Statement of Senator Harry Reid
EPW Subcommittee on Transportation,
Infrastructure and Nuclear Safety
Hearing on FY 2003 FHWA Budget
February 11, 2002
Welcome to today’s hearing on the Federal
Highway Administration’s fiscal year 2003 budget proposal and budget issues
related to the reauthorization of TEA-21, the Transportation Equity Act for the
21st Century. The
President’s budget raises some important short and long-term concerns and I
welcome the opportunity to discuss these issues today with Federal Highway
Administrator Mary Peters and our other distinguished witnesses.
I will get right to the point – the
President’s budget cannot be sustained.
A 27 percent cut in highway funding is a move in the wrong direction
given our nation’s transportation needs.
It will also mean the elimination of hundreds of thousands of good jobs
and be a drag on our economic recovery.
I am pleased that Tom Stephens, our fine
Director of the Nevada Department of Transportation, is here to testify on
behalf of state Departments of Transportation across the nation. I am sure that Mr. Stephens will speak to
the negative impact these cuts will have on Nevada. Nevada is the fastest growing state in the nation and we have
huge needs for new road capacity, not to mention new transit and rail
initiatives. A $50 million dollar
spending cut in Nevada next year will force my state to cut back on critical
transportation projects. The result
will be more congestion, reduced productivity, worsened air quality, and lost
jobs. This is not an acceptable outcome. My state has significant unmet
transportation needs and these cuts cannot be allowed.
The Revenue Aligned Budget Authority – or
RABA – mechanism was created to ensure that spending from the Highway Trust
Fund was tied to revenues into the trust fund.
This is a goal that I fully support.
However, the RABA mechanism clearly needs to be fixed so that we can
avoid the dramatic swings in spending that we have seen over the past few
years.
One of the reasons that we authorized TEA-21
for six years and created the budget firewalls for highways and transit was to
provide states with some certainty as to the level of funding they would
receive each year. A stable and
dependable funding stream is essential for states to develop long-term
transportation plans and efficiently manage projects. I agree with the philosophy behind RABA -- that spending from the
Highway Trust Fund should be connected to revenues, but I do not think it
necessary for us to follow a broken mechanism off a spending cliff.
Regardless of the spending adjustment
mandated by RABA, we cannot allow a 27 percent drop in highway funding next
year. Adequate funding of our nation’s
highways is important not only for obvious short-term economic stimulus and
highway improvement needs, but for long-term reasons as well. This Subcommittee will be working with the
chairman and ranking member of the full Environment and Public Works Committee
to put together a TEA-21 reauthorization proposal early next year. One of my priorities is to ensure that
adequate funding is available to meet our nation’s significant transportation
needs.
With this in mind, it is important to
understand that the funding level Congress enacts for FY 2003 will serve as the
baseline from which our Committee’s reauthorization proposal will be
scored. Therefore, if we base reauthorization
on the President’s FY 2003 budget proposal, we will have $28 billion dollars
less available to us than if FY 2003 spending equals the amount authorized in
TEA-21.
A spending baseline that is $28 billion below
the TEA-21 baseline would spell disaster for our transportation system. In fact, my focus is on doing just the
opposite and finding a way to increase funding for all of the components of our
surface transportation system – highways, transit, and rail. This is why the leaders of the Senate
Environment and Public Works Committee have worked on a bipartisan and
bicameral basis with the House Transportation and Infrastructure Committee to
introduce the “Highway Funding Restoration Act.”
This legislation, which every member of this
Committee cosponsored, will ensure that funding in fiscal year 2003 is at least
at the level authorized in TEA-21. Rest
assured that I will be advocating for the highest funding level possible, but I
will not accept a penny less than the amount authorized in TEA-21.
I know that Administrator Peters shares some
of my concerns about the impact of these proposed highway-funding cuts. Administrator Peters, welcome, and let me
tell you how pleased I am that someone so familiar with the transportation challenges
faced by fast growing western states is at the helm of the Federal Highway
Administration. I look forward to
working with you to develop a top-notch reauthorization bill.
I also welcome Assistant Secretary for Budget Donna McLean and look forward to further discussion on these important budget issues.