STUYVESANT HIGH SCHOOL PARENTS'
ASSOCIATION
345 Chambers Street
New York, NY 10282-1099
(212) 312-4800 · www.stuypa.org
PA Hotline:
(212) 312-4838
Testimony of Marilena
Christodoulou
President, Stuyvesant High School
Parents’ Association
before the
U.S. Senate Committee on
Environment and Public Works
Subcommittee on Clean Air,
Wetlands, and Climate Change
February
11, 2002
On behalf of the six thousand
parents at Stuyvesant High School, I want to thank you for holding this hearing
on a matter of great concern to our community.
Stuyvesant High School is an
academically excellent school for which each student must take a competitive
examination in order to gain admission. Approximately 20,000 students take the
Specialized Science High Schools’ entrance examination for the 750 available
spaces at the school. It is the most competitive school in the New York City
public school system and arguably in the country.
The school, located four blocks
north of the World Trade Center, was heavily impacted by the events of
September 11. The 3,000 students and 200 staff members were evacuated in the
middle of a cloud of toxic dust and debris as the second tower was collapsing.
Almost immediately, the school building was commandeered for use by rescue and
recovery agencies and personnel.
The Board of Education (BOE)
reopened the school on October 9th. We were the first school in the
Ground Zero area to return to its building. Some of the remaining six schools
have only returned last week and one school, PS 89, has initiated legal
proceedings against the BOE seeking an injunction against the return. The goal
of our Parents’ Association (PA) has been to ensure that the return to
Stuyvesant would occur only when the streets were safe for walking and the
building was safe for occupancy. Our single most important concern is the issue
of air quality—both inside and outside the school—specifically, the possible
presence of airborne contaminants and related potential adverse health effects.
Unfortunately, it is my opinion that the return to Stuyvesant was premature and
that environmental conditions in and around the school continue to pose a
potential threat to our children’s health and well-being.
As the inside of the school tested positive for asbestos, the BOE conducted an asbestos abatement prior to reoccupancy. We were encouraged by the fact that the BOE’s cleanup should have taken care of not only asbestos, but also all other particulate contaminants. In addition, as a result of negotiations with the PA, the BOE agreed to undertake environmental sampling inside and outside the school (which continues to this day). Results are reviewed by H.A. Bader Consultants, Inc., the PA’s hired environmental engineers, and by the PA Environmental Health & Safety Committee. The excavation operations and the few remaining fires at Ground Zero continue to release a variety of contaminants into the lower Manhattan air. These contaminants, all of which are associated with potential adverse health effects, include asbestos, lead, crystalline silica, dioxins, carbon monoxide, diesel and gasoline exhaust, PCB’s, heavy metals, and benzene and other volatile organic compounds. In addition, several hundred trucks a day carry pulverized debris and steel girders coated with remnants of asbestos fireproofing from Ground Zero past Stuyvesant to the waste transfer barge operation located immediately adjacent to the north side of the school on Pier 25. This is the main debris removal operation from Ground Zero. Additional contaminants are released into the air as loads are transferred from trucks to barges. Diesel emissions from the many trucks and cranes at the barge are another source of contaminants.
Our experience since returning to
school has been and continues to be problematic. Our children are getting sick.
We are also concerned about the possible delayed health effects (like
cancer) 10-20 years from now from exposure to the chemicals in the air.
Contaminants Are Entering the School
Our goal is to prevent contaminants
in the outdoor environment from entering the school and affecting our children.
The primary route of outdoor contaminants into the school (assuming windows and
doors are kept closed) is through the ventilation system. The main defense
against contaminants is the filtration in the ventilation system. To date, the
BOE has failed to take adequate measures to protect our children. Despite
repeated requests from the PA, the BOE still has not cleaned the ductwork of
the ventilation systems. After months of stalling, the BOE finally upgraded the
filters at the end of January. Although these replacement filters provide an
improvement in efficiency, they still do not provide adequate protection,
according to evaluations by two independent professional ventilation engineers
working with the PA.
Results from environmental sampling conducted by the
BOE demonstrate that, on more than 50% of the days from October 9, when our
children returned to school, to February 1, measurements of respirable
particulate matter (PM 2.5) inside the school have exceeded EPA guidelines for
children. These particulates may pose a greater danger because they may contain
a mixture of toxins. Levels of lead dust in excess of regulatory limits were
found inside Stuyvesant on several occasions in December, January, and
February.
The Barge
Operation is a Main Source of Contaminants
It
is clear that the close proximity of the barge to the school is putting our
children at a greater risk of exposure to toxic contaminants. The PA’s
environmental engineer has measured and compared airborne concentrations of
particulate matter at Ground Zero and on the north side of the Stuyvesant
building, and found the particular matter to be higher at Stuyvesant. As the
north side of the school faces away from Ground Zero and towards the barge
operation, the only reasonable explanation is that we have elevated levels of
particulates coming from the barge/truck operation. The PA expert also reports
that levels of particulate matter at Stuyvesant have consistently been double
the levels at Barclay Street, one block from Ground Zero.
