Congressional Budget OfficeSkip Navigation
Home Red Bullet Publications Red Bullet Cost Estimates Red Bullet About CBO Red Bullet Press Red Bullet Careers Red Bullet Contact Us Red Bullet Director's Blog Red Bullet   RSS
PDF
FEDERALISM AND ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION: CASE STUDIES FOR DRINKING WATER AND GROUND-LEVEL OZONE
 
 
NOVEMBER 1997
 
 

Preface

The federal government's role in making decisions about environmental protection has expanded greatly since the early 1970s. In recent years, however, the Congress has considered returning some decisionmaking authority back to state and local governments. An important question when assigning decisionmaking authority is, Which level of government is most likely to make decisions that balance all the relevant benefits and costs?

In response to a request from the Chairman of the Senate Committee on Environment and Public Works, this study examines several considerations that might help determine which level of government is most likely to make efficient decisions with regard to environmental protection. Those considerations are then applied to two case studies, the protection of drinking water and the control of ground-level ozone--the principal ingredient in smog.

Terry Dinan and Natalie Tawil of the Congressional Budget Office's (CBO's) Natural Resources and Commerce Division wrote the study under the supervision of Jan Paul Acton and Roger Hitchner. CBO analysts Kim Cawley, Marjorie Miller, and Pepper Santalucia made valuable comments, and Carl Muelmann provided assistance with data analysis. Outside CBO, Nancy Brooks, Maureen Cropper, Wallace Oates, and Paul Portney made helpful comments on various sections. In addition, several staff members of the Environmental Protection Agency's Office of Drinking Water and Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards provided useful information.

Paul L. Houts edited the manuscript, and Melissa Burman provided editorial assistance. Rae Wiseman typed the drafts. Kathryn Quattrone and Jill Sands prepared the study for publication. Laurie Brown prepared the electronic version for CBO's World Wide Web site.

June E. O'Neill
Director
November 1997
 
 


Contents

SUMMARY

ONE - ECONOMIC THEORY OF ENVIRONMENTAL FEDERALISM

TWO - CASE STUDY OF DRINKING WATER PROTECTION

THREE - CASE STUDY OF GROUND-LEVEL OZONE CONTROL

FOUR - CONCLUSIONS

APPENDIX

Is Federal Involvement in Inspection and Maintenance Programs Needed for Efficient Outcomes?
 

TABLES
 
1. Considerations Indicating Whether Centralized or Decentralized Decisionmaking Is Likely to Be More Efficient
2. Welfare Effects per Household of Meeting the Proposed Standard for Adjusted Gross Alpha Emitters
3. Number of Systems Exceeding Concentration Levels for Adjusted Gross Alpha Emitters
4. Number of Households Exceeding Concentration Levels for Adjusted Gross Alpha Emitters
5. Average Cost per Household for Monitoring and Compliance, by Size of System and Number of Treatments
6. Requirements and Deadlines Under the 1990 Amendments to the Clean Air Act
7. Potential Gains in Efficiency from Reallocating Emission Reductions
 
FIGURES
 
1. Number of Counties in the Ozone Transport Region Predicted to Exceed the One-Hour Standard When the 1990 Amendments to the Clean Air Act and Ozone Transport Commission Controls Are in Place
2. Annual Cost-to-Benefit Ratio at the State Level as a Result of Regionwide Emission Control Programs
 
BOXES
 
1. Financing Environmental Improvements
2. Government Involvement in Choosing Methods of Pollution Control
3. The Ozone Transport Commission Agreements

Table of Contents Next Page