Congressional Budget OfficeSkip Navigation
Home Red Bullet Publications Red Bullet Cost Estimates Red Bullet About CBO Red Bullet Press Red Bullet Careers Red Bullet Contact Us Red Bullet Director's Blog Red Bullet   RSS
PDF
     
Accounting for Employee Stock Options
  April 2004  


Cover Graphic
Eyewire/GettyImages






                
Preface

In March 2003, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) began reconsidering the accounting standard for equity-based compensation. The accounting board released an exposure draft for a revised standard on March 31, 2004. That revised standard would require firms to recognize the fair value of employee stock options as an expense, as was first proposed by FASB more than 10 years ago.

This Congressional Budget Office (CBO) paper assesses whether, under the current accounting standard, firms that grant employee stock options without recognizing an expense overstate their reported income. The paper presents the relevant issues, describes the current standard for employee stock options, compares the intrinsic value and fair value methods of measurement, and weighs the potential economic effects of revising the current standard. The report was prepared at the request of Congressman Brad Sherman in his capacity as a member of the House Committee on Financial Services.

Judith S. Ruud of CBO's Microeconomic and Financial Studies Division prepared the paper under the direction of Roger Hitchner and Marvin Phaup. Early investigation of the subject was conducted by Douglas Gruener, a summer intern at CBO. George J. Benston of Emory University and Deborah Lucas of Northwestern University reviewed a draft of the paper and provided valuable suggestions. Wendy Kiska, Angelo Mascaro, David Torregrosa, Philip Webre, and Thomas Woodward, all of CBO, also provided helpful comments.

Christine Bogusz and Leah Mazade edited the paper, and John Skeen proofread it. Maureen Costantino prepared the paper for publication and designed the cover, and Annette Kalicki produced the electronic versions for CBO's Web site.

Douglas Holtz-Eakin
Director
April 2004




CONTENTS


Summary
 
The Key Issue: Intrinsic Versus Fair Value
      The Current Accounting Standard
      FASB's Proposal
 
Why Firms Grant Stock Options
 
Potential Economic Effects of Fair Value Recognition
 
Valuing and Recognizing Employee Stock Options
      The Difficulty of Measuring the Value of Employee Stock Options
      When Should the Value of Employee Stock Options Be Measured?
      When Should the Expense of Employee Stock Options Be Recognized?
 
Comparing Accounting Alternatives: An Example
      Granting Cash, Stock, and Purchased Call Options as Compensation
      Granting Employee Stock Options in Lieu of Equivalent Cash Compensation
      Letting Options Expire or Exercising Them
      The Bottom Line: Reporting Differences Between the Two Accounting Methods

Tables
   
1.  Comparison of Accounting Treatments for Selected Forms of Compensation: Cash, Stock, and Purchased Call Options
2.  Comparison of Accounting Treatments for Employee Stock Options
3.  Comparison of Accounting Treatments for Employee Stock Options at Expiration
   
Boxes
   
1.  The Accounting Framework
2.  How Employee Stock Options Differ from Call Options

Table of Contents Next Page