Results tagged “college affordability” from EdLabor Journal

The Wall Street Journal writes today about the new rules for student loans. 

Some parents and students may also see lower interest rates on new loans. Now that all Parent PLUS loans are under the Direct Loan Program, the fixed rate for new Parent PLUS loans is 7.9%. Some lenders had charged 8.5%.

And the fixed rate has dropped, to 4.5% from 5.6%, for new subsidized Stafford loans for undergraduates. With subsidized loans, the federal government pays the interest on a loan while the student is in school, during the grace period after graduation or if the loan is in deferment, which is when borrowers are temporarily allowed to stop making payments.

The Department of Education also has increased the maximum Federal Pell Grant award to $5,550 for the 2010-2011 academic year, from $5,350 for the 2009-2010 school year.

As Investopedia pointed out, the reforms eliminate the middleman, enlarge Pell Grants, increase funding for minority-serving institutions, lower income-based payments, and offer more forgiveness opportunities.

Learn more about how reforms to federal student loans help students, families and taxpayers.

The USA Today highlighted some of the July 1st changes to the federal student loan program that lowered rates and made repayment easier.

But before you even think about a private loan, make sure you have maxed out on your federal student loans. Federal student loans have fixed interest rates and more flexible repayment terms than private loans. If you have trouble making payments after you graduate, the federal government offers several programs that provide relief (more on this later). Private lenders aren't required to do anything to help troubled borrowers.

All PLUS loans (Parent Loan for Undergraduate Students) are now issued through the Direct Loan program. Like Stafford loans, these loans were previously offered by private lenders, as well as through the Direct Loan program. The rate for Direct PLUS Loans is 7.9% vs. 8.5% for FFEL PLUS Loans. Parents can use PLUS loans to pay for any college costs that aren't covered through Stafford loans and financial aid. Graduate students are also eligible to borrow through the PLUS program.

Rates for subsidized Stafford loans, which are available to borrowers who demonstrate economic need, fell to 4.5% from 5.6%. This new rate will apply only to subsidized Stafford loans issued between July 1, 2010, and June 30, 2011, says Robert Murray, spokesman for USA Funds, a non-profit company that services loans. Rates on subsidized loans issued before July 1 won't change, he says. The rate for unsubsidized Stafford loans, which are available to all students, remains at 6.8%.

Origination fees for Direct Stafford loans dropped to 1% from 1.5% on July 1. Because the cost of the fee is deducted from the proceeds of the loan, the reduction will increase the amount of money available to pay your college costs, Murray says.

Additionally, the maximum Pell Grant increased to $5,500.

But current students aren't the only ones who benefit. There is help for graduates, too.

Other changes that took effect July 1 could provide relief for graduates who aren't making enough money to afford their loan payments.

The income-based repayment program allows federal student loan borrowers to have their loan payments reduced, based on income and family size. For most eligible borrowers, loan payments will be less than 10% of their income. Two updates to the program could lower payments even more for some borrowers:

Married couples will no longer be penalized. Previously, when couples filed a joint tax return, the program assumed that both spouses could use 100% of their combined income to make loan payments. In cases in which both spouses had student loans, the minimum payments were much higher than the minimum for unmarried borrowers with the same debt and income, says Lauren Asher, president of the Institute for College Access and Success. The new formula will take into account married couples' combined income and their combined debt to calculate minimum payments, Asher says.

Eligibility for income-based repayment will be based on the balance when the loan went into repayment or the current loan amount, whichever is greater. This will primarily benefit borrowers who have gone into forbearance or deferment, Asher says. These programs allow borrowers to temporarily suspend payments, but if interest accrues during the period, they end up with a larger loan balance.

Learn more about the July 1, 2010 federal student loan benefits.

Now more than ever, Americans need affordable, quality education opportunities to help make our economy strong and competitive again. The Student Aid and Fiscal Responsibility Act was included in the health care reconciliation bill that was signed into law on March 30, 2010. Reforms in this law will move America toward producing the most college graduates by 2020 by making the single largest investment in federal student aid ever.



Specifically, these provisions will:

• Invest the bill’s savings to make college affordable and help more Americans graduate
• Provide reliable, affordable, high-quality Federal student loans for all families
• Meet Pay-As-You-Go fiscally responsible principles and reduce the deficit

See how SAFRA will benefit students living in each congressional district

Sign up for the EdLabor Insider newsletter to get timely updates.

