Statement of Senator Baucus
Senate Committee on Environment and Public Works
Subcommittee on Superfund, Toxics, Risk and Waste
Management
Oversight hearing on the Superfund program
July 31, 2002
Thank you, Chairwoman Boxer, for holding this timely
hearing today on the status of the Superfund program. You have always been a
great champion of the Superfund program and I admire your leadership and
hard-work on this issue.
I am very concerned, as I know you are Madame Chairwoman,
that we're losing momentum on Superfund with this Administration.
As I've stated before, I remember very clearly when
Congress debated the original Superfund law, and I remember thinking what an
incredible legacy Congress could leave the nation by enacting that historic
legislation.
Seeing how successful Superfund has been over the last 25
years, particularly in Libby, Montana, reinforces my belief that we did the
right thing for the people of this country when we created the Superfund
program.
That's why I was very disturbed by the Inspector
General's report that indicated the Administration planned to reduce funding or
delay clean-up efforts at Superfund sites around the country. These are sites that are heavily contaminated
with hazardous and toxic materials, that pose significant threats to public
health and the environment.
Two of the sites mentioned in that report are located in
my state of Montana - the Upper Tenmile site and the Basin Creek mining
site. Both of these sites are on the
National Priorities List. In the case
of the Tenmile site, the City of Helena's water supply is threatened with toxic
mine wastes. This is very serious.
I understand that Basin and Tenmile received some funding
after the Inspector General's report came out.
But it's also my understanding that this funding is less than one-third
what Region 8 said was necessary to move forward with long-term clean-up plans
at these sites. It looks to me like
Basin and Tenmile got just enough funding to put a band-aid on the problem.
I'm extremely concerned that the more we fall behind in
securing the funding necessary for clean-up activities at NPL sites like
Tenmile and Basin, the worse off we're going to be in future years. This has serious implications for the future
stability of the Superfund program.
How long can we fund the status-quo at heavily
contaminated sites before the risks to public health and the environment become
too great? How long before this
practice ends up costing us far more than if we provided the necessary funding
at the front-end of the process?
Let me emphasize again that a Superfund designation is
not a trivial event for the communities involved - it invokes real fear and
uncertainty in people about the future, about the future economic health of
their community, and about the future effects of any contamination on their
health or their children's health.
In a place like Libby, Montana, people just want to know
that they're not going to be the next one to get sick or die. We should not burden communities with such
fear and uncertainty for any longer than is necessary to remedy the problem.
I know my state is not alone in facing cut-backs in
funding. I also know that the
Administration and Congress have to juggle a lot of competing priorities. However, jeopardizing the viability of the
Superfund program is just not an option, not when public health and safety is
at risk.
Cleaning up massively contaminated sites and pursuing the
parties responsible takes money, it takes a lot of money -- you just have to
take one look at the Berkeley Pit or the WR Grace vermiculite mine in my state
to grasp that fact. And, we're not
always going to find a responsible party.
The sooner this Administration accepts that fact, the
sooner we can start looking together for solutions to the problem, including
taking another look at re-authorization of the Superfund tax to replenish the
trust fund, so that individual taxpayers aren't stuck with the tab. I commend you, madame Chairwoman, for
starting that discussion by introducing S. 2596. I'm proud to be a co-sponsor
of that legislation because we have to look at every available option to shore
up Superfund.
Madame Chairwoman, I thank you again for holding this
hearing so we can get to the bottom of what's going on with the Superfund
program. I look forward to hearing the
testimony of the witnesses.