Tuesday, and Wednesday). It passed 243-170.
  12. Senator Rand Paul is correct in his description of the 2013 NDAA. It's the 2012 NDAA (not 2013) that authorizes indefinite detention without charge or trial. There's much more to be done to protect our rights and undo the harm of the 2012 N...
    DAA (which doesn't expire), but thanks to the efforts of United States Senator Mike Lee and Sen. Paul, we are making significant progress in (re-)advancing the principle that all people in the United States have a constitutionally protected right to full due process.
    See More
    I have noticed that many are confused by my vote for NDAA. Please allow me to explain. 
     
    First, we should be clear about what the bill is. NDAA is the yearly defense authorization bill. It’s primary function is to specify which programs ca...
  13. Thanks to those of you at home for speaking out—not for me, but for yourselves. I'm proud and honored to represent the vast majority of Americans who believe that Members of Congress need to work together to balance the budget.

    We will no longer sit silently while political insiders and corporate lobbyists saddle our children and grandchildren with an insurmountable debt. It's time for Republican leadership to show us the vote scorecard they used to determine committee assignments—a scoring system that docks a person for fiscal responsibility.

    Only in Washington, DC, is a person taken off of the Budget Committee for wanting to balance the budget.

    #ShowUsTheScorecard
  14. Rumor has it that I’ve been removed from the House Committee on the Budget. Remarkably, I still have not received a single call, e-mail, or text from Republican leadership confirming this story. In fact, I wouldn’t even have learned about it if not for the news reports. I look forward to hearing from my party’s leadership about why my principled, conservative voting record offends them. That’s sur...
    e to be a lively and entertaining conversation.

    In the meantime, I can only speculate as to what specifically would make Republican leadership punish several of its party’s most principled members. Rep. Tim Huelskamp, who was kicked off of both Budget and the Committee on Agriculture, voted with me against the 2013 House budget resolution because it does not sufficiently address the federal government’s debt crisis. That was one of only three times during this Congress that I voted against the Chairman’s recommendations in committee. In fact, I voted with the Republican Chairman more than 95% of the time, and I have voted with my party’s leadership more than three-quarters of the time on the House floor.

    What message does leadership’s heavy-handedness send? It says that independent thinking won’t be tolerated, not even 5% of the time. It says that voting your conscience won’t be respected. It says that fulfilling your commitment to your constituents to work with both Republicans and Democrats to reduce our debt takes a back seat to the desires of corporate special interests. And, most troubling for our party, it says to the growing number of young believers in liberty that their views are not welcome here.

    I’ll miss working with my colleagues on Budget. I don’t relish this situation, but if one thing is clear based on the response from the grassroots, it’s that leadership’s actions will backfire. If they think kicking me off of a committee will lead me to abandon my principles or stifle my bipartisan work toward a balanced budget, I have a message for them: You’re dead wrong.
    See More
  15. To get a sense of the gap, consider this: When Amash was born in 1980, Democratic Rep. John Dingell, a fellow Michigander, had already been in Congress for 25 years.

    Amash uses Twitter himself instead of having a staffer do it, allowing him to connect with constituents in a way some other congressmen won’t. And he said his libertarian version of conservatism could be appealing to a younger generation of voters who see only the “old” in GOP.

    “The party has to adapt. It’s got to reach out to young people. It’s got to reach out to constituencies that it hasn’t reached before,” he said.

    His advice to the new members of the so-called ’80s caucus? Get involved and know what you are talking about.

    “I’ve developed relationships by focusing on policy and by being good at as many things as possible,” he said.
  16. I voted "no" on the motion to suspend the rules and concur in the Senate Amendment to H R 915, Jaime Zapata Border Enforcement Security Task Force. The Senate Amendment only marginally improves the House version of the bill, which I voted against earlier this year. The amendment removes the explicit authorization for appropriations, but to implement the bill, the Department of Homeland Security will have to continue funding the task forces from its other appropriations. It passed 397-4.

    My vote explanation for the House version is here: http://facebook.com/repjustinamash/posts/403579536348125.
  17. I voted "no" on the motion to suspend the rules and pass H R 5997, Medical Preparedness Allowable Use Act. The bill adds medical preparedness to the list of allowable uses for two Homeland Security grant programs meant to assist state and local governments in the prevention and response to acts of terrorism. I have three main objections: (1) It's unnecessary (current language already allows such f...
    unding); (2) it puts upward pressure on funding by making it more likely that existing dollars will be spread over more uses; and (3) the bill's definition of terrorism is so broad that these grants may be used for many purposes that do not have a federal nexus and are not constitutionally authorized. The bill passed 397-1.
    See More
  18. I voted "yes" on H R 6156, Russia and Moldova Jackson-Vanik Repeal and Sergei Magnitsky Rule of Law Accountability Act of 2012. The bill combines two separate bills.

    The first bill removes the Jackson-Vanik amendment, which restricts trade with Russia. The amendment was intended to penalize Soviet countries that limited the ability of Jews to emigrate. The administration can waive Jackson-Vanik's...
    restrictions if it certifies that the target countries have stopped their abuses. Administrations have waived the amendment since the 1990s.