Subscribe to our YouTube channel to see more informative videos such as this one.

The New York Times reports today on the increased demand for college financial aid:

"The envelope arrives with good news. The college is pleased to announce that the student has been offered acceptance and, if he or she is fortunate, some scholarship money.

"But in this busted economy, more parents are saying they need more money and are filing appeals. Then the waiting starts again, for a phone call.

"The job of delivering that news — after weighing hopes and dreams against limited budgets — falls to people like Sandra J. Oliveira, the executive director of the financial aid office at Providence College."

Federal student aid is a key component in enabling many students to pay for college:

"'With the change in circumstance, they may get another $1,000, $2,000 in grant,' she said, using shorthand for a direct scholarship, as opposed to loans. Moreover, the precipitous drop in income will most likely qualify the family for a federal Pell grant, perhaps as much as $5,550."

Just a reminder: the maximum Pell Grant award was increased for the 2010 school year, thanks to the education reconciliation bill President Obama signed into law in March, which invests $36 billion over 10 years to increase the maximum annual Pell Grant scholarship to $5,550 in 2010 and to $5,975 by 2017. 

The law also makes federal loans more affordable for borrowers to repay by investing $1.5 billion to strengthen an Income-Based Repayment program that currently allows borrowers to cap their monthly federal student loan payments at 15 percent of their discretionary income. These new provisions would lower this monthly cap to just 10 percent for new borrowers after 2014.

Investopedia put together what they deemed as 5 Surprise Changes to the Student Loan Program. (Frequent readers of this blog won't be surprised by the reforms helping students and taxpayers.)

Investopedia highlighted these 5 changes to federal student loans:

1. Elimination of the Middleman
2. Larger Pell Grants
3. Increased Funding for Minority-Serving Institutions
4. Lower Income-Based Payments
5. More Forgiveness Opportunities

They finished with this:

The Bottom Line
While cash-strapped college students (and their parents) will likely welcome anything that helps them manage those hefty tuition payments, many critics say these measures don't go far enough, especially considering several elements don't go into effect for several years. However, when coupled with recent changes to simply the FAFSA (the form students may complete to apply for federal aid) and the expansion of college-related tax credits, the new legislation may at least provide a little bit of a helping hand to families struggling to afford the overwhelming cost of higher education.

Learn more about how reforms to federal student loans help students, families and taxpayers.

Since 2007, the Democratic-led Congress has:

INCREASED THE MAXIMUM PELL GRANT AWARD TO $5,550 THIS YEAR: By 2017, the maximum Pell Grant is expected to be $5,975. The value of the Pell Grant had been shrinking—paying 75% of college costs in 1977, and just 33% last year.

MADE YOUR STUDENT LOAN REPAYMENTS MORE AFFORDABLE: Right now you can cap your student loan payment at 15% of your discretionary income, and any balances you have left after 25 years will be forgiven. For new borrowers starting in 2014, this goes down to 10% of your discretionary income, with balances forgiven after 20 years.

LOWERED STUDENT LOAN INTEREST RATES ON YOUR NEED-BASED LOANS: Subsidized Stafford loan rates have been dropping and will continue to decrease over the next two years, going down to 4.5% in the 2010-2011 school year and reaching 3.4% in the 2011-2012 school year.

INVESTED IN STUDENTS, NOT BANKS: By switching all schools to the more efficient Direct Loan program, the government will save $61 Billion over the next 10 years—money that will now be used to help you, rather than to give subsidies to banks.

MADE IT EASIER TO APPLY FOR FEDERAL STUDENT AID & PLAN FOR TEXTBOOKS: We streamlined the Free Application for Federal Student Aid (FAFSA) process down from 100 questions and created a two-page FAFSA-EZ form—giving families extra time to plan for college expenses. On textbooks, colleges are now required to provide you with advance information on textbook pricing to help you plan. And publishers must provide pricing information on “unbundled” versions of every “bundled” textbook they sell.

INVESTED IN COMMUNITY COLLEGES -$500 MILLION A YEAR FOR NEXT 4 YEARS: All students—including those who are returning to school after being in the workforce—will have access to high-quality, low-cost higher education. More courses will be available, at times that work for you.

