Senator Bob Smith
Statement for Hearing on “Project Delivery and
Environmental Stewardship–
Progress on Environmental Streamlining under TEA-21
September 19, 2002
Thank you, Mr. Chairman, and welcome to our
witnesses
Progress on
implementing the TEA-21 Environmental Streamlining provisions, Section 1309,
has been a challenge. TEA-21 was
authorized over 4 years ago, and implementing regulations have not yet been
issued.
On their own
initiative, with support from DOT, a number of States have developed improved
project delivery and environmental management systems, demonstrating that
Section 1309 is not only a laudable goal but a practical reality.
I believe we all
recognize that delays in the delivery of highway projects can cause severe
economic impact, increased congestion and accidents, and higher construction
costs.
In addition to the
states and DOT, other Federal agencies, especially those under EPW jurisdiction
(Corps, EPA, Fish and Wildlife Service) must do better to make streamlining a
priority.
So I am very pleased
that President Bush issued this executive order which I believe will make huge
strides in implementing the fundamental elements of section 1309, including:
Integrated review of environmental
regulations or concurrent reviews;
Full and early participation by all relevant
agencies;
Coordinated time schedules; and,
Dispute resolution procedures.
Mr. Chairman, I ask
unanimous consent to include a copy of Executive Order titled “Environmental
Stewardship and Transportation Infrastructure Project Reviews,” dated September
18, in the record of this hearing.
I would also like to
acknowledge today some important work being undertaken by the Western
Governor’s Association, and led by Governors Leavitt of Utah and Kitzhaber of
Oregon, to reform the NEPA process.
This effort is called
“Enlibra” and being undertaken in a growing number of states. At the heart of “Enlibra” is a set of
principles that I believe could help guide our effort to streamline highway
project delivery and improve environmental stewardship.
These principles
provide a common-sense approach to making progress on streamlining and
improving our protection of the environment.
They emphasize the
need to reward results (project construction and environmental stewardship),
and not red-tape process and procedures.
They recognize the
need to promote collaboration, not polarization; and the need to support
national standards yet allow flexibility for local solutions.
They also promote
basic conservative principles of sound science and economics.
I ask unanimous
consent to include a copy of the Enlibra principles in the record of this
hearing.
Lastly, I’d like to
make a few remarks about New Hampshire’s I-93 highway widening.
The widening of I-93
is the State’s highway priority project.
It experiences daily rush-hour congestion and there are serious safety
concerns.
In 2000, Congress
designated I-93 a National Environmental Streamlining Pilot Project.
I’d like to applaud
Carol Murray and the other members of the I-93 Board of Directors, which was
created to develop a streamlined and environmental sound project.
Your efforts have led
to greater trust, reduced delays, and provided for a rapid dispute resolution
process.
It is unfortunate,
however, that U.S. EPA cannot join the other agencies in either a consensus or
negotiated package of wetlands mitigation and continues to demand that DOT
purchase over $50 million (dollars) worth of land for conservation.
I do not want to see transportation projects used as a back door to
fund federal conservation programs.
This certainly appears
unreasonable, and I hope today’s hearing will provide us guidance for how we
may resolve this, and other streamlining issues.
Enlibra Principles
T
National
Standards, Neighborhood Solutions - Assign Responsibilities at the Right Level
NEPA is basically sound--the Act does not
need to be changed. Local areas,
however, need flexibility, with
accountability, to address local environmental, economic and social conditions.
T
Collaboration,
Not Polarization - Use Collaborative Processes to Break Down Barriers and Find
Solutions
Increase public involvement early in the
transportation planning and NEPA process, and close legal loopholes used for
disruptive and special interest lawsuits.
Collaborative approaches produce longer-term solutions and save money.
T
Reward Results,
Not Programs - Move to a Performance- Based System
Eliminate unnecessary paperwork and
procedures, while rewarding better accountability, environmental protection and
faster transportation project delivery.
T
Science For
Facts, Process for Priorities - Separate Subjective Choices from Objective Data
Gathering
Use sound science, engineering and economics
to assess the impact of transportation projects on the environment and
economy. Increase State and local use
of GIS to provide better location information on environmental and historical
resources.
T
Markets Before
Mandates - Pursue Economic Incentives Whenever Appropriate
Market incentives can encourage more
cost-effective and sustainable solutions to the environmental impacts of
transportation projects
T
Change A Heart,
Change A Nation - Environmental Understanding is Crucial
Ultimately, environmental protection depends
on the transportation choices people make every day. Government has a role in educating people about the impact their
transportation choices have on the environment.
T
Recognition of Benefits and Costs - Make Sure All Decisions
Affecting Infrastructure, Development and Environment are Fully Informed
Decisions should be guided
by an assessment of the true environmental and transportation costs and
benefits. These assessments, with equal
consideration of non-qualitative factors, can illustrate the advantages of different
options.
T
Solutions Transcend Political Boundaries - Use Appropriate
Geographic Boundaries for Environmental Problems
Focusing on the natural
boundaries, or watershed, of the transportation project can help insure that
the full range of scientific, economic, and political factors and interests are
taken into consideration.