The Budgetary Treatment of Leases and Public/Private Ventures |
February 2003 |
Note
The cover photo shows the Thurgood Marshall Federal Judiciary Building
in Washington, D.C. Completed in October 1992, the facility is being acquired
by the federal government over a 30-year period using a lease-purchase.
(Photo is courtesy of the Architect of the Capitol.)
|
Federal agencies sometimes use leases or special-purpose public/private ventures to acquire capital assets without recording their full costs as obligations and outlays up front in the budget. That budgetary practice
increased in the 1990s with the Department of Defense's military housing
privatization ventures and the Department of Veterans Affairs' enhanced-use
leasing ventures. This paper examines agencies' recent use of leases and
special-purpose public/private ventures to finance the acquisition of federal
assets. It reviews how the Congressional Budget Office (CBO) scores budget
authority and outlays for the legislation that provides agencies with the
authority to enter into those arrangements and how the Office of Management
and Budget records the obligations and outlays associated with specific
leases and public/private ventures.
This paper was prepared as part of CBO's continuing analysis of federal
budget concepts. Recent papers include Evaluating and Accounting for Federal Investment in Corporate Stocks and Other Private Securities (January 2003), The President's Proposal to Accrue Retirement Costs for Federal Employees (June 2002), and Accrual Budgeting for Military Retirees' Health Care (March 2002). CBO's Budget and Economic Outlook: Fiscal Years 2004-2013 (January 2003) also includes a discussion titled "Is It Time for a New Budget Concepts Commission?" In keeping with CBO's mandate to provide objective analysis, this report makes no recommendations.
Deborah Clay-Mendez of CBO's National Security Division prepared this
paper with significant contributions from Kathleen Gramp of CBO's Budget
Analysis Division and Jennifer Smith of CBO's Office of the General Counsel.
J. Michael Gilmore, Robert Sunshine, and Robert Murphy supervised the project.
Ian MacLeod provided research assistance. The authors gratefully acknowledge
the useful comments of many others within CBO, including Kim Cawley, Kent
Christensen, Richard Farmer, Peter Fontaine, Deborah Lucas, Marvin Phaup,
and Jo Ann Vines. The work also benefited from reviews provided by Richard
Kogan and other budget analysts outside of CBO.
Joseph Foote and John Skeen edited the manuscript, with assistance from
Christine Bogusz and Leah Mazade. Cindy Cleveland typed the many drafts.
Chris Spoor prepared the report for publication, with help from Kathryn
Winstead, and Annette Kalicki
produced the electronic versions for CBO's Web site.
Barry B. Anderson
Acting Director
February 2003
Table |
|
|
|
1. |
The Office of Management and Budget's Summary of Scorekeeping Requirements |
|
|
Figures |
|
|
|
1. |
Number of Housing Units in the Department of Defense's Military Housing
Ventures, as of April 2002 |
2. |
The Costs of the Department of Defense's Military Housing Ventures,
as of April 2002 |
3. |
The Costs of the Department of Veterans Affairs' Enhanced-Use Leasing
Ventures |
|
|
Boxes |
|
|
|
1. |
Capital Budgeting |
2. |
The Anti-Deficiency Act and Full Funding |
3. |
The Criteria for Operating Leases |
4. |
Identifying the Degree of Risk for the Government |
5. |
The Structure of a Lease-Purchase: the Example of T-5 Tankers |
6. |
The Scoring of Direct Spending |
7. |
Scoring Under Credit Reform |
8. |
The Budgetary Treatment of Asset Sales and Barters |
|