INVESTED $3 BILLION IN HISTORICALLY BLACK COLLEGES AND UNIVERSITIES AND MINORITY-SERVING INSTITUTIONS: This can renew, reform, and expand programming to provide students with the support they need to stay in school and graduate.

ENCOURAGED TEACHING THROUGH TUITION ASSISTANCE AND REWARDED PUBLIC SERVICE THROUGH LOAN FORGIVENESS: You can receive up to $4,000 a year in up-front tuition assistance if you commit to teaching in a high-need school or subject area for four years after you graduate. If you work in public service or at a non-profit for 10 years, and make payments on your federal student loans during that time, any balances you have after 10 years will be forgiven.

A poll from Rasmussen Reports released today purports to show that Americans are strongly against the historic student loan reforms signed into law by President Obama this week. However, when reading the questions Rasmussen asked, it is clear that the firm is playing an April Fools’ gag.

What’s up next for Rasmussen? Gauging Americans’ job approval of the Tooth Fairy?

APRIL FOOLS: “49% think new student loan plan is a bad idea, 35% like it.”(Rasmussen headline)

When presented information on what the student loan reforms signed into law actually do, Americans strongly support it. The Student Aid and Fiscal Responsibility Act invests billions of dollars in students and families, at no costs to taxpayers. Not surprisingly, critics are using scare tactics to try to mislead the American public about this effort. They’re desperate to preserve the status quo – a system that for too long has favored banks at the expense of students and taxpayers.

APRIL FOOLS: “Under a newly approved law, students will borrow money directly from the federal government rather than through a private bank.” (Rasmussen poll question #3)

It’s ridiculous to argue this is a government takeover, when the federal student loan programs are already a federal program, established and subsidized by the federal government. The Federal Family Education Loan Program (FFELP) is broken and now depends on taxpayer dollars not just for subsidies that reimburse lenders when borrowers default on loans, but also for the capital to finance their lending activity altogether.

Taxpayers now fund 8.8 of every 10 dollars in federal student lending activity. They absorb all the risk. There is simply no reason to keep pumping taxpayer dollars into a broken system when the federal government can provide the same low-cost federal loans more reliably for students and at a lower cost for taxpayers.

APRIL FOOLS: “The government says it will save billions by cutting private banks out of the student loan process. How likely is it that the government involvement will save billions of dollars?”(Rasmussen poll question #4)

According to the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office, but cutting out subsidies to big banks and switching to the cheaper Direct Loan program, the student loan reforms save taxpayers $61 billion over the 10 years. In addition to investing in college aid, these provisions will also reduce the deficit by at least $10 billion over 10 years.

This morning Michelle Singletary noted in the Washington Post the many benefits for students in the Health Care and Education Affordability Reconciliation Act of 2010.

She wrote:

The federal Pell Grant program will get a badly needed financial boost. The Obama administration says the new law pumps more than $40 billion into this program, which provides need-based grants to low-income undergraduates and certain graduate students.

Starting in 2013, the award will be scaled to the consumer price index, adding on a cost-of-living increase. That will raise the maximum from $5,550 to $5,975, according to CBO estimates.

Here's what really excites me. There will be additional funds for community colleges, historically black colleges and other institutions that serve minorities.

Community colleges are expected to get $2 billion over four years. Minority and historically black colleges and universities will get $2.55 billion.

It's about time community colleges got some attention and needed funds. Maybe now, these institutions will shed the reputation that they exist for the academically challenged. Maybe now they won't be seen as the "13th grade," as some people say in discouraging students from this road to higher education.

...

At least if you're stuck with the debt, provisions in the health-care law will lower the cap on monthly payments for some.

Beginning in 2014, student-loan payments under the income-based repayment plan will be capped at no more than 10 percent of a borrower's discretionary income -- the amount of a person's adjusted gross income that exceeds 150 percent of the poverty line for the family size. Payments are capped at 15 percent.

If people keep up their payments, any borrowed amount not paid after 20 years will be forgiven (down from the current 25 years). For public service workers -- teachers, nurses and those in military service -- the debt is forgiven after 10 years.

In many respects, it was quite appropriate to fold higher education provisions into the health-care reform legislation. The financial health of a lot of people has been hurt by the amount of debt they use to get an education.