    Russia finally joined the WTO in August. Russia's accession was contingent on the country lowering trade barriers and tariffs to other countries' goods and services. Every other country in the WTO, including the U.S., must give Russia "permanent normal trade relations" (PNTR), formerly known as "most favored nation" status. Even though it is routinely waived, Jackson-Vanik violates PNTR. If the U.S. does not repeal Jackson-Vanik, Russia does not have to lower its trade barriers to our country's goods and services.

    The trade portion of H R 6156 also extends PNTR to Moldova.

    The second bill combined in H R 6156 concerns the death of Sergei Magnitsky, a lawyer who alleged powerful interests had stolen billions of dollars from the Russian government. Magnitsky was imprisoned without a trial for a year before he was beaten to death by prison guards. The bill requires the administration to freeze the assets of and to deny entrance to the U.S. to persons responsible for Magnitsky's death.

    I favor lowering trade barriers between the U.S. and Russia. Tariffs and trade barriers limit economic freedom and make us poorer. The human rights portion of the bill is not ideal. It's ironic that our government would criticize the judicial process of another country through a sanctions process that requires our own government to make factual and legal determinations about a murder that happened thousands of miles away. However, the bill replaces broad and relatively severe sanctions in the Jackson-Vanik amendment with narrower sanctions aimed at an abuse that recently occurred (as opposed to sanctioning an abuse that largely ceased decades ago). On balance, the bill moves us in the direction of economic freedom and a restrained foreign policy.

    It passed 365-43.
    See More
  19. My friends Mike Lee and Rand Paul are fighting for liberty, fighting for the Constitution, and fighting for you every day. We may disagree from time to time, but we're in this together. Debating issues like NDAA indefinite detention is what makes us better representatives of the people. It's a victory for liberty that Congress is even having a debate on such provisions.
  20. The heart of the Feinstein amendment:

    "An authorization to use military force, a declaration of war, or any similar authority shall not authorize the detention without charge or trial of a citizen or lawful permanent resident of the United States apprehended in the United States, UNLESS AN ACT OF CONGRESS EXPRESSLY AUTHORIZES SUCH DETENTION."

    Well, that Act of Congress is the 2012 NDAA, which renders the rest of the Feinstein amendment meaningless.
  21. The Feinstein amendment to the 2013 NDAA does NOT protect you from indefinite detention without charge or trial. In fact, it explicitly permits such detention so long as the detention is approved by an Act of Congress . . . such as the 2012 NDAA.
  22. I voted "no" on the motion to suspend the rules and concur in the Senate Amendments to H R 2453, Mark Twain Commemorative Coin Act. The Senate made two minor changes to the House bill, which I voted against in April.

    My vote explanation is here: http://facebook.com/repjustinamash/posts/419852804693622.

    Despite the House's earmark ban, Congress continues to pass wasteful earmarks like this one. S...
    en. Jim DeMint and I have teamed up to write a bill that would block these giveaways to special interests.

    You can find out more here: http://facebook.com/repjustinamash/posts/284448524989867.

    The motion to concur (and thus to pass the Mark Twain Commemorative Coin Act) passed 370-19. This coin bill had the most opposition ever. We're making progress.
    See More
  23. I voted "yes" on H Res 808. The closed rule provides for 90 minutes of debate on H R 6156, Russia and Moldova Jackson-Vanik Repeal and Sergei Magnitsky Rule of Law Accountability Act of 2012, with one hour of debate equally divided between the Chairman and the Ranking Member of the Committee on Ways and Means and with 30 minutes equally divided between the Chairman and the Ranking Member of the Co...
    mmittee on Foreign Affairs. One motion to recommit with or without instructions may be offered.

    From November 19 through November 23, the Journal is considered approved, the Chair may adjourn the House, any bills that are introduced may be referred by the Speaker at a later time, and the Speaker may appoint a Chair for longer than three days (which is the usual limit under House rules).

    It passed 253-150.
    See More
  24. I voted "yes" on ordering the previous question (closing debate) on H Res 808, the rule defining the process for considering H R 6156, Russia and Moldova Jackson-Vanik Repeal and Sergei Magnitsky Rule of Law Accountability Act of 2012. It passed 243-164.
  25. I voted "yes" on the motion to suspend the rules and pass H R 6371, Streamlining Claims Processing for Federal Contractor Employees Act. The federal government withholds a certain percentage of payments it owes contractors in anticipation of subcontractors and employees' claims against the contractors. Currently, the Department of Labor is responsible for investigating the claims and deciding the amount the contractors owe, while GAO cuts the claims checks. GAO and DoL both have asked Congress to transfer payment authority from GAO to DoL to increase efficiency. It makes little sense to have an agency that has nothing to do with claims disputes pay out the claims. It passed 361-3.
  26. May God bless and comfort Zachary's family during this difficult time, and may his memory be eternal. We pray that all of our troops will return home soon in safety, health, and peace. And we thank them and their families for their incredible sacrifices.

Earlier in December

Earlier in November

Earlier in 2012

Joined Facebook