On several occasions, the
EPA notified the PA that, weeks earlier, it had monitored high levels of
certain contaminants in outdoor air at its monitoring station, between the
school and the barge, in excess of EPA regulatory limits. These contaminants
included asbestos, tetrachloroethane, and isocyanate. Unfortunately, the EPA has not been monitoring the latter
contaminants on a regular basis nor is it monitoring and disclosing the full
array of possible contaminants. Further, there is no system in place for
proactive notification of the residents, workers, and students in the area to
enable them to take protective measures (like staying at home) on days when
levels of contaminants in the air are high. Carting of the Ground Zero debris
material to the barge constitutes an unacceptable risk to our children and to
the surrounding community along the truck route. We are in the unique position
to observe the truck and barge operation, and we can report to you that,
despite assurances from government officials, the trucks are not always
adequately covered; on cold days the debris cannot be hosed down to prevent the
release of dust; and the levels of visible dust in the air and on the pavement
are high.
To
date, government agencies have been unwilling to either relocate the barge
operation to a less damaging site or to take effective measures to protect the
community. There was discussion to containerize the debris at Ground Zero prior
to trucking them to the barge; to install particulate traps by the barge; and
to use low-sulfur fuel for the trucks and the cranes. To date, none of these
measures has been implemented.
Even simple measures such as halting barge
operation on below-freezing non-hose down days, rerouting trucks from Pier 25
to Pier 6 during the hours when school children are outdoors, and directing
trucks hauling loads with high dust content to Pier 6, have not been implemented.
There
are 4,500 school children, some as young as 4 years old, within two blocks of
this barge operation. We are at a loss to understand how the Government could
locate a toxic dump right next to a school in the middle of a residential
community. The BOE has taken no
effective action to have the barge relocated, or to ensure its operation in an
environmentally safe manner.
In summary, our children are exposed
to three sources of contaminants: the air inside the school, the toxic
composition of the Ground Zero debris trucked and dumped at the barge, and the
diesel emissions and combustion byproducts generated by the trucks and the
cranes.
Incidence of Illness Among
Students and Staff
Since
the return to school on October 9th, a number of students and
faculty have reported and exhibited clinically diagnosable symptoms of illness.
Many parents report that their children have experienced unusual rashes,
nosebleeds, coughing attacks, and chronic sinus and respiratory problems, including
new onset asthma and chemical bronchitis. Parents have reported to us several
emergency room visits. It has been reported that several custodians have
chemical bronchitis. Since the return
to Stuyvesant on October 9 through December 14, at least eleven students have
left the school due to air quality problems. These students, who will not be
allowed to return by the BOE, have chosen to leave one of the most prestigious
public high schools in the nation, and to forfeit a public educational opportunity
that essentially cannot be replaced.
Several faculty members have left or taken
sabbaticals for health reasons or medical concerns. The teachers’ union has
filed a grievance over environmental conditions at the school. The National
Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (“NIOSH”), a branch of the Centers
for Disease Control, has begun an investigation of environmental conditions and
health effects among teachers at Stuyvesant (and other lower Manhattan
locations). However, NIOSH can only
investigate the health impact on workers and has no jurisdiction to conduct an
evaluation of our children. Neither the BOE nor the NYC Department of Health
have conducted an epidemiological study of the students. The incidence of
student illness cannot be adequately characterized based only on attendance
rates and visits to the school nurse’s office.
Stuyvesant’s student population is
very diverse. Many of our students come from first and second generation
non-English speaking immigrant families.
We are concerned that many of these families do not have the wherewithal
to seek early medical care. Dr. Stephen Levin, of the Mt. Sinai Selikoff Center
for Occupational and Environmental Medicine, has advised us that early
detection and treatment of respiratory illness is critical in terms of
preventing such illness from becoming chronic. (I would like to take this
opportunity to thank Dr. Levin for his help during this period).
In
conclusion, these developments call into question any unequivocal assurances
from government agencies, including the EPA and the BOE, about the health and
safety of our children.
The following courses of action
should be implemented to protect environmental quality and public health:
A. Barge Operation:
The truck/barge operation on Pier 25 should be relocated to an area where there
is less residential and educational impact.
B. Ventilation Protocols:
The Government should immediately issue protocols for proper preventive
measures to be taken by schools and other institutions in the area with regard
to installation of protective air filtration and cleaning and operation of
ventilation systems.
C. Cleaning of Buildings and Enclosed Structures:
The Government should mandate regular proper cleaning (i.e., wet-cleaning and
HEPA-vacuum) of building interiors and other enclosed structures in the area,
including foot-bridges such as the one outside Stuyvesant.
D. Cleaning of Streets and Sidewalks:
The Department of Sanitation, as well as entities such as the Battery Park City
Authority, should be required to regularly wet-clean the streets and sidewalks
in the area, as it is necessary for dust suppression.
E. Environmental Monitoring and Notification:
The Government should take action to ensure complete environmental testing,
both indoor and outdoor; full and timely disclosure of results; and immediate
and full notification of elevated levels of contaminants to residents, workers,
and students in lower Manhattan.
F. Monitoring of Incidence of Illness and
Medical Coverage: The Government should assume
responsibility for implementing a centralized and coordinated effort to monitor
and track incidence of illness among residents, workers, and students in the
area. A central registry of all residents, workers, and students who have been
exposed to contaminants as a result of the September 11 attacks should be
established. The Government should assume responsibility for early detection
and medical treatment of illness related to the World Trade Center disaster.
Also, in my opinion, a dedicated fund should be established to pay for medical
costs associated with any future health problems of registered individuals as a
result of WTC chemical exposure.
Thank you for the opportunity to address you today.