September 24, 2002
The Honorable Max Baucus
Chairman, Committee on
Finance
The Honorable James
Jeffords
Chairman, Committee on
Environment and Public Works
United States Senate
Washington, D.C. 20510
Re: Joint Hearing of September 25,
2002
Dear
Chairmen Baucus and Jeffords:
The
American Highway Users Alliance (AHUA) takes this opportunity to briefly
address issues regarding the financing of the Federal highway program and asks
that this letter be included in the record of the September 25
joint hearing of the Finance and Environment and Public Works Committees on
this subject.
Your
Committees are to be commended for holding this hearing on how the Federal
government can finance an increased level of Federal investment in highways — an
investment that will provide important benefits throughout the country.
As
the nation’s broadest-based highway advocacy organization and the organization
that represents the motorists, truckers, and businesses that pay the taxes that
fully fund and rely on our nation’s highway and bridge investments, The Highway
Users is particularly interested in your joint efforts to improve revenue
collection and increase investments.
America’s
roads have serious and documented ftinding needs — too many Americans are dying
or being injured on roads suffering from outmoded design — traffic congestion
is worsening, threatening safety, slowing air quality progress, increasing
tailpipe greenhouse gas emissions, wasting fuel, slowing product deliveries,
and taking commuters away from their families and other productive exercises.
Some
have called for increasing federal fuel taxes. If there are demonstrated needs
and current funding is being invested appropriately, highway users will
seriously consider that option. But we believe that your committees must first
improve where today’s taxes are going, prevent further erosion of available
resources, and examine all means available to boost highway revenues without
raising taxes.
Thus,
we take this opportunity to support S. 2678, the “Maximum Economic Growth for
America Through the Highway Trust Fund Act,” bi-partisan legislation introduced
earlier this year by Chairman Baucus. The twelve co-sponsors of that bill
include the ‘following members of the Finance or Environment and Public Works
Committees: Senators Daschle, Reid, Graham, Warner, Bond, Thomas, and Crapo. We
thank all the supporters of that legislation for their leadership in advancing
the provisions of that bill.
Among
other provisions, S. 2678 would provide that the 2.5 cents per gallon of tax on
gasohol that currently is directed to the General Fund of the Treasury would be
deposited in the Highway Account.
In
addition, S. 2678 would deposit into the Highway Account an amount equal to the
fuel taxes not imposed on gasohol due to the gasohol tax preference. This is in
keeping with historical precedence of funding agricultural programs, like
ethanol, from the general fund. The bill would not raise the tax imposed on
gasohol. This means that the Highway Account would receive treatment on gasohol
comparable to the treatment currently given to the Mass Transit Account. That
account, unlike the Highway Account, already receives the same amount of
funding for a gallon of gasohol as it does for a gallon of regular gas.
S.
2678 would also resume the practice of crediting the Highway and Mass Transit
Accounts of the Highway Trust Fund with interest on their respective balances.
While we would prefer that Congress invest those surpluses, the trust fund
should receive interest on highway use taxes collected, but not invested.
Increased
revenues for the highway program can also come from improved collections. We
ask that the two committees work to achieve greater compliance with our tax
laws that support the Highway Trust Fund. We have heard, for example, that
changing the point of collection of aviation fuel taxes could add billions to
the Trust Fund over the life of a reauthorization. Other enforcement steps
could be beneficial as well. We urge the Congress to take appropriate steps to
achieve the highest possible rate of collection of the taxes due to the Highway
Trust Fund.
In
addition, we understand that Senator Baucus is exploring additional legislation
that would allow the Secretary of the Treasury to sell tax credit bonds. The
proceeds would go into the Highway Trust Fund and the General Treasury would be
responsible for the principal and interest. We are eager to see this approach
advance as an additional means of increasing highway investment.
Mssrs.
Chairmen, the American Highway Users Alliance commends the Committees for
holding this hearing and urges enactment of legislation, in accord with the
points outlined above, to finance increased Federal highway investment. Thank
you for your consideration of our views on this important matter.
Respectfully submitted,
William D. Fay
President and CEO