Statement of Chairman
James M. Jeffords
Senate Committee
on Environment and Public Works
Federal
Procurement and Beverage Container Recycling
Thursday, July 11,
2002
The issue of recycling could not be more
timely. In the last year, our security and
resource concerns have been highlighted more than ever. Lest we not forget that President
Roosevelt's recycling campaign helped us win World War II.
While today's war is very
different, the energy consequences are even more dramatic.
I was alarmed by several statistics
in the Container Recycling Institute's new study on Aluminum. Let me share one of them with you. In 2001, 100 billion aluminum cans were
sold. More than half, over 50 billion,
were wasted, which means landfilled, littered or incinerated. If these 50 billion cans had been recycled,
they would have saved the energy equivalent of 16 million barrels of crude
oil. That is enough energy to generate
electricity for almost 3 million U.S. homes for a year.
And the trend is worsening: the 2001 aluminum recycling rate was the lowest in 15 years. These statistics are astounding. The waste is disturbing. Our disposal practices have got to change.
The federal government must become
a better role model. Or industry must
begin taking steps voluntarily. Or Congress must pass recycling
legislation. Or all of the above.
In our search for the right answer
or balance of right answers, we will focus on two areas of recycling today.
First, we will look at whether the Federal government, which spent more than $230 billion in 2001 on goods and products, is maximizing its purchases of recycled content products.
In June 2001, the General
Accounting Office released a study that concerned me. One of their conclusions was that many
procuring officials and other Federal purchasers either do not know about or
chose not to implement the requirements for establishing recycled-content
procurement programs.
If the Federal government is not
recycling, how can we expect the rest of the country to do so? If the
Federal government is not creating market demand, how can we expect our
businesses to continue their innovation?
The second issue I would like to
talk about today is beverage container recycling.
For the last several Congresses, I have introduced a national bottle deposit bill. Vermont has been a leader in the area of beverage container recycling.
The first bottle bill was passed in
Vermont in 1953. And now eleven states
have bottle bill laws.
It has been over two decades since
the Senate has evaluated the merits of deposit legislation to encourage greater
beverage container recycling. I hope that today's hearing galvanizes the
beverage industry to work cooperatively with other stakeholders to accept
deposit systems or develop other solutions to the beverage container waste
problem.
Every Congress, we hold hearings on
the flow of trash through our states. It is a difficult issue that elicits strong
reactions. One of the best ways to temper
these fights is to ensure that there is less trash on the road in the first
place.
It is time that we all work
together to restore the public's faith and therefore enthusiasm in
recycling. I look forward to working
with all of you.