Congressional Budget OfficeSkip Navigation
Home Red Bullet Publications Red Bullet Cost Estimates Red Bullet About CBO Red Bullet Press Red Bullet Careers Red Bullet Contact Us Red Bullet Director's Blog Red Bullet   RSS
PDF
A
CBO
STUDY

Reducing Gasoline Consumption:
Three Policy Options
November 2002



Notes

Numbers in the text and tables of this report may not add up to totals because of rounding.

Unless otherwise indicated, all years referred to are calendar years.





                
Preface

Several Members of Congress and public interest groups have recently proposed policies that would reduce gasoline consumption in the United States. Such proposals stem primarily from a desire to enhance the nation's energy security and to decrease its emissions of carbon dioxide, a key greenhouse gas that affects the Earth's climate. This Congressional Budget Office (CBO) study--prepared at the request of the Senate Committee on Environment and Public Works--compares three methods of reducing gasoline consumption: increasing the corporate average fuel economy (CAFE) standards that govern passenger vehicles, raising the federal tax on gasoline, and setting a limit on carbon emissions from gasoline combustion and requiring gasoline producers to hold allowances for those emissions (a policy known as a cap-and-trade program).

The study weighs the relative merits of those policies against several major criteria: whether they would minimize costs to producers and consumers; how reliably they would achieve a given reduction in gasoline use; their implications for automobile safety; and their effects on such factors as traffic congestion, requirements for highway construction, and emissions of air pollutants other than carbon dioxide. In addition, the analysis examines two more policy implications that lawmakers may be concerned about: the impact on people at different income levels and in different regions, and the effects on federal revenue. In keeping with CBO's mandate to provide objective, impartial analysis, this report makes no recommendations.

The study was written by Terry Dinan and David Austin of CBO's Microeconomic and Financial Studies Division, which is directed by Roger Hitchner. Robert Dennis, Barbara Edwards, Arlene Holen, Mark Lasky, Deborah Lucas, John Peterson, and Tom Woodward of CBO provided valuable comments, as did Haynes Goddard of the University of Ohio at Cincinnati and Margaret Walls of Resources for the Future.

Christian Spoor edited the study, and Christine Bogusz proofread it. Angela McCollough and Cecil McPherson produced initial versions of the tables and figures, Kathryn Winstead prepared the study for publication, and Annette Kalicki prepared the electronic versions for CBO's Web site.

Dan L. Crippen
Director
November 2002




CONTENTS


  Summary
   
Introduction
      The Rationale for Reducing Gasoline Consumption
      A Brief History of the Three Policy Options
      The Evaluation Criteria Used in This Study
   
Cost-Effectiveness
      The Cost-Effectiveness of Raising CAFE Standards
      The Cost-Effectiveness of Raising the Gasoline Tax
      The Cost-Effectiveness of Creating a Cap-and-Trade Program
     
   
Predictability of Gasoline Reductions
      CAFE Standards
      A Gasoline Tax and a Cap-and-Trade Program
   
Effects on Safety
      CAFE Standards
      A Gasoline Tax and a Cap-and-Trade Program
   
Effects on Other External Costs Related to Driving
      Emissions of Regulated Air Pollutants
      Congestion
      Highway Construction and Maintenance
   
Other Policy Implications: Distributional and Revenue Effects
      Distributional Effects
      Effects on Federal Revenue


Tables
   
1.  Average Characteristics of New Cars, Model Years 1978-2000
2.  Estimated Burden of Gasoline Spending on Households
3.  Revenue Effects of a 15-Cent Increase in the Federal Gasoline Tax
   
Figures
   
1.  Vehicles' Average Fuel Economy Compared with CAFE Standards, Model Years 1978-2000
2.  Total State and Local Gasoline Taxes, End of 2001
3.  Gasoline Prices and Federal Gasoline Taxes, 1950-2000
4.  Fatality Rates for Cars and Light Trucks, 1975-2000
5.  Annual Cost to Households in Different Regions from a 4.3-Cent Rise in the Federal Gasoline Tax
6.  Annual Cost to Households in Different Regions from a 4.3-Cent Rise in the Federal Gasoline Tax, as a Share of Household Income
   
Boxes
   
1.  Making CAFE Standards More Cost-Effective by Improving Their Design
2.  Is the Market for Fuel Economy in New Vehicles Efficient?
3.  The Effect of Price Changes on Gasoline Consumption
4.  Changing the Design of CAFE Standards to Improve Auto Safety

Table of Contents Next Page