Yesterday was a milestone for students and taxpayers. President Obama signed the Health Care and Education Affordability Reconciliation Act of 2010 into law.

The Denver Post reports:

President Barack Obama signed into law the last piece of his mammoth plan to overhaul health care Tuesday and, with the same pen strokes, achieved a far-reaching change in the way most Americas help pay the cost of a college education.

Both the health care provisions and revamping the loan program for college students were sandwiched into a single piece of legislation — the budget-reconciliation bill approved last week by the House and Senate.

The San Francisco Chronicle summarizes how students and taxpayers benefit from these new student loan reforms.

President Obama signed important and welcome changes to the nation's campus loan program. The reforms should save the country billions and give more students a crack at a college degree.

Why it took so long is a minor scandal. Since the 1970s, federal money was doled out to banks to lend to students. In practice, though, the banks collected a healthy fee and fobbed off the bad loans to the government. It was a no-lose deal for these lenders.

But it endured, largely through fierce lobbying from lenders such as Sallie Mae. This year, the dam broke. The Senate and House voted to put Washington in charge of the loans, a shift estimated to save $68 billion over 10 years. That will allow loan limits to rise slightly, expand Pell Grants to defray tuition bills for needy students and invest $2 billion in community colleges.

But the changes didn't come easily, despite the sustained and gallant efforts of Rep. George Miller, D-Martinez.

Which is what made the signing ceremony all that more enjoyable. The Washington Post reported on the "ebullient mood" of the signing ceremony:

Pelosi vigorously clapped back at the crowd as camera flashes popped. When Obama later singled Pelosi out, calling her "amazing," the crowd jumped to its feet again. (Rep. George Miller (D-Calif.) got a standing ovation, too).

Learn more about the reforms to federal student loans as well as the fixes to the health care reform legislation.

The Economic Policy Institute took a look at the recently-passed Student Aid and Fiscal Responsibility Act in the budget reconciliation and found it would actually produce jobs in local communities.

While lenders used scare tactics about job loss to try to protect their billion dollar subsidies, EPI found that the legislation will result in more help for student and more jobs:

According to the Congressional Budget Office, the legislation will reduce bank subsidies by $61 billion between 2010 and 2019. A large share of these savings will then be used to boost financial aid for low- and middle-income borrowers.

For example, the legislation increases funding for Pell Grants by $36 billion over the next 10 years. Pell Grants are scholarships to help low- and moderate-income students pay their college costs. Sixty-two percent of dependent Pell Grant recipients come from families with incomes below $30,000 per year. Pell Grants are therefore extremely well-targeted to individuals who will rely on them to increase their spending (for textbooks, tuition, and other expenses) rather than to increase their savings.

Similar to food stamps and unemployment insurance, this spending creates demand for goods and services in local communities, and this in turn helps to create jobs. The key reason for persistently high unemployment in the United States is the lack of demand for goods and services; spending that spurs demand thus creates jobs.

The job-creating effects of the education provisions of the reconciliation legislation will likely outweigh any job loss that could result from eliminating the middlemen in the student loan programs. These reforms are clearly a win-win-win for American workers, students, and taxpayers.

(emphasis and link added)

Yesterday, the House approved legislation that makes key improvements to the historic health reform law, and makes the single largest investment in college aid ever, at no additional cost to taxpayers.

The legislation makes health care even more affordable for the middle class, lowers prescription drug costs for seniors by closing the “donut hole” over time, reduces the deficit and strips out special deals that favored one state over another. The bill also makes the most sweeping changes to our federal student loan program in a generation.

This morning, the Speaker of the House enrolled the bill. The package will now go to President Obama’s desk for his signature. Below are some photos of the enrollment ceremony as well as a few of a surprise birthday cake for Speaker Pelosi on her birthday.

Later today, the U.S. House of Representatives will cast a final vote on the budget reconciliation bill that will make necessary reforms to the federal student loan program. CNN polled Americans on how they felt on the Student Aid and Fiscal Responsibility Act.

They found:

Nearly two-thirds of Americans say they favor a proposal to increase the amount of money available for college loans by allowing the government to provide those loans directly to students, according to a new poll.

A CNN/Opinion Research Corporation survey released Wednesday indicates that 64 percent of respondents favor the proposal and 34 percent opposed it.

