Statement of Senator Max Baucus
Senate Committee on Environment and Public Works
Hearing to Assess the Environmental and Health Impacts of Power Plant Emissions
July 26, 2001, 9:30 a.m.

Thank you, Mr. Chairman for calling us here today to discuss such an important issue. I appreciate your efforts, and the efforts of the Ranking Minority Member Senator Smith, to move the debate forward on how best to achieve realistic reductions in power plant emissions. I would also like to give my sincere thanks to our distinguished panel of experts for testifying here today.

When I go home to my ranch in Helena, Montana it is easy for me to forget some of the air pollution problems plaguing other parts of the country. In Montana, we are blessed with a small population and plenty of space. But, even in Montana, this is an issue we cannot ignore. For example, acid rain continues to be a significant problem in the Rocky Mountain region. But, I don't think anyone, on any side of this issue, is advocating that we do nothing. For instance, the Administration has directed the EPA to develop a proposal to reduce SOx, NOx, and mercury emissions from power plants. The problem is that as we in Congress try to fashion an appropriate response to the continuing problem of power plant emissions, there remain significant differences over the best way to achieve cleaner power. But as long as retain our common goal -- cleaner and more efficient power -- I am confident that we will find a way to reach a bi-partisan solution to this problem.

We have already gone a long way towards reducing amount of pollutants we release into the atmosphere and in cleaning up our lakes, streams and oceans. The Clean Air Act has resulted in significant reductions in emissions of SOx and NOx from power plants. We are on target to achieve even more reductions in the near future, and emissions control technologies continue to advance. We of course want to make sure that industry has every incentive to invest in these new technologies. Hopefully as we continue to hold hearings and discuss this issue, we can find the best combination of carrot and stick -- government regulation and market-based incentives -- to ensure we are on track to produce the cleanest power we can.

As for addressing emissions of greenhouse gases, I have stated before that I believe that we need to take action to address the consequences of climate change. Whether we like it or not, on this issue, the world still looks to the United States to take the lead, although that attitude may be changing, which is unfortunate. However, the proposed regulation of carbon emissions in the United States is controversial. Some argue that currently, there are no cost-effective control technologies for greenhouse gas emissions. However, I don't think anyone would argue that global emissions of greenhouse gases is something we can choose to ignore. The questions becomes, again, what is the best way to address the problem, and achieve realistic emissions reductions.

I look forward to hearing the testimony of today's witnesses. My colleagues and I appreciate your insight and knowledge on this issue.