Congressional Budget OfficeSkip Navigation
Home Red Bullet Publications Red Bullet Cost Estimates Red Bullet About CBO Red Bullet Press Red Bullet Careers Red Bullet Contact Us Red Bullet Director's Blog Red Bullet   RSS
PDF
     
The Effects of Tort Reform:
Evidence from the States
  June 2004  


Cover Graphic
© Royalty-free/BPX61344/Brand X Pictures






                
Preface

In response to the perception that liability insurance coverage was becoming more costly and less available, most states enacted legislation in the mid-1980s that reformed the common-law rules and other court procedures involving tort litigation. Despite those reforms, the U.S. tort liability system remains controversial. Some critics contend that the system, which holds parties liable for injuries to people or their property, is costly and inefficient, arbitrary and open to abuse. Opponents of tort reform disagree with those criticisms and also point to a lack of evidence on the effectiveness of past reform efforts.

Several bills now before the Congress would change the rules at the federal level that govern tort claims for medical malpractice and asbestos exposure and claims litigated as class actions. Most states have already enacted reforms similar to those under consideration. This Congressional Budget Office (CBO) paper reviews the major studies that evaluate the effects of state-level tort reforms and assesses the relevance of that research to similar federal proposals. Both this report and a companion CBO study from October 2003, The Economics of U.S. Tort Liability: A Primer, were prepared at the request of the Senate Budget Committee. In accordance with CBO's mandate to provide impartial analysis, this report makes no recommendations.

Cary Elliott of CBO's Microeconomic and Financial Studies Division wrote the paper under the supervision of David Moore and Roger Hitchner. The author received valuable comments and assistance from Robert Arnold, David Austin, Perry Beider, Stuart Hagen, Allison Percy, and Shou Wang of CBO, as well as Jeff O'Hara, formerly of CBO, and Albert Yoon of the University of Chicago. (The assistance of external reviewers implies no responsibility for the final product, which rests solely with CBO.)

Christine Bogusz edited the paper, and John Skeen proofread it. Angela Z. McCollough prepared drafts of the manuscript, Allan Keaton and Maureen Costantino prepared the report for publication, and Maureen Costantino designed the cover. Lenny Skutnik printed the copies of the report, and Annette Kalicki produced the electronic versions for CBO's Web site.

Douglas Holtz-Eakin
Director
June 2004




CONTENTS


Summary
 
Introduction
      Tort Liability as a Tool for Achieving Efficiency and Equity
      Arguments For and Against Federal Tort Reform
 
Tort Reform Initiatives at the State Level
      Limits on Joint-and-Several Liability
      Changes to the Collateral-Source Rule
      Caps on Noneconomic Damage Awards
      Limits on Punitive Damage Awards
      Other Reforms
 
The Difficulties of Evaluating State-Level Tort Reforms
 
A Review of the Major Studies of State-Level Tort Reforms
      Effects of Tort Reform Legislation on Damage Claims and Lawsuits
      Effects of Tort Reform Legislation on the Liability Insurance Market
      Effects of Tort Reform Legislation on Medical Malpractice and Defensive Medicine
 
Bibliography

Tables
   
S-1.  Selected Tort Reforms Enacted Since 1986
S-2.  Findings from the Major Studies of State-Level Tort Reforms Published Since 1993
1.  Major Studies of State-Level Tort Reforms Published Since 1993
2.  Findings from the Major Studies of State-Level Tort Reforms Published Since 1993
   
Figures
   
1.  States That Have Enacted Reforms to Joint-and-Several Liability and the Collateral-Source Rule Since 1986
2.  States That Have Enacted Caps on Damages Since 1986
   
Box
   
1.  Definitions of Some Common Tort Terms

Table of Contents Next Page