...

The survey also indicates, to a degree, some rare bipartisan support, with a vast majority of Democrats, a solid majority of Independents, and a slight majority of Republicans favoring the proposal.

Read more about their poll and learn more about the Student Aid and Fiscal Responsibility Act.

Yesterday, students from all over the United States rallied on Capitol Hill in favor of the Student Aid and Fiscal Responsibility Act while lenders spent millions to derail these much needed reforms for students and taxpayers.

The Washington Post reports:

College students swarmed Capitol Hill on Tuesday to plead for more financial aid as private lenders made a last push to preserve their endangered role in making federal student loans.

The dueling messages sought to influence potential Senate action this week on a proposal to expand direct government lending by cutting funding for private firms that make federally guaranteed loans. Tens of billions of dollars in projected savings would flow to grants for needy students.

...

The measure would save an estimated $61 billion over 10 years by cutting out subsidies for private lenders, which the Obama administration describes as needless go-betweens, and by expanding direct government lending. It would provide $36 billion in Pell grants for students from low- and moderate-income families, including $13.5 billion to plug a shortfall this year because rising numbers of students are eligible for aid.

The United States Student Association rallied hundreds of members on Capitol Hill for the bill. They waved signs -- "Students NOT Banks!" and "$ Now!" -- and chanted slogans that underscored the fiscal straits universities face as they raise tuition. "They say, 'Cut back!' " students yelled. "We say, 'Fight back!' "

"I'm an independent student," said Sabrina Ford, 19, of Ypsilanti, Mich., a financial aid recipient in her first year at Eastern Michigan University. "If the Pell grants are cut, I have no idea how I would pay for education. Right now, I rely on myself and the government to assist me."

Learn more about the Student Aid and Fiscal Responsibility Act, read Chairman Miller's condemnation of Sallie Mae's scare tactics and his comments after the House passed the bill on Sunday.

The New York Times highlights the important of including the Student Aid and Fiscal Responsibility Act in the budget reconciliation package passed by the House last night to getting both health insurance reform and the federal student loan reform done.

The New York Times says:

Lots of Democrats can point to lots of different moments when they think the health care bill was brought back from the brink of collapse.

But for a number of senior House Democrats, the crucial turning point was a meeting the night of March 9 in the offices of Speaker Nancy Pelosi. It was supposed to be a strategy session with Senate Democratic leaders about the budget reconciliation procedure that Democrats were planning to use to make final changes to the health care bill and push them through the Senate on a simple majority vote.

Instead, the session focused entirely on the question of whether to include another of President Obama’s top legislative priorities — a sweeping overhaul of federal student loan programs — in the reconciliation package.

The budget resolution approved by Congress last spring provided for completing both major health care legislation and major education legislation through reconciliation, which adjusts federal policy to meet specific goals for reducing the deficit.

A trio of House leaders — Representatives James E. Clyburn, the Democratic whip; George Miller, the chairman of the Education and Labor Committee; and Xavier Becerra of California, the vice chairman of the Democratic caucus — argued strenuously in favor of including the education proposal.

...

Although overshadowed by the larger health care fight, the inclusion of the education bill may have been a decisive factor, especially at a time when House Democrats were exceedingly distrustful of their Senate colleagues and were essentially being forced against their better judgment to approve the Senate’s health care bill as the base law to which they would later make changes.

The student loan overhaul was very popular in the House. And because it would save tens of billions of taxpayer dollars by ending subsidies to private commercial banks, it offered a purely populist message at a time when public anger at Wall Street is running high and many liberals were disappointed that the health care bill would not include a public option, or government-run insurance plan.

Mr. Clyburn, who as the whip is the party’s main vote-counter, argued forcefully that the student loan measure would help generate support for the health care package.

...

For some Democrats, the student loan plan is the hidden triumph in the health care fight, and the late-night meeting earlier this month was the crucial moment. “It was an fascinating conversation about what the Democratic Party represented,” one Democrat said.

“Members of Congress have a clear choice,” Mr. Miller said in a floor speech on Sunday night. We can side with the American people by making health insurance and college more affordable and accessible, while creating millions of jobs and reducing the deficit. Or we can side with the insurance companies and the banks. That’s it. That’s the choice. I’m siding with the American people.”

Learn more about the Student Aid and Fiscal Responsibility Act.

