Senator Bob Smith
Opening Statement -
Superfund Subcommittee
April 10, 2002
I want to welcome all of the witnesses who have come before this
subcommittee to testify on an issue that I have been closely involved with for
quite some time. Before I became
chairman of the full committee in 1999, I had been the chairman of this
subcommittee. Needless to say, I have
quite an extensive background on Superfund.
It would be a vast understatement to say that, historically, Superfund
has been a challenging issue. And that
challenge has not diminished with time.
We are entering a period where we are addressing some of the most
complicated and complex Superfund sites – sites that do not allow for simple
remediation. It is inevitable that
these sites will take a longer period of time to clean up – that is simply a
fact.
I know some will try to score political points by comparing the time it
takes to clean up the sites of today, and the number of sites we clean up, with
the less complicated sites of the past.
Unfortunately, that comparison doesn’t paint an accurate picture. I am also aware that the Superfund tax will
be the subject of political posturing.
That tax expired in 1995 - a time when I was heavily involved in trying
to pass comprehensive Superfund reform.
It didn’t make sense to reauthorize a tax for a program that was
broken. I have consistently held that
position.
Superfund still needs to be reformed.
If you don’t believe that to be the case, then come to New Hampshire and
talk to anyone who has been involved in Beede Superfund site. It is a disgrace what the law has done to so
many good people who were only trying to do the right thing. I have introduced legislation once again to
address these problems, but so far there has been a lack of will to do the
right thing.
Until we can fix the problems with Superfund, we shouldn’t consider
renewing the tax. I want a Superfund
program that is a success. One that
will be fair and will clean up the problems created in the past. I have fought hard to get many sites in New
Hampshire cleaned up, and I continue to do so.
It has not been rare to fight to keep sites off of the Superfund list
out of fears that listing would delay clean up efforts.
We must fix this law. For years
there has been tremendous resistance to comprehensive reform. When I was chairman, I decided that we
should try a piecemeal approach – one step at a time. We took a big step last year with our Brownfields bill. That
effort took strong leadership and a bipartisan commitment for us to achieve our
ultimate success. I hope we can take
the next step toward comprehensive reform soon.
I want to welcome our witnesses today and thank them for sharing their
thoughts on the Superfund program – a special welcome to Assistant
Administrator Marianne Horinko. I
appreciate and commend you for the approach you have brought to your office – one
that encourages innovation and thinking outside the box.
If we are to meet the current and future challenges of Superfund, we
must be able to think and act outside the box.
A leading insurance company – AIG – will present one such approach today. This company has been on the forefront of innovative
approaches to the financial side of Superfund and Brownfield cleanups since
1980. Their testimony raises some
interesting approaches to Superfund that could provide cost savings to both the
government and private sector. I know
that the Department of Defense has utilized this approach and found it to be
very effective in managing costs at a number of sites. I would certainly encourage EPA to take a
serious look at this innovative concept.
I will be following up with EPA on this and other innovative ideas that
will help to speed up cleanups and are in the best interest of the
taxpayer. Superfund isn’t an easy
issue, but we must continue to find ways to make it a better program for all
involved. Again, I want to thank you
all for your appearance before this subcommittee and I look forward to your
testimony.