Statement of Senator Max Baucus
Senate Committee on Environment and Public
Works
Hearing on the Administration=s Fiscal Year 2003 Budget Proposal for the
EPA
February 13, 2002
Good morning Mr.
Chairman. I would like to welcome
Administrator Whitman and thank her for being here today to talk the
Administration=s Fiscal Year 2003 budget proposal. I look
forward to hearing about the priorities of the Environmental Protection Agency
and I look forward to working with Administrator Whitman to make sure that we
are doing the best job we can to allocate our scarce federal dollars in a
manner that best protects public health and the environment.
First, let me say I
am very pleased that the Administration has proposed a substantial increase in
the budget for brownfields programs.
The Administration=s commitment to cleaning up brownfields complements the hard-work
Congress did last year in getting a brownfields revitalization bill passed, and
signed into law by President Bush just last month. Montana has its share of sites that communities, private
individuals and public interest groups have been wanting to clean up for years. With the Administration=s support, I hope we=ll finally have the resources to help them do
that.
However, I am
concerned about the substantial cuts in the Clean and Safe Drinking Water
accounts proposed by the Administration, including a flat funding request for
the Drinking Water State Revolving Fund and a significant decrease from the FY
2002 levels for the Clean Water State Revolving Fund. These are extremely important and highly successful
programs. They are a very efficient
way to leverage federal dollars for maximum benefit. Folks in Montana tell me that the State Revolving Funds have done
Aamazing@ things on the ground, for communities, for the environment and for
public health and safety. They tell me
we need to increase our support for these programs, so that more communities
can benefit from them. I hope we will
be able to work with Administration on this.
I also want to make
it clear to Administrator Whitman and to the Administration that Libby, Montana
continues to be one of my top priorities.
I want to make sure that Libby will continue to be a top priority with
the EPA until the community finally gets a clean bill of health. EPA so far has done a remarkable job on the
ground in Libby, and I can=t thank those folks enough. If
we all stay the course here, we can finally do right by the people in Libby who
have suffered terribly for so many years.
Finally, as I know
Administrator Whitman is aware, EPA is considering declaring a public health
emergency in Libby so that EPA can go in and take the asbestos-contaminated
vermiculite from peoples= homes. I hope EPA does the
right thing here, because this decision shouldn=t be about anything other than protecting the health and lives of the
people in Libby.
Thank you again, Mr.
Chairman, and thank-you Administrator Whitman for your time.