Testimony
of
Ken Morefield
Assistant Secretary for
Transportation Policy
Before the
Committee on Environment and
Public Works
United States Senate
Thursday, September 19, 2002
Washington, D.C.
Mr. Chairman, it is my pleasure to appear before the
Committee today to present the views of the Florida Department of
Transportation (FDOT) concerning the reauthorization of the Transportation
Equity Act for the 21st Century (TEA-21). This Committee is to be commended for the extensive hearings that
have been held in preparation for legislative action next year.
Florida’s natural resources and pristine environment
are what make us unique among the states.
We are indeed fortunate to be home to the Nation’s oldest city, St.
Augustine, the Nation’s largest restoration project in history, America’s
Everglades, and some of the most endangered large terrestrial and marine
mammals in the world. It is the policy
of the Florida Department of Transportation to help preserve and enhance
Florida’s natural, physical, cultural and social environment as we develop,
implement and maintain transportation facilities and services.
My testimony today will address “Project Delivery and
Environmental Stewardship”. Section
1309 of TEA-21 has provided the impetus for state and federal agencies to look
for ways to improve the delivery of transportation projects while protecting
our environment. The Federal Highway
Administration along with the Federal Transit Administration have worked with
us and many other federal, state, and local agencies to develop a new process
we call the “Efficient Transportation Decision Making Process” or “ETDM”. I am pleased to report that we are virtually
finished developing the new process.
Training on the new process is scheduled to begin in January 2003 with
completion by the end of June. We
expect to begin full statewide implementation by July 2003.
This new process has not been developed by the Florida
Department of Transportation working in isolation. It began on February 3, 2000 when over twenty federal, state, and
local agencies met and pledged their support of an effort to examine how
transportation decisions are made in Florida and to develop an improved
process. A multi-agency working group
including representatives of Metropolitan Planning Organizations was then
formed and met several times during the year.
Later, nine Task Work Groups worked on specific issues related to
implementation of the new process.
In December 2001, federal, state, and local agencies
gathered at an “Executive Summit” and signed a Memorandum of Understanding
endorsing the ETDM process and pledging their continued support for the full
development and implementation of the process in Florida. I am equally proud of the assistance we
received from one of our environmental organizations, 1000 Friends of Florida,
as they hosted five meetings around the state to explain the process to
non-governmental organizations.
We believe our ETDM process is fully responsive to the
direction of Section 1309 and the National Environmental Policy Act. We have been pleased to brief your Committee
staff and others on our process, but we do not promote it as one that will fit
every state. In fact, Florida’s
environmental laws, our own mix of state and local agencies, and other
differences led us to an early conclusion that the best way to address improved
project delivery and efficient decision making was within our own efforts, and
not through a “one-size-fits-all” approach.
Section 1309 of TEA-21 called for change. Key changes requested by Congress included:
·
Early and continuous
agency and public involvement
·
Integrated environmental
review and permitting processes
·
Early approvals in the
planning process
·
Coordinated time schedules
for agency involvement
·
Effective dispute
resolution mechanisms
Florida’s ETDM process accomplishes all these
objectives and more. The State of
Florida is fortunate to have a very rich database of information about our
resources. We have collected that
information at the University of Florida GeoPlan Center in Gainesville,
Florida. This high technology digital
database tool allows agencies and the public to access project planning
information over the Internet. It
provides the foundation for our ETDM process and is called the “Environmental
Screening Tool”.
This tool enables us to perform two “screening events”
which document agency and community inputs much earlier in our transportation
planning process. We call these
screening events the “Planning Screen” and the “Programming Screen”. Modification of project plans in response to
these early screening events will enable us to avoid or reduce costly changes
late in the process. These screening
events will provide information that will allow agencies to be engaged in the
thoughtful exchange necessary to properly balance land use, environmental
protection and mobility needs.
The primary purpose for the “Planning Screen” is to
provide decision makers with better information to stage transportation
improvements in the Cost Feasible Long Range Transportation Plan. The “Programming Screen” provides an
opportunity to identify project issues and the need
for technical studies prior to the project advancing into our Work
Program. The NEPA process begins at the
“Programming Screen” with a class of action determination that leads to
environmental documentation and construction permits. A fundamental premise of our process is that it builds upon
earlier analyses rather than reopening all issues at every step of the process.
The screening events will be performed by federal,
state, and local agencies working together as an Environmental Technical
Advisory Team. We will have one team in
each of our seven geographic Districts.
Each team will be responsible for agency review and feedback as projects
are developed. Community Outreach
Coordinators within FDOT will seek input from the affected community and post
the input received so that agencies are aware of community concerns.
Project planning information is entered into the
Environmental Screening Tool by Metropolitan Planning Organizations (or by FDOT
for our rural areas). Standardized
analyses will then be performed on these planned projects and the results are
then made available to agencies through the Internet. All agencies will perform their reviews on a coordinated time
schedule and enter the agencies’ official comments about the impact on the
resources protected by their agency.
The agency will be able to suggest changes to project concepts through
the feedback portion of the database system.
At the same time, the opinions of the affected community are also posted
in the feedback portion of the system.
The results are visible to the agencies, non-governmental organizations
and the public. Everyone will have
access to the same information.
In summary, Florida is about to implement a new way of
doing business. We believe the
Efficient Transportation Decision Making Process meets all the objectives this
Committee set forth in TEA-21. We are convinced
that this new process will provide for earlier and concurrent agency reviews
resulting in a reduction in the time required to plan projects and achieve
earlier permit approval. Further
benefits include improved public participation in the transportation planning
process, a reduction in the cost of planning and building projects, and, most
importantly, improved decisions.
Thank you for the opportunity to share Florida’s
efforts on project delivery and environmental stewardship. I will be pleased to address any questions
you may have.
ATTACHMENT (.pdf
file)