STATEMENT OF
J. PAUL GILMAN
NOMINEE FOR
ASSISTANT
ADMINISTRATOR
FOR RESEARCH AND
DEVELOPMENT
U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL
PROTECTION AGENCY
BEFORE THE
COMMITTEE ON
ENVIRONMENT AND PUBLIC WORKS
UNITED STATES SENATE
Good morning, Mr.
Chairman and Members of the Committee.
It is a privilege to appear before you as the nominee to be the
Assistant Administrator for Research and Development for the United States
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
I am honored that President Bush has nominated me and I am excited about
the opportunity to serve with Governor Whitman. I am delighted to be joined today by my wife Ginny and our sons
Samuel and Will.
Let me first address
my qualifications for the position. I
believe my education, research, and employment experiences have all contributed
to my qualifications. While employed at
Celera Genomics I had the opportunity to participate in the creation of a
fast-paced and highly productive private sector research enterprise. My knowledge of research management was
greatly enhanced by this experience. I
believe my immersion in the new fields of genomics and bioinformatics will be
useful as we begin to use these tools to solve scientific and technical
challenges in the environmental sciences.
Serving as an External Member of the Department of Energy=s Laboratory
Operations Board has afforded me an excellent opportunity for insight into the
management of federal research facilities.
While at the National Academies of Science and Engineering=s National Research
Council I had responsibility for activities in the life sciences, including
agriculture. The scientific and
technical activities of the EPA were often the subject of our various review
and reports. This provided me with an in depth view of some of the most
significant issues faced by the EPA, the scientific context for these issues,
and the research personnel and programs at the EPA working to inform the agency=s
decision-making. At the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB) I had direct responsibility for budget formulation
and oversight for the EPA among other science-related agencies. My responsibilities also included
participation in OMB=s process for the
review of proposed regulations from the EPA.
While employed at the DOE my specific responsibilities included advising
the Secretary on scientific and technical matters. These included the programs studying human health and
environmental effects of energy-related technologies, environmental research,
and environmental remediation. During
my 13 years working for the United States Senate, including 1 year as a
Congressional Science Fellow of the American Association for the Advancement of
Science, I had the opportunity to work on a wide variety of science-related
issues, including environment and human health issues. I participated in the Committee on
Environment and Public Works= investigation of the Three Mile Island Nuclear Power
Plant accident, the passage of the Nuclear Waste Policy Act of 1982, and
oversight of the U.S. Department of Energy=s (DOE) research and development programs
including its environmental research and remediation programs. As a staff member for a Senate Committee I
had the opportunity to participate in and learn the Congressional budget
process for federal agencies. As a staff
member for Senator Pete Domenici I necessarily became a student of the federal
government=s overall budget
process. Lastly, my undergraduate
education in the liberal arts included a broad involvement in the
sciences. My graduate education and
research focused in the earth and life sciences with a concentration in ecology
and evolutionary biology.
I would like to
share with the Committee my thoughts about the nature of science in government
and at the EPA. I believe those who
pursue science and engineering in government take on a special role and a
weighty responsibility. You must be an
advocate on behalf of the truth. There
is a quote of Albert Einstein=s engraved in the monument to him outside the National
Academy of Sciences. It captures my
feelings and my commitment to this Committee and my President. It reads:
The right
to search for truth implies also a duty; one must not conceal any part of what
one has recognized to be true.
There has been
substantial change in the Office of Research and Development at EPA under the
past 2 Assistant Administrators. It has
been aimed at improving the quality and utility of its science. Dr. Robert J. Huggett set major research
programs on a new course. One that was
designed to have science serve the mission of the Agency, not just research for
the sake of research. He also initiated
a substantial program for funding university-based research that is also
focused on serving the mission of the agency.
His successor, Dr. Norine E. Noonan, supported his initiatives and
extended them. There is today a
rigorous research planning process aimed at making the right research available
to the EPA regulators when they need it.
We are beginning to see the results of this effort. If confirmed, I will sustain these reforms
and where appropriate, initiate new ones in the pursuit of the best use of
science in the EPA regulatory process.
Thank you for this
opportunity to appear before you, Mr. Chairman.