As the Congress prepares to vote on the budget reconciliation bill that contains the Student Aid and Fiscal Responsibility Act this week, Newsweek is reporting that surging numbers of college applicants is putting the Department of Education under strain to fill the need for Pell Grants. The Secretary of Education says that the only way to ensure all students get what they need is to pass SAFRA.

Newsweek says:

Because of the recession and continued high jobless rates, a surge of prospective students are heading to college to gain a competitive advantage in the job market, and an unexpectedly large number of them are applying and qualifying for Pell grant money to help pay for their classes. The U.S. Department of Education says 2.6 million more people have already applied and qualified for Pell grants for fall 2010, compared with academic years before the recession began. Specifically, between fiscal year 2008 and fiscal year 2011, the number of qualified applicants has risen from 6.1 million to 8.7 million.

During a conference call with reporters late Thursday, Education Secretary Arne Duncan stressed that if the direct-student-loan bill fails to pass, there will be no way to span the gap between the money already allocated for Pell grants this fall and the increased demand for financing. The result would be that many qualified applicants would not get the maximum of $5,150 but a whittled-down check averaging $2,150.

The savings from the bill, Duncan said, could help the country “educate our way to a better economy. The downside, if we do nothing, is that as many as 8 million students will see their aid cut by as much as 50 percent. This is a huge, huge opportunity.”

Learn more how the Student Aid and Fiscal Responsibility Act will affect your congressional district.

Chairman George Miller wrote two op-eds today about how the reforms to federal student loans fits well with the budget reconciliation and health insurance reform package being considered in Congress.

In the Richmond Times-Dispatch, Chairman Miller said:

If Congress makes the right call this week, students and taxpayers will win out.

In the coming days, the House and Senate will take a critical up or down vote on historic health insurance reforms. Tied to them will be the most significant reform of our federal student loan program in a generation. It will make federal aid more effective and cost-efficient for students, families, and taxpayers, without increasing the deficit.

Congress should support both measures.

In the San Francisco Chronicle, Rep. Miller wrote:

Our bill is good for taxpayers. It would eliminate these needless subsidies and instead have the government initiate student loans, as it does today, and private banks service them. Consider that the government now funds 88 percent of all federal student loan volume. There's simply no reason to keep giving banks a handout.

Our bill is good for students. The federal government has already proved to be a more reliable lender for students in the midst of economic instability. All of the savings generated from switching to direct lending will go to help students pay for college and reduce our deficit.

Our bill is good for jobs. It would preserve private-sector jobs by allowing banks to compete for loan servicing contracts - and could even bring overseas jobs back home. Unlike loans made by banks, direct government loans must be serviced by U.S. workers.

Gregory Cendana, President of the United States Student Association, wrote an op-ed in today's Hill about the overwhelming support for the Student Aid and Fiscal Responsibility Act by students:

Students overwhelmingly support the proposal. During the 2009 National Student Congress, student aid reform was unanimously passed as a top legislative priority for the United States Student Association, which represents over 4.5 million college students. Hundreds of student governments have subsequently adopted resolutions supporting the Student Aid and Fiscal Responsibility Act, and hundreds of thousands of students have contributed to a national “wall of student debt” with paper “bricks” exhibiting their personal and financial struggles to pay for college.

Those who are using the lending services to finance their education see the wisdom investing in the next generation rather than subsidizing banks.

We encourage you to read Cendana's entire op-ed as well as learn more about the Student Aid and Fiscal Responsibility Act as well as other groups that support the legislation.

The Washington Post editorial yesterday highlighted the value of the Student Aid and Fiscal Responsibility Act, calling it better student loans than the current option.

They fact checked two myths opponents are peddling and made a strong case for passage of SAFRA:

First, it's no government takeover. Opponents would make it appear as though Democrats want bureaucrats to destroy a functioning private market for federally backed student loans. In fact, the only reason any private company is in the business of originating such loans is because of government support, and propping up that artificial market is expensive. In the end, it's a better deal for taxpayers to have the government lend money directly to students. Private lenders, who want to preserve some role for themselves in the loan origination business, counter that they provide better services to students. But the government plans to farm out loan servicing to them through a process of competitive contracting.

