WASHINGTON – Citing concerns over Washington’s continual assault on the use of coal, U.S. Representative Ed Whitfield (KY-01) cautioned against the overregulation of coal ash which could have a devastating impact on a critical Kentucky industry. While there is no evidence that, when properly managed and monitored, coal ash cannot be utilized for a variety of purposes, movements are underway to classify the substance as a “hazardous material,” rendering the byproduct essentially useless and presenting a challenge as to how to dispose of the material.
“Coal is a vital resource in my home state of Kentucky and anything that seeks to harm coal production, such as a ruling by the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) classifying coal ash as a hazardous material, would cause electricity rates to rise and put many people out of work at a time in our nation’s history when we can least afford to lose jobs,” Whitfield said. “While we are all committed to protecting our nation’s water supply and safeguarding the health of the public, we must be mindful of the impact further assault on the use of coal will have on our economy.”
The House Energy and Environment Subcommittee, on which Whitfield serves, held a hearing today entitled “Drinking Water and Public Health Impacts of Coal Combustion Waste Disposal.” The hearing examined current practices for the disposal of coal fly ash and its impact on drinking water and public health. During the hearing, Whitfield cautioned against classifying coal ash as a hazardous material.
Coal fly ash, the byproduct generated from the combustion of coal, is currently used in building materials and as a structural fill for building sites. In many cases coal ash is cheaper to use, makes cement more structurally sound and actually releases fewer carbon emissions than raw materials. There is no evidence that when properly managed and monitored, coal ash cannot be safely used as a substitute for raw materials.
Utilizing coal ash in building materials provides a means for disposing of the byproduct in a manner that is both environmentally and economically sound. Whitfield expressed concerns today that a designation of coal ash as a hazardous material would cause many companies to stop using the ash in building materials and, therefore, drive up costs for electric utility companies that would trickle down to consumers. Furthermore, such a ruling would present the problem of deciding how to dispose of this material for the long term.
EPA has examined the classification of coal ash as a hazardous material repeatedly over the years. In 1993, 1999 and 2000, the EPA looked at this issue and decided the material did not warrant such a classification. Currently, states regulate coal ash. Whitfield said that if standards for dealing with coal ash need to be strengthened, Congress should discuss ways to do this that will allow the material to continue to be used in a beneficial manner, without classifying it as hazardous.