Costa: My
message from this April still stands. If Miller thinks he can destroy the
entire Valley way of life to suit his own ends, he’ll get the fight of a
lifetime.
Washington,
D.C. –
In April, Congressman Jim Costa took on Bay Area Democratic Congressman George
Miller (D-Richmond) following his promise to push for tougher restrictions on
water deliveries to farms and cities in the San Joaquin Valley (link here).
Costa said at the time that if Miller wants a war over water allocations, then
Costa and California’s 20th Congressional District would give him
one (link here).
Costa
and the Valley responded by fighting to increase federal water allocations to
communities south of the Delta. But the war over Valley water is still on. Most
recently, Miller and a group of outside politicians sent a letter to Jean
Sagouspe, President of Westlands Water District in West Fresno, harassing the
water district over how they use their water. The letter specifically addresses
Westlands’ water supply and a water exchange taking place with Metropolitan
Water District of Southern California.
Today,
Costa responded to Miller and the other lawmakers in a letter and issued the
following statement:
“Miller
and his allies are dead wrong to create the impression that extra water was
delivered to Westlands in 2010. No region’s water supply in California has been
more impacted by the water crisis than here in the San Joaquin Valley. That is
a fact.
“Thanks
to our efforts, we secured a lot more water this year than what the federal
government originally intended to give us. While we still need more, we handed
Miller a defeat and he just can’t stand to see more water flowing to the
Valley. Now he is harassing one of our water districts because he doesn’t like
their attempts to maximize what water they have.
“Water
exchanges are an important part of planning for coming water years and
delivering water to communities in times of need. They are also an important
tool for Valley communities to use in the face of the flawed federal water
regulations that we are fighting and Miller supports.
“My
position has not changed one bit. If Miller and his allies think they can get
away with attacking Valley farmers and farmworkers whose livelihoods depend on
water, he is wrong.
“If
he wants to pick a fight with an entire Valley population whose economy hinges
on a fair share of water, we’ll give him one.
“We
won a partial victory this year and Congressman Miller clearly doesn’t like it.
His letter to Westlands is another reminder of how serious and long-term this
battle is and how hard we have to keep working.
“But
my message from this April still stands. If Miller thinks he can destroy the
entire Valley way of life to suit his own ends, he’ll get the fight of a
lifetime.”
Text
of Rep. Costa’s letter is copied below.
###
October 1, 2010
The
Honorable Grace Napolitano
The Honorable John Garamendi
1610
Longworth House Office Building
2459 Rayburn House Office Building
Washington,
D.C.
20515
Washington, D.C. 20515
The
Honorable Mike
Thompson
The Honorable George Miller
231
Cannon Office Building
2205 Rayburn House Office Building
Washington,
D.C. 20515
Washington, D.C. 20515
Dear
Colleagues:
This letter is in response to your
recent correspondence with my constituent, Jean Sagouspe of Westlands Water
District (Westlands), requesting information regarding the agency’s water
supply. While I am certain that Mr. Sagouspe will appreciate the
opportunity to address the specific questions in your letter in detail, I would
be remiss in my role as a representative of the San Joaquin Valley if I did not
share my own thoughts with you on this critical issue.
You are wrong to create the impression
that extra water was delivered to Westlands in 2010. The reality is that in
recent years insufficient water has been provided to one of the most productive
agricultural regions in the world due to the regulatory imposed drought and
below average rainfall. No region’s water supply in California has been more
impacted by the water crisis than here in the San Joaquin Valley. This is a
fact.
Water is the lifeblood of the Valley.
Without an adequate water supply, farmers, farm workers, and entire communities
across my District have endured significant hardships trying to sustain jobs and
provide for their families. While we have worked to increase our share of water
flowing to the region this past year, the devastating impact on the Valley’s
economy and quality of life due to a lack of water is real and still persists.
More work must be done and California must get serious and work together
to provide meaningful solutions to our water supply challenges.
Your letter makes reference to an
innovative water exchange that I and other members of the Valley delegation
helped to facilitate between Metropolitan Water District (Metropolitan) and
Westlands. Above all else, the work of these two agencies to find
creative solutions to ongoing problems that have been made worse by federal
regulatory requirements is something that should be commended. The exchange
will benefit cities and farms alike by making water available to 25 million
people in Southern California where it is needed and also return those supplies
back to the San Joaquin Valley at a time when they are needed.
Even with these noteworthy efforts, the
underlying problem remains: federal regulatory restrictions have crippled the
operational flexibility of California’s water system. This lack of
flexibility has placed a greater value on water storage, which is what a water exchange
between two water agencies is all about – finding a place to store water until
it is needed. The exchange between
Metropolitan and Westlands is effective because it produces dual benefits,
first for Southern California and then for the San Joaquin Valley.
However, interim solutions like these may not always be available to us. As you know, I have been pushing the
Administration and working with the federal, state, and local water agencies to
revise and change the regulations that have negatively impacted the Valley, and
will continue to do so. But, if we intend to work towards solving
California’s water problems in future water years, we will need to work
together to find more flexibility and storage throughout the system and need
your support.
Now more than ever, California’s water
crisis has placed a premium on everyone working together rather than splitting
into factions for those below the Delta and those above it. Each of us relies
on the Delta as the lynchpin of our plumbing system and each of us has a part
to play in the solution. To illustrate that point, Congresswoman
Napolitano, your constituents are totally dependent upon both the quality and
quantity of water that we are able to deliver though the Delta.
Congressman Miller, your constituents are at risk from the pathogens that the
Sacramento Regional County Sanitation District is releasing into the Delta.
Congressman Garamendi, your constituents are counting on the repairs to the
Delta that only the Bay Delta Conservation Plan (BDCP) can deliver. And,
Congressman Thompson, your constituents and the rest of Northern California
would face massive cutbacks in water used above the Delta that some
environmentalists are now calling for in the wake of the State Water Resources
Control Board’s draft flow criteria report.
It is high time that we put regional
politics of the past aside and address our state’s long-term water needs.
Every region of California deserves a water supply they can count on, and if we
cannot start from there, we are doomed to failure. Our water system is
clearly broken; and arguing over who broke it rather than working on solutions
such as BDCP and the coequal goals of the Delta Vision is not beneficial to any
of the constituencies we serve.
Sincerely,
JIM COSTA
Member of
Congress
|