Second, reconciliation, which removes the filibuster as an option and allows legislation to pass with a simple majority, has been on the record as an option for student loan reform for months. Since there can be only one reconciliation bill per budget year, the Democrats' move to add the education measure to health-care reconciliation should be no surprise. If there is a proposal tailor-made for reconciliation -- a procedure originally intended to help Congress rationalize the budget -- it is this plan to end a wasteful program of subsidies for private lenders.

Learn more about the Student Aid and Fiscal Responsibility Act.

Yesterday, Chairman Miller and Senator Harkin made a strong argument to include the Student Aid and Fiscal Responsibility Act in the budget reconciliation package.

As the New York Times reports:

Democratic Congressional leaders struck a tentative agreement on Thursday that breathes new life into President Obama’s proposed overhaul of federal student loan programs.

The deal would bundle the bill into an expedited budget package along with the Democratic health care legislation, which would allow for both measures to be passed by the Senate on a simple majority vote. Without the deal, the student loan bill would have been unlikely to pass because it lacked the 60 votes needed to overcome a filibuster.

The bill would end government payments to private, commercial student lenders, leaving the government to lend directly to students. It would also redirect billions of dollars to expand the Pell grant program for low-income students, and to pay for other education initiatives.

Politico is reporting that the loan bill could give Obama twin win. And it is a win for students, families, and taxpayers too. Chairman Miller said, "Supporting students and their families rather than banks is a win-win for our country, is a much better use of taxpayer dollars, and is helpful to passing the overall health reform bill. Sen. Harkin and I and many of our colleagues have been making the case that joining these two bills presents a remarkable opportunity for our country.”

The bill isn't finalized and faces some possible roadblocks as the LA Times and Chronicle of Higher Education report, but Chairman Miller and House Democrats are a lot more confident that the budget reconciliation will include student loan and health bills.

Former Secretary of Education and current Senator of Tennessee, Lamar Alexander, published an op-ed in Sunday's Washington Post about the Student Aid and Fiscal Responsibility Act. Unfortunately, in his effort to explain why he is against something where "students are helped," Sen. Alexander gets his facts wrong.

The Wonk Room notes:

The op-ed has plenty of scaremongering about Washington takeovers and long lines for student loans, but it doesn’t acknowledge the simple fact that the government already makes millions of loans every year, in a process that does not look anything like waiting in line at the DMV. In fact, under SAFRA, student loan companies will still service and administer the loans, they just won’t take federal money and originate them. That money, instead of going to the compensation, advertising, and overhead of private companies, will be reinvested in Pell Grants and other education initiatives.

And Kevin Carey at the Quick and the Ed goes so far as to say Senator Lamar Alexander is Making Things Up regarding this bill.

In reality, getting a student loan through the Federal Direct Loan Program isn’t going be any different than it is for the millions of students who are already getting loans through the Federal Direct Loan Program, which involves filling out the same forms you use to get loans under the “give-banks-billions-of-free-taxpayer-dollars” program that Alexander is defending.

Alexander also alleges that the administration has been less than forthcoming about what’s really going on here:

Here is what they haven’t told us: The Education Department will borrow money at 2.8 percent from the Treasury, lend it to you at 6.8 percent and spend the difference on new programs. So you’ll work longer to pay off your student loan to help pay for someone else’s education — and to help your U.S. representative’s reelection.

It’s not a secret that the government will be lending money for more than that money costs. All lending programs work this way. The difference is that currently the money left over after paying people to administer the program is used to line the pockets of bank shareholders and executives whereas under Obama’s plan it will be used for Pell grants that benefit low-income students. Alexander’s contention that “you’ll work longer to pay off your student loan to help pay for someone else’s education” ignores the fact that many borrowers also receive Pell grants. Or attend the colleges that will receive grants to improve graduation rates, or have small children who will benefit from new investments in early childhood education. Alexander concedes that most people think such programs are a good idea. Otherwise, they wouldn’t help U.S. representatives get re-elected! He suggests that instead of subsidizing Pell grants, the federal government should use its unique ability to borrow cheaply to lend at extremely low rates, thus undercutting the private market for loans from companies that can’t raise money by issuing Treasury bonds. This, of course, would immediately be denounced as “socialism.”

Learn more about the Student Aid and Fiscal Responsibility Act and as well as some of the facts surrounding other myths about this bill.