John Boehner 8TH DISCTRICT OF OHIO

Home >> Blog >> Blog

Blog

GOP Bans Earmarks: When Will Democrats Listen to the American People?
Posted by Press Office on November 18, 2010
House Republicans today unanimously adopted a resolution offered by Representative-elect Sean Duffy (R-WI) to ban earmarks in the people’s House.  Mr. Duffy will soon represent the same district as current Appropriations Chairman David Obey (D-WI), author of the infamous “stimulus” bill.  But when will congressional Democrats hold a similar vote, and when will President Obama call on them to do so?

Judging by their track record, Democrats may never get around to banning earmarks.  Check out what then-Democratic Leader Nancy Pelosi (D-CA) said in 2006:
“Ms. Pelosi also spoke out against earmarking billions of dollars for home-state projects, a practice she calls a ‘monster’ that hurts Congress.  If she becomes speaker in the next Congress, she says, she would press to severely reduce earmarks. ‘Personally, myself, I'd get rid of all of them,’ she says.” (The Wall Street Journal, 7/13/06, A4)

Speaker Pelosi and Washington Democrats have had four years to ban earmarks – and never did.  The new Republican majority has already moved to ban earmarks even before the start of the 112th Congress, earning support of support of both House and Senate Republicans, as Reuters recently noted:
Republicans in both the Senate and the House of Representatives have now forsworn earmarks as they eye large spending cuts in the coming year…Though earmarks account for less than one half of a percent of the federal budget, they have become a symbol of wasteful spending for many grassroots Tea Party activists who helped Republicans win big in the November 2 elections.  ‘I think it shows that this conference is serious about doing what it said we were going to be about -- limited government, spending reduction, dealing with the national debt,’ said newly elected Republican Senator Marco Rubio.

With bicameral Republican support of a ban on earmarks, House and Senate Republicans are demonstrating that they are listening to the American people and are serious about restoring trust between the American people and those who are elected to represent them.  As the New York Times noted yesterday, the earmark ban “has quickly emerged as a high-profile if somewhat symbolic test of the willingness of Republicans…to respond to what they see as a message of the midterm elections.”

Contrast that with Washington Democrats, who have refused to consider an earmark ban, as POLITICO reported last evening:
One day after Republicans challenged them to reject earmarks, Senate Democrats huddled behind closed doors Wednesday and held a ‘long discussion’ on the practice as part of a larger debate over how to balance the federal budget and erase mounting debt...But most Democrats defend the practice of funneling federal dollars to pet projects in their home states.

Yesterday, White House Press Secretary said the President supported the Republicans’ earmark ban:
Q: And real quick on the earmarks, on the earmarks.  I know Obama has come out up front a lot on this, but does he want an outright ban on earmarks?

MR. GIBBS: Yes.

Q: He does?

MR. GIBBS: Yes.

Representative-elect Sean Duffy wrote in an op-ed for POLITICO today that “If we are serious about cutting spending, focusing on creating jobs and reforming Congress, then we must agree: The time for earmarks has come to an end.”  By banning earmarks in the 112th Congress, Republicans have shown they are listening to the American people; when will President Obama and Washington Democrats follow suit?
Comments
The opinions expressed below are those of their respective authors and do not necessarily represent those of this office.
  • Wayne Kirby commented on 11/19/2010
    Do NOT underestimate the importance of banning earmarks!!! Do NOT let the American people down! I think this is a very important "TEST". I pray that our Congress makes the grade! THIS IS IMPORTANT TO THE AMERICAN PEOPLE! May God Bless you and guide you in leading the House! We are ready for a change!
  • Janice Hiroms commented on 11/23/2010
    I hear many in Congress say that banning earmarks will not save money. First, anytime you don't spend taxpayer money you are saving money (Economics 101). However, the bigger issues are not being highlighted. When earmarks are attached to major bills, two things are happening. Someone is trying to hide that expenditure or someone is trying to get something for their vote. In society (outside Congress or the White House) "buying off" someone is a crime. But in gov't it is a way of doing business. I believe the majority of Americans want to change this behavior. Congress can easily create an open process for monies for their districts. Let us have 435 Congressional members and 100 Senators submit all those items each year at onetime as a budget item. Then the American people can see the list and the cost of each submittal.When Americans see those lists/costs year-after-year , then they will understand what earmarks are costing, who is getting those funds and whether those projects should be funded with taxpayer money(Transparency 101). The American taxpayer should not be "screwed" by special deals for Unions or any other special interest group when major bills are written. I for one am tired of paying for everyone else's blunders and mistakes.
Post a Comment
We encourage you to participate in the Ohio-8 Blog by commenting.
All comments are moderated. Comments that are off topic, abusive, defamatory, contain personal attacks or obscenity, or are considered inappropriate will not be approved. We will make every reasonable effort to quickly review comments; however due to staffing constraints approval may require up to or beyond 24 hours.
You are fully responsible for any content that you post.
7969 Cincinnati-Dayton Road Suite B West Chester, OH 45069 (513) 779-5400 tel (513) 779-5315 fax
12 South Plum Street Troy, OH 45373 (937) 339-1524 (937) 339-1878 fax
1011 Longworth H.O.B. Washington, DC 20515 (202) 225-6205 (202) 225-0704 fax