CBO
TESTIMONY
Statement of
James L. Blum
Deputy Director
Congressional Budget Office
on
Creating a New One-Dollar Coin
before the
Subcommittee on Domestic and
International Monetary Policy
Committee on Banking and Financial Services
U.S. House of Representatives
May 3, 1995
NOTICE
This statement is not available for public release
until it is delivered at 9:30 a.m. (EDT), on Wednesday, May 3, 1995.
|
Mr. Chairman and Members of the Subcommittee, I appreciate the opportunity
to discuss the cost savings associated with the proposal to eliminate the
one-dollar bill and replace it with a new one-dollar coin. In my statement,
I will make three points:
-
Savings to the government in production and processing costs from substituting
the more durable dollar coin for the Federal Reserve dollar note would
be on the order of $150 million per year when the change is completed.
-
Conversion would also have a favorable effect on the budget deficit. The
Congressional Budget Office (CBO) estimates that over the 1996-2000 period,
budgetary savings would total $100 million as a direct result of reduced
production and processing costs. In subsequent years, as the switch to
coin nears completion, budgetary savings could exceed $200 million per
year, even more than the government's saving on production and processing
costs.
-
Switching from one-dollar bills to one-dollar coins could also have secondary
effects that could produce additional budgetary savings. Those effects
are reflected in the interest costs on the government's debt and are not
scorable under the Budget Enforcement Act (BEA). They would result only
if the public was willing to hold a higher value of coins than notes; for
example, if the public was willing to hold two one-dollar coins for each
one-dollar note formerly held.
This document is available in its entirety in PDF.